Exploring GVS as a display modality: signal amplitude and polarity, in various environments, impacts on posture, and with dual-tasking.

Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation (GVS) has been proposed as an alternative display modality to relay information without increasing demands on the visual or auditory sensory modalities of the wearer or in environments where those modalities cannot be used (e.g., covert night operations). We further investigated this concept with four experiments designed to test: (1) thresholds at which subjects could distinguish between different GVS current amplitudes and polarities, (2) thresholds at which different bipolar (i.e., sinusoidal waveform with current oscillating between left and right directions) current frequencies were distinguishable among room temperature, hot, cold, and windy environments, (3) effects of unipolar (i.e., sinusoidal waveform with current occurring in only the left or right direction) currents on balance performance, and (4) dual-task performance among frequency and polarity modulated GVS conditions during a concordant visual search task. Subjects reliably distinguished between current amplitudes that varied from a pedestal of ± 0.6 mA by a median of 0.03 mA (range of 0.02-0.32 mA) and between unipolar currents at a median amplitude of 0.55 mA (range of 0.32-0.83 mA). GVS frequency thresholds were robust to the environment conditions tested, with no statistical differences found. Sway and balance errors were increased with unipolar currents. GVS thresholds were not impacted by the dual-task paradigm, but the visual search scores were slightly elevated when congruently performing a polarity thresholding task. Overall findings continue to support GVS use as a display modality, but some limitations are noted, such as the use of unipolar currents under scenarios where postural control is important.

Efficacy of Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation as a Display Modality Dissociated from Self-Orientation.

OBJECTIVE: We propose and assess galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) as a novel means to provide information dissociated from self-orientation. BACKGROUND: In modern user interfaces, visual and auditory modalities dominate information transfer so much that these "processing channels" become overloaded with information. Fortunately, the brain is capable of processing separate sensory sources in parallel enabling alternative display modalities to inform operators more effectively and without increasing cognitive strain. To date, the vestibular system, normally responsible for sensing self-orientation and helping with balance, has not been considered as a display modality. METHOD: Bilateral GVS was provided at 0.6 mA for 1-second intervals with moderately high-frequency sinusoidal waveforms, designed to not elicit sensations of self-motion. We assessed subjects' ability to differentiate between two cues of different frequencies. RESULTS: We found subjects were able to reliably distinguish between cues with an average just-noticeable difference threshold of only ±12 Hz (range across subjects: 5.4-19.6 Hz) relative to a pedestal cue of 50 Hz. Further, we found the GVS sensory modality to be robust to various environments: walking, standing, sitting, passive motion, and loud background noise. Finally, the application of the GVS cues did not have significant destabilizing effects when standing or walking. CONCLUSION: These results show that GVS may be an effective alternative display modality, using varying frequency to encode information. It is robust to various operational environments and non-destabilizing. APPLICATION: A fully functional display can convey information to operators of vehicles and other machinery as well as high-performance operators like astronauts and soldiers.