Institutional injustice: Implications for system transformation emerging from the mental health recovery narratives of people experiencing marginalisation.

BACKGROUND: Institutional injustice refers to structures that create disparities in resources, opportunities and representation. Marginalised people experience institutional injustice, inequalities and discrimination through intersecting personal characteristics and social circumstances. This study aimed to investigate sources of institutional injustice and their effects on marginalised people with experience of mental health problems. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 77 individuals from marginalised groups with experience of mental health problems, including psychosis, Black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) populations, complex needs and lived experience as a work requirement. These were analysed inductively enabling sensitising concepts to emerge. FINDINGS: Three processes of institutional injustice were identified: not being believed because of social status and personal backgrounds; not being heard where narratives did not align with dominant discourses, and not being acknowledged where aspects of identity were disregarded. Harmful outcomes included disengagement from formal institutions through fear and mistrust, tensions and reduced affiliation with informal institutions when trying to consolidate new ways of being, and damaging impacts on mental health and wellbeing through multiple oppression. CONCLUSIONS: Institutional injustice perpetuates health inequalities and marginalised status. Master status, arising from dominant discourses and heuristic bias, overshadow the narratives and experiences of marginalised people. Cultural competency has the potential to improve heuristic availability through social understandings of narrative and experience, whilst coproduction and narrative development through approaches such as communities of practice might offer meaningful avenues for authentic expression.

Men's views of antidepressant treatment for depression, and their implications for community pharmacy practice.

BACKGROUND: Men with depression can express and navigate their condition differently to women. Understanding this population's needs, and experiences, can help healthcare professionals better support these patients. There is a lack of knowledge in this area, and no studies have explored men's depression in the context of community pharmacy. OBJECTIVES: Explore views of men around their medication for the treatment of depression and the role of community pharmacy in their treatment. SETTING: United Kingdom (UK) primary care. METHOD: Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted. Eligible participants were male, aged 18-65 years, and treating depression with antidepressants. Participants were recruited through 5 UK pharmacies (via the pharmacist or poster recruitment) and a UK University (poster recruitment). A thematic approach was used for analysis. RESULTS: 14 men aged 26-61 years, predominantly of white ethnicity were interviewed. Key themes were found. The theme 'Antidepressant's attributions to benefits' highlighted all men noticed benefits when taking antidepressants, but held uncertainty on what extent their antidepressants caused this. The themes 'Views of pharmacist's role influences engagement', and 'Influence of cognitive state upon healthcare interactions' demonstrated men were not inclined to discuss concerns with the community pharmacist. These men didn't see this as the pharmacist's role, nor had these men given cognitive space to evaluate their treatment beliefs or information needs. Yet the theme 'Reflection of support and information needs' shows men did have unmet information and support needs. This also links into the 'Hegemonic Masculinity and taking antidepressants' theme, where taking antidepressants could challenge ones masculinity. CONCLUSION: Community pharmacists should create opportunities for men to engage in conversations around their antidepressants and wider support. Men, as a requisite for engagement, will need to see such interactions as within the community pharmacists' remit, and as part of a collaborative healthcare system.

Assessment of the University of Michigan's dental hygiene partnership with the Huron Valley Boys & Girls Club: a study of students' and staffs' perceptions and service learning outcomes.

PURPOSE: The Boys & Girls Club of America (BGCA) requires a health curriculum be taught. With the assistance of the University of Michigan (UM) Dental Hygiene program, these requirements have been addressed at the Huron Valley Boys & Girls Club (HVBGC) through dental hygiene students presenting oral health education to club members throughout the year. This study assessed the outcomes and benefits of the service learning initiative between the UM Dental Hygiene Program and the HVBGC from both the students' and staffs' perceptions. METHODS: Three surveys were distributed: one to the HVBGC staff, one to UM's Dental Hygiene class of 2012 (with no service learning experience at the HVBGC) and one to UM Dental Hygiene classes of 2010 and 2011 (most of whom had experience at the HVBGC). Qualitative and quantitative data were collected and evaluated. RESULTS: The respondents from the class of 2012 were less knowledgeable about the BGCA and access to care issues. The members of the classes of 2010 and 2011, 79% of whom had HVBGC experience, identified they had benefitted from this service learning experience. The HVBGC staff survey indicated a high level of satisfaction with the student presentations and felt their curricular requirements were being met. Future topics of safety, orthodontics and gardening/nutrition were identified. CONCLUSION: This study indicates the service learning initiative has been beneficial for both the UM Dental Hygiene students and the HVBGC. Future studies should use a longitudinal design to obtain baseline and post-service learning data.