Nasopharyngeal Ventilation Compared to Facemask Ventilation: A Prospective, Randomized, Crossover Trial in Two Different Elective Cohorts.

BACKGROUND: Facemask ventilation is routinely used to preoxygenate patients before endotracheal intubation during anesthesia induction or to secure ventilation in patients with respiratory insufficiency. Occasionally, facemask ventilation cannot be performed adequately. The placement of a regular endotracheal tube through the nose into the hypopharynx may be a valid alternative to improve ventilation and oxygenation before endotracheal intubation (nasopharyngeal ventilation). We tested the hypothesis that nasopharyngeal ventilation is superior in its efficacy compared to traditional facemask ventilation. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, crossover trial, we enrolled surgical patients requiring either nasal intubation (cohort #1, n = 20) or patients who met "difficult to mask ventilate" criteria (cohort #2, n = 20). Patients in each cohort were randomly assigned to receive pressure-controlled facemask ventilation followed by nasopharyngeal ventilation or vice versa. The ventilation settings were kept constant. The primary outcome was tidal volume. The secondary outcome was the difficulty of ventilation, measured using the Warters grading scale. RESULTS: Tidal volume was significantly increased by nasopharyngeal ventilation in cohort #1 (597 ± 156 ml vs.462 ± 220 ml, p = 0.019) and cohort #2 (525 ± 157 ml vs.259 ± 151 ml, p < 0.01). Warters grading scale for mask ventilation was 0.6 ± 1.4 in cohort #1, and 2.6 ± 1.5 in cohort #2. CONCLUSION: Patients at risk for difficult facemask ventilation may benefit from nasopharyngeal ventilation to maintain adequate ventilation and oxygenation before endotracheal intubation. This ventilation mode may offer another option for ventilation at induction of anesthesia and during the management of respiratory insufficiency, especially in the setting of "unexpected" ventilation difficulty.

Traumatic hemorrhage and chain of survival.

Trauma is the number one cause of death among Americans between the ages of 1 and 46 years, costing more than $670 billion a year. Following death related to central nervous system injury, hemorrhage accounts for the majority of remaining traumatic fatalities. Among those with severe trauma that reach the hospital alive, many may survive if the hemorrhage and traumatic injuries are diagnosed and adequately treated in a timely fashion. This article aims to review the recent advances in pathophysiology management following a traumatic hemorrhage as well as the role of diagnostic imaging in identifying the source of hemorrhage. The principles of damage control resuscitation and damage control surgery are also discussed. The chain of survival for severe hemorrhage begins with primary prevention; however, once trauma has occurred, prehospital interventions and hospital care with early injury recognition, resuscitation, definitive hemostasis, and achieving endpoints of resuscitation become paramount. An algorithm is proposed for achieving these goals in a timely fashion as the median time from onset of hemorrhagic shock and death is 2 h.

Perioperative Management of the Acute Stroke Patient: From Door to Needle to NeuroICU.

Acute ischemic stroke is a neurologic emergency that requires precise care due to high likelihood of morbidity and mortality. Current guidelines recommend thrombolytic therapy with alteplase within the first 3 to 4.5 hours of initial stroke symptoms and endovascular mechanical thrombectomy within the first 16 to 24 hours. Anesthesiologists may be involved in the care of these patients perioperatively and in the intensive care unit. Although the optimal anesthetic for these procedures remains under investigation, this article will review how to best optimize and treat these patients to achieve the best outcomes.

Echocardiography and Management for Cardiac Trauma.

Trauma is the number one cause of death among Americans between the ages of 1 and 46, costing >$670 billion a year. Blunt and penetrating trauma can lead to cardiac and aortic injuries, with the incidence of death varying upon the location of the damage. Among those who reach the hospital alive, many may survive if the hemorrhage and cardiovascular injuries are diagnosed and treated adequately in a timely fashion. Although echocardiography often is underused in the setting of cardiac trauma, it offers significant diagnosis and treatment potential because it is accessible in most settings, safe, relatively noninvasive, and can provide rapid and accurate trauma assessment in the hands of trained providers. This review article aims to analyze the pathophysiology of cardiac injuries in patients with trauma and the role of echocardiography for the accurate diagnosis of cardiac injury in trauma. This review, additionally, will offer a patient-centered, team-based, early management plan with a treatment algorithm to help improve the quality of care among these patients with cardiac trauma.

Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke-Specific Focus on Anesthetic Management for Mechanical Thrombectomy.

Acute ischemic stroke is a neurological emergency with a high likelihood of morbidity, mortality, and long-term disability. Modern stroke care involves multidisciplinary management by neurologists, radiologists, neurosurgeons, and anesthesiologists. Current American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA) guidelines recommend thrombolytic therapy with intravenous (IV) alteplase within the first 3-4.5 hours of initial stroke symptoms and endovascular mechanical thrombectomy within the first 16-24 hours depending on specific inclusion criteria. The anesthesia and critical care provider may become involved for airway management due to worsening neurologic status or to enable computerized tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning, to facilitate mechanical thrombectomy, or to manage critical care of stroke patients. Existing data are unclear whether the mechanical thrombectomy procedure is best performed under general anesthesia or sedation. Retrospective cohort trials favor sedation over general anesthesia, but recent randomized controlled trials (RCT) neither suggest superiority nor inferiority of sedation over general anesthesia. Regardless of anesthesia type, a critical element of intraprocedural stroke care is tight blood pressure management. At different phases of stroke care, different blood pressure targets are recommended. This narrative review will focus on the anesthesia and critical care providers' roles in the management of both perioperative stroke and acute ischemic stroke with a focus on anesthetic management for mechanical thrombectomy.