Surgery for metastatic spine tumors in the elderly. Advanced age is not a contraindication to surgery!

BACKGROUND: With recent advances in oncologic treatments, there has been an increase in patient survival rates and concurrently an increase in the number of incidence of symptomatic spinal metastases. Because elderly patients are a substantial part of the oncology population, their types of treatment as well as the possible impact their treatment will have on healthcare resources need to be further examined. PURPOSE: We studied whether age has a significant influence on quality of life and survival in surgical interventions for spinal metastases. STUDY DESIGN: We used data from a multicenter prospective study by the Global Spine Tumor Study Group (GSTSG). This GSTSG study involved 1,266 patients who were admitted for surgical treatments of symptomatic spinal metastases at 22 spinal centers from different countries and followed up for 2 years after surgery. PATIENT SAMPLE: There were 1,266 patients recruited between March 2001 and October 2014. OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient demographics were collected along with outcome measures, including European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), neurologic functions, complications, and survival rates. METHODS: We realized a multicenter prospective study of 1,266 patients admitted for surgical treatment of symptomatic spinal metastases. They were divided and studied into three different age groups: <70, 70-80, and >80 years. RESULTS: Despite a lack of statistical difference in American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, Frankel neurologic score, or Karnofsky functional score at presentation, patients >80 years were more likely to undergo emergency surgery and palliative procedures compared with younger patients. Postoperative complications were more common in the oldest age group (33.3% in the >80, 23.9% in the 70-80, and 17.9% for patients <70 years, p=.004). EQ-5D improved in all groups, but survival expectancy was significantly longer in patients <70 years old (p=.02). Furthermore, neurologic recovery after surgery was lower in patients >80 years old. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons should not be biased against operating elderly patients. Although survival rates and neurologic improvements in the elderly patients are lower than for younger patients, operating the elderly is compounded by the fact that they undergo more emergency and palliative procedures, despite good ASA scores and functional status. Age in itself should not be a determinant of whether to operate or not, and operations should not be avoided in the elderly when indicated.

Value of diagnostic lumbar selective nerve root block: a prospective controlled study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although diagnostic lumbar selective nerve root blocks are often used to confirm the pain-generating nerve root level, the reported accuracy of these blocks has been variable and their usefulness is controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of diagnostic lumbar selective nerve root blocks to analyze potential causes of false results in a prospective, controlled, single-blinded manner. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 105 block anesthetics were performed under fluoroscopic guidance in 47 consecutive patients with pure radiculopathy from a single confirmed level: 47 blocks were performed at the symptomatic level, and 58 were performed at the adjacent asymptomatic "control" level. Contrast and local anesthetics were injected, and spot radiographs were taken in all cases. We calculated the diagnostic value of the block anesthetics using concordance with the injected level. We analyzed the potential causes of false results using spot radiographs. RESULTS: On the basis of a definition of a positive block as 70% pain relief, determined by receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) analysis, diagnostic lumbar selective nerve root block anesthetics had a sensitivity of 57%, a specificity of 86%, an accuracy of 73%, a positive predictive value of 77%, and a negative predictive value of 71%. False-negatives were due to the following causes identifiable on spot radiographs: insufficient infiltration, insufficient passage of the injectate, and intraepineural injections. On the other hand, false-positives resulted from overflow of the injectate from the injected asymptomatic level into either the epidural space or symptomatic level. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of diagnostic lumbar selective nerve root blocks is only moderate. To improve the accuracy, great care should be taken to avoid inadequate blocks and overflow, and to precisely interpret spot radiographs.

Cauda equina syndrome in ankylosing spondylitis (the CES-AS syndrome): meta-analysis of outcomes after medical and surgical treatments.

The cauda equina syndrome in ankylosing spondylitis (the CES-AS syndrome) is marked by slow, insidious progression and a high incidence of dural ectasia in the lumbosacral spine. A high index of suspicion for this problem must be maintained when evaluating the patient with ankylosing spondylitis with a history of incontinence and neurologic deficit on examination. There has been disagreement in the literature as to whether surgical treatment is warranted for this condition. A meta-analysis was thus performed comparing outcomes with treatment regimens. Our results suggest that leaving these patients untreated or treating with steroids alone is inappropriate. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs may improve back pain but do not improve neurologic deficit. Surgical treatment of the dural ectasia, either by lumboperitoneal shunting or laminectomy, may improve neurologic dysfunction or halt the progression of neurologic deficit.

Disproportionately severe calcinosis cutis in an 88-year-old patient with CREST syndrome.

An 88-year-old woman with CREST syndrome (calcinosis, Raynaud's phenomenon, esophageal dysmotility, sclerodactyly, and telangiectasias) presented with hyperglycemia, intravascular depletion, and atrial fibrillation. The patient was found to have unusually severe calcinosis cutis in both legs extending from the knees to the ankles bilaterally, as well as Raynaud's phenomenon, sclerodactyly, and telangiectasias. The patient was normocalcemic and normophosphatemic. Although subcutaneous calcification is often seen with CREST syndrome, this case is unusual in that the area of involvement was much larger than previously described. Furthermore, the amount of calcinosis was disproportionately severe and was the major cause of symptoms and disability compared with the other components of the syndrome.

Dural ectasia and conventional radiography in the Marfan lumbosacral spine.

OBJECTIVE: To determine how well conventional radiographic findings can predict the presence of dural ectasia in Marfan patients. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: Twelve Marfan patients without dural ectasia and 21 Marfan patients with dural ectasia were included in the study. Five radiographic measurements were made of the lumbosacral spine: interpediculate distance, scalloping value, sagittal canal diameter, vertebral body width, and transverse process width. RESULTS: The following measurements were significantly larger in patients with dural ectasia: interpediculate distances at L3-L4 levels (P<0.03); scalloping values at the L1 and L5 levels (P<0.05); sagittal diameters of the vertebral canal at L5-S1 (P<0.03); transverse process to width ratios at L2 (P<0.03). Criteria were developed for diagnosis of dural ectasia in Marfan patients. These included presence of one of the following: interpediculate distance at L4 > or = 38.0 mm, sagittal diameter at S1 > or = 18.0 mm, or scalloping value at L5 > or = 5.5 mm. CONCLUSION: Dural ectasia in Marfan syndrome is commonly associated with several osseous changes that are observable on conventional radiographs of the lumbosacral spine. Conventional radiography can detect dural ectasia in patients with Marfan syndrome with a very high specificity (91.7%) but a low sensitivity (57.1%).

The lumbar interpediculate distance is widened in adults with the Marfan syndrome: data from 32 cases.

32 patients with Marfan syndrome, diagnosed with DePaepe's criteria, volunteered for this study. All patients underwent standard anteroposterior radiographs of the lumbar spine. Interpediculate distances (IPD) at each level were compared to those of previously established norms. Criteria were developed to determine the presence of Marfan using "cut-off values" for the IPDs at each lumbar level. The IPDs were significantly larger in the Marfan patients at all lumbar levels. Cut-off values were calculated setting the specificity at 95% at each lumbar level. The cut-off value at L4 yielded the greatest sensitivity. We conclude that the IPDs are widened in patients with Marfan syndrome. The IPD at L4 is a good criterion for Marfan with specificity of 95% and sensitivity of 75%. One must consider using this as a skeletal criterion or a screening tool for Marfan.

Early failure associated with the use of Hylamer-M spacers in three primary AMK total knee arthroplasties.

We report 3 cases of early failure associated with AMK total knee arthroplasties with the use of Hylamer-M spacers. In 2 of these cases, massive osteolysis of the posterior condyles was noted; revision with the use of allograft bone to fill in the cavitary defects yielded excellent results. In all cases, large areas of pitting and delamination of the Hylamer spacers were noted. Given these cases and the previous literature on early failure of hip arthroplasties with Hylamer inserts, we recommend caution in using Hylamer for knee arthroplasty surgery.

Cauda equina syndrome secondary to lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis of surgical outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN: A meta-analysis of surgical outcomes of cauda equina syndrome secondary to lumbar disc herniation. OBJECTIVES: To determine the relationship between time to decompression after onset of cauda equina syndrome and clinical outcome, and to identify preoperative variables that were associated with outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The timing of surgical decompression for cauda equina syndrome is controversial. Although most surgeons recommend emergent decompression, results in certain studies show that delayed surgery may provide a satisfactory outcome. METHODS: A meta-analysis was performed to determine the correlation between timing of decompression and clinical outcome. One hundred four citations were reviewed, and 42 met the inclusion criteria. Preoperative and postoperative data were recorded. Length of time to surgery was broken down into five groups: less than 24 hours, 24-48 hours, 2-10 days, 11 days to 1 month, and more than 1 month. Logistic regression was used to determine the association between preoperative variables and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Outcomes were analyzed in 322 patients. Preoperative chronic back pain was associated with poorer outcomes in urinary and rectal function, and preoperative rectal dysfunction was associated with worsened outcome in urinary continence. In addition, increasing age was associated with poorer postoperative sexual function. No significant improvement in surgical outcome was identified with intervention less than 24 hours from the onset of cauda equina syndrome compared with patients treated within 24-48 hours. Similarly, no difference in outcome occurred in patients treated more than 48 hours after the onset of symptoms. Significant differences, however, were found in resolution of sensory and motor deficits as well as urinary and rectal function in patients treated within 48 hours compared with those treated more than 48 hours after onset of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant advantage to treating patients within 48 hours versus more than 48 hours after the onset of cauda equina syndrome. A significant improvement in sensory and motor deficits as well as urinary and rectal function occurred in patients who underwent decompression within 48 hours versus after 48 hours.

Dural ectasia in the Marfan syndrome: MR and CT findings and criteria.

PURPOSE: To create criteria for detecting dural ectasia on MR or CT images in adult Marfan patients. METHODS: Images were analyzed using a workstation. Parameters that predicted dural ectasia were included in our criteria. RESULTS: Major criteria include: (1) width of dural sac below L5 > width above L4; (2) anterior sacral meningocele. Minor criteria include: (1) L5 nerve root sleeve diameter > 6.5 mm and (2) S1 scalloping > 3.5. Dural ectasia exists if 1 major or 2 minor criteria are present. CONCLUSION: MR and CT diagnose dural ectasia with high specificity and sensitivity. Our criteria accurately diagnose dural ectasia in adult Marfan patients.

Functional outcome of plate fusions for disorders of the occipitocervical junction.

Twenty-eight patients with average followup of 27 months (range, 12-51 months) required occipitocervical fusion with plates. A 1992 to 1996 consecutive case series enrolled patients prospectively from two institutions. Five surgeons participated. Sixteen patients had inflammatory arthritis; four, osteogenesis imperfecta; three, tumors; three, congenital anomalies; one, pseudarthrosis after odontoid fracture; and one, osteoarthritis. Twenty-two of 28 (78.6%) patients had serious comorbid medical conditions. Additional halo immobilization of 6 weeks was used in 16 of 27 patients. Four patients required revision surgery. No patients showed a decline in neurologic status and average neurologic improvement was one Nurick grade. Two-year followup showed 13 (50%) excellent, nine (34.6%) good, two (7.7%) fair, and two (7.7%) poor outcomes based on a functional outcome scale. There were three deaths during the followup period (overall mortality rate of 10.7%). One death was attributable to airway obstruction, one death 14 months postoperatively was attributable to late Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus sepsis at the bone graft donor site, and one death 41 months postoperatively was attributable to a stroke. The overall fusion rate was 85.2% (23 of 27 patients), with a 96.3% (26 of 27 patients) occipitocervical fusion rate. Three patients had a possible asymptomatic end segment pseudarthrosis with screw loosening. Twenty-two of 26 (84.6%) interviewed patients would choose the surgery again if given the choice.