RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Female warfighters are at increased risk of urogenital infections (UGIs) when serving in austere environments with varying levels of access to water, sanitation, and hygiene resources. Urogenital infections among servicewomen were among the top five reported medical encounters and one of the top seven reasons for medical evacuation from deployed locations between 2008 and 2013. In this study, we examine the use of water and sanitation resources across three environments (home duty station, field training, and deployment) and analyze associations between water, sanitation, and hygiene resource access and UGIs during training or deployment. The analyses are based on answers from 751 diverse active duty servicewomen (ADSW) at a large military installation in the southeastern USA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data for this population-based, prospective, cross-sectional survey design were collected during the administration of the Military Women's Readiness Urogenital Health Questionnaire. This research study was guided by two specific research questions derived from self-reported data in sections 2 and 3 of the questionnaire. RESULTS: The sample consisted of an extremely diverse pool of U.S. Army ADSW attached to highly operational units with robust field training and deployment tempos. Over one-half of the participants reported being diagnosed with one or more UGIs before military service. Of that participant group, more than 76.0% experienced one or more infections since joining the military. We found that the majority of UGIs occurred while U.S. Army ADSW were at their home duty stations rather than during field training or deployment. Of the three types of UGIs, bacterial vaginosis is more often associated with water and sanitation constraints. None of the water factors were significantly associated with UGIs during deployment. Intentional dehydration was not associated with UGIs in either field training or deployment, but intentionally delaying urination was associated with a significant increase in the odds of developing urinary tract infection during deployment. We identified trends in hygiene practices that may put ADSW at a higher risk for UGIs. CONCLUSIONS: Austere conditions, which may exist in any service environment, pose risks to the urogenital health and wellness of a female warfighter. Access to clean water and sanitation resources in military settings is essential for optimal health and operational readiness. It is necessary to identify and investigate critical research and policy gaps in need of investment and support for successful, evidence-based integration of female warfighters into military combat roles and to optimize their performance.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Female warfighters are at risk for sex-specific and frequently unrecognized urogenital health challenges that may impede their ability to serve. The constraints on water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) resources by austere environments, whether at home or abroad, require women to practice unhealthy hygiene behaviors that jeopardize their urogenital health. In this manuscript, we examine the use of WASH resources by U.S. Army active duty servicewomen (ADSW) across three settings-home duty, field training, and deployment-to determine how the changing availability of WASH resources alters hygiene and sanitation practices in austere environments. Additionally, we report findings from a previously developed theoretical framework for determining the impacts of austere environments on ADSW's hygiene knowledge, behaviors, and outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study used a prospective, cross-sectional survey design with population sampling and generalized ordered logit regression models. We recruited ADSW assigned to a large military installation in the southeastern United States after conducting a structured field hygiene training for female readiness. RESULTS: We surveyed a highly diverse sample of 751 ADSW and found that the use of WASH resources significantly differs between field training and deployment. Clean running water significantly differed among all settings, with nearly 70% reporting clean running water to be rarely or never available during field training. Bathing facility types significantly differed in each setting, with Cadillac bathrooms more often used during deployment than during field training and wipe baths more often used during field training than during deployment. We found that women were significantly less likely to wash their private areas more than 2 days a week during field training, compared to deployment. Women reported changing their underwear ≤2 times per week in field training environments as compared to during deployment. Soap and water were reported as the most common ways of washing in both home duty stations and during deployment, followed by wipes at home duty stations and in deployed settings. Participants reported wipes as their primary bathing method during field training, followed by soap and water. Participants used intentional dehydration or delayed urination more frequently in field training than during deployment. Women reported significant differences in holding their urine between field training and deployment, with principal reasons reported as "dirty facilities" and "distance to the nearest restroom." Significantly, they reported safety concerns when bathing, using the bathroom, or toileting facilities across the three settings. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to characterize sex-specific challenges by a large sample of operational ADSW and to explore the use of WASH resources in home duty, field training, and deployment settings. The results show that field training is more austere than deployed settings, indicating that austerity, not deployment, increases the urogenital infection risk for ADSW. With women more integrated into the military strategy than at any time in U.S. history, military leaders can use our results to develop interventions that ameliorate the unique challenges that influence the military readiness and overall health of female warfighters.
