The 2022 Annual Report of DataDerm: The database of the American Academy of Dermatology.

The American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) launched DataDerm in 2016 as the clinical data registry platform of AAD. DataDerm has evolved to be the largest database containing information about dermatology patients in the world. As of December 31, 2021, DataDerm contained data from 13.2 million unique patients and 47.0 million unique patient visits, with 403 practices representing 1670 clinicians actively participating in DataDerm in 2021. Of the 1670 clinicians participating in DataDerm in 2021, the majority were dermatologists (978) followed by physician assistants (375) and nurse practitioners (163) who are employed by AAD members and meet the AAD definition of the AAD DermCare team. Furthermore, in 2021, 834 clinicians submitted data via DataDerm to the Merit-based Incentive Payment System of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. This article is the third annual report about the status of DataDerm. This year's 2022 annual report presents the progress DataDerm has made over the past year in conjunction with OM1, the data analytics partner of DataDerm, as well as the current status and future plans of DataDerm.

Characteristics of Treatment-experienced HIV-infected African Children and Adolescents Initiating Darunavir and/or Etravirine-based Antiretroviral Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Data are limited on the selection and sequencing of second-line and third-line pediatric antiretroviral treatment (ART) in resource-limited settings. This study aimed to evaluate characteristics of African pediatric patients initiated on darunavir (DRV) and/or etravirine (ETR) through a specific drug donation program. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of baseline immunologic, virologic and demographic characteristics of children and adolescents initiating DRV-based and/or ETR-based ART. Descriptive statistics were used. RESULTS: Study enrolled 48 patients (45.8% women; median age = 15 years [interquartile range 17.7-10.3]) at 9 clinical sites in Zambia, Swaziland, Kenya and Lesotho. The majority (87.5%; n = 42) had received ≥2 prior ART regimens; most (81.2%) had received lopinavir/ritonavir-based ART before switch. All patients had detectable HIV RNA (median = 56,653 copies/mL). Forty seven patients (98.9%) had HIV genotype results: 41 (87.2%) had ≥1 nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-resistance mutation (RM), predominantly M184V (76.6%; n = 36); 31 (65.9%) had ≥1 non-NRTI-RM, including 27 (57.4%) with ≥1 ETR-RM; 30 (63.8%) had ≥3 protease inhibitor RM, including 20 (42.6%) with ≥1 DRV-RM. For new ART regimens, DRV and raltegravir were most frequently prescribed (83.3%; n = 40 on DRV and raltegravir, each). Eighteen patients (37.5%) were initiated on the NRTI-sparing ART. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, a significant proportion of treatment-experienced African children and adolescents had one or more DRV-RM and ETR-RM. For the new regimen, more than a third of pediatric patients failing second-line ART were prescribed NRTI-sparing regimens. Better understanding of the current approaches to pediatric ART sequencing in resource-limited settings is needed.