Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Radiol Med ; 109(3): 260-7, 2005 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês, Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15775895

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate the sensitivity of the mammographic screening programme and the causes of diagnostic fault in cases surfacing as interval cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Interval cancers (CI) were identified by linkage of the screening database for the years 2000-2002 to the database of hospital discharge records (HDR) for breast cancer during 2000-2002. Linkage between screening attenders during 2000-2001 and HDR (biennial follow-up for year 2000, one year follow-up for year 2001) was used to calculate the proportional rate of observed/expected IC. The observed/ expected rate was compared with international standards and literature data. Screening mammograms followed by IC, randomly admixtured with negative controls, underwent blind review by an independent radiologist, using the recommended classification criteria to evaluate causes of error (occult, minimal signs, screening error). RESULTS: The analysis of HDR during 2000-2002 allowed us to identify 31 out of 89 expected IC. Proportional observed/expected IC rate in the first or second year of screening interval was 26 or 67%, respectively. Screening mammograms for radiological review were available in 38 of 61 total IC: 20 cases (52.6%) were classified as occult, whereas minimal signs or screening errors were 2 (5.2%) or 16 (42.1%), respectively. Diagnostic suspicion had been reported at screening in 7 of 16 cases classified as screening error, but were not diagnosed at the subsequent diagnostic assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Proportional IC rate was higher than reported in the literature or currently recommended (<30% in the 1st, <50% in the 2nd year). The analysis of error causes shows an excess of screening errors with respect to current recommendations (<20% of IC should be classified as screening error at review), but also an excess of IC suspected at screening but misdiagnosed at assessment (7/38=18.4 %). Overall the analysis revealed a reduced sensitivity of the screening programme, as often observed in service screening as compared to excellence centres, and suggests proper action to improve diagnostic accuracy. Analysis and critical review of IC is an early indicator of screening efficacy which is not currently used in Italian screening programmes. Using HDR for this purpose may have limited drawbacks, but gives the advantage of earlier identification of IC as compared to cancer registries and is the most reliable source of information in areas lacking a cancer registry. The present study methodology might be currently applied in screening programmes.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Erros de Diagnóstico , Mamografia/normas , Programas de Rastreamento/normas , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Bases de Dados como Assunto , Erros de Diagnóstico/estatística & dados numéricos , Reações Falso-Negativas , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Mamografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vigilância da População , Sistema de Registros , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
2.
Ig Sanita Pubbl ; 58(1-2): 5-15, 2002.
Artigo em Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12904821

RESUMO

This study examines the early data of a breast cancer screening campaign (Progetto Donna) set up by the Milan Health Unit 1 in 1999. The authors have focused on some basic organizational aspects of such campaign and the patients' high response to the project showed a good efficiency of this initiative, aimed at informing and awakening people. The high rate of suspiciously positive results checked in several Hospitals, led to a careful assessment of the quality and the standards of radiology services.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...