Feminizing Hormone Therapy Prescription Patterns and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Aging Transgender Individuals in Australia.

Context: The safety and efficacy of feminizing hormone therapy in aging transgender (trans) individuals is unclear. Current recommendations suggest transdermal estradiol beyond the age of 45 years, especially if cardiometabolic risk factors are present. Objective: To evaluate feminizing hormone therapy regimens and cardiovascular risk factors in aging trans individuals. Design: Retrospective cross-sectional analysis. Setting: Primary care and endocrine specialist clinic in Melbourne, Australia. Participants: Trans individuals on feminizing therapy for ≥6 months. Main Outcomes Measures: Feminizing hormone regimens and serum estradiol concentrations by age group: (a) ≥45 years, (b) <45 years, and prevalence of cardiometabolic risk factors in individuals ≥45 years. Results: 296 individuals were stratified by age group: ≥45 years (n=55) and <45 years (n=241). There was no difference in median estradiol concentration between groups (328 nmol/L vs. 300 nmol/L, p=0.22). However, there was a higher proportion of individuals ≥45 years treated with transdermal estradiol (31% vs. 8%, p<0.00001). Of those treated with oral estradiol, the median dose was lower in the ≥45 years group (4mg vs. 6mg, p=0.01). The most prevalent cardiometabolic risk factor in the ≥45 years group was hypertension (29%), followed by current smoking (24%), obesity (20%), dyslipidaemia (16%) and diabetes (9%). Conclusions: A greater proportion of trans individuals ≥45 years of age were treated with transdermal estradiol. Of those who received oral estradiol, the median dose was lower. This is important given the high prevalence of cardiometabolic risk factors in this age group, however cardiovascular risk management guidelines in this demographic are lacking.

The Informed Consent Model of Care for Accessing Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy Is Associated With High Patient Satisfaction.

BACKGROUND: There are 2 common approaches to assess an individual before commencing of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT); a mental health practitioner assessment and approval or an informed consent model undertaken with a primary care general practitioner (GP). AIM: In a primary care clinic practising an Informed Consent Model of care to initiate GAHT, we aimed to firstly describe the proportion and characteristics of patients referred for secondary consultation to a mental health practitioner (MH referred) and secondly, we aimed to measure patient satisfaction. METHODS: A retrospective audit of all new patients with a transgender or gender diverse identity presenting to a primary care clinic in Melbourne, Australia was performed between March 2017 and March 2019. In those newly seeking GAHT, de-identified data were obtained including presence of secondary mental health practitioner referral, time to GAHT commencement and co-occurring mental health conditions. A separate survey assessed patient satisfaction. OUTCOMES: Mental health conditions and overall patient satisfaction in those referred for secondary mental health consultation (MH referred) were compared with those who were not (GP assessed). RESULTS: Of 590 new consultations, 309 were newly seeking GAHT. Referrals for secondary mental health assessment before GAHT occurred in 8%. The GP-assessed group commenced GAHT at median 0.9 months (0.5-1.8) after initial consultation compared with 3.1 months (1.3-4.0), P < .001 in the MH-referred group. The MH-referred group was more likely to have post-traumatic stress disorder (adjusted P = .036) and schizophrenia (adjusted P = .011). Of 43 respondents to the survey, a higher proportion in the GP-assessed group was extremely satisfied with their overall care compared with the MH-referred group (P < .01). Notably, 80% in the GP-assessed group chose to seek mental health professional support. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Initiation of GAHT can be performed in primary care by GPs using an informed consent model and is associated with high patient satisfaction. Mental health professionals remain a key source of support. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: This retrospective audit did not randomize patients to pathways to initiate GAHT. Follow-up duration was short. Responder bias to survey with low response rates may overestimate patient satisfaction. This is one of the first studies to evaluate an informed consent model of care. CONCLUSION: More widespread uptake of an informed consent model of care to initiate GAHT by primary care physicians has the potential for high patient satisfaction and may be a practical solution to reduce waiting lists in gender clinics. Spanos C, Grace JA, Leemaqz SY, et al. The Informed Consent Model of Care for Accessing Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy Is Associated With High Patient Satisfaction. J Sex Med 2021;18:201-208.

Relationships between body mass index with oral estradiol dose and serum estradiol concentration in transgender adults undergoing feminising hormone therapy.

AIM: Feminising hormone therapy with estradiol is used to align an individual's physical characteristics with their gender identity. Given considerable variations in doses of estradiol therapy administered as gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT), we aimed to assess if body mass index (BMI) correlated with estradiol dose/concentration and assess the correlation between estradiol dose and estradiol concentrations. METHODS: In a retrospective cross-sectional study, we analysed transgender individuals attending a primary or secondary care clinic in Melbourne, Australia who were prescribed oral estradiol valerate for at least 6 months and had estradiol dose and concentration available. Estradiol concentration was measured by immunoassay. Outcomes were the correlation between estradiol dose and BMI, and estradiol dose and estradiol concentration. RESULTS: Data were available for 259 individuals {median age 25.8 [interquartile range (IQR) 21.9, 33.5] years}. Median duration of estradiol therapy was 24 (15, 33) months. Median estradiol concentration was 328 (238, 434) pmol/l [89 (65, 118) pg/ml] on 6 (4, 8) mg estradiol valerate. Median BMI was 24.7 (21.8, 28.6) kg/m2. There was a weak positive correlation between estradiol dose and estradiol concentration (r = 0.156, p = 0.012). There was no correlation between BMI and estradiol concentration achieved (r = -0.063, p = 0.413) or BMI and estradiol dose (r = 0.048, p = 0.536). Estradiol concentrations were within the target range recommended in consensus guidelines in 172 (66%) individuals. CONCLUSION: Estradiol dose was only weakly correlated with estradiol concentration, suggesting significant interindividual variability. Prescription of estradiol dose should not be based upon an individual's BMI, which did not correlate with estradiol concentration achieved. In all, 66% of individuals achieved estradiol concentrations recommended in Australian consensus guidelines with a relatively high oral estradiol dose.