Medicolegal Aspects of Huntington Disease.

Unlawful behaviors have been reported in association with Huntington's disease (HD), although their overall prevalence and clinical significance remain unknown. Recognition of problematic behavior is limited by stigma and lack of routine clinical assessment, as well as the absence of validated screening measures. We performed a retrospective chart review of 289 patients treated for HD at Vanderbilt University Medical Center from 2006 to 2020 to assess the frequency of illegal activity in our HD population. We identified 31 patients with HD who have a documented history of unlawful behavior, comprising 11 percent of the charts reviewed. Physical violence was the most common behavior reported, followed by reckless driving, substance abuse, illegal financial activity, and inappropriate sexual behavior. Mean age at the time of the first offense was 37 years. Patients with criminal offenses were more likely to be male and in the early stages of disease with associated psychiatric symptoms. Our results emphasize that illegal activities are a significant clinical problem in individuals with HD, particularly young adult males with comorbid psychiatric symptoms. These findings highlight the need for improved screening measures to detect high-risk behaviors in individuals with HD, as well as evidence-based protocols to guide triage and management of patients engaging in potentially detrimental activities.

Healthcare Delivery and Huntington's Disease During the Time of COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Safer-at-home orders during the COVID-19 pandemic altered the structure of clinical care for Huntington's disease (HD) patients. This shift provided an opportunity to identify limitations in the current healthcare infrastructure and how these may impact the health and well-being of persons with HD. OBJECTIVE: The study objectives were to assess the feasibility of remote healthcare delivery in HD patients, to identify socioeconomic factors which may explain differences in feasibility and to evaluate the impact of safer-at-home orders on HD patient stress levels. METHODS: This observational study of a clinical HD population during the 'safer-at-home' orders asked patients or caregivers about their current access to healthcare resources and patient stress levels. A chart review allowed for an assessment of socioeconomic status and characterization of HD severity. RESULTS: Two-hundred and twelve HD patients were contacted with 156 completing the survey. During safer-at-home orders, the majority of HD patients were able to obtain medications and see a physician; however, 25% of patients would not commit to regular telehealth visits, and less than 50% utilized an online healthcare platform. We found that 37% of participants were divorced/single, 39% had less than a high school diploma, and nearly 20% were uninsured or on low-income health insurance. Patient stress levels correlated with disease burden. CONCLUSION: A significant portion of HD participants were not willing to participate in telehealth services. Potential explanations for these limitations may include socioeconomic barriers and caregiving structure. These observations illustrate areas for clinical care improvement to address healthcare disparities in the HD community.