A Cognitive Aid for Neonatal Epinephrine Dosing.

OBJECTIVES: Errors are common when preparing epinephrine for neonatal resuscitation. Epinephrine is available in two concentrations (1 mg/mL and 1 mg/10 mL) and requires weight-based calculations, which increases the risk of dosing errors. We developed a printed cognitive aid to assist with dose preparation. We hypothesized that the cognitive aid would result in a 25% difference in errors in preparing the dose of epinephrine during simulated neonatal resuscitation. METHODS: Nurses (N = 100) in a large academic and community hospital were randomly assigned to calculate the intended dose and prepare epinephrine for neonatal resuscitation with or without the cognitive aid. Scenarios were video recorded and timed. Secondary outcomes included errors in the written intended dose, errors in choosing the correct epinephrine concentration, and time required to prepare the final dose. Proportions were compared by using Fisher's exact test. Variables influencing dosing errors were investigated by using logistic regression. RESULTS: Using the cognitive aid significantly decreased the proportion of doses prepared incorrectly (24% vs 50%; P = .01). The aid also decreased errors in choosing the correct epinephrine concentration (12% vs 44%; P < .001), but there was no difference in the written intended dose or the time to prepare the dose. Years of experience, self-perceived math comfort, and anxiety were not predictive of dosing errors. CONCLUSIONS: A simple cognitive aid decreased epinephrine dosing errors during simulated neonatal resuscitation but did not improve efficiency. Despite the effectiveness of the cognitive aid, errors were not completely eliminated. This is a serious safety risk for newborns and requires additional interventions.

Volume Versus Mass Dosing of Epinephrine for Neonatal Resuscitation: A Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous epinephrine for neonatal resuscitation requires weight-based calculations. Epinephrine is available in 2 different concentrations, increasing the risk of dosing errors. Expert panels have conflicting recommendations for the ordering method. The Neonatal Resuscitation Program recommends the volume (milliliters per kilogram) method, whereas the Institute for Safe Medication Practices recommends the mass (milligrams per kilogram) method. In this study, we aim to determine if the mass method is more accurate and efficient than the volume method. METHODS: In a randomized crossover simulation study, 70 NICU and pediatric emergency department nurses calculated the intended dose then prepared epinephrine using both the mass and volume methods. Both epinephrine concentrations were available. Scenarios were video recorded and timed. The primary outcome was the proportion of epinephrine doses prepared correctly. Variables associated with correct dosing were analyzed by using logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 136 total doses, 77 (57%) were prepared correctly. The correct intended dose was calculated more frequently by using the mass method (82% vs 68%; risk difference 15%; 95% confidence interval 3% to 26%), but there was no difference in the proportion of doses that were actually prepared correctly (53% of mass method doses versus 60% of volume method doses; risk difference -7%; 95% confidence interval -24% to 9%). There was no difference between methods in the time required to prepare the dose. Selecting the correct epinephrine concentration was the only variable associated with correct dosing. CONCLUSIONS: The mass method was neither more accurate nor more efficient. Nurses made frequent errors when using both methods. This is a serious patient safety risk. Additional educational and medication safety interventions are urgently needed.