Factors Associated With Symptom Recurrence After Surgical Treatment of Interdigital Neuroma: A Retrospective Chart Review of 127 Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Interdigital neuroma (IN) is a benign enlargement of tissue surrounding the common plantar digital nerve. Although the standard surgical treatment of IN remains debated, recent attention has been given to less-invasive surgical decompression by intermetatarsal ligament (IML) release with neurolysis. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of IML release with neurolysis with standard interdigital neurectomy. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on 350 consecutive patients who underwent surgical treatment of IN. Patients who satisfied our inclusion and exclusion criteria were categorized into two groups based on the surgical treatment received: IML release with neurolysis or interdigital neurectomy. Outcomes assessed included recurrence of symptoms, rate of revision surgery, and postoperative wound infection. RESULTS: Of the total sample, 40 patients (31.5%) reported recurrence of symptoms within a 12-month follow-up period. Patients who underwent IML release with neurolysis had a markedly higher recurrence rate (47.50%) than those who underwent interdigital neurectomy (24.14%). The rate of postoperative wound infection was similar between the two groups. Binary logistic regression revealed that only the surgical technique was associated with the recurrence of symptoms. Despite the higher rate of symptom recurrence in the IML release with neurolysis patient group, the rate of revision surgery in those with symptom recurrence was similar between both groups. DISCUSSION: IML release with neurolysis seems to have a higher risk of symptom recurrence than interdigital neurectomy. No patient-specific factors were identified as being associated with symptom recurrence. However, patients who did experience symptom recurrence in either surgical group had similar rates of revision surgery, which may be due to mild recurrent symptom severity in the IML release group that does not warrant revision surgery in these patients. Future studies should consider objective symptom recurrence severity and patient satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Clinical outcome results of total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis: a pilot randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Ankle arthrodesis (AA) and replacement (TAA) are widely accepted options in managing end-stage ankle arthritis (ESAA). We hypothesize that clinical outcomes would be similar for both interventions. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter randomized controlled trial that collected data on patient demographics, complication rates, Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores. We evaluated pre and postoperative scores within and between cohorts. RESULTS: The thirty-nine ankles enrolled had a mean follow-up of 5.1 ± 2.8 years. Total AOS scores improved significantly in both groups; 59.4 ± 15.9 to 38 ± 20 (p-value = 0.002) for TAA and 64.6 ± 19.7 to 31.8 ± 16.5 (p-value < 0.001) for AA at last follow-up. Complication rate was higher in the AA cohort with four major complications (20%). CONCLUSION: We observed a statistically significant benefit with TAA and AA. As a pilot trial, this study is meant to inform on design and feasibility of future RCTs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Technique for Removal of Broken InterTAN Integrated Cephalomedullary Screw.

SUMMARY: Pertrochanteric femoral fractures are routinely treated with cephalomedullary nailing, with good success. In the event of nonunion, implant fatigue failure may occur. The Trigen InterTAN system (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN) features 2 integrated cephalomedullary screws for improved rotational stability of the proximal segment. The inferior compression screw prevents rotation of the larger, superior lag screw. In the event of inferior screw breakage, the retained portion will prevent the integrated lag screw from being rotated to permit extraction. We present a case of a broken nail as well as a broken integrated screw, and describe a technique for successful implant removal.

Suture Button Technique for Tibialis Anterior Tendon Transfer for the Treatment of Residual Clubfoot.

BACKGROUND: The Ponseti method has revolutionized the treatment of idiopathic clubfoot, but recurrence remains problematic. Dynamic supination is a common cause of recurrence, and the standard treatment is tibialis anterior tendon transfer using an external button. Although safe and effective, the placement of the button on the sole creates a pressure point, which can lead to skin ulceration. In our institution, a suture button has been used for the tibialis anterior tendon transfer and we report our results here. METHODS: Two senior authors' case logs were retrospectively reviewed to identify 23 patients (34 feet) for tibialis anterior tendon transfer using a suture button. Complications and additional operative procedures were assessed by reviewing operative notes, follow-up visit clinic notes, and radiographs. The mean age of the patients was 6 years 2 months (SD 40 months) and the average follow-up duration was 67.1 weeks (SD 72 weeks). RESULTS: There were 5 complications (14.7%). Recurrence occurred bilaterally in 1 patient (5.9%) but did not require reoperation. Other complications included a cast-related pressure sore (2.9%) and an infection (2.9%) requiring irrigation with debridement along with hardware removal. CONCLUSIONS: Tibialis anterior tendon transfer using a suture button was a safe procedure with theoretical advantage of providing stronger fixation and reducing the risk of skin pressure necrosis compared to the standard external button technique. We believe a suture button could allow earlier rehabilitation and may afford stronger ankle eversion. Prospective studies are required to compare the differences in functional outcomes between the procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series, therapeutic study.

Minimally invasive surgical treatment for chronic ankle instability: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the evidence-based support for the treatment for chronic ankle instability (CAI) using minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques. METHODS: A systematic comprehensive review of the literature was performed on 4 September 2015 using PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane databases and Web of Science along with the two search concepts: lateral ligament of the ankle (patients) and minimally invasive surgical procedure (intervention). Articles of clinical study on MIS for CAI were included in this review and classified into four MIS categories (arthroscopic repair, non-arthroscopic minimally invasive repair, arthroscopic reconstruction and non-arthroscopic minimally invasive reconstruction) based on the adopted surgical procedure. Included articles were reviewed and assigned a classification according to the research method quality of evidence (Level I-V evidence). Analysis of these studies was then conducted to provide a grade of recommendation for each MIS category. RESULTS: The systematic literature review generated 430 articles, and 33 articles met our inclusion criteria. The highest recommendation was Grade C (poor-quality evidence) to support the use of the arthroscopic repair, arthroscopic reconstruction and non-arthroscopic minimally invasive reconstruction. Insufficient evidence was currently available to make any recommendation (Grade I) for non-arthroscopic minimally invasive repair category. CONCLUSIONS: Despite recent increases in publications on MIS for the treatment for CAI, there was currently poor quality of evidence that was insufficient to allow a high grade of recommendation to support the use of the MIS. This paper should stimulate those surgeons performing higher quality studies in the form of prospective and preferably randomized comparative studies that will be necessary to allow better recommendations for the treatment for CAI with MIS. The present study showed thorough evidence-based recommendation for the clinical use of the MIS based on the comprehensive review of the literature. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic review, Level IV.