Blood glucose meters and accessibility to blind and visually impaired people.

In 2007, five blood glucose meters (BGMs) were introduced with integrated speech output necessary for use by persons with vision loss. One of those five meters had fully integrated speech output, allowing a person with vision loss independence in accessing all features and functions of the meter. In comparison, 13 BGMs with integrated speech output were available in 2011. Accessibility attributes of these 11 meters were tabulated and product design features examined. All 13 meters were found to be usable by persons with vision loss to obtain a blood glucose measurement. However, only 4 of them featured the fully integrated speech output necessary for a person with vision loss to access all features and functions independently.

Are current insulin pumps accessible to blind and visually impaired people?

BACKGROUND: In 2004, Uslan and colleagues determined that insulin pumps (IPs) on the market were largely inaccessible to blind and visually impaired persons. The objective of this study is to determine if accessibility status changed in the ensuing 4 years. METHODS: Five IPs on the market in 2008 were acquired and analyzed for key accessibility traits such as speech and other audio output, tactual nature of control buttons, and the quality of visual displays. It was also determined whether or not a blind or visually impaired person could independently complete tasks such as programming the IP for insulin delivery, replacing batteries, and reading manuals and other documentation. RESULTS: It was found that IPs have not improved in accessibility since 2004. None have speech output, and with the exception of the Animas IR 2020, no significantly improved visual display characteristics were found. Documentation is still not completely accessible. CONCLUSION: Insulin pumps are relatively complex devices, with serious health consequences resulting from improper use. For IPs to be used safely and independently by blind and visually impaired patients, they must include voice output to communicate all the information presented on their display screens. Enhancing display contrast and the size of the displayed information would also improve accessibility for visually impaired users. The IPs must also come with accessible user documentation in alternate formats.

Blood glucose meters that are accessible to blind and visually impaired persons.

Blood glucose meters (BGMs) that can be used nonvisually or with a visual limitation were introduced in the mid-1990s, but it was not until 2006 and 2007 that a new set of meters with accessibility features were introduced: Prodigy, Prodigy Autocode, and Prodigy Voice (Diagnostic Devices, Charlotte, NC), and Advocate and Advocate Redi-Code (TaiDoc, Taiwan). Accessibility attributes of the newly introduced BGMs were tabulated, and product design features were examined and documented. The Prodigy Voice was found to be the only one of these new BGMs that is fully usable by blind and visually impaired persons.

Accessibility of home blood pressure monitors for blind and visually impaired people.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of hypertension comorbid with diabetes is a significant health care issue. Use of the home blood pressure monitor (HBPM) for aiding in the control of hypertension is noteworthy because of benefits that accrue from following a home measurement regimen. To be usable by blind and visually impaired patients, HBPMs must have speech output to convey all screen information, an easily readable visual display, identifiable controls that are easy to use, and an accessible user manual. METHODS: Data on the physical aspects and the features and functions of nine Food and Drug Administration-approved HBPMs (eight of which were recommended by the British Hypertension Society) were tabulated and analyzed for usability by blind and visually impaired individuals. Video Electronics Standards Association standards were used to measure contrast modulation in the displays of the HBPMs. Ten persons who are blind or visually impaired and who have diabetes were surveyed to determine how they monitor their blood pressure and to learn their ideas for improvements in usability. RESULTS: Physical controls were found to be easy to identify, and operating procedures were found to be relatively simple on all of the HBPMs, but user manuals were either inaccessible or minimally accessible to blind persons. The two HBPMs that have speech output do not voice all of the information that is displayed on the screen. Some functions that are standard in the HBPMs without speech output, such as the feature for automatically setting cuff inflation volume and memory, were lacking in the HBPMs with speech output. These features were mentioned as desirable in interviews with legally blind persons who are diabetic and who monitor their blood pressure at home. Visual display output was large and adequate in all of the HBPMs. Michelson contrast for numeric digits in the HBPM displays was also measured, ranging from 55 to 75% for characters with dominant spatial frequency components lying in the range of 0.5-1.0 cycles/degree. CONCLUSIONS: Home blood pressure monitors are easy-to-use devices that do not present accessibility barriers that are difficult to surmount, either technically or operationally. Two HBPMs with voice output were found to have a significant degree of accessibility, but they were not found to offer as many features as those HBPMs that were less accessible. Recommendations were made to improve accessibility, including the development of visual display standards that specify a minimally acceptable level of Michelson contrast.

Accessibility of insulin pumps for blind and visually impaired people.

BACKGROUND: Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion using an insulin pump (IP) more closely mimics the normal pancreas than multiple insulin injections. It is an effective, and often a preferred, means of maintaining normal blood glucose levels, but IPs were not designed to be fully accessible to blind or visually impaired people. This study will identify accessibility issues related to the design of IPs and focus on the key improvements required in the user interface to provide access for people who are blind or visually impaired. METHODS: IPs that are commercially available were evaluated, and features and functions such as operating procedures, user interface design, and user manuals were tabulated and analyzed. Potential failures and design priorities were identified through a Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA). RESULTS: Although the IPs do provide some limited audio output, in general, it was found to be of minimal use to people who are blind or visually impaired. None of the IPs uses high-contrast displays with consistently large fonts preferred by people who are visually impaired. User manuals were also found to be of minimal use. Results of the FMEA emphasize the need to focus design improvements on communicating and verifying information so that errors and failures can be detected and corrected. CONCLUSIONS: The most important recommendation for future IP development is speech output capability, which, more than any other improvement, would break down accessibility barriers and allow blind and visually impaired people to take advantage of the benefits of IP technology.