Effects of nanotechnology-based devices on postural control in healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present preliminary randomized controlled study was to ascertain whether the use of newly developed nanotechnologies-based patches can influence posture control of healthy subjects. METHODS: Thirty healthy female subjects (age 39.4 years, BMI 22.74 kg/m2) were randomly assigned to two groups: one with active patches and a control group with sham patches. Two patches were applied with a tape: one on the subject's sternum and the other on the C7 apophysis. Body sway during quiet upright stance was recorded with a dynamometric platform. Each subject was tested under two visual conditions, eyes open and closed. We used a blocked stratified randomization procedure conducted by a third party. RESULTS: Subjects wearing the sham patches showed a significant increase of the center of pressure sway area after 4 hours when they performed the habitual moderate-intensity work activities. In the active patch group, a decrease of the sway path was evident, providing evidence of an enhanced balance control. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary findings on healthy subjects indicate that nanotechnological devices generating ultra-low electromagnetic fields can improve posture control.

Range of motion limitations of the upper body in obese female workers.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of obesity is increasing worldwide, and the economic consequences of an increased percentage of obese workers are relevant in terms of health costs and absences from work. Obesity is associated with reduced participation in the workforce, increased absence from work, disability and health costs, lower salaries and reduced productivity. OBJECTIVES: We aimed at quantifying the limitations in range of motion (ROM) of the upper limb and the trunk of obese workers during basic occupational tasks. METHODS: One group of 15 obese female subjects (BMI: 42.10±9.10 kg/m2) and one control group of 13 normal-weight female subjects were recruited. Three group of tasks were selected as representative of basic occupational movements: 1) upper limb movements (reaching, abduction-adduction, frontal elevation); 2) trunk movements (lateral bending, rotation); 3) whole body movement (target task). RESULTS: We observed significant range of motion limitations in lateral and frontal upper arm elevation. Statistically significant difference in terms of center of pressure (the point of application of the ground reaction force measured by means of force platform) excursions was observed for lateral bending and trunk rotation tasks. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that obese subjects have significant range of motion limitations of the upper body during basic occupational activities. This study provides quantitative evidence of these limitations of obese workers and may serve occupational specialists to allocate them to adequate jobs and reduce the rate of work-related musculoskeletal disorders.