Methods for quantifying breast cancer-related lymphedema in patients undergoing a contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.

Patients treated for breast cancer are at risk of developing breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). A significant proportion of patients treated for breast cancer are opting to undergo a contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM). Currently, it remains unclear as to whether the relative volume change (RVC) equation may be used as an alternative to the weight adjusted change (WAC) equation to quantify BCRL in patients who undergo CPM. In order to simplify BCRL screening, our cohort of patients who underwent a CPM (n=310) was matched by BMI to a subset of patients who underwent unilateral breast surgery (n=310). Arm volume measurements were obtained via an optoelectronic perometer preoperatively, postoperatively, and in the follow-up setting every 6-12 months. The correlation of ipsilateral RVC and WAC values for those who underwent bilateral surgery was calculated (r=0.60). Contralateral WAC values for patients in both cohorts were compared, and there was no significant difference between the two distributions in variance (p=0.446). The RVC equation shows potential to be used to quantify ipsilateral postoperative arm volume changes for patients who undergo a CPM. However, a larger trial in which RVC and WAC values are prospectively assessed is needed.

Comparison of perometry-based volumetric arm measurements and bioimpedance spectroscopy for early identification of lymphedema in a prospectively-screened cohort of breast cancer patients.

Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) affects more than one in five women treated for breast cancer, and women remain at lifelong risk. Screening for BCRL is recommended by several national and international organizations for women at risk of BCRL, and multiple methods of objective screening measurement exist. The goal of this study was to compare the use of perometry and bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) for early identification of BCRL in a cohort of 138 prospectivelyscreened patients. At each screening visit, a patient's relative volume change (RVC) from perometer measurements and change in L-Dex from baseline (ΔL-Dex) using BIS was calculated. There was a negligible correlation between RVC and ΔL-Dex (r=0.195). Multiple thresholds of BCRL were examined: RVC ≥5% and ≥10% as well as and ΔL-Dex ≥6.5 and ≥10. While some patients developed an elevated RVC and ΔL-Dex, many demonstrated elevations in only one threshold category. Moreover, the majority of patients with RVC ≥5%, ΔL-Dex ≥6.5, or ΔL-Dex ≥10 regressed to non-elevated measurements without intervention. These findings suggest a role for combining multiple screening methods for early identification of BCRL; furthermore, BCRL diagnosis must incorporate patient symptoms and clinical evaluation with objective measurements obtained from techniques such as perometry and bioimpedance spectroscopy.