Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Alzheimers Res Ther ; 16(1): 90, 2024 Apr 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38664843

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Plasma neurofilament light chain (NfL) is a promising biomarker of neurodegeneration with potential clinical utility in monitoring the progression of neurodegenerative diseases. However, the cross-sectional associations of plasma NfL with measures of cognition and brain have been inconsistent in community-dwelling populations. METHODS: We examined these associations in a large community-dwelling sample of early old age men (N = 969, mean age = 67.57 years, range = 61-73 years), who are either cognitively unimpaired (CU) or with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Specifically, we investigated five cognitive domains (executive function, episodic memory, verbal fluency, processing speed, visual-spatial ability), as well as neuroimaging measures of gray and white matter. RESULTS: After adjusting for age, health status, and young adult general cognitive ability, plasma NfL level was only significantly associated with processing speed and white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume, but not with other cognitive or neuroimaging measures. The association with processing speed was driven by individuals with MCI, as it was not detected in CU individuals. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that in early old age men without dementia, plasma NfL does not appear to be sensitive to cross-sectional individual differences in most domains of cognition or neuroimaging measures of gray and white matter. The revealed plasma NfL associations were limited to WMH for all participants and processing speed only within the MCI cohort. Importantly, considering cognitive status in community-based samples will better inform the interpretation of the relationships of plasma NfL with cognition and brain and may help resolve mixed findings in the literature.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores , Cognição , Disfunção Cognitiva , Vida Independente , Proteínas de Neurofilamentos , Neuroimagem , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Humanos , Masculino , Proteínas de Neurofilamentos/sangue , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Transversais , Disfunção Cognitiva/sangue , Disfunção Cognitiva/diagnóstico por imagem , Neuroimagem/métodos , Cognição/fisiologia , Biomarcadores/sangue , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagem , Substância Branca/diagnóstico por imagem , Substância Branca/patologia , Envelhecimento/sangue
2.
Age Ageing ; 53(3)2024 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38454901

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The study explores whether frailty at midlife predicts mortality and levels of biomarkers associated with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) and neurodegeneration by early old age. We also examine the heritability of frailty across this age period. METHODS: Participants were 1,286 community-dwelling men from the Vietnam Era Twin Study of Aging at average ages 56, 62 and 68, all without ADRD at baseline. The cumulative deficit frailty index (FI) comprised 37 items assessing multiple physiological systems. Plasma biomarkers at age 68 included beta-amyloid (Aß40, Aß42), total tau (t-tau) and neurofilament light chain (NfL). RESULTS: Being frail doubled the risk of all-cause mortality by age 68 (OR = 2.44). Age 56 FI significantly predicted age 68 NfL (P = 0.014), Aß40 (P = 0.001) and Aß42 (P = 0.023), but not t-tau. Age 62 FI predicted all biomarkers at age 68: NfL (P = 0.023), Aß40 (P = 0.002), Aß42 (P = 0.001) and t-tau (P = 0.001). Age 68 FI scores were associated with age 68 levels of NfL (P = 0.027), Aß40 (P < 0.001), Aß42 (P = 0.001) and t-tau (P = 0.003). Genetic influences accounted for 45-48% of the variance in frailty and significantly contributed to its stability across 11 years. CONCLUSIONS: Frailty during one's 50s doubled the risk of mortality by age 68. A mechanism linking frailty and ADRD may be through its associations with biomarkers related to neurodegeneration. Cumulative deficit frailty increases with age but remains moderately heritable across the age range studied. With environmental factors accounting for about half of its variance, early interventions aimed at reducing frailty may help to reduce risk for ADRD.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer , Fragilidade , Masculino , Humanos , Idoso , Doença de Alzheimer/diagnóstico , Doença de Alzheimer/genética , Fragilidade/diagnóstico , Peptídeos beta-Amiloides , Biomarcadores
3.
Addiction ; 117(4): 1049-1059, 2022 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34605095

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Smoking is associated with increased risk for brain aging/atrophy and dementia. Few studies have examined early associations with brain aging. This study aimed to measure whether adult men with a history of heavier smoking in early mid-life would have older than predicted brain age 16-28 years later. DESIGN: Prospective cohort observational study, utilizing smoking pack years data from average age 40 (early mid-life) predicting predicted brain age difference scores (PBAD) at average ages 56, 62 (later mid-life) and 68 years (early old age). Early mid-life alcohol use was also evaluated. SETTING: Population-based United States sample. PARTICIPANTS/CASES: Participants were male twins of predominantly European ancestry who served in the United States military between 1965 and 1975. Structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) began at average age 56. Subsequent study waves included most baseline participants; attrition replacement subjects were added at later waves. MEASUREMENTS: Self-reported smoking information was used to calculate pack years smoked at ages 40, 56, 62, and 68. MRIs were processed with the Brain-Age Regression Analysis and Computation Utility software (BARACUS) program to create PBAD scores (chronological age-predicted brain age) acquired at average ages 56 (n = 493; 2002-08), 62 (n = 408; 2009-14) and 68 (n = 499; 2016-19). FINDINGS: In structural equation modeling, age 40 pack years predicted more advanced age 56 PBAD [ß = -0.144, P = 0.012, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.257, -0.032]. Age 40 pack years did not additionally predict PBAD at later ages. Age 40 alcohol consumption, but not a smoking × alcohol interaction, predicted more advanced PBAD at age 56 (ß = -0.166, P = 0.001, 95% CI = -0.261, -0.070) with additional influences at age 62 (ß = -0.115, P = 0.005, 95% CI = -0.195, -0.036). Age 40 alcohol did not predict age 68 PBAD. Within-twin-pair analyses suggested some genetic mechanism partially underlying effects of alcohol, but not smoking, on PBAD. CONCLUSIONS: Heavier smoking and alcohol consumption by age 40 appears to predict advanced brain aging by age 56 in men.


Assuntos
Fumar Cigarros , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Envelhecimento , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagem , Fumar Cigarros/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Nicotiana , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...