Impact of shaggy aorta on intraoperative cerebral embolism during carotid artery stenting.

BACKGROUND: Careful selection of patients for carotid stenting is necessary. We suggest that patients with a shaggy aorta syndrome may be at higher risk for perioperative embolic complications. METHODS: The study is a retrospective subanalysis of the SIBERIA Trial. We included 72 patients undergoing transfemoral carotid artery stenting. Patients were monitored during the procedures using multifrequency transcranial Doppler with embolus detection and differentiation. Pre- and postprocedural (2 and 30 days) cerebral diffusion-weighted cerebral MRIs were performed. RESULTS: Forty-six patients had shaggy aorta syndrome. Intraoperative embolisms were recorded in 82.6% and 46.1% of patients with and without shaggy aorta syndrome, respectively (P=0.001). New asymptomatic ischemic brain lesions in the postoperative period occurred in 78.3% and in 26.9% of patients with and without shaggy aorta syndrome, respectively (P<0.001). There were no cases of stroke within 2 days in both groups. 3 (6.5%) cases of stroke within 30 days after the procedure were observed only in patients with shaggy aorta syndrome. There were no cases of contralateral stroke. Shaggy aorta syndrome (OR 5.54 [1.83:16.7], P=0.001) and aortic arch ulceration (OR 6.67 [1.19: 37.3], P=0.02) were independently associated with cerebral embolism. Shaggy aorta syndrome (OR 9.77 [3.14-30.37], P<0.001) and aortic arch ulceration (OR 12.9 [2.3: 72.8], P=0.003) were independently associated with ipsilateral new asymptomatic ischemic brain lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Shaggy aorta syndrome and aortic arch ulceration significantly increase the odds of intraoperative embolism and new asymptomatic ischemic brain lesions. Carotid endarterectomy or transcervical carotid stent should be selected in patients with shaggy aorta syndrome.

One-Year Results of Long femoropopliteal Lesions Stenting with Fasciotomy Lamina Vastoadductoria.

BACKGROUND: Fasciotomy can increase the mobility of the superficial femoral artery and decrease the incidence of stent fractures. This study aimed to compare the long-term patency of drug-eluting nitinol stents with and without fasciotomy in patients with prolonged superficial femoral artery occlusions. METHODS: A randomized clinical trial was conducted in 60 (1:1) patients with long femoropopliteal steno-occlusive lesions >200 mm. Patients in group 1 (Zilver) underwent recanalization of femoropopliteal artery occlusion with stenting. In group 2 (ZilverFas), the femoropopliteal occlusion was recanalized with stenting and fasciotomy of Gunter's canal. The follow-up assessment of the patency took place after 6-12 months. RESULTS: Twelve-month primary patency in Zilver and ZilverFas groups was 51% and 80%, respectively (P = 0.02). The freedom from target lesion revascularization in the Zilver and ZilverFas groups was 50% and 76%, respectively (P = 0.04). At 1 year, primary-assisted patency and secondary patency for the ZilverFas and Zilver groups were 83% vs. 62% (P = 0.07) and 86% vs. 65% (P = 0.05), respectively. In the Zilver and ZilverFas groups, the number of stent fractures was 14 and 7, respectively (P = 0.05). The multivariable Cox regression indicated that the stent fracture and diabetes mellitus were independent predictors of restenosis and reocclusion. Fasciotomy reduced the risk of reocclusion and restenosis by 2.94 times. CONCLUSIONS: Our study has shown that decompressing the stented segment with fasciotomy significantly improves the patency of the femoropopliteal segment and significantly reduces the number and severity of stent fractures.

Bypass Versus Interwoven Nitinol Stents for Long Femoro-Popliteal Occlusions: A Propensity Matched Analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare femoro-popliteal bypass and interwoven nitinol stenting for long occlusions of the femoro-popliteal segment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single center retrospective propensity matching analysis of the symptomatic patients with long occlusion of the femoro-popliteal segment (> 20 cm), who underwent stenting with interwoven nitinol stent or femoro-popliteal bypass from 2012 to 2020. PRIMARY ENDPOINTS: primary patency, primary-assisted patency, secondary patency. Secondary endpoints: major adverse cardiovascular events, major adverse limb events, primary sustained clinical improvement, survival. RESULTS: A total of 437 patients were enrolled: 294 in the bypass group and 143 in the endovascular therapy (EVT) group. After propensity score matching, 264 and 113 patients remained in the groups, respectively. A median occlusion length was 250 mm. One-year and two-year primary and secondary patency rates were comparable in both groups (two-year primary patency: 68.5% for bypass vs. 68.9% for EVT, p = 1.00). In the "above the knee" subgroup analysis, two-year secondary patency was higher in the EVT group than in the bypass group (90.9% vs. 77.5%, p = 0.048). In "below-the-knee" subgroup analysis, primary and primary assisted patency were statistically significantly higher in the EVT group than in artificial bypass subgroup (66.7% vs. 42.4%, p = .046 and 76.7% vs. 45.5%, p = .011, respectively). However, compared to autovenous bypass, the EVT group showed lower primary patency rates, although the differences are not significant. CONCLUSION: A nonselective endovascular strategy can allow for regular successful treatment of femoro-popliteal lesions longer than 25 cm.

Randomized Controlled Trial of Conventional Versus MicroNet-Covered Stent in Carotid Artery Revascularization.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare procedure-related ipsilateral cerebral embolism with a conventional (Acculink, Abbott Vascular) versus a MicroNet-covered (CGuard, InspireMD) stent in carotid artery stenting (CAS). BACKGROUND: The MicroNet-covered stent may reduce periprocedural cerebral embolism in CAS, but level 1 evidence is lacking. METHODS: A total of 100 consecutive patients were randomized 1:1 to filter-protected CAS using the Acculink or the CGuard device. The study was powered for its primary endpoint of at least 50% reduction in ipsilateral diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging lesion average volume 48 hours postprocedure (blinded external core laboratory analysis). RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of the study groups were similar. Eighty-two (total volume = 18,212 mm3) diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging postprocedural cerebral lesions occurred in 26 Acculink-treated patients and 45 lesions (total volume = 3,930 mm3; 78.4% reduction) in 25 CGuard-treated patients. New cerebral lesion average volume was 171 mm3 vs 73 mm3 (P = 0.017) per affected patient and 222 mm3 vs 84 mm3 (P = 0.038) per lesion (Acculink vs CGuard). In lesion-affected patients, the average sum of lesion volumes was 701 mm3 vs 157 mm3 (P = 0.007). The Acculink significantly increased the risk for multiple (≥5) cerebral lesions (relative risk: 7.8; 95% CI: 1.3-14.9; P = 0.021). At 30 days, new permanent (fluid-attenuated inversion recovery) lesion prevalence was 3:1 (P < 0.001), with total permanent lesion volume 7,474 mm3 vs 574 mm3 (92.3% reduction with the CGuard). There were 6 vs 0 new ipsilateral lesions (P = 0.030) and 2 versus 0 strokes. CONCLUSIONS: The MicroNet-covered stent significantly reduced periprocedural and abolished postprocedural cerebral embolism in relation to a conventional carotid stent. This is consistent with the MicroNet-covered stent's sustained embolism prevention, translating into cerebral protection not only during but also after CAS. The present findings may influence decision making in carotid revascularization. (The SIBERIA Trial [Acculink™ Versus CGuard™]; NCT03488199).

Post-Traumatic Arteriovenous Fistulas Leading to Heart Failure.

INTRODUCTION: The detection of acquired arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) is mostly incidental. However, the modification of haemodynamic conditions secondary to AVFs can lead to dramatic systemic complications, including cardiac complications. In this report, two unusual cases of congestive heart failure secondary to acquired AVF are presented. REPORT: A 40 year old man with past history of gunshot wound of the right flank complained of severe right limb swelling and shortness of breath. An AVF between the right external iliac artery and external iliac vein responsible for the cardiac failure was diagnosed. A 40 year old woman with past history of spinal surgery complained of breathlessness and lower limb oedema. She presented with recurrent episodes of ascites and dyspnoea. An AVF between the right common iliac artery and the common iliac vein responsible for high output cardiac failure was diagnosed. Open surgery was performed in both patients and treatment of the AVFs led to the resolution of all symptoms. Follow up at four and three years, respectively, was uneventful in both cases. DISCUSSION: Although rare, heart failure secondary to an AVF can be encountered. These rare cases highlight the significance of careful inquiry into the patient's medical history and meticulous follow up physical examinations for patients with injuries in close proximity to vessels.

Is it possible to prevent cerebral embolization by improving the design and technology of carotid stent implantation?

INTRODUCTION: The prevention of atherosclerotic plaque fragmentation during carotid artery stenting is a fundamental problem in decreasing the risk of disability of patients. The goal of this review is to clarify whether the stent design can have a decisive impact on the rate of intraoperative and postoperative complications. AREAS COVERED: Different designs of the carotid stents are briefed and the advantages and disadvantages of different stent designs are discussed as well as the results of their clinical use. Various solutions are presented to reduce cerebral embolism during carotid artery stenting. EXPERT OPINION: There is no conclusive evidence for the benefits of closed cell and hybrid stents. The stent design cannot completely resolve the problem of cerebral embolism. Most of the events of cerebral microembolism occur at the stages of stent delivery rather than protrusion of an atherosclerotic plaque in the long-term follow-up. Most likely, minimization of the risks for periprocedural and postprocedural strokes requires not only the new solutions in stent design as well as the corresponding delivery systems and brain embolic protection systems, but also the new strategies of preprocedural drug stabilization of the atherosclerotic plaque in the carotid artery. Abbreviations: CAS, carotid artery stenting; CE, carotid endarterectomy; DW-MRI, diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging; ECA, external carotid artery; ICA, internal carotid artery; IVUS, intravascular ultrasound examination; OCT, optical coherence tomography.

Comparative Analysis of Carotid Artery Stenting and Carotid Endarterectomy in Clinical Practice.

The objective of the study was to describe immediate and long-term results of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) versus carotid stenting (CAS) with embolic protection in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis in clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study, conducted between 2009 and 2017. During the analyzed period, 2132 operations (2006 patients) were performed: 1215 (57%) CEA and 917 (43%) CAS. 278 patients (13.8% of 2006) were not contactable during the follow-up period (>30 days) leaving 1791 cases (1728 patients) for inclusion in the analysis. Propensity score matching was used to compare the treatment results of groups (561 cases were matched out of 1791). The results of 615 CEA (316 eversion, 299 "classic" with patch) and 615 CAS (using a variety of carotid stents) were compared. RESULTS: In the asymptomatic subgroup (n = 455), the 30-day rate of stroke was not significantly different between the CEA group and the CAS group (1.5% versus 2.4%, P = .48). The 5-year rate of stroke was not significantly higher for CAS than for CEA (4.6% versus 3.3%, P = .3). In the symptomatic subgroup (n = 160), the 30-day rate of stroke was significantly higher in the CAS group than in the CEA group (7.5% versus 2.5%, P = .04). The 5-year rate of stroke was 13% for CAS and 8.7% for CEA (P = .2). CONCLUSIONS: In the symptomatic subgroup, the 30-day rate of stroke was significantly higher in the CAS group than in the CEA group, therefore the use of CAS for symptomatic patients in routine practice should be limited. Our study demonstrates that the rates of stroke and survival after CEA and CAS in patients aged 80 years or younger with asymptomatic or symptomatic severe carotid stenosis did not differ significantly over a period of 5 years.