[Therapy of physical frailty]. / Therapie der physischen Frailty.

As an overarching geriatric syndrome, frailty describes a potentially reversible transitional stage between functional autonomy and irreversible disability. Thus, frailty addresses a "window of opportunity" in which functional limitations can be successfully treated. This article provides an overview of the therapeutic approaches and their scientific evidence.

Clinical teaching in applied health science: effects of a student-led journal club on aging and physical activity.

BACKGROUND: This project aims to investigate the effects of a student-led journal club on students' critical thinking and clinical application skills in the academic field of aging and physical activity. METHODS: A pre-post design analysis with data collected in four successive cohorts of the program M.Sc. Sport and Movement Gerontology was conducted. Each student assigned himself/herself to a study, and then led the journal club discussion and published a summary of the journal club via graphical abstract on social media. The students rated their perceived confidence in the beginning (T0) and after the semester (T1) via questionnaire and 5-point Likert scales addressing their ability to review and summarize the evidence, to present it in a journal club and to lead the discussion. RESULTS: 41 students (32 women, M = 25 years SD 1.9 years) were included. The journal club was rated as "very good" (median 2, IQR 1). Students' confidence on participating, leading the journal club and transferring the results into clinical practice improved significantly (r ≥ 0.6, p < 0.01) - e.g.: "I feel confident in leading a discussion on the literature presented", T0: "undecided" (median 3, IQR 2) to T1: "rather agree" (median 4, IQR 1, Z= -5.41, r = 0.85, p < 0.01). DISCUSSION: The student-led journal club shows to be an effective teaching approach for the field of aging and physical activity within applied health science education. Especially the students' self-assignment to the studies and involving the scientific community via social media was rated as useful and highly motivating for students and lecturers.

MicroRNAs miR-7 and miR-340 predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

PURPOSE: miRNAs have been linked to chemosensitivity of breast cancer cells in vitro. In patients, however, there is no clinically validated method for predicting chemotherapy response. The aim of this study was to assess whether (I) a specific pattern of miRNA expression in pretherapeutic biopsies can predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and (II) differential miRNA expression in residual tumor after completion of chemotherapy allows further prognostic stratification of non-responding patients. METHODS: Sixty-four patients with newly diagnosed large (≥3 cm) or locally advanced primary breast cancers who underwent neoadjuvant anthracycline/taxane-based chemotherapy were included. Relative expression of 10 miRNAs likely to be associated with chemotherapy response (miR-7,-21,-29a,-29b,-34a,-125b,-155,-200c,-340,-451) was determined by quantitative RT-PCR from pretherapeutic biopsies (n = 64) and residual invasive tumor after chemotherapy (n = 42). Pathologic complete response (pCR) defined by absence of invasive tumor served as reference standard. In addition, miRNA expression was compared with disease-free and overall survival. RESULTS: Nine (14%) of 64 patients achieved pCR. High expression of miR-7 and low expression of miR-340 in pretherapeutic biopsies predicted pCR with a negative predictive value of 96 and 97%, respectively (specificity 54 and 57%). The combined profile of miR-7high/miR-340low demonstrated improved specificity of 86% while maintaining a high negative predictive value (96%) to identify non-responders. Pretherapeutic expression of miR-200c and miR-155 showed prognostic information, and low expression was associated with increased overall survival (115 vs. 90 months, p ≤ 0.03). After chemotherapy, the overall survival of patients with residual invasive tumor was better for those demonstrating low miR-7 or high miR-125b (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Intratumoral expression of miR-7 and miR-340 prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy could be used to predict pCR and a profile of miR-7low or miR-340high identified patients unlikely to achieve pCR who might benefit from alternative treatment options including earlier surgery. Our study identifies miRNAs as promising predictive biomarkers, which could aid in optimization of breast cancer management and treatment stratification.

Common protein biomarkers assessed by reverse phase protein arrays show considerable intratumoral heterogeneity in breast cancer tissues.

Proteins are used as prognostic and predictive biomarkers in breast cancer. However, the variability of protein expression within the same tumor is not well studied. The aim of this study was to assess intratumoral heterogeneity in protein expression levels by reverse-phase-protein-arrays (RPPA) (i) within primary breast cancers and (ii) between axillary lymph node metastases from the same patient. Protein was extracted from 106 paraffin-embedded samples from 15 large (≥3 cm) primary invasive breast cancers, including different zones within the primary tumor (peripheral, intermediate, central) as well as 2-5 axillary lymph node metastases in 8 cases. Expression of 35 proteins including 15 phosphorylated proteins representing the HER2, EGFR, and uPA/PAI-1 signaling pathways was assessed using reverse-phase-protein-arrays. All 35 proteins showed considerable intratumoral heterogeneity within primary breast cancers with a mean coefficient of variation (CV) of 31% (range 22-43%). There were no significant differences between phosphorylated (CV 32%) and non-phosphorylated proteins (CV 31%) and in the extent of intratumoral heterogeneity within a defined tumor zone (CV 28%, range 18-38%) or between different tumor zones (CV 24%, range 17-38%). Lymph node metastases from the same patient showed a similar heterogeneity in protein expression (CV 27%, range 18-34%). In comparison, the variation amongst different patients was higher in primary tumors (CV 51%, range 29-98%) and lymph node metastases (CV 65%, range 40-146%). Several proteins showed significant differential expression between different tumor stages, grades, histological subtypes and hormone receptor status. Commonly used protein biomarkers of breast cancer, including proteins from HER2, uPA/PAI-1 and EGFR signaling pathways showed higher than previously reported intratumoral heterogeneity of expression levels both within primary breast cancers and between lymph node metastases from the same patient. Assessment of proteins as diagnostic or prognostic markers may require tumor sampling in several distinct locations to avoid sampling bias.

Intratumoral heterogeneity of microRNA expression in breast cancer.

Profiling studies have identified specific microRNA (miRNA) signatures in malignant tumors including breast cancer. Our aim was to assess intratumoral heterogeneity in miRNA expression levels within primary breast cancers and between axillary lymph node metastases from the same patient. Specimens of 16 primary breast cancers were sampled in 8-10 distinct locations including the peripheral, intermediate, and central tumor zones, as well as two to five axillary lymph node metastases (n = 9). Total RNA was extracted from 132 paraffin-embedded samples, and the expression of miR-10b, miR-210, miR-31, and miR-335 was assessed as well as the reproducibility of RNA extraction and miRNA analysis by quantitative RT-PCR. Considerable intratumoral heterogeneity existed for all four miRNAs within primary breast cancers (CV 40%). No significant differences within (CV 34%) or between different tumor zones (CV 33%) were found. A similar variation in miRNA expression was observed between corresponding lymph node metastases (mean CV 40%). In comparison, the variation among different patients showed a CV of 80% for primary tumors and 103% for lymph node metastases. Both miRNA extraction procedures and quantitative RT-PCR showed high reproducibility (CV ≤ 2%). Thus, the intratumoral heterogeneity of miRNA expression in breast cancers can lead to significant sampling bias. Assessment of breast cancer miRNA profiles may require sampling at several different tumor locations and of several tumor-involved lymph nodes when deriving miRNA expression profiles of metastases.