Information from the Internet: attitudes of Australian oncology patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients require accurate information about their illness to make informed decisions. Many sources of information exist, although reliability is variable. Our objective was to investigate information seeking behaviour and attitudes toward health-related information from the Internet in a sample of Australian oncology patients. METHOD: During their outpatient attendance, 109 patients completed a self-administered paper-pen format questionnaire. They were required to have a recent cancer diagnosis (<6 months ago) adequate English and no cognitive impairment. RESULTS: Seventy-four per cent of questionnaires were returned. The majority of patients (78%) wanted as much information about their cancer diagnosis as possible and 90% reported receiving adequate information from their treating team. Despite this, more than half actively searched for additional information, with 77% using the Internet. Patients were trusting of information obtained from the Internet. More than half of information searchers discussed information obtained in their search with a health professional. The majority of patients did not believe that information searching adversely affected the doctor-patient relationship. CONCLUSION: Information searching is common in ambulatory Australian oncology patients, with the Internet being a frequently used resource. To ensure patients find reliable and relevant information and to minimize the risk of harm, health professionals involved in treating oncology patients should provide guidance in finding information sources and assistance in interpreting the information obtained.

Oral capecitabine as an alternative to i.v. 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy for colon cancer: safety results of a randomized, phase III trial.

BACKGROUND: Oral capecitabine achieves a superior response rate with an improved safety profile compared with bolus 5-fluorouracil-leucovorin (5-FU/LV) as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. We report here the results of a large phase III trial investigating adjuvant oral capecitabine compared with 5-FU/LV (Mayo Clinic regimen) in Dukes' C colon cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients aged 18-75 years with resected Dukes' C colon carcinoma were randomized to receive 24 weeks of treatment with either oral capecitabine 1250 mg/m(2) twice daily, days 1-14 every 21 days (n = 993), or i.v. bolus 5-FU 425 mg/m(2) with i.v. leucovorin 20 mg/m(2) on days 1-5, repeated every 28 days (n = 974). RESULTS: Patients receiving capecitabine experienced significantly (P <0.001) less diarrhea, stomatitis, nausea/vomiting, alopecia and neutropenia, but more hand-foot syndrome than those receiving 5-FU/LV. Fewer patients receiving capecitabine experienced grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia/sepsis and stomatitis (P <0.001), although more experienced grade 3 hand-foot syndrome than those treated with 5-FU/LV (P <0.001). Capecitabine demonstrates a similar, favorable safety profile in patients aged <65 years or > or = 65 years old. CONCLUSIONS: Based on its improved safety profile, capecitabine has the potential to replace 5-FU/LV as standard adjuvant treatment for patients with colon cancer. Efficacy results are expected to be available in Keywords: Adjuvant treatment, capecitabine, chemotherapy, colorectal cancer

An analysis of the outcomes of treatment of small cell lung cancer in the elderly.

BACKGROUND: Many cases of small cell lung cancer will occur in the elderly population but optimal management of the disease in this age group remains uncertain. AIMS: To evaluate treatment of small cell lung cancer in the elderly in Australia and to compare treatment received and outcomes with those of younger patients. To draw insights from these observations into the optimal management of small cell lung cancer in the elderly. METHODS: A retrospective review of treatment charts and case notes for 51 elderly patients and 102 younger patients was undertaken. RESULTS: Elderly patients had similar baseline parameters with respect to disease stage and performance status. Elderly patients were mostly treated uniformly with combination chemotherapy, but suffered more dose reductions than younger patients. Benefits of chemotherapy were seen even in patients with poor performance status. Despite the dose reductions, response rates and survival times for elderly patients were usually similar to younger patients. CONCLUSIONS: Combination chemotherapy is beneficial to elderly patients with small cell lung cancer. Optimal therapy for the elderly may be different from that for younger patients and should be defined through prospective randomised clinical trials.