Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Infect Dis Ther ; 12(10): 2417-2435, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37833467

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Regdanvimab, a neutralising monoclonal antibody (mAb) against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), received approval for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in South Korea in 2021. The Ministry of Food and Drug Safety in South Korea mandate that new medications be re-examined for safety and effectiveness post-approval in at least 3000 individuals. This post-marketing surveillance (PMS) study was used to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of regdanvimab in real-world clinical care. METHODS: This prospective, multicentre, phase 4 PMS study was conducted between February 2021 and March 2022 in South Korea. Eligible patients were aged ≥ 18 years with confirmed mild COVID-19 at high risk of disease progression or moderate COVID-19. Patients were hospitalised and treated with regdanvimab (40 mg/kg, day 1) and then monitored until discharge, with a follow-up call on day 28. Adverse events (AEs) were documented, and the COVID-19 disease progression rate was used to measure effectiveness. RESULTS: Of the 3123 patients with COVID-19 infection identified, 3036 were eligible for inclusion. Approximately 80% and 5% of the eligible patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 during the delta- and omicron-dominant periods, respectively. Median (range) age was 57 (18-95) years, and 50.6% of patients were male. COVID-19 severity was assessed before treatment, and high-risk mild and moderate COVID-19 was diagnosed in 1030 (33.9%) and 2006 (66.1%) patients, respectively. AEs and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were experienced by 684 (22.5%) and 363 (12.0%) patients, respectively. The most common ADR was increased liver function test (n = 62, 2.0%). Nine (0.3%) patients discontinued regdanvimab due to ADRs. Overall, 378 (12.5%) patients experienced disease progression after regdanvimab infusion, with extended hospitalisation/re-admission (n = 300, 9.9%) as the most common reason. Supplemental oxygen was required by 282 (9.3%) patients. Ten (0.3%) patients required intensive care monitoring and 3 (0.1%) died due to COVID-19. CONCLUSION: This large-scale PMS study demonstrated that regdanvimab was effective against COVID-19 progression and had an acceptable safety profile when used in real-world clinical practice.

2.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(16): e19620, 2020 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32311931

RESUMO

For the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer disease (AD), variable neuroimaging and neuropsychological tests have been used. We aimed to evaluate the correlation of neuropsychological domain with new amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) study and to validate the availability of new PET tracer.We enrolled 20 patients who underwent C-PiB-PET/CT, new PET tracer F-FC119S PET/CT from November, 2014 to July, 2015. Among them, 10 patients were diagnosed with AD and 10 patients with MCI. The current version of Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery (SNSB) II was performed for cognitive evaluation. Each parameter of SNSB was compared between 2 patient groups. Spearman correlation analysis between value of SNSB domain and standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) of PET was also performed.The AD group presented significant poor z-score in Korean-Boston Naming Test(K-BNT) (P = .01),copy score of Rey Complex Figure Test (RCFT) (P = .049), immediate (P = .028)and delayed memory of Seoul Verbal Learning Test (SVLT) (P = .028), recognition of RCFT (P = .004), "animal" of Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) (P = .041), color reading of Korean-Color Word Stroop test (K-CWST) (P = .014), and Digit Symbol Coding (DSC) (P = .007) compared with MCI group. That means, except attention domain, all other cognitive domains were relatively impaired in AD compared with MCI. In correlation analysis, we found that poor performances on copy score of RCFT in MCI groups were associated with great beta amyloid burden in frontal area in both C-PiB-PET/CT and F-FC119S PET/CT. In AD group, F-FC119S PET presented more extensive correlation in each cognitive domain with multiple cortical areas compared with C-PiB-PET.The degree of amyloid burden assessed on F-FC119S PET was significantly correlated with neuropsychological test in AD, and also MCI patients. The combination of neuropsychological evaluation with novel F-FC119S PET/CT can be used for valid biomarker for MCI and AD.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer/diagnóstico por imagem , Amiloide/metabolismo , Disfunção Cognitiva/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doença de Alzheimer/metabolismo , Doença de Alzheimer/psicologia , Compostos de Anilina , Benzotiazóis , Radioisótopos de Carbono , Disfunção Cognitiva/metabolismo , Disfunção Cognitiva/psicologia , Feminino , Radioisótopos de Flúor , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neuroimagem/métodos , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Piridinas , Traçadores Radioativos , Tiazóis
3.
J Clin Neurol ; 16(1): 131-139, 2020 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31942769

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic performance and safety of a new ¹8F-labeled amyloid tracer, ¹8F-FC119S. METHODS: This study prospectively recruited 105 participants, comprising 53 with Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients, 16 patients with dementia other than AD (non-AD), and 36 healthy controls (HCs). In the first screening visit, the Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery cognitive function test was given to the dementia group, while HC subjects completed the Korean version of the Mini Mental State Examination. Individuals underwent ¹8F-FC119S PET, ¹8F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET, and brain MRI. The diagnostic performance of ¹8F-FC119S PET for AD was compared to a historical control (comprising previously reported and currently used amyloid-beta PET agents), ¹8F-FDG PET, and MRI. The standardized uptake value (SUV) ratio (ratio of the cerebral cortical SUV to the cerebellar SUV) was measured for each PET data set to provide semiquantitative analysis. All adverse effects during the clinical trial periods were monitored. RESULTS: Visual assessments of the ¹8F-FC119S PET data revealed a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 84% in detecting AD. ¹8F-FC119S PET demonstrated equivalent or better diagnostic performance for AD detection than the historical control, ¹8F-FDG PET (sensitivity of 80.0% and specificity of 76.0%), and MRI (sensitivity of 98.0% and specificity of 50.0%). The SUV ratios differed significantly between AD patients and the other groups, at 1.44±0.17 (mean±SD) for AD, 1.24±0.09 for non-AD, and 1.21±0.08 for HC. No clinically significant adverse effects occurred during the trial periods. CONCLUSIONS: ¹8F-FC119S PET provides high sensitivity and specificity in detecting AD and therefore may be considered a useful diagnostic tool for AD.

4.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 96(12): e6441, 2017 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28328855

RESUMO

As a new beta amyloid (Aß) positron emission tomography (PET) tracer, F-FC119S has shown higher cortical uptake in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) than that in healthy control subjects without adverse effects in a previous preliminary study. The aim of this study was to compare F-FC119S PET and C-PiB PET in healthy control (HC) subjects, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients, and AD patients.A total of 48 subjects, including 28 HC subjects, 10 MCI patients, and 10 AD patients, underwent static F-FC119S PET (30 minutes after intravenous [i.v.] injection) and C-PiB PET (40 minutes after i.v. injection) on the same day. Both PET images were visually and quantitatively assessed. Standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs) were calculated for each brain region using the cerebellar cortex as a reference region.None (0%) of the 28 HC subjects and 4 (40%) of 10 MCI patients had positive scans on both PET images. Of the 10 AD patients, 7 (70%) had positive scans on C-PiB PET while 6 (60%) had positive scans on F-FC119S PET. Overall, 47 (98%) of 48 participants showed identical results based on visual analysis. Cortical SUVR of F-FC119S was higher in AD patients (1.38 ±â€Š0.16), followed by that in MCI patients (1.24 ±â€Š0.10) and in HC subjects (1.14 ±â€Š0.05). Compared with C-PiB PET, F-FC119S PET yielded a higher effect size (d = 2.02 vs. 1.67) in AD patients and a slightly lower effect size (d = 1.26 vs. 1.38) in MCI patients. In HC subjects, the nonspecific binding of F-FC119S to white matter (with the frontal cortex-to-white matter SUV ratio of 0.76) was slightly lower than that of C-PiB (ratio of 0.73). There was a significant linear correlation (slope = 0.41, r = 0.78, P < 0.001) between C-PiB and F-FC119S cortical SUVR.We could safely obtain images similar to C-PiB PET imaging Aß in the brain using F-FC119S PET. Therefore, F-FC119S might be suitable for imaging Aß deposition.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer/diagnóstico por imagem , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagem , Disfunção Cognitiva/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doença de Alzheimer/patologia , Compostos de Anilina , Benzotiazóis , Encéfalo/patologia , Radioisótopos de Carbono , Disfunção Cognitiva/patologia , Feminino , Radioisótopos de Flúor , Voluntários Saudáveis , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tiazóis
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...