A Matched-Paired Comparative Analysis of the Hemodynamics of the Trifecta and Perimount Aortic Bioprostheses.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Current cohort studies comparing the Trifecta valve to alternative pericardial bioprostheses are limited by selection bias. The study aim was to determine if hemodynamics are improved after the aortic valve implantation of a Trifecta valve as compared to a standard pericardial valve, when evaluated using strict paired matching for specific key relevant confounders. METHODS: Valve hemodynamics were compared in patients undergoing implantation with a Trifecta or Perimount valve matched for left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) diameter, gender, age, body size, and days since surgery, using a 1:1 matched-paired cohort analysis (n = 20 per group). RESULTS: Patients receiving a Trifecta valve had a larger increase in indexed stroke volume (SVi) relative to baseline compared to the Perimount patients (p = 0.013), in whom SVi was decreased. The mean transvalvular pressure gradient was lower in Trifecta patients despite the larger SVi (p = 0.02). The effective orifice area (EOA) and indexed EOA (EOAi) were significantly larger in Trifecta patients compared to Perimount patients (2.04 +/- 0.46 versus 1.77 +/- 0.45 cm2, p = 0.049; 1.10 +/- 0.22 versus 0.95 +/- 0.06 cm2/m2, p = 0.027, respectively), and there was a greater increase in EOA and EOAi from baseline (p = 0.010 for both). Severe prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) (EOAi < or = 0.65 cm2/m2) was seen in two (10%) of the Perimount cases, but in none of the patients with the Trifecta valve (p = 0.072). CONCLUSION: Trifecta valve implantation is associated with a significant improvement in EOA and a decreased incidence of PPM as compared to the Perimount valve. The superior hemodynamic outcomes observed support consideration of this valve for aortic valve replacement, particularly in patients with a small LVOT at risk for PPM.

Comparison between transcatheter and surgical prosthetic valve implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: Patients with severe aortic stenosis and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) have a poor prognosis with conservative therapy but a high operative mortality when treated surgically. Recently, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for patients considered at high or prohibitive operative risk. The objective of this study was to compare TAVI and SAVR with respect to postoperative recovery of LVEF in patients with severe aortic stenosis and reduced LV systolic function. METHODS AND RESULTS: Echocardiographic data were prospectively collected before and after the procedure in 200 patients undergoing SAVR and 83 patients undergoing TAVI for severe aortic stenosis (aortic valve area ≤1 cm(2)) with reduced LV systolic function (LVEF ≤50%). TAVI patients were significantly older (81±8 versus 70±10 years; P<0.0001) and had more comorbidities compared with SAVR patients. Despite similar baseline LVEF (34±11% versus 34±10%), TAVI patients had better recovery of LVEF compared with SAVR patients (ΔLVEF, 14±15% versus 7±11%; P=0.005). At the 1-year follow-up, 58% of TAVI patients had a normalization of LVEF (>50%) as opposed to 20% in the SAVR group. On multivariable analysis, female gender (P=0.004), lower LVEF at baseline (P=0.005), absence of atrial fibrillation (P=0.01), TAVI (P=0.007), and larger increase in aortic valve area after the procedure (P=0.01) were independently associated with better recovery of LVEF. CONCLUSION: In patients with severe aortic stenosis and depressed LV systolic function, TAVI is associated with better LVEF recovery compared with SAVR. TAVI may provide an interesting alternative to SAVR in patients with depressed LV systolic function considered at high surgical risk.

Myocardial blood flow in patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: differences between true and pseudo-severe aortic stenosis. Results from the multicentre TOPAS (Truly or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis) study.

BACKGROUND: Impairment of myocardial flow reserve (MFR) in aortic stenosis (AS) with normal left ventricular function relates to the haemodynamic severity. OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether myocardial blood flow (MBF) and MFR differ in low-flow, low-gradient AS depending on whether there is underlying true-severe AS (TSAS) or pseudo-severe AS (PSAS). METHODS: In 36 patients with low-flow, low-gradient AS, dynamic [13N]ammonia PET perfusion imaging was performed at rest (n = 36) and during dipyridamole stress (n = 20) to quantify MBF and MFR. Dobutamine echocardiography was used to classify patients as TSAS (n = 18) or PSAS (n = 18) based on the indexed projected effective orifice area (EOA) at a normal flow rate of 250 ml/s (EOAI(proj )0.55 cm(2)/m(2)). RESULTS: Compared with healthy controls (n = 14), patients with low-flow, low-gradient AS had higher resting mean (SD) MBF (0.83 (0.21) vs 0.69 (0.09) ml/min/g, p = 0.001), reduced hyperaemic MBF (1.16 (0.31) vs 2.71 (0.50) ml/min/g, p<0.001) and impaired MFR (1.44 (0.44) vs 4.00 (0.91), p<0.001). Resting MBF and MFR correlated with indices of AS severity in low-flow, low-gradient AS with the strongest relationship observed for EOAI(proj) (r(s) = -0.50, p = 0.002 and r(s) = 0.61, p = 0.004, respectively). Compared with PSAS, TSAS had a trend to a higher resting MBF (0.90 (0.19) vs 0.77 (0.21) ml/min/g, p = 0.06), similar hyperaemic MBF (1.16 (0.31) vs 1.17 (0.32) ml/min/g, p = NS), but a significantly smaller MFR (1.19 (0.26) vs 1.76 (0.41), p = 0.003). An MFR <1.8 had an accuracy of 85% for distinguishing TSAS from PSAS. CONCLUSIONS: Low-flow, low-gradient AS is characterised by higher resting MBF and reduced MFR that relates to the AS severity. The degree of MFR impairment differs between TSAS and PSAS and may be of value for distinguishing these entities.

Direct drainage of the right pulmonary veins into the coronary sinus with intact interatrial septum: a case report.

Partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection to the coronary sinus is rare. This anomaly is even more rare in the absence of interatrial communication. Usually, the anomalous right pulmonary veins drain to the right atrium or venae cavae, while the anomalous left veins connect to the coronary sinus or left innominate vein. The present report is the first in the English literature to document a situs solitus case in which all three right pulmonary veins drained directly into the coronary sinus without an atrial septal defect. Closure of the coronary sinus orifice and unroofing of the coronary sinus into the left atrium is a safe and effective way of treating this anomaly.

Isolated pulmonic valve endocarditis in healthy hearts: a case report and review of the literature.

The case of a 53-year-old man with isolated pulmonic valve endocarditis in a structurally normal heart is presented. The patient had a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and was admitted to hospital with an apparent exacerbation with pneumonia. Blood cultures grew Staphylococcus aureus, and an echocardiogram identified a large vegetation on the pulmonic valve in a structurally normal heart. He was unsuccessfully treated with antibiotics and eventually required pulmonic valve replacement. The literature from 1960 to 1999 identified only 36 reported cases of pulmonic valve endocarditis in structurally normal hearts. The present report underscores the importance of suspecting pulmonic valve endocarditis in patients with multiple pulmonary lesions, and discusses the predisposing factors, clinical features, diagnostic role of echocardiography and the potential benefits of early surgical treatment.

Aortic valve area discrepancy by Gorlin equation and Doppler echocardiography continuity equation: relationship to flow in patients with valvular aortic stenosis.

BACKGROUND: In vitro studies have shown a discrepancy between aortic valve area (AVA) measurements derived invasively by Gorlin equation (Gorlin AVA) and noninvasively by Doppler echocardiography (Doppler-echo) continuity equation (Doppler AVA) during low flow states. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether a flow-related discrepancy between Gorlin AVA and Doppler AVA occurs in the clinical setting in patients with isolated valvular aortic stenosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-five consecutive patients with isolated valvular aortic stenosis, who had AVA determined both invasively by Gorlin equation and noninvasively by Doppler-echo continuity equation, were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Gorlin AVA and Doppler AVA correlated (r=0.68) over the narrow AVA range (Gorlin AVA 0.30 to 1.22 cm2); however, Doppler AVA was systematically larger than Gorlin AVA (0.80+/-0.21 versus 0.70+/-0.23 cm2, AVA difference = 0.10+/-0.17 cm2, P<0.0001). The AVA difference was inversely related to invasive cardiac index (r=-0.51) and was significantly greater at low flow states (cardiac index less than 2.5 L/min/m2) than at normal flow states (cardiac index 2.5 L/min/m2 or more) (0.16+/-0.15 versus -0.03+/-0.15 cm2, P<0.0001). Independent predictors of the AVA difference were the difference between Doppler-echo and invasive cardiac output (P<0.0001); the difference between Doppler-echo and invasive mean transvalvular pressure gradient (P=0.0002); and the average cardiac output (Doppler-echo plus invasive cardiac output/2, P=0.001) at the time of the hemodynamic assessments. The AVA difference was not related to average pressure gradient, average AVA or patient characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: A flow-related discrepancy between Gorlin AVA and Doppler AVA occurs in the clinical setting of patients with isolated valvular aortic stenosis. This discrepancy should be considered when assessing aortic stenosis severity during low flow states, where Gorlin AVA may be significantly smaller than Doppler AVA.

Predictive value of pulmonary venous flow patterns in detecting mitral regurgitation and left ventricular abnormalities.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether abnormalities in pulmonary venous flow (PVF) patterns detected by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) correlate with the severity of mitral regurgitation (MR) or the presence of left ventricular (LV) abnormalities, and to demonstrate whether a normal PVF pattern predicts the absence of structural heart disease. DESIGN: Review of all TEEs performed at a tertiary care cardiac hospital over a four-month period. PATIENTS: Among 195 studies, 100 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: PVF was categorized into three patterns, which have been described previously. A normal PVF pattern predicted the absence of clinically significant MR with a high degree of certainty (positive predictive value [PPV] 98%). However, it did not predict the absence of structural cardiac disease (PPV 64%). A PVF pattern that showed systolic flow reversal was strongly predictive of the presence of significant MR (sensitivity 86%, specificity 100%, PPV 100%). The frequency of significant MR in this group was much higher than in patients with normal PVF (12 of 12 versus one of 66, P<0.0001). Patients with a blunted PVF pattern were more likely than patients with a normal PVF to have LV abnormalities (18 of 22 versus 23 of 66, P=0.0005). However, a blunted PVF was not associated with clinically significant MR. CONCLUSIONS: A normal PVF does not rule out the absence of LV abnormalities but confirms the absence of significant MR. Systolic flow reversal is highly predictive of the presence of significant MR. A blunted PVF is more likely to be associated with LV abnormalities than with MR and has limited usefulness in the diagnosis of significant MR.

Management of patients with mild aortic stenosis undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

BACKGROUND: The management of mild aortic stenosis during coronary artery bypass grafting remains controversial. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of consecutive patients between January 1, 1977, and December 31, 1994, to identify 51 patients with mild aortic stenosis who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (group A), and 19 patients with mild aortic stenosis who underwent combined coronary artery bypass grafting and aortic valve replacement (group B). Patients with more than moderate aortic regurgitation were excluded. Preoperative angiograms were reviewed to assess the severity of calcification and restricted mobility of the aortic cusps. RESULTS: In group A there were 11 deaths and 8 subsequent aortic valve replacements; in group B there were 5 deaths and 3 prosthetic valve-related complications. There was no difference in event-free survival between the two groups after adjusting for the difference in age. Among group A patients, the initial transvalvular gradient (p = 0.0005) and aortic valvular calcification (p = 0.06) identified patients who demonstrated progression to severe aortic stenosis during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that routine aortic valve replacement during coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with mild aortic stenosis is not indicated, but concomitant aortic valve replacement may be appropriate in patients with higher transvalvular gradients and calcified valves.

Prospective study of asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis. Clinical, echocardiographic, and exercise predictors of outcome.

BACKGROUND: Only limited data on the rate of hemodynamic progression and predictors of outcome in asymptomatic patients with valvular aortic stenosis (AS) are available. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 123 adults (mean age, 63 +/- 16 years) with asymptomatic AS, annual clinical, echocardiographic, and exercise data were obtained prospectively (mean follow-up of 2.5 +/- 1.4 years). Aortic jet velocity increased by 0.32 +/- 0.34 m/s per year and mean gradient by 7 +/- 7 mm Hg per year; valve area decreased by 0.12 +/- 0.19 cm2 per year. Kaplan-Meier event-free survival, with end points defined as death (n = 8) or aortic valve surgery (n = 48), was 93 +/- 5% at 1 year, 62 +/- 8% at 3 years, and 26 +/- 10% at 5 years. Univariate predictors of outcome included baseline jet velocity, mean gradient, valve area, and the rate of increase in jet velocity (all P < or = .001) but not age, sex, or cause of AS. Those with an end point had a smaller exercise increase in valve area, blood pressure, and cardiac output and a greater exercise decrease in stroke volume. Multivariate predictors of outcome were jet velocity at baseline (P < .0001), the rate of change in jet velocity (P < .0001), and functional status score (P = .002). The likelihood of remaining alive without valve replacement at 2 years was only 21 +/- 18% for a jet velocity at entry > 4.0 m/s, compared with 66 +/- 13% for a velocity of 3.0 to 4.0 m/s and 84 +/- 16% for a jet velocity < 3.0 m/s (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: In adults with asymptomatic AS, the rate of hemodynamic progression and clinical outcome are predicted by jet velocity, the rate of change in jet velocity, and functional status.

Feasibility and complications of single-plane and biplane versus multiplane transesophageal imaging: a review of 2947 consecutive studies.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze and compare the incidence of procedural complications and failure of intubation with various sizes of probes used in transesophageal echocardiography. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: A Canadian, tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 2947 consecutive transesophageal echocardiographic patient examinations between January 1992 and March 1996 at the University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario. RESULTS: The multiplane probe (MP) was used in 1274 studies, biplane (BP) in 1642 and single plane (SP) in 31. Data for BP and SP were combined because of their similar size. Complications or failed intubation occurred in 86 studies (2.9%). There were 53 complications (1.8%) and 40 failed intubations (1.4%). Seven patients (0.3%) had both. Complications were death in one, tracheal intubation or bronchospasm in nine, bleeding in nine, angina in two, pulmonary edema in two, superficial thrombophlebitis in two, supraventricular tachycardia in one and minor adverse events in 27. Complications were unrelated to the choice of probe (MP 2%, BP and SP 1.7%, not significant). Failure of intubation (40 cases) was more common with MP than with BP and SP (2.3% versus 0.7%, P = 0.0003, OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.7 to 7.5). The main reasons for failure were cervical spondylosis in 16 patients and hypersensitive pharynx despite topical anesthesia and sedation in 13 patients. Of 21 cases of failed MP intubation, 16 (76%) were subsequently successful with BP. CONCLUSIONS: Serious complications with transesophageal echocardiography, although infrequent, do occur. The MP carries a 3.5-fold increased risk of failed intubation. In the majority of failures, successful intubation can be achieved with a smaller probe.

Flow dependence of measures of aortic stenosis severity during exercise.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to investigate the effect of altering transvalvular volume flow rate on indexes of aortic stenosis severity (valve area, valve resistance, percent left ventricular stroke work loss) derived by using Doppler echocardiography. BACKGROUND: Assessment of hemodynamic severity in aortic stenosis has been limited by the absence of an index that is independent of transvalvular flow rate. The traditional measurement of valve area by the Gorlin equation has been shown to vary with alterations in transvalvular flow. Recently, valve resistance and percent stroke work loss have been proposed as indexes that are relatively independent of flow. Although typically derived with invasive measurements, valve resistance and percent stroke work loss (in addition to continuity equation valve area) can be determined noninvasively with Doppler echocardiography. METHODS: We performed 110 symptom-limited exercise studies in 66 asymptomatic patients with valvular aortic stenosis. Continuity equation valve area, valve resistance (the ratio between mean transvalvular pressure gradient and mean flow rate) and the steady component of percent stroke work loss (the ratio between mean transvalvular pressure gradient and left ventricular systolic pressure) were assessed by Doppler echocardiography at rest and immediately after exercise. RESULTS: Mean transvalvular volume flow rate increased 24% (from [mean +/- SD] 319 +/- 80 to 400 +/- 140 ml/s, p < 0.0001); mean pressure gradient increased 36% (from 30 +/- 14 to 41 +/- 18 mm Hg, p < 0.0001); continuity equation aortic valve area increased 14% (from 1.38 +/- 0.50 to 1.58 +/- 0.69 cm2, p < 0.0001); valve resistance increased 13% (from 137 +/- 81 to 155 +/- 97 dynes.s.cm-5, p < 0.0001); and percent stroke work loss increased 17% (from 17.4 +/- 6.9% to 20.3 +/- 8.5%, p < 0.0001). The effects of flow on valve area, valve resistance and percent stroke work loss were independent of the presence of an aortic valve area < or = or > 1.0 cm2 or reduced transvalvular flow rate (rest cardiac output < 4.5 liters/min). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis, Doppler echocardiographic measures of valve area, valve resistance and percent stroke work loss are flow dependent. Flow dependence is observed with valve area < or = or > 1.0 cm2 and in the presence of both normal and low transvalvular flow states. The potential effects of transvalvular flow should be considered when interpreting Doppler measures of aortic stenosis severity.

Dependence of Gorlin formula and continuity equation valve areas on transvalvular volume flow rate in valvular aortic stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Valve areas derived by the Gorlin formula have been observed to vary with transvalvular volume flow rate. Continuity equation valve areas calculated from Doppler-echo data have become a widely used alternate index of stenosis severity, but it is unclear whether continuity equation valve areas also vary with volume flow rate. This study was designed to investigate the effects of changing transvalvular volume flow rate on aortic valve areas calculated using both the Gorlin formula and the continuity equation in a model of chronic valvular aortic stenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using a canine model of chronic valvular aortic stenosis in which anatomy and hemodynamics are similar to those of degenerative aortic stenosis, each subject (n = 8) underwent three studies at 2-week intervals. In each study, transvalvular volume flow rates were altered with saline or dobutamine infusion (mean, 10.3 +/- 5.1 flow rates per study). Simultaneous measurements were made of hemodynamics using micromanometer-tipped catheters, of ascending aortic instantaneous volume flow rate using a transit-time flowmeter, and of left ventricular outflow and aortic jet velocity curves using Doppler echocardiography. Valve areas were calculated from the invasive data by the Gorlin equation and from the Doppler-echo data by the continuity equation. In the 24 studies, mean transit-time transvalvular volume flow rate ranged from 80 +/- 33 to 153 +/- 49 mL/min (P < .0001). Comparing minimum to maximum mean volume flow rates, the Gorlin valve area changed from 0.54 +/- 0.22 cm2 to 0.68 +/- 0.21 cm2 (P < .0001), and the continuity equation valve area changed from 0.57 +/- 0.18 cm2 to 0.70 +/- 0.20 cm2 (P < .0001). A strong linear relation was observed between Gorlin valve area and mean transit-time volume flow rate for each study (median, r = .88), but the slope of this relation varied between studies. The Doppler-echo continuity equation valve area had a weaker linear relation with transit-time volume flow rate for each study (median, r = .51). CONCLUSIONS: In this model of chronic valvular aortic stenosis, both Gorlin and continuity equation valve areas were flow-dependent indices of stenosis severity and demonstrated linear relations with transvalvular volume flow rate. The changes in calculated valve area that occur with changes in transvalvular volume flow should be considered when measures of valve area are used to assess the hemodynamic severity of valvular aortic stenosis.

Echocardiographic volume flow and stenosis severity measures with changing flow rate in aortic stenosis.

The anatomy of degenerative valvular aortic stenosis has been poorly represented in animal models, limiting the evaluation of noninvasive echo-Doppler measures of transvalvular volume flow rate and stenosis severity during progressive disease evolution or under conditions of changing volume flow rates. To study these issues, chronic valvular aortic stenosis, characterized by stiff leaflets without commissural fusion, was created in nine adult mongrel dogs by suturing pericardial covered Teflon-felt pads into the sinuses of Valsalva below the coronary ostia during hypothermic cardiac arrest. In the eight surviving dogs, echo-Doppler examinations were performed weekly for up to 8 wk postoperatively. Simultaneous invasive micromanometer pressure data were collected at 2-wk intervals in all subjects, with simultaneous ascending aortic transit time-volume flow measurement in four subjects. Volume flow rates were altered with saline and dobutamine infusions during invasive studies for comparison of echo-Doppler and invasive pressure gradients, volume flow, and valve areas. Serial echo-Doppler follow-up (39 +/- 11 days) demonstrated that, from baseline to final study, mean transvalvular pressure gradient increased (4 +/- 1 to 38 +/- 7 mmHg, P = 0.001), continuity equation aortic valve area decreased (2.06 +/- 0.18 to 0.54 +/- 0.04 cm2, P < 0.0001), and progressive left ventricular hypertrophy developed (62 +/- 6 to 114 +/- 9 g, P = 0.0003). Echo-Doppler and invasive data correlated well for measures of transvalvular pressure gradients (n = 98, maximum instantaneous gradient r = 0.95, mean gradient r = 0.91), volume flow (n = 75, stroke volume r = 0.86, cardiac output r = 0.86), and valve area (n = 73, r = 0.73) despite acute alterations in volume flow and progressive disease evolution. This chronic canine model, with anatomy and hemodynamics similar to clinical degenerative valvular aortic stenosis, should provide a valuable tool for investigating clinically relevant new measures of stenosis severity with use of invasive or noninvasive techniques.

Sympathetic stimulation alters left ventricular relaxation and chamber size.

Alterations in left ventricular (LV) contractility, relaxation, and chamber dimensions induced by efferent sympathetic nerve stimulation were investigated in nine anesthetized open-chest dogs in sinus rhythm. Supramaximal stimulation of acutely decentralized left stellate ganglia augmented heart rate, LV systolic pressure, and rate of LV pressure rise (maximum +dP/dt, 1,809 +/- 191 to 6,304 +/- 725 mmHg/s) and fall (maximum -dP/dt, -2,392 +/- 230 to -4,458 +/- 482 mmHg/s). It also reduced the time constant of isovolumic relaxation, tau (36.5 +/- 4.8 to 14.9 +/- 1.1 ms). Simultaneous two-dimensional echocardiography recorded reductions in end-diastolic and end-systolic LV cross-sectional chamber areas (23 and 31%, respectively), an increase in area ejection fraction (32%), and increases in end-diastolic and end-systolic wall thicknesses (14 and 13%, respectively). End-systolic and end-diastolic wall stresses were unchanged by stellate ganglion stimulation (98 +/- 12 to 95 +/- 9 dyn x 10(3)/cm2; 6.4 +/- 2.4 to 2.4 +/- 0.3 dyn x 10(3)/cm2, respectively). Atrial pacing to similar heart rates did not alter monitored indexes of contractility. Dobutamine and isoproterenol induced changes similar to those resulting from sympathetic neuronal stimulation. These data indicate that when the efferent sympathetic nervous system increases left ventricular contractility and relaxation, concomitant reductions in systolic and diastolic dimensions of that chamber occur that are associated with increasing wall thickness such that LV wall stress changes are minimized.

Physiologic changes with maximal exercise in asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis assessed by Doppler echocardiography.

OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that the physiologic response to exercise in valvular aortic stenosis could be measured by Doppler echocardiography. BACKGROUND: Data on exercise hemodynamics in patients with aortic stenosis are limited, yet Doppler echocardiography provides accurate, noninvasive measures of stenosis severity. METHODS: In 28 asymptomatic subjects with aortic stenosis maximal treadmill exercise testing was performed with Doppler recordings of left ventricular outflow tract and aortic jet velocities immediately before and after exercise. Maximal and mean volume flow rate (Qmax and Qmean), stroke volume, cardiac output, maximal and mean aortic jet velocity (Vmax, Vmean), mean pressure gradient (delta P) and continuity equation aortic valve area were calculated at rest and after exercise. The actual change from rest to exercise in Qmax and Vmax was compared with the predicted relation between these variables for a given orifice area. Subjects were classified into two groups: Group I (rest-exercise Vmax/Qmax slope > 0, n = 19) and Group II (slope < or = 0, n = 9). RESULTS: Mean exercise duration was 6.7 +/- 4.3 min. With exercise, Vmax increased from 3.99 +/- 0.93 to 4.61 +/- 1.12 m/s (p < 0.0001) and mean delta P increased from 39 +/- 20 to 52 +/- 26 mm Hg (p < 0.0001). Qmax rose with exercise (422 +/- 117 to 523 +/- 209 ml/s, p < 0.0001), but the systolic ejection period decreased (0.33 +/- 0.04 to 0.24 +/- 0.04, p < 0.0001), so that stroke volume decreased slightly (98 +/- 29 to 89 +/- 32 ml, p = 0.01). The increase in cardiac output with exercise (6.5 +/- 1.7 to 10.2 +/- 4.4 liters/min, p < 0.0001) was mediated by increased heart rate (71 +/- 17 to 147 +/- 28 beats/min, p < 0.0001). There was no significant change in the mean aortic valve area with exercise (1.17 +/- 0.45 to 1.28 +/- 0.65, p = 0.06). Compared with Group I patients, patients with a rest-exercise slope < or = 0 (Group II) tended to be older (69 +/- 12 vs. 58 +/- 19 years, p = 0.07) and had a trend toward a shorter exercise duration (5.3 +/- 2.9 vs. 7.3 +/- 4.9 min, p = 0.20). There was no difference between groups for heart rate at rest, blood pressure, stroke volume, cardiac output, Vmax, mean delta P or aortic valve area. With exercise, Group II subjects had a lower cardiac output (7.4 +/- 2.4 vs. 11.5 +/- 4.6 liters/min, p = 0.005) and a smaller percent increase in Vmax (3 +/- 9% vs. 22 +/- 14%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Doppler echocardiography allows assessment of physiologic changes with exercise in adults with asymptomatic aortic stenosis. A majority of subjects show a rest-exercise response that closely parallels the predicted relation between Vmax and Qmax for a given orifice area. The potential utility of this approach for elucidating the relation between hemodynamic severity and clinical symptoms deserves further study.

Usefulness of left atrial and left ventricular chamber sizes as predictors of the severity of mitral regurgitation.

Left ventricular (LV) and left atrial (LA) chamber sizes are frequently used to assist in assessing the severity of mitral regurgitation (MR). To study the reliability of these measurements in the clinical setting 2-dimensional echocardiographic measurements of the left ventricle and left atrium were obtained in 92 consecutive patients with MR present on both angiography and Doppler echocardiographic examinations performed within 2.8 +/- 2.5 days of each other. The accuracy of chamber dimensions in identifying severe MR (angiographic grade 3 to 4+) was determined in the total population and the following patient subgroups: (1) isolated chronic MR with preserved LV function inclusive of all rhythms; (2) isolated chronic MR, preserved LV function and sinus rhythm; (3) isolated chronic MR with LV dysfunction; (4) chronic MR associated with other valvular disease; and (5) acute MR. Only in subgroup 2 were chamber sizes reliable in identifying severe MR. Atrial dimensions provided the most accurate assessment with an LA volume greater than 58 ml, anteroposterior dimension greater than 45 mm and superoinferior dimension greater than 55 mm, with sensitivities of 75, 75 and 88%, specificities of 83, 100 and 83%, positive predictive values of 92, 100, and 93% and negative predictive values of 56, 60, and 71%, respectively. LV dimensions had excellent positive predictive values but lower sensitivities. Normalizing for body surface area did not improve the accuracy of uncorrected dimensions. Although increased LA and LV dimensions can identify severe MR, smaller dimensions do not exclude this diagnosis. With acute MR, atrial fibrillation, LV dysfunction or associated valvular disease, these dimensions are not reliable.