Postchemotherapy Residual Tumor Resection in Patients with Elevated Tumor Markers.

PURPOSE: The oncologic benefit of postchemotherapy (PC) residual tumor resection (RTR) in patients with germ cell tumors and elevated serum tumor markers (STMs) remains unclear. This analysis was performed to better define patients who benefit from surgery in this setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 575 PC-RTR procedures (July 2008-July 2019) 153 were performed in patients with elevated STMs (human chorionic gonadotropin [HCG] >2.0 mIU/ml, alpha-fetoprotein [AFP] >7.0 µg/l), including 55 after first line and 98 after second or later line chemotherapy. RESULTS: Viable cancer in the resected specimen was significantly more common in the salvage group than in the first line group (48.98% vs 16.36%, p=0.0001988) and was a predictor of survival in both groups. A preoperative serum level of AFP ≥30 µg/l was a significant predictor of viable cancer in the first line and salvage groups (55.56% [p=0.0157] and 66.67% [p=0.0017], respectively). The overall relapse-free survival rate (22.7% and 50%, p=0.00032) and overall survival rate (37.8% and 65%, p=0.0059) were significantly worse in the salvage group than in the first line group. A preoperative serum level of AFP ≥30 µg/l and viable cancer/teratoma found in the histological examination of the RTR specimens were significant predictors of relapse after first line chemotherapy. Serum AFP ≥30 µg/l and HCG ≥20 mIU/ml were significant factors affecting survival in the first line group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AFP serum levels >30 µg/l and HCG ≥20 mIU/ml after first line chemotherapy should receive salvage chemotherapy instead of surgery. After second or later line therapy, the prognosis of patients with elevated markers and surgery is poor regardless of the tumor marker levels. However, 38% of these patients are long-term survivors, which justifies PC-RTR in this setting.

Late relapsing germ cell tumors with elevated tumor markers.

PURPOSE: Late relapsing germ cell tumors (LR-GCT) are considered a rare distinct biologic entity as their clinical presentation and response to treatment is different to early recurrences. While serum tumor markers (AFP and ß-HCG) play an important role at the time of first diagnosis to correctly classify prognosis and treatment of germ cell tumors, they may not have the same significance in a late relapse situation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with LR-GCT with elevated serum tumor markers were identified in our database. Twenty-six patients underwent primary surgical resection of the late relapsing tumor. Eleven patients received salvage chemotherapy and a post-chemotherapy residual tumor resection. Serum tumor markers, histological findings and oncological outcome were analyzed. RESULTS: In the histopathological specimen, viable cancer was found in 20 cases (54%) and teratoma was found in 16 cases (43%). In nine cases (24%), a somatic-type malignant transformation was present. In 19 of 37 patients (51.4%), the late relapse specimen presented a histological type of GCT, which was not present in the primary histology. Twenty-two patients (59.5%) were included in follow-up analysis. Mean and median follow-up time was 62.2 and 53 months, respectively. Seventeen patients (77.3%) suffered a relapse or had progressive disease after LR therapy. Five patients (22.7%) have been relapse-free after LR therapy (mean FU 61.6 months). Ten patients died of disease during follow-up (45.5%) and had a mean time from LR to death of 66.4 months. Eleven patients were alive at last follow-up (mean FU 62.2 months). Relapse and survival rate were similar between patients who received primary resection of LR tumor and patients who received salvage chemotherapy followed by surgery. CONCLUSION: Patients with a late relapsing germ cell tumor and elevated markers have a poor prognosis and a high risk for another relapse independent on primary treatment. The histological type and aggressiveness of a late relapsing tumor cannot be predicted with serum tumor marker levels at the time of diagnosis of LR. In up to 54% of cases, primary histology did not coincide with LR histology. Therefore, we propose primary surgical resection of a late relapsing tumor if a complete resection is feasible in order to gain exact histology and tailor further treatment.

Robotic Assisted Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Small Volume Metastatic Testicular Cancer.

PURPOSE: Robotic assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in patients with testicular cancer is controversial. Lately, unusual recurrence patterns with adverse outcomes after robotic assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection have been published. In this report we determine the feasibility, safety and early oncologic outcome of robotic assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in patients with small volume metastatic testicular cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 27 consecutive patients with small volume metastatic testicular cancer (October 2010 to November 2019) who underwent robotic assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (unilateral modified template). Intraoperative and postoperative complications as well as early oncologic outcomes are reported. Surgery was performed in the primary metastatic setting in 22 (81%), post-chemotherapy in 4 (15%) and for late relapse in 1 patient (4%). Initial clinical stage was IIA for 14 (52%), IIB for 12 (43%) and III for 1 (4%) patient. RESULTS: Median operative time, blood loss and length of hospital stay were 175 minutes, 50 ml and 4 days, respectively. Expectedly, viable tumor was found in 21/27 patients (78%) and 6 patients (22%) showed fibrosis, necrosis or no tumor. Overall 3 (11%) patients experienced intraoperative (Satava II) and 1 (4%) postoperative (Clavien-Dindo IIIb) complications, respectively. Median followup was 16.5 months (3-69), and 3 (11%) patients experienced relapse outside of the surgical field after 12, 22 and 36 months. CONCLUSIONS: In highly selected patients with low volume metastatic testicular cancer robotic assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection may be indicated, and appears to be technically feasible and comparable with open surgery in terms of complications and early oncologic safety. Prospective data collection in larger series is necessary to clarify the role and specific indications of this approach.

Prospective comparison of whole-body MRI and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for the detection of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: To assess whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (wb-MRI) for detection of biochemical recurrence in comparison to 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (68Ga-PSMA PET/CT) in prostate cancer (Pca) patients after radical prostatectomy. METHODS: This was a prospective trial including 28 consecutive patients (mean age 65.3 ± 9.0 years) with newly documented biochemical recurrence of Pca (mean prostate-specific antigen, PSA, 2.09 ± 1.95 ng/ml) following radical prostatectomy. All patients underwent both wb-MRI including a dedicated pelvic imaging protocol and PET/CT with 166 ± 35 MBq 68Ga-PSMA within a time window of 11 ± 10 days. PET/CT and MRI datasets were separately evaluated regarding Pca lesion count, type, localization and diagnostic confidence (three-point Likert scale, 1-3) by two nuclear medicine specialists and two radiologists, respectively. The reference standard was based on histopathological results, PSA levels following targeted salvage irradiation and follow-up imaging. Lesion-based and patient-based detection rates were compared using the chi-squared test. Differences in diagnostic confidence were assessed using the Welch test. RESULTS: A total of 56 Pca lesions were detected in 20 of the 28 patients. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT detected 56 of 56 lesions (100%) in 20 patients (71.4%), while wb-MRI detected 13 lesions (23.2%) in 11 patients (39.3%). The higher detection rate with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT was statistically significant on both a per-lesion basis (p < 0.001) and a per-patient basis (p = 0.0167). In 8 patients (28.6%) no relapse was detectable by either modality. All lesions detected by wb-MRI were also detected by 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. Additionally, 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT provided superior diagnostic confidence in identifying Pca lesions (2.7 ± 0.7 vs. 2.3 ± 0.6, p = 0.044). CONCLUSION: 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT significantly out-performed wb-MRI in the detection of biochemical recurrence in Pca patients after radical prostatectomy.