Progressive Oncological Surgery Is Associated with Increased Curative Resection Rates and Improved Survival in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Secondary resection rates in first-line chemotherapy trials for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remain below 15%, representing a clear contrast to reports by specialised surgical centres, where progressive liver, peritoneal-surface, and pulmonary surgery increased access to curative-intent treatment. We present a long-term evaluation of oncosurgical management in a single-centre, analysing the aggregate effect of gradual implementation of surgical subspecialties and systemic treatments on mCRC patients' resection rates and prognosis. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed mCRC from 2003 to 2014 were retrospectively categorised into palliative treatment (PAT) and curative intent surgery (CIS) and three time periods were analysed for treatment changes and factors associated with survival. RESULTS: Four hundred-twenty patients were treated (PAT:250/CIS:170). Over time periods, the number of presenting patients remained consistent, whereas curative resection rates increased from 29% to 55%, facilitated by an increment of patients undergoing hepatectomy (21 to 35%), pulmonary surgery (6 to 17%), and peritonectomy/intraoperative chemotherapy (0 to 8%). Also, recently, significantly more multi-line systemic treatments were applied. The median survival markedly improved from 21.9 months (2003⁻2006; 95% confidence interval (CI) 17.3⁻26.5) to 36.5 months (2011⁻2014; 95% CI 26.6⁻46.4; p = 0.018). PAT was a significant factor of poor survival and diagnosis of mCRC in the latest time period was independently associated with a distinctly lower risk for palliative treatment (odds ratio 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: In modern eras of medical oncology, achieving appropriate resection rates through utilization of state-of-the-art oncological surgery by dedicated experts represents a cornerstone for long-term survival in mCRC.

Damage control surgery for perforated diverticulitis: a two center experience with two different abdominal negative pressure therapy devices.

Purpose: The adoption of abdominal negative pressure therapy (NPT) during urgent laparotomy has shown to be helpful to control abdominal sepsis, improve morbidity and increase anastomosis rate. The aim of this study was to compare feasibility and outcome of two different abdominal negative pressure devices. Methods: The retrospective two-center study includes 78 consecutive patients with perforated sigmoid diverticulitis, who underwent urgent laparotomy using the ABThera™ (KCI, Wien, Austria) abdominal NPT device (Group A, n = 51) or the Suprasorb® CNP (Lohmann & Rauscher, Wien, Austria) abdominal NPT device (Group B, n = 27). Results: The mean length of abdominal NPT was 3.6 days in Group A and 2.8 days in Group B. Revisional surgery after closure of the abdomen was necessary due to surgical site infections, fascial dehiscence or anastomotic insufficiency in 25% and 29%, respectively. NPT-associated complications like fistula formation or acute bleeding were not observed. Mortality was 15% (Group A) and 7% (Group B). Conclusion: Despite the good feasibility and the well-known positive effect of abdominal NPT, perforated diverticulitis is still associated with high morbidity. However, the analysis did not show significant differences between the two abdominal NPT devices.

First Episode of Spontaneous Pneumothorax: CT-based Scoring to Select Patients for Early Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Although recurrence of primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) is frequent, guidelines do not routinely recommend surgery after first presentation. A CT-based lung dystrophy severity score (DSS) has recently been proposed to predict recurrence following conservative therapy. This study compares the DSS in surgically and conservatively treated patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of first episode PSP patients, comparing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS; group A) to conservative treatment with or without chest drainage (group B). CT scans were reviewed for blebs or bullae, and patients were assigned DSS values and stratified into risk groups (low and high-grade). Primary end point was ipsilateral or contralateral recurrence. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were included, 33 received VATS and 23 conservative treatment. In total, 37.5 % experienced recurrence, with a 5-year estimated recurrence rate of 40.7 % (group A: 13.3 %; group B: 73.9 %; p < 0.001). In group B, detection of any dystrophic lesions resulted in significantly higher 5-year recurrence rates (86.7 vs. 50.0 %; p = 0.03), there was no significant difference in group A (17.7 vs. 7.7 %; p = 0.50). Greater DSS values correlated with higher 5-year recurrence rates in group B (p = 0.02), but not in group A (p = 0.90). Comparing low- and high-grade patients in group B resulted in a significant 5-year recurrence rate of 53.8 versus 100 % (p = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: The DSS is useful to indicate VATS after the first episode. For routine application, assigning patients to low- and high-grade groups seems most practical. We recommend CT-evaluation for every PSP patient and early surgery for those with lesions exceeding one bleb. After VATS, the preoperative DSS is not beneficial in predicting recurrence.

Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of pelvic reconstruction with porcine dermal collagen mesh following extra-levator abdominoperineal excision for primary rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Extra-levator abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer includes resection of the levator ani muscle and therefore makes pelvic reconstruction advisable. The aim of our study was to evaluate morphologic and functional long-term results of pelvic floor augmentation with porcine dermal collagen mesh by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging and clinical examination. METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients underwent perineal reconstruction with porcine dermal collagen mesh following extra-levator abdominoperineal excision for primary rectal adenocarcinoma with curative intent between 2009 and 2012. Patient perioperative and postoperative data were collected prospectively. There were one cancer-related and two noncancer-related deaths in the follow-up period, and another three patients refused the dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were included in the study. The median time period from surgery to dynamic magnetic resonance imaging and clinical examination was 31 months (range 19-56). Wound infections were observed in 43% (6 of 14) of these patients in the postoperative period, but no mesh had to be removed. No focal mesh defect, no damage on the suture line, and no perineal hernia were detected on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Clinical examination revealed no pathological findings in any patient. CONCLUSIONS: The implantation of a porcine dermal collagen mesh is an effective and reliable option for pelvic floor reconstruction after extra-levator abdominoperineal excision. Despite a high incidence of primary wound infections, the healing rate was satisfactory, no mesh had to be removed, and long-term stability could be achieved.

Cumulative incidence of permanent stoma after sphincter preserving low anterior resection of mid and low rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Changes in the treatment of rectal cancer during the past decades have led to an increase in sphincter preservation with a consecutive decline in abdominoperineal resection rates. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the cumulative incidence of permanent stoma in patients undergoing sphincter-preserving resection of mid and low rectal cancer. DESIGN: This study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a tertiary referral cancer hospital. PATIENTS: From 2003 to 2010, 125 patients with primary mid and low rectal cancer who underwent sphincter-preserving low anterior resection were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The occurrence of a permanent stoma over time was investigated by using a Cox proportional hazards regression model and competing-risk models, with death as a competing risk. The risk factors were assessed by computing HRs and a Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: After a median follow-up time of 61 months (range, 22-113), 15 of 125 patients ended up with a permanent stoma, accounting for a 5-year cumulative incidence of 6% (95% CI, 4%-11%). The reasons for obtaining a permanent stoma were anastomotic leakage (60%, 9/15), intractable fecal incontinence (27%, 4/15), and local recurrence (13%, 2/15). The Cox proportional hazards regression identified anastomotic leakage (HR, 6.10; 95% CI, 2.23-16.71; p = 0.0004) and coloanal anastomosis (HR, 4.31; 95% CI, 1.49-12.47; p = 0.007) as statistically significant risk factors. LIMITATIONS: Because of the small number of events in this sample, further investigations with a larger number of patients are required. Fecal incontinence was assessed by patient self-reported data without the use of a validated score. CONCLUSION: The 5-year cumulative incidence of a permanent stoma was 6%. Anastomotic leakage and coloanal anastomosis were identified as risk factors. These details should be considered before sphincter-preserving surgery.