[Serodiagnosis of toxoplasmosis: a comparative multicenter study of a standard scale through various actual tests and expression of the results in international units. Groupe de travail toxoplasmose du Contrôle national de qualité en parasotologie. Syndicat des fabricants de réactifs de laboratoire. Groupe de travail standardisation des tests sérologiques du Réseau européen de lutte contre la toxoplasmose congénitale]. / Le sérodiagnostic de la toxoplasmose: etude comparative multicentrique d'une gamme étalon, par les différents tests actuels et avec expression des résultats en unités internationales. Groupe de travail toxoplasmose du Contrôle national de qualité en parasitologie, Syndicat des fabricants de réactifs de laboratoire, Groupe de travail standardisation des tests sérologiques du Réseau européen de lutte contre la toxoplasmose congénitale.

Reported are the results of a multicentre study involving 40 laboratories that was carried out in France to assess all the currently available methods used for the serodiagnosis of toxoplasmosis. For this purpose 10 batches of control sera were prepared with titres in the range 0-260 IU per ml. These sera were tested in nine laboratories using immunofluorescence methods; in three laboratories using dye tests; in forty laboratories using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; in four laboratories using direct agglutination and haemagglutination; in seven laboratories using the high-sensitivity IgG agglutination test; and in three laboratories using the latex agglutination test. In this way, 70 series of titrations were carried out using seven procedures and the results were compared with those obtained using the WHO reference serum in 15 cases, with the French national E6 serum in 16 other cases, and in 39 cases using 15 reference sera supplied by the reagent manufacturers. Rigorous comparison of the tests was not possible in all cases because one aim of the study was to ensure that the tests were carried out under the usual working conditions that prevailed in the participating laboratories. The results obtained indicate that the serological tests currently available for toxoplasmosis are acceptable for its serodiagnosis. Presentation of the titres in IU has advantages; however, caution is required since the definition of IU varies according to the test and reagents used. It is therefore essential that the conditions and limits for a positive reaction be carefully defined in each case, especially for commercially available kits.

[Multicenter study of toxoplasma serology using various commercial ELISA reagents. Work Group Toxoplasmosis of the National Agency for Quality Control in Parasitology]. / Etude multicentrique de la sérologie toxoplasmique par différents réactifs ELISA commercialisés. Groupe de travail Toxoplasmose du Contrôle National de Qualité en Parasitologie.

A collaborative study conducted by the French National Agency for Quality Control in Parasitology (CNQP) and various manufacturers of ELISA kits, represented by the Association of Laboratory Reagent Manufacturers (SFRL) compared the toxoplasmosis IgG antibody titres obtained with different ELISA-IgG kits and determined the relationships between the titres obtained by these techniques and the titre defined in international units (IU). Fifty-one serum samples with toxoplasmosis antibody titres ranging from 0 to 900 IU were tested in two successive studies with 16 ELISA-IgG kits. For the negative sera, false-positive reactions were observed with one kit. For the positive sera, the titres observed in ELISA were generally higher than those expressed in IU. Above 250 IU, the very wide variability of the titres found with the different ELISA kits renders any comparative analysis impossible. For titres below 250 IU, the results are sufficiently homogeneous to permit the use of regression analysis to study how the results for each ELISA kit compare with the mean results for the other kits. The slope of the line of regression shows a tendency to over-titration or under-titration compared with the results of the other manufacturers; the ordinate at the origin reflects the positivity threshold of the reaction and can be used to assess the risk of a lack of sensitivity (high threshold) or of specificity (threshold too low). On the whole, the trends revealed for a given manufacturer are constant from one study to the other. Within this range of titres, regression analysis also reveals the general tendency of ELISA kits to overestimate the titres by comparison with immunofluorescence.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Evaluation of a new bicolored latex agglutination test for immunological diagnosis of hepatic amoebiasis.

A new bicolored latex agglutination amoeba test (BLA) for detection of antibodies against Entamoeba histolytica was evaluated for its practicability and diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. BLA is rapid (5 min) and simple to perform. It requires only 20 microliters of a 1/3-diluted serum, 17 microliters of reagent, and a glass slide. Reading of the test is easy because a positive result shows a green spot with a red surrounding edge. This bicolored pattern is easily distinguishable from the negative test result, which shows a homogeneous dark-brown spot. By using serum samples from 348 individuals, BLA was compared with immunofluorescence assay, indirect hemagglutination, and counterimmunoelectrophoresis. Sensitivity, specificity, efficiency, and positive and negative predictive values of the four methods were almost identical. The results of this study indicate that BLA could be very useful both as a screening method for the diagnosis of invasive amoebiasis and for epidemiological purposes.