RESUMO
Introduction Infertility affects an estimated 186 million individuals globally and is associated with numerous mental health issues. Trace elements are essential for reproductive health, yet the role of nickel in female fertility is not well understood. Previous research has shown conflicting evidence regarding nickel's impact on ovarian function and its potential to disrupt reproductive processes. Methods We utilized data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) focusing on a cohort of 7,839 women, with an emphasis on 1,404 women aged 18 to 35. Logistic regression was employed to investigate the relationship between urinary nickel levels and fertility status, controlling for age, BMI, and race/ethnicity. Results The fertility analysis included 880 fertile and 106 infertile women, identifying age as a significant predictor of fertility status. Nickel exposure did not demonstrate a statistically significant association with fertility. The racial distribution within the groups showed a higher proportion of non-Hispanic White women in the fertile category and Mexican American women in the infertile group, although race was not a significant predictor in the regression model. Conclusions We found no significant relationship between nickel exposure and fertility status when adjusted for race, BMI, and age. Age was the only significant factor associated with fertility. These results highlight the complexity of the interplay between environmental exposures and reproductive health, suggesting that further research is necessary to elucidate the role of nickel and other trace elements in fertility.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare active with passive voiding trials on the rate of passing a trial of void and discharge rates with catheter in women who have undergone midurethral sling for treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched through February 24, 2023. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Our population included women undergoing midurethral sling, with or without anterior or posterior repair, for treatment of SUI. Our two primary outcomes were rate of passing voiding trial and rate of discharge with a catheter. Our secondary outcome was the rate of delayed postoperative urinary retention, when a patient initially passes a trial of void but then subsequently presents in retention. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Abstracts were doubly screened; full-text articles were doubly screened; and accepted articles were doubly extracted. In single-arm studies evaluating either passive or active voiding trial, random-effects meta-analyses of pooled proportions were used to assess outcomes. Of 3,033 abstracts screened, 238 full-text articles were assessed, and 26 met inclusion criteria. Ten studies including 1,370 patients reported active trial of void. Sixteen studies including 3,643 patients reported passive trial of void. We included five randomized controlled trials, five comparative retrospective studies, five prospective single group studies, and 11 retrospective single group studies. Five of the studies included patients with a concomitant anterior or posterior colporrhaphy. On proportional meta-analysis, the active trial of void group was less likely to pass the voiding trial (81.0%, 95% CI, 0.76-0.87% vs 89.0%, 95% CI, 0.84-0.9%3, P =.029) with high heterogeneity ( I2 =93.0%). Furthermore, there were more discharges with catheter in active trial of void compared with passive trial of void (19.0%, 95% CI, 0.14-0.24% vs 7.0%, 95% CI, 0.05-0.10%, P <.01). The rates of delayed postoperative urinary retention were low and not different between groups (0.6%, 95% CI, 0.00-0.02% vs 0.2%, 95% CI, 0.00-0.01%, P =.366) with low heterogeneity ( I2 =0%). Sling revisions were statistically lower in the active trial of void group (0.5%, 95% CI, 0.00-0.01% vs 1.5%, 95% CI, 0.01-0.02%, P =.035) with low heterogeneity ( I2 =10.4%). CONCLUSION: Passive trial of void had higher passing rates and lower discharge with catheter than active trial of void. Rates of most complications were low and similar between both groups, although passive trial of void had higher sling revisions. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42022341318.
