The effects of GSK2981710, a medium-chain triglyceride, on cognitive function in healthy older participants: A randomised, placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: This double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, two-part study assessed the impact of GSK2981710, a medium-chain triglyceride (MCT) that liberates ketone bodies, on cognitive function, safety, and tolerability in healthy older adults. METHODS: Part 1 was a four-period dose-selection study (n = 8 complete). Part 2 was a two-period crossover study (n = 80 complete) assessing the acute (Day 1) and prolonged (Day 15) effects of GSK2981710 on cognition and memory-related neuronal activity. Safety and tolerability of MCT supplementation were monitored in both parts of the study. RESULTS: The most common adverse event was diarrhoea (100% and 75% of participants in Parts 1 and 2, respectively). Most adverse events were mild to moderate, and 11% participants were withdrawn due to one or more adverse events. Although GSK2981710 (30 g/day) resulted in increased peak plasma ß-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) concentrations, no significant improvements in cognitive function or memory-related neuronal activity were observed. CONCLUSION: Over a duration of 14 days, increasing plasma BHB levels with daily administration of GSK2981710 had no effects on neuronal activity or cognitive function. This result indicates that modulating plasma ketone levels with GSK2981710 may be ineffective in improving cognitive function in healthy older adults, or the lack of observed effect could be related to several factors including study population, plasma BHB concentrations, MCT composition, or treatment duration.

Target engagement and cellular fate of otelixizumab: a repeat dose escalation study of an anti-CD3ε mAb in new-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus patients.

AIMS: This paper describes the pharmacological findings from a study where otelixizumab, an anti-CD3ɛ mAb, was dosed in new onset Type 1 diabetes mellitus (NOT1DM) patients. This is the first time that the full dose-response of an anti-CD3ɛ mAb has been investigated in the clinic. The data have been validated using a previously developed pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model of otelixizumab to simulate the interplay between drug administration, CD3ɛ target engagement and downmodulation. METHODS: Patients were randomized to control or active treatment with otelixizumab (1:4), administered via infusion over 6 days, in a dose-ascending study consisted of three cohorts (n = 10 per cohort) at doses of 9, 18 or 27 mg respectively. The study allowed quantification of otelixizumab PK, CD3ɛ target engagement and its pharmacodynamic effect (CD3ε/TCR modulation on circulating T lymphocytes). RESULTS: Otelixizumab concentrations increased and averaged to 364.09 (54.3), 1625.55 (72.5) and 2781.35 (28.0) ng ml-1 (Geom.mean, %CV) at the 9, 18 and 27 mg dose respectively. CD3ɛ target engagement was found to be rapid (within the first 30 min), leading to a receptor occupancy of ~60% within 6 h of dosing in all three doses. A dose-response relationship was observed with the two highest doses achieving a ~90% target engagement and consequential CD3ɛ/TCR downmodulation by Day 6. CONCLUSIONS: Data from this study revealed maximum target engagement and CD3ɛ/TCR modulation is achieved at doses of 18, 27 mg of otelixizumab. These findings can be useful in guiding dose selection in clinical trials with anti-CD3ɛ mAbs.

Adjustment of the area under the concentration curve by terminal rate constant for bioequivalence assessment in a parallel-group study of lamotrigine.

AIM: A new strength of lamotrigine extended-release formulation unexpectedly failed to show bioequivalence with the existing strengths at the same dose in a parallel-group study. We report the post-hoc analyses conducted to identify the cause and propose an approach for future evaluations in similar situations. METHODS: A seemingly bimodal distribution of the half-life among the study participants prompted the use of terminal-phase-rate-constant-adjusted area under the concentration curve as the endpoint for bioequivalence assessment. Population pharmacokinetic modelling was also performed to assess the bimodal distribution of apparent clearance and the potential treatment effects on bioavailability. RESULTS: The cause for failing to achieve bioequivalence appeared to be a biased representation of a bimodal clearance distribution between the groups. The pharmacokinetic modelling with a mixture routine identified two subpopulations: 88% had a mean clearance of 1.99 l h-1 ; 12% had a mean clearance of 0.64 l h-1 . The low-clearance population was unequally represented by 13% and 4% of subjects in the reference and test groups, respectively, and treatment appeared to have no significant effect on oral bioavailability. The bioequivalence comparison using the adjusted area concluded with a 90% confidence interval of 0.91-1.06, suggesting that treatment had no significant effect on bioavailability and the formulations would meet regulatory criteria for bioequivalence. CONCLUSIONS: The adjustment of the area under the concentration curve adjusted by terminal-phase rate constant should be considered for situational application in bioequivalence assessment when there are multiple clearance subpopulations in a parallel-group study.

Systemic Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Preliminary Efficacy of Topical AhR Agonist Tapinarof: Results of a Phase 1 Study.

Tapinarof cream is a novel topical nonsteroidal agent that represents a unique class of anti-inflammatory molecules targeting the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Study 201851 was an open-label, 2-cohort sequential study that assessed the systemic pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of tapinarof in adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. A total of 11 participants were enrolled: 5 received 2% cream, and 6 received 1% cream. Tapinarof was systemically absorbed, and measurable amounts were detected in both cohorts. Generally, plasma exposure was greater with the 2% cream and decreased from day 1 to day 21. Median Tmax ranged from 1 to 4 hours. Preliminary efficacy results were similar between the 1% and 2% concentrations, with the 1% cream showing better tolerability based on 3 subjects in the 2% cohort who discontinued treatment because of systemic AEs. The efficacy and safety of 1% tapinarof support results of previous positive studies that used a different formulation. However, conclusions in the present study are limited because of the open-label design and small number of participants. The 1% cream was selected as the concentration for use in future studies because of its lower AE incidence and efficacy comparable to the 2% cream.

Safety and efficacy of ozanezumab in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Neurite outgrowth inhibitor A (Nogo-A) is thought to have a role in the pathophysiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). A monoclonal antibody against Nogo-A showed a positive effect in the SOD1G93A mouse model of ALS, and a humanised form of this antibody (ozanezumab) was well tolerated in a first-in-human trial. Therefore, we aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of ozanezumab in patients with ALS. METHODS: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial was done in 34 centres in 11 countries. Patients aged 18-80 years with a diagnosis of familial or sporadic ALS were randomly assigned (1:1), centrally according to a computer-generated allocation schedule, to receive ozanezumab (15 mg/kg) or placebo as intravenous infusions over 1 h every 2 weeks for 46 weeks, followed by assessments at week 48 and week 60. Patients and study personnel were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was a joint-rank analysis of function (ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised) and overall survival, analysed at 48 weeks in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01753076, and with GSK-ClinicalStudyRegister.com, NOG112264, and is completed. FINDINGS: Between Dec 20, 2012, and Nov 1, 2013, we recruited 307 patients, of whom 303 were randomly assigned to receive placebo (n=151) or ozanezumab (n=152). The adjusted mean of the joint-rank score was -14·9 (SE 13·5) for the ozanezumab group and 15·0 (13·6) for the placebo group, with a least squares mean difference of -30·0 (95% CI -67·9 to 7·9; p=0·12). Overall, reported adverse events, serious adverse events, and adverse events leading to permanent discontinuation of study drug or withdrawal from study were similar between the treatment groups, except for dyspepsia (ten [7%] in the ozanezumab group vs four [3%] in the placebo group), depression (11 [7%] vs five [3%]), and diarrhoea (25 [16%] vs 12 [8%]). Respiratory failure was the most common serious adverse event (12 [8%] vs seven [5%]). At week 60, the number of deaths was higher in the ozanezumab group (20 [13%]) than in the placebo group (16 [11%]), mainly as a result of respiratory failure (ten [7%] vs five [3%]). Two deaths were considered related to the study drug (bladder transitional cell carcinoma in the ozanezumab group and cerebrovascular accident in the placebo group). INTERPRETATION: Ozanezumab did not show efficacy compared with placebo in patients with ALS. Therefore, Nogo-A does not seem to be an effective therapeutic target in ALS. FUNDING: GlaxoSmithKline.

The relative bioavailability of 2 prototype fixed-dose combination formulations for amlodipine and rosuvastatin in healthy white and Chinese subjects.

A fixed-dose combination (FDC) may improve patient compliance and clinical outcomes in the management of cardiovascular risk in hypertensive and dyslipidemic patients. The study (NCT02075619) evaluated the bioavailability of 2 prototype FDC tablet formulations (FDC1 and FDC2) of amlodipine/rosuvastatin (10 mg/20 mg) compared with coadministered reference tablets. It was a randomized, single-dose, 3-way crossover pilot study in healthy white (n = 12) and Chinese (n = 12) adults. Three treatments (FDC1, FDC2, and reference) were administered after fasting with a washout period of 12-17 days. The pharmacokinetics of amlodipine and rosuvastatin were studied for all subjects (pooled) and by ethnicity. Safety and tolerability were also evaluated. Both FDCs met the bioequivalence criteria (90% confidence intervals falling within the range of 0.80-1.25) for AUC0-t and Cmax for amlodipine and rosuvastatin. Intrasubject variability (AUC0-t and Cmax ) was in the region of 23%-25% for rosuvastatin and 7%-10% for amlodipine. The FDC formulations demonstrated similar bioavailability to coadministered commercially available amlodipine and rosuvastatin. All treatments were generally well tolerated.

A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of the analgesic efficacy and safety of the p38 MAP kinase inhibitor, losmapimod, in patients with neuropathic pain from lumbosacral radiculopathy.

OBJECTIVES: Preclinical studies have demonstrated involvement of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways in the development of persistent pain after peripheral nerve injury. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study was undertaken to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of losmapimod (GW856553), a novel p38α/ß inhibitor, in patients with chronic neuropathic pain due to lumbosacral radiculopathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 144 patients with at least moderate baseline pain intensity (average daily score of ≥4 on an 11-point pain intensity numeric rating scale) were randomized to receive losmapimod, 7.5 mg bid orally or placebo. All patients underwent a blinded placebo run-in period for 7 days before receiving losmapimod/placebo for 28 days. Efficacy and safety evaluations were undertaken weekly. RESULTS: The adjusted mean treatment difference for the change from baseline to week 4 in numeric rating scale was -0.36 U (95% confidence interval, -0.84, 0.13; P=0.149) in favor of losmapimod over placebo; this was not considered clinically meaningful. Statistically significant differences in favor of losmapimod were observed, however, for several secondary endpoints of emotional, physical, and social functioning: Oswestry Disability Index; Profile of Mood States total score; Short-Form 36 Health Survey physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, role emotional, social functioning, and vitality domains; and Short-Form 36 physical, and mental components. There were no unexpected findings related to safety or tolerability following treatment with losmapimod. DISCUSSION: Losmapimod could not be differentiated from placebo in terms of analgesia. The lack of response could reflect insufficient losmapimod levels in the spinal cord or differences between lumbosacral radiculopathy and animal models of neuropathic pain.

Ozanezumab dose selection for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis by pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of immunohistochemistry data from patient muscle biopsies.

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is a rare and fatal neurodegenerative disease with a high unmet medical need. In this context, a potential therapy should be brought to patients in the most expeditious way and early exploration of pharmacology is highly beneficial. Ozanezumab, a humanised IgG monoclonal antibody against Nogo-A protein which is an inhibitor of neurite outgrowth, is currently under development for the treatment of ALS and has been recently assessed in 76 patients in a first-in-human study. Inadequate target engagement has been recognised as a major contributing reason for drug trial failures. In this work, we describe the development of a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) model using immunohistochemistry (IHC) data of co-localization of ozanezumab with Nogo-A in skeletal muscle as a surrogate measure of target engagement. The rich plasma concentration data and the sparse IHC data after one or two intravenous doses of ozanezumab were modelled simultaneously using a non-linear mixed-effect approach. The final PKPD model was a two-compartment PK model combined with an effect compartment PD model that accounted for the delay in ozanezumab concentrations to reach the site of action which is skeletal muscle. Diagnostic plots showed a satisfactory fit of both PK and IHC data. The model was used as a simulation tool to design a dose regimen for sustained drug-target co-localization in a phase II study.

Effect of hemodialysis on pharmacokinetics of ezogabine/retigabine and its N-acetyl metabolite in patients with end stage renal disease.

Ezogabine (EZG)/retigabine (RTG) and its metabolites are mainly eliminated renally. This Phase I study assessed the effect of hemodialysis on the pharmacokinetics of EZG/RTG and its N-acetyl metabolite (NAMR) in patients with end-stage renal disease; tolerability of EZG/RTG was a secondary endpoint. Patients (N=8) received EZG/RTG 100 mg orally 4 hours before (Period 1) or following (Period 2) dialysis. Blood (both periods) and dialysate (Period 1) samples were taken up to 68 hours post dose. Tolerability was assessed throughout both periods. The area under the concentration- time curve (0-68 hours) for EZG/RTG was 33% lower (geometric mean ratio [90% confidence interval]: 0.67 [0.61, 0.73]) on dialysis versus off dialysis and 43% lower for NAMR (0.57 [0.53, 0.62]). Median (range) reductions in plasma concentrations from dialysis start to end were 52% (17-59%) for EZG/RTG and 51% (27-72%) for NAMR. EZG/RTG 100 mg was generally tolerated.

Safety, pharmacokinetic, and functional effects of the nogo-a monoclonal antibody in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a randomized, first-in-human clinical trial.

UNLABELLED: The neurite outgrowth inhibitor, Nogo-A, has been shown to be overexpressed in skeletal muscle in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS); it is both a potential biomarker and therapeutic target. We performed a double-blind, two-part, dose-escalation study, in subjects with ALS, assessing safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and functional effects of ozanezumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against Nogo-A. In Part 1, 40 subjects were randomized (3∶1) to receive single dose intravenous ozanezumab (0.01, 0.1, 1, 5, or 15 mg/kg) or placebo. In Part 2, 36 subjects were randomized (3∶1) to receive two repeat doses of intravenous ozanezumab (0.5, 2.5, or 15 mg/kg) or placebo, approximately 4 weeks apart. The primary endpoints were safety and tolerability (adverse events [AEs], vital signs, electrocardiogram (ECG), and clinical laboratory tests). Secondary endpoints included PK, immunogenicity, functional endpoints (clinical and electrophysiological), and biomarker parameters. Overall, ozanezumab treatment (0.01-15 mg/kg) was well tolerated. The overall incidence of AEs in the repeat dose 2.5 mg/kg and 15 mg/kg ozanezumab groups was higher than in the repeat dose placebo group and repeat dose 0.5 mg/kg ozanezumab group. The majority were considered not related to study drug by the investigators. Six serious AEs were reported in three subjects receiving ozanezumab; none were considered related to study drug. No study drug-related patterns were identified for ECG, laboratory, or vital signs parameters. One subject (repeat dose 15 mg/kg ozanezumab) showed a weak, positive anti-ozanezumab-antibody result. PK results were generally consistent with monoclonal antibody treatments. No apparent treatment effects were observed for functional endpoints or muscle biomarkers. Immunohistochemical staining showed dose-dependent co-localization of ozanezumab with Nogo-A in skeletal muscle. In conclusion, single and repeat dose ozanezumab treatment was well tolerated and demonstrated co-localization at the site of action. These findings support future studies with ozanezumab in ALS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00875446 GSK-ClinicalStudyRegister.com GSK ID 111330.

Characterising the plasma-target occupancy relationship of the neurokinin antagonist GSK1144814 with PET.

GSK1144814 is a potent, insurmountable antagonist at human NK1 and NK3 receptors. Understanding the relationship between plasma pharmacokinetics and receptor occupancy in the human brain, was crucial for dose selection in future clinical studies. GSK1144814 occupancy data were acquired in parallel with the first-time-in-human safety and tolerability study. [¹¹C]GR-205171 a selective NK1 receptor PET ligand was used to estimate NK1 occupancy at several time-points following single dose administration of GSK1144814. The time-plasma concentration-occupancy relationship post-single dose administration was assessed, and used to predict the plasma concentration-occupancy relationship following repeat dose administration. Repeat dose predictions were tested in a subsequent cohort of subjects examined following approximately 7 and 14 days dosing with GSK1144814. GSK1144814 was shown to demonstrate a dose-dependent occupancy of the NK1 receptor with an estimated in vivo EC50~0.9 ng/mL in the human brain. A direct relationship was seen between the GSK1144814 plasma concentration and its occupancy of the brain NK1 receptor, indicating that in future clinical trials the occupancy of brain receptors can be accurately inferred from the measured plasma concentration. Our data provided support for the further progression of this compound and have optimised the likely therapeutic dose range.

Pharmacokinetics and central nervous system effects of the novel dual NK1 /NK3 receptor antagonist GSK1144814 in alcohol-intoxicated volunteers.

AIMS: Antagonism of both NK1 and NK3 receptors may be an effective strategy in the pharmacotherapy of schizophrenia, drug addiction or depression. GSK1144814 is a novel selective dual NK1 /NK3 receptor antagonist. The potential influence of GSK1144814 on the effects of alcohol was investigated. METHODS: In a blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled, two period crossover study, the pharmacokinetics and central nervous system (CNS) effects of single oral doses of 200 mg GSK1144814 were evaluated in 20 healthy volunteers, using a controlled alcohol infusion paradigm to maintain stable alcohol concentrations with subsequent analysis of eye movements, adaptive tracking, body sway, visual analogue scales, Epworth sleepiness scale and the verbal visual learning test. RESULTS: Frequent adverse effects were mild somnolence, fatigue and headache. Plasma concentration of GSK1144814 in the presence of alcohol was maximal 1.5 h after dose administration. GSK1144814 did not affect alcohol pharmacokinetics. Co-administration of GSK1144814 and alcohol impaired saccadic reaction time and peak velocity, adaptive tracking, alertness, sleepiness, word recognition and recognition reaction time compared with administration of alcohol alone, but the size of the interaction was small. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of GSK1144814 in the presence of alcohol was generally well tolerated and not likely to produce clinically relevant additional impairments after alcohol consumption.

Human microdose evaluation of the novel EP1 receptor antagonist GSK269984A.

AIM: The primary objective was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the novel EP(1) antagonist GSK269984A in human volunteers after a single oral and intravenous (i.v.) microdose (100 µg). METHOD: GSK269984A was administered to two groups of healthy human volunteers as a single oral (n= 5) or i.v. (n= 5) microdose (100 µg). Blood samples were collected for up to 24 h and the parent drug concentrations were measured in separated plasma using a validated high pressure liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method following solid phase extraction. RESULTS: Following the i.v. microdose, the geometric mean values for clearance (CL), steady-state volume of distribution (V(ss) ) and terminal elimination half-life (t(1/2) ) of GSK269984A were 9.8 l h(-1) , 62.8 l and 8.2 h. C(max) and AUC(0,∞) were 3.2 ng ml(-1) and 10.2 ng ml(-1) h, respectively; the corresponding oral parameters were 1.8 ng ml(-1) and 9.8 ng ml(-1) h, respectively. Absolute oral bioavailability was estimated to be 95%. These data were inconsistent with predictions of human PK based on allometric scaling of in vivo PK data from three pre-clinical species (rat, dog and monkey). CONCLUSION: For drug development programmes characterized by inconsistencies between pre-clinical in vitro metabolic and in vivo PK data, and where uncertainty exists with respect to allometric predictions of the human PK profile, these data support the early application of a human microdose study to facilitate the selection of compounds for further clinical development.

Effects of lamotrigine and phenytoin on the pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin in healthy volunteers.

PURPOSE: Statins and antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are frequently coprescribed to individuals with hypercholesterolemia and new-onset seizures. Statins are metabolized by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme system. Interactions between statins and agents that undergo CYP metabolism are common. In this study, the effects of two commonly prescribed AEDs, lamotrigine and phenytoin, with different routes of metabolism (CYP3A4 versus glucuronic acid conjugation) on atorvastatin pharmacokinetics were evaluated. METHODS: Healthy volunteers (n=119) received atorvastatin 40 mg/day for 7 days followed by addition of lamotrigine (target 300 mg/day) or phenytoin (target ~4 mg/kg per day) in this open-label, single-sequence, two-cohort study. Serial pharmacokinetic sampling of atorvastatin was conducted on day 7 of atorvastatin dosing and day 70 of lamotrigine + atorvastatin dosing or day 28 of phenytoin + atorvastatin dosing. Main outcome measures were steady-state area under the curve over the 24-h dosing interval (AUC((0-τ)) ) and maximum concentration (C(max) ) of atorvastatin and its metabolites, 2OH-atorvastatin and 4OH-atorvastatin, in the presence of lamotrigine or phenytoin. KEY FINDINGS: When atorvastatin was administered with lamotrigine compared with when atorvastatin was administered alone, atorvastatin AUC((0-τ)) was within bounds indicating no interaction, whereas C(max) was slightly higher(14%); AUC((0-τ)) and C(max) were 3% and 20% higher, respectively, for 2OH-atorvastatin and 25% and 21% higher, respectively, for 4OH-atorvastatin.When atorvastatin was administered with phenytoin compared with when atorvastatin was administered alone, reductions in AUC((0-τ)) and C(max) were observed for atorvastatin (54% and 24%, respectively), 2OH-atorvastatin (53% and 22%, respectively), and 4OH-atorvastatin (44% and 52%, respectively). SIGNIFICANCE: Pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin were not significantly affected by coadministration with lamotrigine. Phenytoin significantly reduced atorvastatin bioavailability. Consistent with the published literature, these data are consonant with the possibility that atorvastatin does not require dose adjustment when coadministered with lamotrigine at doses to 300 mg/day, whereas atorvastatin coadministered with phenytoin may require atorvastatin dose adjustment to maintain atorvastatin exposure.

A randomized, controlled study to investigate the analgesic efficacy of single doses of the cannabinoid receptor-2 agonist GW842166, ibuprofen or placebo in patients with acute pain following third molar tooth extraction.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the postoperative analgesic efficacy of GW842166, a noncannabinoid CB2 agonist, in patients undergoing third molar tooth extraction. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study compared the analgesic efficacy of single doses of GW842166 (100 or 800 mg) or ibuprofen with placebo in patients undergoing extraction of at least 1 fully or partially impacted third molar tooth. Eligible participants were dosed preoperatively within 1 hour of surgery. Participants allocated to active comparator received a second dose of ibuprofen (400 mg), 4 hours after the first 800 mg dose. Participants in the GW842166 and placebo groups received placebo at 4 hours. Procedures for the assessment of efficacy included a visual analog scale and verbal rating scale for scoring pain up to 10 hours postsurgery, duration of analgesia, patient global evaluation, proportion of patients requiring rescue medication, and elapsed time to rescue analgesia. Analysis of covariance was used to compare efficacy variables. Patient global evaluation was analyzed using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and time to data was analyzed using the log-rank test. RESULTS: Ibuprofen was significantly more effective than placebo across all endpoints. Trends for an improvement in pain scores for GW842166 800 mg failed to be of either clinical or statistical significance. GW842166 100 mg showed little separation from placebo. There was no evidence for any beneficial adjunctive effect after coadministration of rescue analgesia with GW842166. All treatments were well tolerated. DISCUSSION: In comparison to ibuprofen, single doses of GW842166 (100 and 800 mg) failed to demonstrate clinically meaningful analgesia in the setting of acute dental pain.

The effects of the TRPV1 antagonist SB-705498 on TRPV1 receptor-mediated activity and inflammatory hyperalgesia in humans.

TRPV1 is a cation channel activated by a range of noxious stimuli and highly expressed in nociceptive fibres. TRPV1 receptors are involved in pain and sensitisation associated with tissue injury and inflammation; hence, TRPV1 antagonists are potentially useful for the treatment of such pain states. SB-705498 is a potent, selective and orally bioavailable TRPV1 antagonist with demonstrated efficacy in a number of preclinical pain models. In this first-time-into-human study, we have investigated the pharmacodynamic and antihyperalgesic activity of SB-705498. The compound was safe and well tolerated at single oral doses up to 400mg. In a cohort of 19 healthy volunteers, we used a randomised placebo-controlled single-blind cross-over design to assess the effects of SB-705498 (400mg) on heat-evoked pain and skin sensitisation induced by capsaicin or UVB irradiation. Compared with placebo, SB-705498 reduced the area of capsaicin-evoked flare (P=0.0047). The heat pain threshold on non-sensitised skin was elevated following SB-705498 (estimated difference from placebo [95% confidence intervals]: 1.3 degrees C [0.07,2.53], P=0.019). Following capsaicin sensitisation, the heat pain threshold and tolerance were similar between SB-705498 and placebo. However, SB-705498 increased heat pain tolerance at the site of UVB-evoked inflammation (estimated difference from placebo: 0.93 degrees C [0.25,1.6], P=0.0054). The magnitude of the pharmacodynamic effects of SB-705498 appeared to be related to plasma concentration. These results indicate that SB-705498, at a clinically safe and well-tolerated dose, has target-specific pharmacodynamic activity in humans. These data provide the first clinical evidence that a TRPV1 antagonist may alleviate pain and hyperalgesia associated with inflammation and tissue injury.

Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of lamotrigine and olanzapine coadministered to healthy subjects.

AIM: To assess the pharmacokinetic effect and tolerability of lamotrigine 200 mg day(-1) and olanzapine 15 mg day(-1) coadministration in healthy male volunteers. METHODS: Subjects were randomized to receive either lamotrigine titrated on days 1-42 with olanzapine added on days 43-56 (LTG + OLZ group; N = 16), lamotrigine titration with placebo added on days 43-56 (LTG group; N = 12), or placebo on days 1-42 with olanzapine added on days 43-56 (OLZ group; N = 16). Steady state (0-24 h) pharmacokinetic profiles were determined on day 56 in each group. RESULTS: The average (90% confidence interval) ratios of lamotrigine area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h and maximum observed concentration for the comparison of LTG + OLZ:LTG were 0.76 (0.65, 0.90) and 0.80 (0.71, 0.90), respectively. Olanzapine pharmacokinetics were essentially unaffected by lamotrigine. The most frequently reported adverse events (AEs) during combination therapy were fatigue, dizziness and mild transaminase elevations. These AEs occurred at similar frequencies in the LTG + OLZ and OLZ cohorts, while being less frequent or absent in the LTG group. CONCLUSIONS: Lamotrigine and olanzapine coadministration in patients who may benefit from the combination was supported by this study. Lamotrigine dosing schedules are recommended to remain unchanged when combined with olanzapine therapy. However, the possibility exists that the lamotrigine dose for some patients may need adjustment to optimize treatment when olanzapine is added to or withdrawn from a regimen including lamotrigine.

Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between oxcarbazepine and lamotrigine.

Epilepsy and bipolar disorder are commonly treated by combination drug therapy, such as lamotrigine and oxcarbazepine. To ensure the safety of this combination, information on pharmacokinetics and tolerability must be available. The objective of study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of coadministered lamotrigine and oxcarbazepine in healthy subjects. This randomized, single-blind, parallel-group study comprised three cohorts: lamotrigine (200 mg daily) plus oxcarbazepine (600 mg twice daily), lamotrigine (200 mg daily) plus placebo, and oxcarbazepine (600 mg twice daily) plus placebo. Serial blood samples were collected at steady state to determine serum concentrations of lamotrigine and plasma concentrations of oxcarbazepine and its active metabolite 10-monohydroxy metabolite (MHD). Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by noncompartmental methods. Tolerability was monitored through adverse event reports, clinical laboratory results, vital signs, and electrocardiograms. A total of 47 male volunteers received study drugs. At steady state, lamotrigine AUC((0-24)) and C(max) were not significantly affected by oxcarbazepine co-therapy, nor were MHD AUC((0-12)) and C(max) significantly affected by lamotrigine co-therapy. The most common adverse events, headache, dizziness, nausea, and somnolence, occurred more frequently during lamotrigine and oxcarbazepine combination therapy than during the monotherapy. No significant changes in clinical laboratory parameters, vital signs, or electrocardiograms were reported. In conclusion, the combination of lamotrigine and oxcarbazepine does not require dose adjustments based on pharmacokinetic data. However, it is important to recognize that the combination therapy was associated with more frequent adverse events.

Pharmacokinetic profile of a new form of sumatriptan tablets in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: Rapid delivery of migraine-specific medication to its site(s) of action is thought to be crucial in preventing or minimizing sensitization of central pain pathways and thereby in optimizing pain-free outcomes in patients with migraine. Sumatriptan has been developed as a new tablet formulation to enhance the rate of systemic drug delivery by improving tablet disintegration and drug dispersion relative to those of conventional tablets. These enhanced formulation characteristics may be beneficial during occurrences of the gastric stasis that can accompany migraine. METHODS: This randomized, open-label, 4-way crossover study (n = 32) was conducted to determine whether the new formulation of sumatriptan 50 and 100 mg is bioequivalent to sumatriptan conventional tablets and to compare the pharmacokinetic profiles of the new formulation and the conventional tablet during the early (0-2 h) postdose interval in healthy volunteers. Pharmacokinetics during the early post-dose interval are important in determining a drug's onset of action, an important parameter to patients with migraine. RESULTS: The results confirm that the new formulation of sumatriptan and sumatriptan conventional tablets are bioequivalent as demonstrated by the finding that the 90% confidence intervals for the sumatriptan area under the concentration time curve to infinity and to the last evaluable time point (AUC(0- infinity ) and AUC(0-t), respectively) and maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) fell within the predetermined bounds defining bioequivalence (0.80-1.25) for both doses. Pharmacokinetic parameters measured early (0-2 h) after dosing reveal slightly faster absorption, on average, of the new sumatriptan formulation than sumatriptan conventional tablets although high intersubject variability was observed. For the new sumatriptan formulation, AUC(0-2) (AUC up to 2 h post dose) was, on average, 1% greater (50 mg) and 8% greater (100 mg) and maximal sumatriptan levels were attained, on average, 10 min earlier (50 mg) and 15 min earlier (100 mg) compared with the conventional tablet. Other measures including AUC(0-0.5) (AUC to 30 min post-dose), times to achieve sumatriptan concentrations of 5 and 10 ng/mL, and mean percentage C(max) 15, 20 and 30 min post-dose demonstrate an observable improvement in rate of drug absorption for the new form of sumatriptan compared with conventional tablets. CONCLUSION: The new form of sumatriptan is bioequivalent to sumatriptan conventional tablets and is absorbed more quickly than conventional tablets.