Preclinical Characterization of Relatlimab, a Human LAG-3-Blocking Antibody, Alone or in Combination with Nivolumab.

Novel therapeutic approaches combining immune-checkpoint inhibitors are needed to improve clinical outcomes for patients with cancer. Lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3) is an immune-checkpoint molecule that inhibits T-cell activity and antitumor immune responses, acting through an independent mechanism from that of programmed death-1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4). Here, we describe the development and preclinical characterization of relatlimab, a human antibody that binds to human LAG-3 with high affinity and specificity to block the interaction of LAG-3 with the ligands MHC II and fibrinogen-like protein-1, and to reverse LAG-3-mediated inhibition of T-cell function in vitro. Consistent with previous reports, in mouse models, the combined blockade of LAG-3 and PD-1 with surrogate antibodies resulted in enhanced antitumor activity greater than the individual blockade of either receptor. In toxicity studies in cynomolgus monkeys, relatlimab was generally well tolerated when combined with nivolumab. These results are consistent with findings from the RELATIVITY-047 phase II/III trial showing that relatlimab combined with nivolumab is a well-tolerated regimen that demonstrates superior progression-free survival compared with nivolumab monotherapy in patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma.

Decreased immune response in monkeys administered a human T-effector cell agonist (OX40) antibody.

The OX40 receptor plays a crucial co-stimulatory role in T effector cell survival, expansion, cytokine production, and cytotoxicity to tumor cells; therefore, OX40 agonists are being evaluated as anti-cancer immunotherapies, especially in combination with checkpoint inhibitors. To support clinical development of BMS-986178 (an OX40 agonist antibody), two repeat-dose toxicity studies were conducted in cynomolgus monkeys. In the first study, BMS-986178 was administered intravenously (IV) once weekly for one month at doses from 30 to 120 mg/kg. BMS-986178 was well tolerated; surprisingly, immune function was suppressed rather than increased based on pharmacodynamic (PD) and flow cytometry readouts (e.g. T-cell dependent antibody response [TDAR]). To determine whether immune suppression was due to a bi-phasic response, a follow-up study was conducted at lower doses (1 and 10 mg/kg). Although receptor engagement was confirmed, immune function was still suppressed at both doses. In addition, treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) at 1 mg/kg resulted in hypersensitivity reactions and reduced BMS-986178 exposure after repeated dosing, which precluded a full PD assessment at this dose. In conclusion, BMS-986178 was clinically well-tolerated by monkeys at weekly IV doses from 10 to 120 mg/kg (AUC[0-168] ≤ 712,000 µg●h/mL). However, despite target engagement, PD assays and other immune endpoints demonstrated immune suppression, not stimulation. Due to the inverted immune response at higher doses and the onset of ADAs, additional repeat-dose toxicity studies of BMS-986178 in monkeys (that would typically be required to support Phase 3 clinical trials and registration) would not add value for human safety assessment.

In vitro and in vivo evaluation of dasatinib and imatinib on physiological parameters of pulmonary arterial hypertension.

PURPOSE: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) results from occlusion or vasoconstriction of pulmonary vessels, leading to progressive right ventricular failure. Dasatinib, a BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved for the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia, has been associated with PAH. In contrast, the BCR-ABL1 TKI imatinib has demonstrated anti-vasoproliferative properties and has been investigated as a potential treatment for PAH. Here we describe studies evaluating the effects of dasatinib and imatinib on cardiovascular and pulmonary functions to understand the reported differential consequences of the two TKIs in a clinical setting. METHODS: The direct effects of dasatinib and imatinib were explored in vivo to investigate possible mechanisms of dasatinib-induced PAH. In addition, effects of dasatinib and imatinib on PAH-related mediators were evaluated in vitro. RESULTS: In rats, both TKIs increased plasma nitric oxide (NO), did not induce PAH-related structural or molecular changes in PA or lungs, and did not alter hemodynamic lung function compared with positive controls. Similarly, in the pulmonary artery endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells co-culture model, imatinib and dasatinib increased NO and decreased endothelin-1 protein and mRNA. CONCLUSIONS: The results of these studies indicated that dasatinib did not induce physiological changes or molecular signatures consistent with PAH when compared to positive controls. Instead, dasatinib induced changes consistent with imatinib. Both dasatinib and imatinib induced biochemical and structural changes consistent with a protective effect for PAH. These data suggest that other factors of unclear etiology contributed to the development of PAH in patients treated with dasatinib.