Clinical Heart fAilure Management Program: Changing the practice by partnering primary care and specialists (CHAMP-HF).

Background: While significant gains were made in the management of heart failure (HF), most patients are still diagnosed when they are acutely ill in hospital, often with advanced disease. Earlier diagnosis in the community could lead to improved outcomes. Whether a partnership and an educational program for primary care providers (PCP) increase HF awareness and management is unknown. Methods: We conducted an observational study between March 2019 and June 2020 during which HF specialists gave monthly HF conferences to PCP. Using a pre-post design, medical charts and administrative databases were reviewed and a questionnaire was completed by participating PCP. Primary and secondary endpoints included: 1) the number of patients diagnosed with HF, 2) implementation of GDMT for patients with HFrEF; 3) PCPs' experience and confidence. Results: Six PCP agreed to participate. Amongst the 11,909 patients of the clinic, 70 (0.59 %) patients met the criteria for HF. This number increased by 28.6 % (n = 90) after intervention. Increased use of GDMT for HFrEF patients at baseline (n = 35) was observed for all class of agents, with doubling of patients on triple therapies, from 8 (22.9 %) to 16 (45.7 %), p = 0.0047. Self-confidence on HF management was low (1, 16.7 %) but increased after the educational intervention of physicians (3, 50 %). Conclusion: An educational and collaborative approach between HF specialists and community PCP increased the number of new HF cases diagnosed, enhanced implementation of GDMT in patients with HFrEF and increase PCPs' confidence in treating HF, despite being conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Optimization of pharmacotherapies for ambulatory patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction is associated with improved outcomes.

BACKGROUND: In heart failure, specific target doses for each drug are recommended, but some patients receive suboptimal dosing, others are undertreated or remain chronically in a titration phase, despite having no apparent contraindication or intolerance. We assessed the association of different levels of adherence to guidelines with outcomes in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHODS: Medical records of patients with HFrEF followed at our heart failure (HF) clinic for at least 6 months (n = 511) were reviewed and patients categorized as: 1) optimized (25.4%); 2) in-titration (29.0%); 3) undertreated (32.7%); and 4) intolerant/contraindicated (12.9%). Risk of mortality or HF events (hospitalization, emergency visit or ambulatory administration of intravenous diuretics) within one year was assessed using Cox regression models and Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: Compared to optimized patients, those intolerant (HR: 4.60 [95%CI: 2.23-9.48]; p < 0.0001) had the highest risk of outcomes, followed by those undertreated (3.45 [1.78-6.67]; p = 0.0002) and in-titration (1.99 [0.97-4.06]; p = 0.0588). Overall predictors of outcomes included loop diuretics' use (4.54 [2.39-8.60]), undertreatment (2.38 [1.22-4.67]), intolerance/ contraindication to triple therapy (3.08 [1.47-6.42]), peripheral vascular disease (2.13 [1.29-3.50]) and NYHA class III-IV (1.89 [1.25-2.85]); all p < 0.05. CONCLUSION: Level of adherence to guidelines is associated with outcomes, with intolerant/contraindicated patients having the worst prognosis and those undertreated and in-titration at intermediate risk compared to those optimized. Up-titration of therapy should be attempted whenever possible, considering patients' limitations, to potentially improve outcomes.

Development of Quality Indicators to Assess Oral Anticoagulant Management in Community Pharmacies for Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated the quality of oral anticoagulant management by community pharmacists. There is no complete set of quality indicators available for this purpose. OBJECTIVE: To develop a set of specific quality indicators to assess oral anticoagulant management by community pharmacists for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: Quality indicators were developed in 3 phases. In phase 1, potential quality indicators were generated based on clinical guidelines and a literature review. In phase 2, a modified RAND appropriateness method involving 2 rounds was implemented with 9 experts, who judged the appropriateness of quality indicators generated in phase 1 based on the extent to which they were accurate, based on evidence, relevant, representative of best practices, and measurable in community pharmacies. Phase 3 consisted of a feasibility assessment in 5 community pharmacies on 2 patients each. RESULTS: The final set included 38 quality indicators grouped into 6 categories: documentation (n = 29), risk assessment (n = 3), clinical control (n = 1), clinical follow-up (n = 15), choice of therapy (n = 11), and interaction management (n = 8). The quality indicators referred to process of care (n = 34), clinical outcomes (n = 2), or structure of care (n = 2). There were 24 quality indicators related to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), and 17 were related to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). To assess quality indicators, a questionnaire was developed for completion by community pharmacists for each patient, which included 17 questions about VKA patients and 12 questions about DOAC patients. CONCLUSIONS: A first set of quality indicators is now available to assess the quality of oral anticoagulant management by community pharmacists for patients with AF. DISCLOSURES: This research was supported by the Réseau Québécois de recherche sur le médicament (RQRM); the Blueprint for Pharmacy in collaboration with Pfizer Canada; and the Cercle du Doyen of the Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Montreal. The study sponsors were not involved in the study design, data collection, data interpretation, the writing of the article, or the decision to submit the report for publication. Chartrand received a scholarship from the Fonds de Recherche du Québec en Santé (FRQ-S), the Réseau Québécois de recherche sur l'usage des médicaments with Pfizer, and the Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Montreal. Guénette holds a Junior-1 Clinician Researcher Award from the FRQ-S in partnership with the Société québécoise d'hypertension artérielle. Williamson holds a Junior-1 Career Award from the FRQ-S. Côté reported being a medical speaker for Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim Canada, and Pfizer Canada. The other authors reported no conflicts of interest. Study concept and design were contributed by Lalonde, Chartrand, and Martin. Chartrand, Martin, and Lalonde collected the data, along with Brouillette, Côté, Huot, Landry, Martineau, Perreault, Williamson, and White-Guay. Data interpretation was performed by Chartrand, Gagnon, and Lalonde, along with Guénette and Martin. The manuscript was primarily written by Chartrand, along with Guénette and Lalonde, and revised by Chartrand, Guénette, and Lalonde, along with the other authors. A portion of this study's results was presented at the 4th RQRM Annual Meeting on September 22-23, 2014, in Orford, Quebec, Canada, in the form of an abstract, which was published in the Journal of Population Therapeutics and Clinical Pharmacology, 2014;21(2):e312.

Rapid-Onset Thrombocytopenia Following Piperacillin-Tazobactam Reexposure.

Drug-induced thrombocytopenia is a rare but serious adverse event that has been associated with multiple drugs including ß-lactams. Although it mostly occurs with prolonged medication use, some cases of rapid-onset thrombocytopenia have been reported. We describe the case of a 69-year-old man who developed severe and immediate thrombocytopenia following reexposure to piperacillin-tazobactam in the critical care setting. He received a 6-day course of piperacillin-tazobactam for a possible pneumonia immediately after cardiac surgery. During this course of therapy, his platelet count decreased (fluctuating between 69 × 10(3) /mm(3) and 104 × 10(3) /mm(3) ) and then progressively increased after completion of the antibiotic to 340 × 10(3) /mm(3) on postoperative day 15. Ten days after the antibiotic course was completed (postoperative day 16), the patient developed new signs of infection (fever and neutrophilia), and piperacillin-tazobactam was restarted. Eight hours after reintroducing the antibiotic, his platelet count dropped from 317 × 10(3) /mm(3) to 7 × 10(3) /mm(3) . After reviewing all the medications administered to the patient as well as other potential causes of thrombocytopenia, and given the chronology of events, piperacillin-tazobactam was suspected as the most likely offending agent and was therefore replaced by meropenem on postoperative day 17. The patient's platelet count began to rise 2 days after discontinuation of piperacillin-tazobactam and reached 245 × 10(3) /mm(3) by postoperative day 30. No spontaneous bleeding or thrombosis occurred while the patient was thrombocytopenic. Use of the Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale indicated a probable relationship (score of 6) between the patient's development of thrombocytopenia and piperacillin-tazobactam therapy. This case highlights the severity and swiftness in which drug-induced thrombocytopenia may present in the context of cardiac surgery.

Impact of a pharmacist-led warfarin self-management program on quality of life and anticoagulation control: a randomized trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a pharmacist-led warfarin patient self-management program on quality of life and anticoagulation control compared with management in a physician-led specialized anticoagulation clinic. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label trial. SETTING: Tertiary care academic medical center. PATIENTS: A total of 114 patients aged 18-75 years who were followed at a specialized anticoagulation clinic, had received warfarin for at least 6 months, and were expected to continue warfarin for a minimum of 4 months. INTERVENTION: All patients attended an educational session on anticoagulation provided by a pharmacist. Patients randomized to the self-management group (58 patients) also received practical training to use the CoaguChek XS device and a self-management dosing algorithm. Patients in the control group (56 patients) continued to undergo standard management at the anticoagulation clinic. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients completed a validated quality-of-life questionnaire and the validated Oral Anticoagulation Knowledge test at the beginning and end of the study. The quality of anticoagulation control was evaluated by using the time spent in therapeutic range. After 4 months of follow-up, a significant improvement in the self-management group was observed compared with the control group in four of the five quality-of-life topics (p<0.05). Improvements in knowledge were observed in both groups after the training session and persisted after 4 months (p<0.05 for all). The time spent in the therapeutic range (80.0% in the self-management group vs 75% in the control group, p=0.79) and in the extended therapeutic range ([target international normalized ratio ± 0.3] 93.2% in the self-management group vs 91.1% in the control group, p=0.30) were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: A self-management warfarin program led by pharmacists resulted in significant improvement in the quality of life of patients receiving warfarin therapy as well as a reduction in the time required for anticoagulation monitoring, while maintaining a level of anticoagulation control similar to a high-quality specialized anticoagulation clinic.