[Lateral ankle ligament injuries]. / Laterale ankelligamentskader.

Lateral ankle ligament injuries occur in connection with inversion traumas and are one of the most common injuries, both in the general population and among athletes. A lateral ankle ligament injury weakens the stabilising structures in the ankle and disposes the ankle joint to prolonged instability. Acute lateral ankle ligament injuries with no suspicion of fracture can be treated and followed up conservatively in the primary health service. In this clinical review article, we emphasise the importance of adequate physical training before referral to an MRI and orthopaedic surgeon for further assessment. Patients with chronic instability who fail to respond to adequate conservative treatment should be referred for surgical assessment.

Component Placement in Direct Lateral vs Minimally Invasive Anterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Radiographic Outcomes From a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: End-stage coxarthrosis is increasingly common; however, limited evidence exists on the effect of direct lateral approach (DLA) and minimally invasive direct anterior approach (MIDA) on component placement in total hip arthroplasty (THA). We therefore conducted a prospective, randomized controlled trial to determine the component placement in DLA vs MIDA in THA. METHODS: Between January 2012 and June 2013, 164 patients with clinically and radiologically confirmed coxarthrosis aged 20-80 years were randomized to either DLA or MIDA (active comparator). Excluded were patients with previous ipsilateral hip surgery, a body mass index >35 kg/m2, and/or mental disability. Primary clinical outcomes have been published elsewhere. Secondary outcomes included radiographic assessment of the acetabular component (cement-mantle thickness, inclination, and anteversion), femoral stem position (varus/valgus and THA index), offset restoration, and leg length discrepancy. RESULTS: The mean cement-mantle was significantly thicker in zone 1 in the MIDA group (mean difference = 0.51 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.09-0.93, P = .018), and the mean degrees of inclination and anteversion were higher in the MIDA group (mean difference = 2.5°, 95% CI 0.3-4.6, P = .023 and mean difference = 3.6°, 95% CI 2.2-5.0, P < .0001, respectively). According to the defined reference range, cup inclination was more often adequate in the DLA group (67.9% (53/78) in the DLA group vs 52.4% (43/82) in the MIDA group, P = .045). There were no differences in frontal or lateral femoral stem position, global offset restoration, or leg length discrepancy. CONCLUSION: In this population of Norwegian patients with coxarthrosis, radiographic assessment showed limited differences in component placement between MIDA and DLA. The findings suggest that component placement is similar in the 2 surgical approaches.

The direct anterior minimal invasive approach in total hip replacement: a prospective departmental study on the learning curve.

INTRODUCTION: Introduction of new surgical techniques is normal, but seldom monitored in real time. The purpose of this study was to monitor the learning curve when introducing a new surgical technique to a department. We did a prospective evaluation of the learning curve when introducing the minimally invasive direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty. We wish to investigate whether there is a learning curve for the direct anterior minimal invasive approach in total hip replacement and what are the early complications to this approach. METHODS: The department changed from the direct lateral approach to the minimally invasive direct anterior approach. We monitored the first 522 patients operated using this approach with regards to patient outcome scores and complications 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The last 250 patients operated all had significantly better results with regard to patient outcome scores and cup placement. We investigated 100 patients at a time and compared them with the rest of the patient and found the same pattern. This pattern ends when we reach patients somewhere between 200-300. DISCUSSIONS: We established the learning curve on a departmental level with regards to introduction of the minimal invasive direct anterior approach. We see a steady improvement in scores with regards to patient outcome scores and cup positioning until we reach a steady-state. The learning curve here flattens out. Departments must understand that one should expect early complications and somewhat less than optimal results at first when introducing this new surgical technique.

Fractures of the greater trochanter following total hip replacement.

We studied the incidence of greater trochanteric fractures at our department following THR. In all we examined 911 patients retrospectively and found the occurance of a greater trochanteric fracture to be 3%. Patients with fractures had significantly poorer outcome on Oxford Hip score, Pain VAS, Satisfaction VAS and EQ-5D compared to THR without fractures. Greater trochanteric fracture following THR is one of the most common complications following THR. It has previously been thought to have little impact on the overall outcome following THR, but our study suggests otherwise.