Personalized approach to management of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.

Cervical cancer ranks 4th place among malignant neoplasms in the world in 2020. HPV is the main reason for cervical cancer. The «Gold standard¼ of cervical screening is an «HPV-testing + PAP-test¼ co-test. The immune system can clear HPV infection. Pathway of cervical cancer development is investigated, but immunity recognition of HPV is still incompletely studied. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are membrane receptors on the cell membranes and membrane organelles. TLRs ligands could be bacterial, viral pathogens or toxins. When a ligand binds to TLRs, cytokines production is triggered. Chronic inflammation process down-regulates TLRs expression. This helps develop HPV infection. The current paper demonstrates how photodynamic therapy induces TLRs gene expression. A personal approach to estimating photodynamic therapy by an innate immune response in a clinical case is described. A 43-year-old woman with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and 33rd type of HPV infection turned into a private clinic. The patient had complex check-ups before we defined a treatment strategy. Photodynamic therapy was performed as a non-invasive fertility-preserving treatment. We tested TLRs 2/3/4/8 gene expression before and after photodynamic therapy in 2 h, one week and 6-month periods. PDT induces TLRs gene expression in a 6-month period. HPV elimination was achieved. The patient has no atypical cells in liquid-based cytology investigation after PDT.

Quality of colonoscopy in an emerging country: A prospective, multicentre study in Russia.

BACKGROUND: The quality of colonoscopy has been related to a higher risk of interval cancer, and this issue has been addressed extensively in developed countries. The aim of our study was to explore the main quality indicators of colonoscopy in a large emerging country. METHODS: Consecutive patients referred for colonoscopy in 14 centres were prospectively included between July and October 2014. Before colonoscopy, several clinical and demographic variables were collected. Main quality indicators (i.e. caecal intubation rate, (advanced) adenoma detection rate, rate of adequate cleansing and sedation) were collected. Data were analysed at per patient and per centre level (only for those with at least 100 cases). Factors associated with caecal intubation rate and adenoma detection rate were explored at multivariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 8829 (males: 35%; mean age: 57 + 14 years) patients were included, with 11 centres enrolling at least 100 patients. Screening (including non-alarm symptoms) accounted for 59% (5188/8829) of the indications. Sedation and split preparation were used in 26% (2294/8829) and 25% (2187/8829) of the patients. Caecal intubation was achieved in 7616 patients (86%), and it was ≥85% in 8/11 (73%) centres. Adenoma detection rate was 18% (1550/8829), and it was higher than 20% in five (45%) centres, whilst it was lower than 10% in four (33%) centres. At multivariate analysis, age (OR: 1.020, 95% CI: 1.015-1.024), male sex (OR: 1.2, 95% CI: 1.1-1.3), alarm symptoms (OR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.7-2), split preparation (OR: 1.4, 95% CI: 1.2-1.6), caecal intubation rate (OR: 1.6, 95% CI: 1.3-1.9) and withdrawal time measurement (OR: 1.2, 95% CI: 1.6-2.1) were predictors of a higher adenoma detection rate, while adequate preparation (OR: 3.4: 95% CI: 2.9-3.9) and sedation (OR: 1.3; 95% CI: 1.1-1.6) were the strongest predictors of caecal intubation rate. CONCLUSIONS: According to our study, there is a substantial intercentre variability in the main quality indicators. Overall, the caecal intubation rate appears to be acceptable in most centres, whilst the overall level of adenoma detection appears low, with less than half of the centres being higher than 20%. Educational and quality assurance programs, including higher rates of sedation and split regimen of preparation, may be necessary to increase the key quality indicators.