Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
J Vet Intern Med ; 27(2): 339-46, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23398291

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A large multistate outbreak of equine herpesvirus myeloencephalopathy (EHM) occurred in May 2011 among horses that participated in a competitive event. OBJECTIVE: To identify EHM risk factors among horses with a common exposure venue. ANIMALS: A total of 123 horses: 19 horses with EHM, 14 equine herpesvirus-1 cases with no reported neurologic signs, and 90 control horses. METHODS: EHM case survey data were compared with data from EHV-1 cases with no neurologic signs and healthy controls using univariable and multivariable methods. RESULTS: Significant factors associated with higher risk for EHM compared with EHV-1 cases with no neurologic signs were (1) greater number of biosecurity risks at the event, (2) female sex, (3) increasing number of classes competed in at the event, and (4) an interaction between sex and number of classes competed in. In the EHM versus controls comparison, in addition to sex and biosecurity risks, factors associated with higher EHM risk included EHV-1 vaccination in the 5 weeks before the event and increasing number of events attended in April 2011; zinc dietary supplementation was associated with decreased risk. An interaction between sex and the number of events attended in April 2011 also was significant. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Findings from this study suggest that dietary zinc supplementation may be associated with decreased risk of EHM. Several factors were associated with increased risk of EHM. Additional investigations of factors associated with risk of EHM are warranted to evaluate the importance of these factors in this complex disease of horses.


Assuntos
Surtos de Doenças/veterinária , Encefalomielite/veterinária , Infecções por Herpesviridae/veterinária , Herpesvirus Equídeo 1/isolamento & purificação , Doenças dos Cavalos/epidemiologia , Doenças dos Cavalos/virologia , Animais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Encefalomielite/epidemiologia , Encefalomielite/virologia , Feminino , Infecções por Herpesviridae/epidemiologia , Infecções por Herpesviridae/virologia , Cavalos , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
2.
J Food Prot ; 75(3): 428-36, 2012 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22410214

RESUMO

Concern about Salmonella contamination of food is compounded by fear that antimicrobials traditionally used to combat the infection will become useless due to rising antibiotic resistance. Livestock, in particular swine, often are blamed for illnesses caused by Salmonella and for increasing antibiotic resistance due to use of antibiotics in pigs. As part of the National Animal Health Monitoring System Swine 2000 and 2006 studies, swine fecal samples were cultured for Salmonella. These samples were collected from 123 operations in 17 states in 2000 and from 135 operations in 17 states in 2006. At each operation, 50 and 60 fecal samples were collected from late finisher pig pens in 2000 and 2006, respectively. Salmonella isolates were characterized to determine serogroup and serotype and were tested for susceptibility to a panel of 17 and 15 antimicrobial drugs in 2000 and 2006, respectively. A total of 5,470 and 7,788 samples were cultured for Salmonella in 2000 and 2006, respectively. Overall, 6.2% of the samples and 34.2% of the farms were positive for Salmonella in 2000. In 2006, 7.2% of the samples and 52.6% of the farms were positive. Salmonella Derby, Salmonella Typhimurium var. 5- (formerly Salmonella Typhimurium var. Copenhagen), and Salmonella Agona were the three serotypes most often recovered in both study years. The most common antimicrobial resistance pattern for Salmonella Derby in the two study years was resistance to streptomycin, sulfisoxazole, and tetracycline. Most isolates were resistant to tetracycline, sulfisoxazole, and streptomycin in both study years. The proportion of Salmonella isolates that were susceptible to all antimicrobials (pansusceptible) was 38.1% in 2000 and 20.4% in 2006. The proportion of Salmonella isolates that were resistant to three or more antimicrobials (multidrug resistant) was similar in 2000 and in 2006 (52.8 and 57.7%, respectively).


Assuntos
Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Contaminação de Alimentos/análise , Intoxicação Alimentar por Salmonella/epidemiologia , Salmonelose Animal/epidemiologia , Doenças dos Suínos/epidemiologia , Animais , Técnicas de Tipagem Bacteriana , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Humanos , Prevalência , Salmonella/efeitos dos fármacos , Salmonella/isolamento & purificação , Intoxicação Alimentar por Salmonella/etiologia , Salmonelose Animal/microbiologia , Salmonelose Animal/transmissão , Vigilância de Evento Sentinela/veterinária , Suínos , Doenças dos Suínos/microbiologia , Doenças dos Suínos/transmissão
3.
J Am Vet Med Assoc ; 216(4): 510-5, 2000 Feb 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10687005

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine types and doses of injectable medications given to periparturient sows and reasons for administering those medications, and to compare medication practices among farms of different sizes. DESIGN: Survey. SAMPLE POPULATION: 301 farms; 231,016 periparturient sows. PROCEDURE: A survey was used to obtain information regarding medications given to sows during the farrowing period. State and federal veterinary medical officers completed surveys during their final interview with producers who had participated in the National Animal Health Monitoring System's (NAHMS) Swine 95 study. Data were summarized and treatment regimens compared among farms of different sizes. RESULTS: More than a third of the sows received medications during the farrowing period. The most common reasons for administering medications were routine preventive treatment and treatment of dystocia, uterine discharge, and poor appetite. The most commonly used medications for treatment of sick sows were oxytocin, procaine penicillin G, and B vitamins. A high percentage of medications were either not indicated for the specific condition or used at greater or less than the approved dose. In general, treatment rates and medications used did not differ among farms of different sizes. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Better treatment protocols are needed to provide more appropriate treatment of sick sows.


Assuntos
Complicações do Trabalho de Parto/veterinária , Doenças dos Suínos/tratamento farmacológico , Animais , Coleta de Dados , Feminino , Injeções/veterinária , Complicações do Trabalho de Parto/tratamento farmacológico , Complicações do Trabalho de Parto/prevenção & controle , Ocitocina/administração & dosagem , Penicilina G Procaína/administração & dosagem , Penicilinas/administração & dosagem , Gravidez , Suínos , Doenças dos Suínos/prevenção & controle , Complexo Vitamínico B/administração & dosagem
4.
Arq. bras. med. vet. zootec ; 51(2): 141-7, abr. 1999. tab
Artigo em Português | LILACS | ID: lil-260963

RESUMO

A mortalidade de suínos, durante um período de 6 meses, variou de 0 a 12 por cento em 53 granjas de crescimento/terminaçäo, que participam do "United States National Animal Health Monitoring System 1995 National Swine Study". Vinte e seis (49,1 por cento) granjas tiveram <2 por cento de mortalidade e 27 (50,9 por cento) tiveram índices >2 por cento. Nove (17,0 por cento) granjas apresentaram mortalidade >4 por cento. A análise pelo teste de Fisher revelou que as granjas que adotavam o sistema "all-in, all-out" eram significativamente mais propensas a apresentar índices <2 por cento que as granjas com manejo contínuo, e que as granjas nas quais todos os suínos terminados eram oriundos de unidades pertencentes às próprias granjas eram significativamente mais propensas a ter mortalidade <2 por cento que as granjas onde os animais (>1) provinham de outras origens. Granjas maiores (com mais de 900 animais entrando na fase de crescimento/terminaçäo) adotavam com maior freqüência o manejo "all-in, all-out" e tiveram menor percentual de mortalidade do que pequenas granjas. O diagnóstico de Salmonella em suínos terminados, realizado 12 meses antes da intervençäo, foi associado ao aumento do percentual de mortalidade geral e diário


Assuntos
Animais , Mortalidade , Suínos/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Saúde Pública Veterinária
5.
Prev Vet Med ; 34(2-3): 147-59, 1998 Feb 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9604264

RESUMO

The United States Department of Agriculture's National Animal Health Monitoring System 1995 National Swine Study was designed to estimate management, health and productivity parameters on pig operations in the United States. Sixteen major swine-producing states that accounted for nearly 91% of June 1, 1995 swine inventory and nearly three-fourths of United States swine producers were included in the study. In the initial phase of the study, National Agricultural Statistics Service enumerators collected information from 1477 producers involved in all phases of swine production (farrowing, nursery, and grower/finisher). Of these, 405 operations with > or = 300 finisher pigs (with at least one finisher pig > or = 54 kg) participated in the subsequent component of the study, which involved on-farm visits by state and federal veterinary medical officers and animal health technicians, and which concentrated on the grower/finisher phase of production. Of those eligible to take part in the second phase of the study, participation was higher among independent producers (48.3%) than among contract producers (15.3%). Participation was also higher among operations that used advanced record-keeping systems (such as record cards for individual breeding hogs or a computer-based record-keeping system). Thus, study results could have been influenced by response biases. As a biosecurity measure, 40.5 +/- 2.1% of operations restricted entry to employees only. For operations that permitted non-employees to enter the premises, relatively few enforced other biosecurity measures on visitors (0.4 +/- 0.1% required feed-delivery personnel and livestock handlers to shower before entering the premises; 3.3+/- 0.9% required a footbath; and 7.0 +/- 1.5% required feed-delivery personnel and livestock handlers not to have visited another operation with pigs on that day). The most common method of waste storage (used by 49.9 +/- 3.8% of operations with > or = 300 finisher pigs) was below-floor slurry or deep pit.


Assuntos
Criação de Animais Domésticos/normas , Carne/normas , Suínos , United States Department of Agriculture , Animais , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Documentação , Monitoramento Ambiental , Feminino , Saúde , Controle de Qualidade , Registros/normas , Estados Unidos
6.
Prev Vet Med ; 33(1-4): 121-45, 1998 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9500169

RESUMO

Over a 6-month period, the mean mortality risk (based on 393 operations participating in the United States National Animal Health Monitoring System 1995 National Swine Study, and representing operations with > or = 300 market hogs in 16 states), was 2.3 +/- 0.2% in the grower/finisher production phase (where figures after the +/- represent the standard error of the estimate). Mortality > or = 4% was experienced by 13.5 +/- 2.9% of grower/finisher operations, while 63.6 +/- 5.3% had < or = 2% mortality. To identify factors associated with > or = 4% mortality, stepwise logistic regression [Statistical Analysis Systems, 1989. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6, 4th edn, Vol. 2. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, 794 pp.] was performed twice: once using operations with all mortality rates, and again excluding operations with between 2% and 4% mortality. Final models were run with SUDAAN [Shah, B.V., Barnwell, B.G., Bieler, G.S., 1996. SUDAAN User's Manual, Version 6.40, 2nd edn. Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC, 492 pp.] to take the sample design into account. In addition, SAS and SUDAAN logistic regression models were developed to analyze factors associated with > 2.3% mortality among grower/finisher pigs. Mean weaning age < or = 28 days entered all models as being associated with increased mortality in the grower/finisher unit. Not obtaining all grower/finisher pigs from farrowing units belonging to the operation was associated with > or = 4% mortality among grower/finisher swine. Not typically giving grower/finisher pigs antibiotics or other agents as disease-preventives or growth-promotants in the feed or water, and ranking producer organizations as very or extremely important sources of antibiotic information were associated with < or = 2.3% mortality in the grower/finisher phase.


Assuntos
Mortalidade , Suínos , Envelhecimento/fisiologia , Criação de Animais Domésticos , Fenômenos Fisiológicos da Nutrição Animal , Animais , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Abrigo para Animais , Modelos Logísticos , Quarentena/veterinária , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Vacinação/veterinária , Desmame
7.
Prev Vet Med ; 37(1-4): 21-31, 1998 Dec 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9879577

RESUMO

In the 1995 National Swine Study of the United States National Animal Health Monitoring System, producers identified respiratory problems as the leading cause of death in pigs during the grower/finisher phase of production. Over a six-month period, 61.7 +/- 4.1% (mean +/- SEM) of operations reported at least one death attributed to respiratory problems among finisher pigs (based on 388 operations representing operations with > or = 300 finisher pigs in 16 states). Mean mortality attributed to respiratory problems was 0.9 +/- 0.1% of finisher pigs per operation. Stepwise logistic regression (using SAS) was used to identify factors associated with operations attributing at least one death to respiratory problems, and to identify factors associated with reporting > or = 2% mortality attributed to respiratory problems. Final models were run with SUDAAN to account for the sampling strategy. Attributing at least one death to respiratory problems was associated with having > or = 3000 pigs enter the grower/finisher unit over a six-month period; diagnosis of Haemophilus (or Actinobacillus) in the past 12 months; and keeping pigs in the grower/finisher unit > 120 days (as compared to < 100 days). Not having a farrowing facility, mean weaning age < 28 days, and < 50% of finisher pigs on solid concrete only were associated with reporting > or = 2% mortality attributed to respiratory problems.


Assuntos
Pneumopatias/veterinária , Doenças dos Suínos/mortalidade , Criação de Animais Domésticos , Animais , Infecções por Haemophilus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Haemophilus/mortalidade , Infecções por Haemophilus/veterinária , Modelos Logísticos , Pneumopatias/epidemiologia , Pneumopatias/mortalidade , Computação Matemática , Fatores de Risco , Suínos , Doenças dos Suínos/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
8.
Prev Vet Med ; 31(1-2): 133-46, 1997 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9234432

RESUMO

Data from the United States National Swine Survey collected by the National Animal Health Monitoring System were used to describe the use of feed additives in swine feeds. Data were collected from 710 farms. The concentration of feed additives expressed in grams per ton of complete feed was described by stage of production, and the use of feed additives above the labeled treatment levels (i.e. off-label) was identified. Of the 3328 feeds, about 79% contained feed additives used in the labeled manner. For all classes of pigs, the prevalence of labeled feed additive use was greater than 75%. Penicillin was used according to its label most often, followed by apramycin, bacitracin, tetracyclines, lincomycin, and tylosin. Carbadox had the highest prevalence of off-label use. Of the 699 feeds that included feed additives in an off-label manner, about 57% included additives at greater than the recommended concentrations or were fed to an incorrect class of pig. About 56% of the feeds had off-label combinations of additives. Small farms were more likely to use rations with no feed additives than intermediate or large farms (P < 0.001). Of those farms using feed additives, the odds of a small farm using all feed additives in the labeled manner was 7.7 times that of an intermediate or large farm (P < 0.0001). After controlling for herd size, producers who used a veterinary consultant were 2.1 times more likely to use feeds with feed additives (P < 0.0001).


Assuntos
Ração Animal/normas , Criação de Animais Domésticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Consultores , Aditivos Alimentares/normas , Suínos/fisiologia , Médicos Veterinários , Envelhecimento/fisiologia , Criação de Animais Domésticos/métodos , Criação de Animais Domésticos/normas , Animais , Antibacterianos/normas , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Infecciosos/normas , Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Carbadox/normas , Carbadox/uso terapêutico , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Rotulagem de Alimentos/normas , Nível de Saúde , Masculino , Penicilinas/normas , Penicilinas/uso terapêutico , Estatística como Assunto , Suínos/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Doenças dos Suínos/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças dos Suínos/epidemiologia , Doenças dos Suínos/prevenção & controle , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA