Comentario del CEIPV a las nuevas Guías Europeas de Prevención Cardiovascular 2021 / Statement of the Spanish Interdisciplinary Vascular Prevention Committee on the updated European Guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention

Presentamos la adaptación española de las Guías Europeas de Prevención Cardiovascular 2021. En esta actualización además del abordaje individual, se pone mucho más énfasis en las políticas sanitarias como estrategia de prevención poblacional. Se recomienda el cálculo del riesgo vascular de manera sistemática a todas las personas adultas con algún factor de riesgo vascular. Los objetivos terapéuticos para el colesterol low density lipoprotein (LDL), la presión arterial y la glucemia no han cambiado respecto a las anteriores guías, pero se recomienda alcanzar estos objetivos de forma escalonada (etapas 1 y 2). Se recomienda llegar siempre hasta la etapa 2, y la intensificación del tratamiento dependerá del riesgo a los 10 años y de por vida, del beneficio del tratamiento, de las comorbilidades, de la fragilidad y de las preferencias de los pacientes. Las guías presentan por primera vez un nuevo modelo para calcular el riesgo Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation-2 (SCORE2) y Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation-2 Old person (SCORE2-OP) de morbimortalidad vascular en los próximos 10 años (infarto de miocardio, ictus y mortalidad vascular) en hombres y mujeres entre 40 y 89 años. Otra de las novedades sustanciales es el establecimiento de diferentes umbrales de riesgo dependiendo de la edad (< 50, 50-69 ≥ 70 años).Se presentan diferentes algoritmos de cálculo del riesgo vascular y tratamiento de los factores de riesgo vascular para personas aparentemente sanas, pacientes con diabetes y pacientes con enfermedad vascular aterosclerótica. Los pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica se considerarán de riesgo alto o muy alto según la tasa del filtrado glomerular y el cociente albúmina/creatinina. Se incluyen innovaciones en las recomendaciones sobre los estilos de vida, adaptadas a las recomendaciones del Ministerio de Sanidad, así como aspectos novedosos relacionados con el control de los lípidos, la presión arterial, la diabetes y la insuficiencia renal crónica.

Statement of the Spanish Interdisciplinary Vascular Prevention Committee on the updated European Guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention. We present the Spanish adaptation of the 2021 European Guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) prevention in clinical practice. The current guidelines besides the individual approach greatly emphasize on the importance of population level approaches to the prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Systematic global CVD risk assessment is recommended in individuals with any major vascular risk factor. Regarding LDL-Cholesterol, blood pressure, and glycemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus, goals and targets remain as recommended in previous guidelines. However, it is proposed a new, stepwise approach (Step 1 and 2) to treatment intensification as a tool to help physicians and patients pursue these targets in a way that fits patient profile. After Step 1, considering proceeding to the intensified goals of Step 2 is mandatory, and this intensification will be based on 10-year CVD risk, lifetime CVD risk and treatment benefit, comorbidities and patient preferences. The updated SCORE algorithm—SCORE2, SCORE-OP— is recommended in these guidelines, which estimates an individual's 10-year risk of fatal and non-fatal CVD events (myocardial infarction, stroke) in healthy men and women aged 40-89 years. Another new and important recommendation is the use of different categories of risk according different age groups (< 50, 50-69 ≥ 70 years). Different flow charts of CVD risk and risk factor treatment in apparently healthy persons, in patients with established atherosclerotic CVD, and in diabetic patients are recommended. Patients with chronic kidney disease are considered high risk or very high-risk patients according to the levels of glomerular filtration rate and albumin-to-creatinine ratio. [...]

[Statement of the Spanish Interdisciplinary Vascular Prevention Committee on the updated European Guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention]. / Comentario del CEIPV a las nuevas Guías Europeas de Prevención Cardiovascular 2021.

Statement of the Spanish Interdisciplinary Vascular Prevention Committee on the updated European Guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention. We present the Spanish adaptation of the 2021 European Guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) prevention in clinical practice. The current guidelines besides the individual approach greatly emphasize on the importance of population level approaches to the prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Systematic global CVD risk assessment is recommended in individuals with any major vascular risk factor. Regarding LDL-Cholesterol, blood pressure, and glycemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus, goals and targets remain as recommended in previous guidelines. However, it is proposed a new, stepwise approach (Step 1 and 2) to treatment intensification as a tool to help physicians and patients pursue these targets in a way that fits patient profile. After Step 1, considering proceeding to the intensified goals of Step 2 is mandatory, and this intensification will be based on 10-year CVD risk, lifetime CVD risk and treatment benefit, comorbidities and patient preferences. The updated SCORE algorithm-SCORE2, SCORE-OP- is recommended in these guidelines, which estimates an individual's 10-year risk of fatal and non-fatal CVD events (myocardial infarction, stroke) in healthy men and women aged 40-89 years. Another new and important recommendation is the use of different categories of risk according different age groups (< 50, 50-69 ≥ 70 years). Different flow charts of CVD risk and risk factor treatment in apparently healthy persons, in patients with established atherosclerotic CVD, and in diabetic patients are recommended. Patients with chronic kidney disease are considered high risk or very high-risk patients according to the levels of glomerular filtration rate and albumin-to-creatinine ratio. New lifestyle recommendations adapted to the ones published by the Spanish Ministry of Health as well as recommendations focused on the management of lipids, blood pressure, diabetes and chronic renal failure are included.

Manejo integral de los factores de riesgo en enfermedad arterial periférica. Consenso de expertos / Comprehensive management of risk factors in peripheral vascular disease. Expert consensus

Antecedentes y objetivo: Actualmente existe cierta divergencia entre las principales guías de práctica clínica sobre el manejo de los factores de riesgo de la enfermedad arterial periférica (EAP). El objetivo de este proyecto es conocer el manejo de los factores de riesgo de la EAP en la práctica clínica y alcanzar un consenso multidisciplinar sobre las estrategias que se tienen que seguir para optimizar su identificación, tratamiento y seguimiento. Metodología: Consenso multidisciplinar mediante metodología Delphi. Resultados: En la consulta participaron 130 profesionales con amplia experiencia en EAP. Los resultados sugieren que para optimizar el control de los factores de riesgo, los esfuerzos deben dirigirse a: 1) promover la involucramiento y concienciación de todas las especialidades en la identificación y el cribado de la enfermedad; 2) garantizar la posibilidad de realizar el índice tobillo-brazo (ITB) en todas las especialidades implicadas; 3) fomentar estrategias de deshabituación del tabaquismo mediante el uso de fármacos, programas o derivaciones a unidades especializadas; 4) promover el seguimiento de una alimentación adecuada basada en la dieta mediterránea y la prescripción de ejercicio diario; 5) concienciar sobre la importancia de alcanzar unos valores de colesterol unido a lipoproteínas de baja densidad (cLDL) inferiores a 70 mg/Dl, especialmente en pacientes sintomáticos, pero también en asintomáticos (< 55 mg/dL tras la publicación de la guía de la European Society of Cardiology y la European Atherosclerosis Society [ESC/EAS]); 6) recomendar el uso de antiagregantes plaquetarios en pacientes asintomáticos con diabetes mellitus (DM) y/o ITB patológico; y 7) protocolizar la reevaluación del ITB anualmente en pacientes de alto riesgo. Conclusión: Las 22 estrategias consensuadas en el presente documento pretenden ayudar a los profesionales a optimizar el manejo multidisciplinar de los factores de riesgo de la EAP (AU)

Introduction: There is currently a degree of divergence among the main clinical practice guidelines on the management of risk factors for peripheral arterial disease (PAD). This project aims to gain understanding of the management of PAD risk factors in clinical practice and to reach a multidisciplinary consensus on the strategies to be followed in order to optimize its identification, treatment, and follow-up. Methodology: A multidisciplinary consensus following the Delphi methodology. Results: Professionals (n = 130) with extensive experience in PAD participated in this consultation. The results suggest that in order to optimize the control of risk factors, efforts should be aimed at: (1) promoting the involvement and awareness of all specialists in the identification of and screening for the disease; (2) guaranteeing the possibility of evaluating the ankle-brachial index (ABI) in all the medical specialties involved; (3) promoting strategies for patients to quit smoking through the use of drugs, programs, or referrals to specialized units; (4) promoting an appropriate Mediterranean-based diet and the prescription of daily exercise; (5) raising awareness of the importance of ensuring LDL cholesterol values below 70 mg/dL, especially in symptomatic but also in asymptomatic patients (< 55 mg/dL following the publication of the ESC/EAS guide); (6) recommending the use of antiplatelet therapy in asymptomatic patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and/or a pathological ABI; and (7) protocolizing the annual evaluation of ABI in high-risk patients. Conclusion:This document presents the 22 agreed-upon strategies which are intended to help professionals optimize multidisciplinary management of PAD risk factors (AU)

Riesgo cardiovascular en la población anciana española. Escala de riesgo EPICARDIAN / Cardiovascular risk in the elderly population of Spain. The EPICARDIAN risk score

Antecedentes y objetivos: La estimación del riesgo cardiovascular en personas mayores de 70 años es problemática. La mayoría de las escalas se han creado basándose en cohortes de personas de mediana edad, con una representación insuficiente de los adultos de más edad. El poder predictivo de los factores de riesgo cardiovascular clásicos disminuye con la edad. El objetivo de este estudio es desarrollar una escala específica para estimar el riesgo cardiovascular de la población anciana española. Métodos: Este estudio se realizó en una cohorte poblacional establecida en 1995. Marco: 3 zonas geográficas de España (Madrid, Ávila y Lugo). Participantes: 3.729 personas mayores de 64 años sin enfermedades cardiovasculares (ECV) al inicio del seguimiento. Mediciones: se investigaron anualmente las sospechas de ECV mortal y no mortal (cardiopatía coronaria e ictus) y se confirmaron usando los criterios del proyecto MONICA de la OMS. Se siguió a todos los participantes hasta que apareció el primer episodio de ECV, hasta su muerte o hasta el 31 de diciembre de 2015. Resultados: La edad fue el factor predictivo más potente de ECV a los 10 años en ambos sexos. Las variables asociadas con ECV en los varones fueron el tratamiento de la hipertensión arterial (HR: 1,35; IC 95%: 1,067-1,710), la diabetes (HR: 1,359; IC 95%: 0,997-1,852) y el tabaquismo (HR: 1,207; IC 95%: 0,945-1,541), y en las mujeres, el tabaquismo (HR: 1,881; IC 95%: 1,356-2,609) y la diabetes (HR: 1,285; IC 95%: 0,967-1,707). El colesterol total no aumentó el riesgo de ECV ni en varones ni en mujeres. Sin embargo, las concentraciones de colesterol total>200mg/dL se asociaron inversamente al riesgo de ECV a los 10 años, tanto en varones como en mujeres. conclusiones: La ECV total a los 10 años aumenta significativamente en los varones españoles de edad avanzada con la edad, la diabetes y el tratamiento antihipertensivo, y en las mujeres con la diabetes y el tabaquismo (AU)

Background and objectives: Cardiovascular risk estimation in people over 70 years of age is problematic. Most scores have been created based on cohorts of middle-aged people, with an underrepresentation of older adults. The predictive power of classical cardiovascular risk factors declines with age. The aim of this work is to develop a specific score for estimating cardiovascular risk among the elderly population in Spain. Methods: This work is a population-based cohort established in 1995. Setting: 3 geographical areas of Spain (Madrid, Ávila, and Lugo). Participants: 3,729 people older than 64 years with no cardiovascular diseases (CVD) at baseline. Measurements: suspected fatal and nonfatal CVD (both coronary heart disease and stroke) were investigated annually and confirmed using the WHO-MONICA criteria. All participants were followed-up on until occurrence of a first CVD event, until death, or until December 31, 2015. Results: Age was the strongest predictor of CVD at 10 years in both men and women. In men, variables associated with CVD were high blood pressure treatment (HR: 1.35; 95% CI: 1.067-1.710), diabetes (HR: 1.359; 95% CI: 0.997-1.852), and smoking (HR: 1.207; 95% CI: 0.945-1.541) and in women, the variables were smoking (HR: 1.881; 95% CI: 1.356-2.609) and diabetes (HR: 1.285; 95% CI: 0.967-1.707). Total cholesterol did not increase the risk of CVD in men or women. However, total cholesterol levels>200mg/dL were inversely associated with 10-year risk of CVD in men and women. Conclusions: In elderly Spanish men, total CVD at 10 years is significantly increased by age, diabetes, and antihypertensive treatment and in elderly Spanish women by diabetes and smoking. Total cholesterol levels did not increase the risk of CVD, particularly in males (AU)

Comprehensive management of risk factors in peripheral vascular disease. Expert consensus.

INTRODUCTION: There is currently a degree of divergence among the main clinical practice guidelines on the management of risk factors for peripheral arterial disease (PAD). This project aims to gain understanding of the management of PAD risk factors in clinical practice and to reach a multidisciplinary consensus on the strategies to be followed in order to optimize its identification, treatment, and follow-up. METHODOLOGY: A multidisciplinary consensus following the Delphi methodology. RESULTS: Professionals (n = 130) with extensive experience in PAD participated in this consultation. The results suggest that in order to optimize the control of risk factors, efforts should be aimed at: (1) promoting the involvement and awareness of all specialists in the identification of and screening for the disease; (2) guaranteeing the possibility of evaluating the ankle-brachial index (ABI) in all the medical specialties involved; (3) promoting strategies for patients to quit smoking through the use of drugs, programs, or referrals to specialized units; (4) promoting an appropriate Mediterranean-based diet and the prescription of daily exercise; (5) raising awareness of the importance of ensuring LDL cholesterol values below 70 mg/dL, especially in symptomatic but also in asymptomatic patients (<55 mg/dL following the publication of the ESC/EAS guide); (6) recommending the use of antiplatelet therapy in asymptomatic patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and/or a pathological ABI; and (7) protocolizing the annual evaluation of ABI in high-risk patients. CONCLUSION: This document presents the 22 agreed-upon strategies which are intended to help professionals optimize multidisciplinary management of PAD risk factors.

Cardiovascular risk in the elderly population of Spain. The EPICARDIAN risk score.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cardiovascular risk estimation in people over 70 years of age is problematic. Most scores have been created based on cohorts of middle-aged people, with an underrepresentation of older adults. The predictive power of classical cardiovascular risk factors declines with age. The aim of this work is to develop a specific score for estimating cardiovascular risk among the elderly population in Spain. METHODS: This work is a population-based cohort established in 1995. SETTING: Three geographical areas of Spain (Madrid, Ávila, and Lugo). PARTICIPANTS: 3,729 people older than 64 years with no cardiovascular diseases (CVD) at baseline. MEASUREMENTS: Suspected fatal and nonfatal CVD (both coronary heart disease and stroke) were investigated annually and confirmed using the WHO-MONICA criteria. All participants were followed-up on until occurrence of a first CVD event, until death, or until December 31, 2015. RESULTS: Age was the strongest predictor of CVD at 10 years in both men and women. In men, variables associated with CVD were high blood pressure treatment (HR: 1.35; 95% CI: 1.067-1.710), diabetes (HR: 1.359; 95% CI: 0.997-1.852), and smoking (HR: 1.207; 95% CI: 0.945-1.541) and in women, the variables were smoking (HR: 1.881; 95% CI: 1.356-2.609) and diabetes (HR: 1.285; 95% CI: 0.967-1.707). Total cholesterol did not increase the risk of CVD in men or women. However, total cholesterol levels >200 mg/dL were inversely associated with 10-year risk of CVD in men and women. CONCLUSIONS: In elderly Spanish men, total CVD at 10 years is significantly increased by age, diabetes, and antihypertensive treatment and in elderly Spanish women by diabetes and smoking. Total cholesterol levels did not increase the risk of CVD, particularly in males.

[Prevalence of microbiologically-confirmed influenza in patients with influenza-like illness in primary care and clinical and epidemiological characteristics]. / Prevalencia de gripe confirmada microbiológicamente en pacientes con síntomas gripales en atención primaria y características clínico-epidemiológicas.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the prevalence of microbiologically-confirmed influenza infection among patients with influenza-like symptoms and compared the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of patients with and without influenza infection. METHODS: Retrospective study of a cohort of patients with influenza-like symptoms from 2016 to 2018 who participated in a clinical trial in thirteen urban primary centres in Catalonia. Different epidemiological data were collected. Patients rated the different symptoms and signs on a Likert scale (absent, little problem, moderate problem and severe problem) and self-reported the measure of health status with the EuroQol visual analogue scale. A nasopharyngeal swab was taken for microbiological isolation of influenza and other microorganisms. RESULTS: A total of 427 patients were included. Microbiologically confirmed influenza was found in 240 patients (56.2%). The percentage of patients with moderate-to-severe cough, muscle aches, tiredness and dizziness was greater among patients with microbiologically confirmed influenza. The self-reported health status was significantly lower among patients with true flu infection (mean of 36.3 ± 18.2 vs 41.7 ± 17.8 in patients without influenza; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical findings are not particularly useful for confirming or excluding the diagnosis of influenza when intensity is not considered. However, the presence of moderate-to-severe cough, myalgias, tiredness and dizziness along with a poor health status is more common in patients with confirmed flu infection.

Estimating the impact of obesity and metabolic phenotype on sickness absence. Results from the ICARIA study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To assess the impact of obesity and being overweight on sickness absence (SA) as a function of healthy/unhealthy metabolic phenotype. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 173 120 healthy workers who underwent a routine check-up, consisting of a structured interview, anthropometric measurements and blood pressure and fasting blood analysis, were included as the study sample (67.1% males; 49.2% manual workers; mean age 40.6 ± 21.9 years). Workers were classified according to their body mass index (BMI) and metabolic phenotype. A metabolically unhealthy phenotype was defined as the presence of three or more of the following criteria: glycaemia ≥110 mg/dL or previously diagnosed type I/II diabetes or treatment for diabetes; triglycerides ≥150 mg/dL or lipid-lowering therapy; HDL <40/50 mg/dL M/F; blood pressure ≥130/85 mmHg or previously diagnosed hypertension or antihypertensive therapy; waist circumference >102/88 cm M/F. A one-year follow-up was conducted to evaluate the incidence of work-related and non-work-related SA (WRSA/NWRSA). The association of BMI with SA was tested using Poisson regression (standard error correction), segmenting on the basis of metabolic phenotype. The overall percentages of workers who were overweight, obese and/or had a metabolically unhealthy phenotype were 37.7%, 16.3% and 8.8%, respectively. BMI was associated with increased incidence of NWRSA in both phenotypes. It was also associated with WRSA in subjects with a BMI in the range of 35-39.99 kg/m2 and in metabolically healthy individuals. WRSA was lower in subjects with a BMI ≥40 kg/m2 and among metabolically unhealthy individuals. CONCLUSION: Obesity is associated with health problems that have a significant impact on SA.

Impacto de la inercia terapéutica y del grado de adherencia al tratamiento en los objetivos de control en personas con diabetes / The impact of therapeutic inertia and the degree of the medication adherence on the control goals for patients with diabetes

Objetivo: El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar el impacto de la baja adherencia terapéutica (AT) y la inercia terapéutica de los profesionales (IT) sobre el mal control glucémico y de los factores de riesgo cardiovasculares en personas con DM2. Material y métodos: Estudio transversal realizado en atención primaria. Se incluyeron 320 personas con DM2. Se valoró si cumplían los objetivos de control (HbA1c≤7%, PA≤130/80mmHg, LDL≤100mg/dl). Se consideró falta de AT la retirada de farmacia <80% de las recetas prescritas e IT la no modificación del tratamiento en personas mal controladas. Resultados: Presentaron buen control de HbA1c, PA y cLDL el 62,5, el 40,9 y el 35,9%, respectivamente. Las personas mal controladas presentaron cifras de AT menores y la IT no se relacionó con la AT. En sujetos mal controlados para HbA1c, presentaban IT el 25,8%, el 24,8% mala AT y el 11,9% estaban afectados por ambos comportamientos. Para cLDL, el 3,6% presentaban mala AT, el 70,4% IT y el 16,0% mala AT e IT (p<0,001). Respecto a la PA, el 3,5% tenían mala AT, el 54,6% IT y el 21,5% presentaban mala AT e IT (p<0,01). Conclusiones: La falta de AT y la IT han estado implicadas en un porcentaje elevado de personas con DM2 mal controladas. La IT ha resultado de gran relevancia en el presente estudio

Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyse both the impact of low therapeutic adherence (TA) and therapeutic inertia (TI) on poor blood glucose control and on risk factors for heart disease in patients with DM2. Material and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a Primary Halth Care centre. A total of 320 patients with DM2 were included and an assessment was made of control goals (HbA1c≤7%, blood pressure ≤130/80mmHg, and LDL-cholesterol≤100mg/dl). A pharmacy retrieval <80% was considered as a lack of TA and the non-modification of treatment in badly controlled patient as TI. Results: The percentage of patients with good control of HbA1c, blood pressure and LDL-cholesterol was 62.5%, 40.9%, and 35.9%, respectively. Lower figures of TA were present in poorly controlled patients, and TI was not found to be related to TA. In the patients with poor HbA1c control, 25.8% had TI, 24.8% poor TA, and 11.9% had both of them. As regards LDL-cholesterol, 3.6% presented poor TA, 70.4% showed TI, and 16% with poor TA and TI (P<.001). As for blood pressure, 3.5% of patients had poor TA, 54.6% had TI, and 21.5% of them had poor TA as well as TI (P<.01). Conclusions: Lack of therapeutic adherence and therapeutic inertia were found in a high percentage of poorly-controlled DM2 patients with bad control. Therapeutic inertia was found to be of great relevance in this study

[The impact of therapeutic inertia and the degree of the medication adherence on the control goals for patients with diabetes]. / Impacto de la inercia terapéutica y del grado de adherencia al tratamiento en los objetivos de control en personas con diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyse both the impact of low therapeutic adherence (TA) and therapeutic inertia (TI) on poor blood glucose control and on risk factors for heart disease in patients with DM2. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a Primary Halth Care centre. A total of 320 patients with DM2 were included and an assessment was made of control goals (HbA1c≤7%, blood pressure ≤130/80mmHg, and LDL-cholesterol≤100mg/dl). A pharmacy retrieval <80% was considered as a lack of TA and the non-modification of treatment in badly controlled patient as TI. RESULTS: The percentage of patients with good control of HbA1c, blood pressure and LDL-cholesterol was 62.5%, 40.9%, and 35.9%, respectively. Lower figures of TA were present in poorly controlled patients, and TI was not found to be related to TA. In the patients with poor HbA1c control, 25.8% had TI, 24.8% poor TA, and 11.9% had both of them. As regards LDL-cholesterol, 3.6% presented poor TA, 70.4% showed TI, and 16% with poor TA and TI (P<.001). As for blood pressure, 3.5% of patients had poor TA, 54.6% had TI, and 21.5% of them had poor TA as well as TI (P<.01). CONCLUSIONS: Lack of therapeutic adherence and therapeutic inertia were found in a high percentage of poorly-controlled DM2 patients with bad control. Therapeutic inertia was found to be of great relevance in this study.

[Patients' needs and expectations concerning prevention and health advice in primary care. Results from the EUROPREVIEW survey]. / Welche Erwartungen hinsichtlich Prävention und Gesundheitsberatung haben Patienten an ihre Hausärzte? Ergebnisse aus dem EUROPREVIEW--Patientensurvey.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the EUROPREVIEW study was to explore patients' beliefs about primary care prevention, to assess their needs to make changes in lifestyle and their willingness to receive support from GPs. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was undertaken in 22 European countries with 10 practices each that consecutively included 40 patients between 30 and 70 years. Validity of the structured questionnaire was evaluated by pilot testing after translation und back-translation for every country. This explorative analysis compared German data on lifestyle factors like smoking, body weight and physical activity to those from other European countries. RESULTS: There were no differences in patients' needs for changes in unhealthy habits and the views of patients that GPs initiated a discussion on lifestyle factors. In Germany significantly less patients wish to receive advice by their GP [eating habits 41.1 (Germany %) vs. 66.6 (other countries %), physical activity 31.0 vs. 57.0, body weight 44.1 vs. 67.1, smoking 49.1 vs. 63.3, alcohol 43.5 vs. 55.9]. CONCLUSION: Further research should firstly adress the reasons for the low demand by German patients for health advice on lifestyle factors and, if necessary, secondly evaluate the opportunities for a better range of preventive services in primary care.

High cardiovascular risk in Spanish workers.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To investigate the prevalence of high cardiovascular risk in the Spanish working population, and its distribution among different occupations and gender. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cross-sectional study of 309,955 workers (72.6% males, mean age 36.5 years, range 16-74 years), who underwent a routine medical check-up. Workers were classified as high, intermediate or low cardiovascular risk, according to the SCORE system. Workers with a relative risk greater than 4 were also considered as high-risk. The prevalence of high cardiovascular risk was 7.6% (95% CI 7.5-7.7) in males and 1.7% (95% CI 1.6-1.8) in females. After adjusting for age and gender, the prevalence of high cardiovascular risk was greater in workers from the Agriculture and Construction sectors than in those from Industry and Service sectors. The prevalence of high cardiovascular risk was higher in blue-collar than in white-collar occupations. CONCLUSIONS: A sizeable proportion of workers, especially blue-collar males, are at high cardiovascular risk. Knowledge of this risk for certain workers may serve as a basis for preventive strategies.

[European Guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice. Spanish adaptation of the CEIPC 2008]. / Guía Europea de Prevención Cardiovascular en la Práctica Clínica. Adaptación Española del Comité Español Interdisciplinario para la Prevención Cardiovascular (CEIPC) 2008.

We present the Spanish adaptation made by the CEIPC of the European Guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention (CVD) in Clinical Practice 2008. This guide recommends the SCORE model for risk evaluation. The aim is to prevent premature mortality and morbidity due to CVD through the management of its related risk factors in clinical practice. The guide focuses on primary prevention and emphasizes the role of the nurses and primary care medical doctors in promoting a healthy life style, based on increasing physical activity, change dietary habits, and non smoking. The therapeutic goal is to achieve a Blood Pressure < 140/90 mmHg, but among patients with diabetes, chronic kidney disease, or definite CVD, the objective is <130/80 mmHg. Serum cholesterol should be < 200 mg/dl and cLDL<130 mg/dl, although among patients with CVD or diabetes, the objective is <100 mg/dl (80 mg/dl if feasible in very high-risk patients). Patients with type 2 diabetes and those with metabolic syndrome must lose weight and increase their physical activity, and drugs must be administered whenever applicable, to reach body mass index (BMI) guided and waist circumference objectives. In diabetic type 2 patients, the objective is glycated haemoglobin <7%. Allowing people to know the guides and developing implementation programs, identifying barriers and seeking solutions for them, are priorities for the CEIPC in order to transfer the recommendations established into the daily clinical practice.

Guía Europea de Prevención Cardiovascular en la Práctica Clínica. Adaptación Española del Comité Español Interdisciplinario para la Prevención Cardiovascular (CEIPC) 2008 / European Guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice. Spanish adaptation of the CEIPC 2008

Presentamos la adaptación española realizada por el CEIPC de la Guía Europea de Prevención de las Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (ECV) 2008. Esta guía recomienda el modelo SCORE de bajo riesgo para la valoración del riesgo cardiovascular. El objetivo es prevenir la mortalidad y morbilidad debidas a las ECV mediante el manejo de sus factores de riesgo en la práctica clínica. La guía hace énfasis en la prevención primaria y en el papel del médico y la enfermería de atención primaria en la promoción de un estilo de vida saludable, basado en el incremento de los niveles de actividad física, la adopción de una alimentación saludable y, en los fumadores, el abandono del tabaco. La meta terapéutica para la presión arterial es en general <140/90 mmHg; pero en pacientes con diabetes, enfermedad renal crónica o ECV el objetivo es 130/80 mmHg. El colesterol debe mantenerse por debajo de 200 mg/dl (cLDL<130 mg/dl); en los pacientes con ECV o diabetes el objetivo es cLDL<100 mg/dl (80 mg/dl si factible en sujetos de muy alto riesgo). En diabetes tipo 2 y en pacientes con síndrome metabólico se debe reducir el peso y aumentar la actividad física y en su caso utilizar los fármacos indicados, para alcanzar los objetivos de índice de masa corporal (IMC) y de perímetro de cintura. El objetivo en diabéticos tipo 2 debe ser alcanzar un nivel de hemoglobina glucosilada (HbA1c) <7%. La amplia difusión de las guías y el desarrollo de los programas destinados a favorecer su implantación, identificando barreras y buscando soluciones, son objetivos prioritarios del CEIPC, como uno de los medios fundamentales para trasladar las recomendaciones establecidas a la práctica clínica diaria (AU)

We present the Spanish adaptation made by the CEIPC of the European Guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention (CVD) in Clinical Practice 2008. This guide recommends the SCORE model for risk evaluation. The aim is to prevent premature mortality and morbidity due to CVD through the management of its related risk factors in clinical practice. The guide focuses on primary prevention and emphasizes the role of the nurses and primary care medical doctors in promoting a healthy life style, based on increasing physical activity, change dietary habits, and non smoking. The therapeutic goal is to achieve a Blood Pressure < 140/90 mmHg, but among patients with diabetes, chronic kidney disease, or definite CVD, the objective is <130/80 mmHg. Serum cholesterol should be < 200 mg/dl and cLDL<130 mg/dl, although among patients with CVD or diabetes, the objective is <100 mg/dl (80 mg/dl if feasible in very high-risk patients). Patients with type 2 diabetes and those with metabolic syndrome must lose weight and increase their physical activity, and drugs must be administered whenever applicable, to reach body mass index (BMI) guided and waist circumference objectives. In diabetic type 2 patients, the objective is glycated haemoglobin <7%. Allowing people to know the guides and developing implementation programs, identifying barriers and seeking solutions for them, are priorities for the CEIPC in order to transfer the recommendations established into the daily clinical practice (AU)

Guía Europea de Prevención Cardiovascular en la Práctica Clínica. Adaptación española del CEIPC 2008 / European Guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice. CEIPC 2008 Spanish Adaptation

Presentamos la adaptación española realizada por el Comité Español Interdisciplinario para la Prevención Cardiovascular (CEIPC) de la Guía Europea de Prevención de las Enfermedades Cardiovasculares 2008. Esta guía recomienda el modelo SCORE de riesgo bajo para valorar el riesgo cardiovascular. El objetivo es prevenir la mortalidad y la morbilidad debidas a las enfermedades cardiovasculares (ECV) mediante el tratamiento de sus factores de riesgo en la práctica clínica. La guía hace énfasis en la prevención primaria y en el papel del médico y el personal de enfermería de atención primaria en la promoción de un estilo de vida cardiosaludable, basado en el incremento de los grados de actividad física, la adopción de una alimentación saludable y, en los fumadores, el abandono del tabaco. La meta terapéutica para la presión arterial es en general < 140/90 mmHg; pero en pacientes con diabetes mellitus, enfermedad renal crónica o ECV el objetivo es 130/80 mmHg. El colesterol debe mantenerse por debajo de 200 mg/dl (colesterol unido a lipoproteínas de baja densidad [cLDL] < 130 mg/dl); en los pacientes con ECV o diabetes mellitus el objetivo es cLDL < 100 mg/dl (80 mg/dl si factible en individuos de riesgo muy alto). En pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 y en pacientes con síndrome metabólico se debe reducir el peso y aumentar la actividad física y, en su caso, utilizar los fármacos indicados, para alcanzar los objetivos del índice de masa corporal y de perímetro de cintura. El objetivo en pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 debe ser alcanzar una hemoglobina glucosilada < 7%. La amplia difusión de las guías y el desarrollo de los programas destinados a favorecer su implantación, en los que se identifiquen barreras y se busquen soluciones, son objetivos prioritarios del CEIPC, como uno de los medios fundamentales para trasladar las recomendaciones establecidas a la práctica clínica diaria(AU)

The present CEIPC Spanish adaptation of the European Guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice 2008. This guide recommends the SCORE model for risk evaluation. The aim is to prevent premature mortality and morbidity due to CVD by means of dealing with its related risk factors in clinical practice. The guide focuses on primary prevention and emphasizes the role of the nurses and primary care doctors in promoting a healthy life style, based on increasing physical activity, changing dietary habits, and not smoking. The therapeutic goal is to achieve a Blood Pressure < 140/90 mmHg, but in patients with diabetes, chronic kidney disease, or definite CVD, the objective is < 130/80 mmHg. Serum cholesterol should be < 200 mg/dl and cLDL < 130 mg/dl, although in patients with CVD or diabetes, the objective is < 100 mg/dl (80 mg/dl if feasible in very high-risk patients). Patients with type 2 diabetes and those with metabolic syndrome must lose weight and increase their physical activity, and drugs must be administered whenever applicable, with the objective guided by body mass index and waist circumference. In diabetic type 2 patients, the objective is glycated haemoglobin < 7%. Allowing people to know the guides and developing implementation programs, identifying barriers and seeking solutions for them, are priorities for the CEIPC in order to put the recommendations into practice(AU)

[European Guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice. CEIPC 2008 Spanish adaptation]. / Guía Europea de Prevención Cardiovascular en la Práctica Clínica. Adaptación española del CEIPC 2008.

The present CEIPC Spanish adaptation of the European Guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice 2008. This guide recommends the SCORE model for risk evaluation. The aim is to prevent premature mortality and morbidity due to CVD by means of dealing with its related risk factors in clinical practice. The guide focuses on primary prevention and emphasizes the role of the nurses and primary care doctors in promoting a healthy life style, based on increasing physical activity, changing dietary habits, and not smoking. The therapeutic goal is to achieve a Blood Pressure < 140/90 mmHg, but in patients with diabetes, chronic kidney disease, or definite CVD, the objective is < 130/80 mmHg. Serum cholesterol should be < 200 mg/dl and cLDL < 130 mg/dl, although in patients with CVD or diabetes, the objective is < 100 mg/dl (80 mg/dl if feasible in very high-risk patients). Patients with type 2 diabetes and those with metabolic syndrome must lose weight and increase their physical activity, and drugs must be administered whenever applicable, with the objective guided by body mass index and waist circumference. In diabetic type 2 patients, the objective is glycated haemoglobin < 7%. Allowing people to know the guides and developing implementation programs, identifying barriers and seeking solutions for them, are priorities for the CEIPC in order to put the recommendations into practice.

Guía Europea de Prevención Cardiovascular en la Práctica Clínica / European guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice

No disponible

No disponible

Patrón de agregación y análisis factorial de los factoresde riesgo cardiovascular integrantes del síndrome metabólicoen población española no diabética: estudio VIVA / Aggregation pattern and factorial analysis of cardiovascular risk factors included

Objetivos: Describir las agregaciones más frecuentes de los factoresde riesgo cardiovascular (FRCV) que integran con el síndrome metabólico(SM) en una muestra de población española no diabética. Comprobarmediante análisis factorial si los diferentes FRCV considerados en elSM son manifestaciones de un posible único factor común. Material ymétodos: Estudio poblacional transversal, multicéntrico, realizado en2.583 sujetos de 30-65 años elegidos al azar de 9 registros poblacionales.Para el cálculo de la frecuencia de cada uno de los FRCV y de susagregaciones se utilizaron las definiciones clásicas de cada factor.Las agregaciones de factores se calcularon de forma excluyente. Lacorrelación entre los FRCV se realizó mediante análisis factorial. Resultados:De mayor a menor, la prevalencia de los distintos FRCV clásicosconsiderados en la defi nición del SM según el NCEP ATP III fue: dislipemia34% (intervalo de confi anza [IC] del 95%: 32-35,5); hipertensión32% (IC del 95%: 30,2-33,8); obesidad 27% (IC del 95%: 25,3-28,7) e hiperglucemia 23% (IC del 95%: 21,6-25). Se observan diferenciassignifi cativas entre sexos: predominaba la dislipemia en hombresy la obesidad en mujeres. El 22% de la población mostraba agregaciónde dos FRCV y el 11% de tres FRCV. Las agregaciones más frecuentesfueron: hipertensión-obesidad, 5,3% (IC del 95%: 4,4-6,2), e hipertensión-obesidad-hiperglucemia, 4,1% (IC del 95%: 3,3-5). Los FRCVconsiderados tienden en general a formar tres conglomerados: 1) índicede masa corporal, diámetro sagital abdominal y glucemia; 2) insulina,glucemia a las 2 horas y presión arterial, y 3) razón colesterol total/colesterolunido a las lipoproteínas de alta densidad y triglicéridos. En loshombres pueden identifi carse hasta cuatro conglomerados de FRCV,mientras que en las mujeres éstos pueden reducirse hasta dos (AU)

Aims: The aim of this study is to describe the most frequent cardiovascularrisk factors (CVRF) clustering related to the metabolic syndrome(MS) in a non-diabetic Spanish population sample. Test by factorial analysisif the CVRF in the MS can be considered manifestations of a uniquecommon factor. Materials and methods: Observational, multicenter,transversal epidemiologic study. 2583 subjects aged 30-65 were randomlyassigned from nine population registries. Exclusive aggregationswere considered. Correlation among the MS variables was analyzed usingfactorial analysis. Results: In order of frequency the prevalence ofconventional CVRF was: dyslipidemia: 34% (IC95%: 32-35.5); hypertension:32% (IC95%: 30.2-33.8); obesity: 27% (IC95%: 25.3-28.7);hyperglycaemia: 23% (IC95%: 21.6-25). 22% of the population showed2 CVRF and 11% 3 CVRF. The most common CVRF aggregations werehypertension-obesity (5.3%; IC95%: 4.4-6.2) and hypertension-obesity-hyper glycaemia (4.1%; IC95%: 3.3-5). MS specifi c risk variablestended to aggregate in three factors: factor 1 (BMI, waist circumferenceand basal glycaemia), factor 2 (insulin, glycaemia 2h, and arterial bloodpressure), factor 3 (total cholesterol/HDL, triglycerides). Conclusions:There is a high prevalence of CVRF and MS in the population studied.Analysis of the metabolic syndrome does not contribute with additionalinformation to predict cardiovascular risk in susceptible patients, as comparedto the clustering of CVRF. Factorial analysis do not confi rm theexistence of a unifying factor to explain MS (AU)