Treatment of esophageal cancer: surgical outcomes of 335 cases operated in a single center.

OBJECTIVES: the surgical approach persists as the main treatment for esophageal cancer. This study compares the patients of the same institution over time at three different times. METHODS: this is a retrospective, observational, descriptive study comparing the surgical outcomes obtained by the Division of Surgical Oncology of Erasto Gaertner Hospital. The sample was divided into Period 1 (1987-1997), Period 2 (1998-2003) and Period 3 (2007-2015). Survival rates and disease-free survival were estimated by the Kaplan-Maier method. Survival predictors were identified with Cox regression. ANOVA test was used for comparison between groups. Data were analyzed with SPSS 25.0 and STATA 16, and p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: a total of 335 patients underwent esophagectomy or esophagogastrectomy. When the clinical characteristics of the 3 groups were compared, there was no statistically significant difference. Neoadjuvance was significantly higher in Period 3 (55.4% of patients). We found a histological change in the diagnosis over time, with a significant increase in adenocarcinoma. Morbidity and mortality rates were higher in Period 3. The main complications were pulmonary and anastomotic fistulas. Overall survival in 5 years increased over time, reaching 59.7% in Period 3. CONCLUSIONS: better neoadjuvant treatment contributed to increase the global survival of patients, despite greater rate of immediate complications to surgery.

Treatment of esophageal cancer: surgical outcomes of 335 cases operated in a single center / Tratamento do câncer de esôfago: resultados cirúrgicos de 335 casos operados em um único centro

ABSTRACT Objectives: the surgical approach persists as the main treatment for esophageal cancer. This study compares the patients of the same institution over time at three different times. Methods: this is a retrospective, observational, descriptive study comparing the surgical outcomes obtained by the Division of Surgical Oncology of Erasto Gaertner Hospital. The sample was divided into Period 1 (1987-1997), Period 2 (1998-2003) and Period 3 (2007-2015). Survival rates and disease-free survival were estimated by the Kaplan-Maier method. Survival predictors were identified with Cox regression. ANOVA test was used for comparison between groups. Data were analyzed with SPSS 25.0 and STATA 16, and p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: a total of 335 patients underwent esophagectomy or esophagogastrectomy. When the clinical characteristics of the 3 groups were compared, there was no statistically significant difference. Neoadjuvance was significantly higher in Period 3 (55.4% of patients). We found a histological change in the diagnosis over time, with a significant increase in adenocarcinoma. Morbidity and mortality rates were higher in Period 3. The main complications were pulmonary and anastomotic fistulas. Overall survival in 5 years increased over time, reaching 59.7% in Period 3. Conclusions: better neoadjuvant treatment contributed to increase the global survival of patients, despite greater rate of immediate complications to surgery.

RESUMO Objetivo: A abordagem cirúrgica persiste como tratamento principal para o câncer de esôfago. O presente estudo compara as casuísticas da mesma instituição ao longo do tempo, em três momentos diferentes. Métodos: Estudo descritivo retrospectivo comparativo observacional dos resultados cirúrgicos obtidos pelo Serviço de Cirurgia Oncológica do Hospital Erasto Gaertner. A amostra foi dividida em: Período 1 (1987-1997), Período 2 (1998-2003) e Período 3 (2007-2015). Taxas de sobrevida e sobrevida livre de doença foram estimadas pelo método de Kaplan-Maier. Preditores de sobrevida foram identificados com regressão de Cox. Para a comparação entre os grupos foi utilizado teste ANOVA. Os dados foram analisados com os programas SPSS 25.0 e STATA 16, sendo p<0,05 considerado estatisticamente significativo. Resultados: Ao todo, 335 doentes foram submetidos a esofagectomia ou esofagogastrectomia. Quando comparadas as características clínicas dos 3 grupos não houve diferença estatística significativa. A realização de neoadjuvância foi significativamente maior no Período 3 (55,4% dos pacientes). Verificamos uma mudança histológica do diagnóstico no decorrer do tempo, com um aumento significativo do adenocarcinoma. As taxas de morbimortalidade foram superiores no Período 3. As principais complicações foram pulmonares e de fistulas anastomóticas. A sobrevida global em 5 anos foi aumentando no decorrer do tempo, atingindo 59,7% no Período 3. Conclusões: Melhor tratamento neoadjuvante contribuiu para aumentar a sobrevida global dos pacientes, apesar de maior incidência de complicações imediatas à cirurgia.

Liver resections for metastasis: surgical outcomes of a single center academic institution.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic metastasis are frequent and liver resection may be an option for some cases, despite the high complexity of the procedure and the possibility of postoperative complications. METHODS: This retrospective comparative descriptive study aims to evaluate a series of 86 consecutive liver resections (LRs) performed for the treatment of metastatic liver tumors, comparing the results between patients undergoing major and minor LR. All patients submitted to LR from October 2010 to July 2015 at the Erasto Gaertner Hospital in Curitiba-PR were included. Quantitative numerical variables were analyzed with the Student t-test. The nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test was used for numerical variables of non-normal distribution. Categorical variables were analyzed with the Chi-square test with Fisher's correction. The data were analyzed with the SPSS 23.0 and STATA 15 programs, being p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Eighty-six LR were performed, 56 cases by colorectal metastasis. The major LR corresponded to 68 cases, with 13.2% of Clavien-Dindo III-V complications and 2.9% of reoperation rate. Eighteen minor LR were performed and one patient had a postoperative complication requiring reoperation. CONCLUSION: Preoperative elevation of transaminases and jaundice negatively influence surgical outcomes in patients undergoing LR. Tumors greater than 3 cm presented worse postoperative survival. Major LR did not significantly increase the surgical morbidity rate. INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD REGISTRATION: 1.122.319/2015.

Abbreviated preoperative fasting favours postoperative oral intake at lower hospital admission costs for cancer patients. / Jejum pré-operatório abreviado favorece realimentação pós-operatória com menor custo de internação hospitalar em pacientes oncológicos.

OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the feasibility of abbreviated fasting in oncologic colorectal surgeries, as well as the impact on the surgical outcome of the patients. METHODS: prospective randomized comparative study with patients undergoing elective colorectal cancer surgeries from May to September 2017. Patients were randomized electronically into two groups according to the preoperative fast to be adopted: conventional or abbreviated. RESULTS: of the 33 patients included, 15 followed the abbreviated fasting protocol and 18 the conventional fasting. Both groups had comparable profiles. No patient underwent mechanical preparation of the colon. In 69.7% of the cases, surgery involved low rectal dissection. The procedures were equivalent in relation to intraoperative variables and severe complications. The time to achieve complete oral intake was shorter for abbreviated fasting (10 versus 16 days, p=0.001), as well as the length of inhospital stay (2 versus 4 days, p=0.009). Hospital costs were lower in the abbreviated fasting (331 versus 682 reais, p<0.001). The univariable analysis revealed a correlation between complete oral intake and abbreviated fasting [HR 0.29 (IC95%: 0.12-0.68] and abdominal distension [HR 0.12 (IC95% 0.01-0.94)]. After multivariable analysis, abbreviated fasting presented a lower time for complete oral intake [HR 0.39 (IC95%: 0.16-0.92]. CONCLUSION: the abbreviated preoperative fasting favors the metabolic-nutritional recovery, reducing the time for complete oral intake. The implementation of the abbreviation protocol reduces hospital admission costs.

OBJETIVO: avaliar a viabilidade de abreviação do jejum em cirurgias colorretais oncológicas, bem como, o impacto no desfecho cirúrgico dos pacientes. MÉTODOS: estudo prospectivo comparativo randomizado com pacientes submetidos à cirurgias eletivas colorretais, por câncer, no período de maio a setembro de 2017. Os pacientes foram randomizados eletronicamente em dois grupos de acordo com o jejum pré-operatório a ser adotado: convencional ou abreviado. RESULTADOS: dos 33 pacientes incluídos, 15 seguiram o protocolo de jejum abreviado e 18 de jejum convencional. Ambos os grupos apresentaram perfis comparáveis. Nenhum paciente foi submetido a preparo mecânico do cólon. Em 69,7% dos casos, a cirurgia envolveu dissecção baixa do reto. Os procedimentos foram equivalentes em relação às variáveis intraoperatórias e complicações graves. O tempo para atingir realimentação plena foi menor para o jejum abreviado (10 versus 16 dias, p=0,001), assim como, o tempo de internação hospitalar (2 versus 4 dias, p=0,009). Os custos hospitalares foram menores no jejum abreviado (331 versus 682 reais, p<0,001). A análise univariável revelou correlação entre a realimentação plena e o jejum abreviado [HR 0,29 (IC95%: 0,12-0,68] e com a distensão abdominal [HR 0,12(IC95%: 0,01-0,94)]. Após análise multivariável, o jejum abreviado apresentou menor tempo para realimentação plena [HR 0,39(IC95%: 0,16-0,92]. CONCLUSÃO: o jejum pré-operatório abreviado favorece a recuperação metabólico-nutricional, diminuindo o tempo para realimentação plena. A implantação do protocolo de abreviação do jejum reduz custos de internação hospitalar.

Jejum pré-operatório abreviado favorece realimentação pós-operatória com menor custo de internação hospitalar em pacientes oncológicos / Abbreviated preoperative fasting favours postoperative oral intake at lower hospital admission costs for cancer patients

RESUMO Objetivo: avaliar a viabilidade de abreviação do jejum em cirurgias colorretais oncológicas, bem como, o impacto no desfecho cirúrgico dos pacientes. Métodos: estudo prospectivo comparativo randomizado com pacientes submetidos à cirurgias eletivas colorretais, por câncer, no período de maio a setembro de 2017. Os pacientes foram randomizados eletronicamente em dois grupos de acordo com o jejum pré-operatório a ser adotado: convencional ou abreviado. Resultados: dos 33 pacientes incluídos, 15 seguiram o protocolo de jejum abreviado e 18 de jejum convencional. Ambos os grupos apresentaram perfis comparáveis. Nenhum paciente foi submetido a preparo mecânico do cólon. Em 69,7% dos casos, a cirurgia envolveu dissecção baixa do reto. Os procedimentos foram equivalentes em relação às variáveis intraoperatórias e complicações graves. O tempo para atingir realimentação plena foi menor para o jejum abreviado (10 versus 16 dias, p=0,001), assim como, o tempo de internação hospitalar (2 versus 4 dias, p=0,009). Os custos hospitalares foram menores no jejum abreviado (331 versus 682 reais, p<0,001). A análise univariável revelou correlação entre a realimentação plena e o jejum abreviado [HR 0,29 (IC95%: 0,12-0,68] e com a distensão abdominal [HR 0,12(IC95%: 0,01-0,94)]. Após análise multivariável, o jejum abreviado apresentou menor tempo para realimentação plena [HR 0,39(IC95%: 0,16-0,92]. Conclusão: o jejum pré-operatório abreviado favorece a recuperação metabólico-nutricional, diminuindo o tempo para realimentação plena. A implantação do protocolo de abreviação do jejum reduz custos de internação hospitalar.

ABSTRACT Objective: to evaluate the feasibility of abbreviated fasting in oncologic colorectal surgeries, as well as the impact on the surgical outcome of the patients. Methods: prospective randomized comparative study with patients undergoing elective colorectal cancer surgeries from May to September 2017. Patients were randomized electronically into two groups according to the preoperative fast to be adopted: conventional or abbreviated. Results: of the 33 patients included, 15 followed the abbreviated fasting protocol and 18 the conventional fasting. Both groups had comparable profiles. No patient underwent mechanical preparation of the colon. In 69.7% of the cases, surgery involved low rectal dissection. The procedures were equivalent in relation to intraoperative variables and severe complications. The time to achieve complete oral intake was shorter for abbreviated fasting (10 versus 16 days, p=0.001), as well as the length of inhospital stay (2 versus 4 days, p=0.009). Hospital costs were lower in the abbreviated fasting (331 versus 682 reais, p<0.001). The univariable analysis revealed a correlation between complete oral intake and abbreviated fasting [HR 0.29 (IC95%: 0.12-0.68] and abdominal distension [HR 0.12 (IC95% 0.01-0.94)]. After multivariable analysis, abbreviated fasting presented a lower time for complete oral intake [HR 0.39 (IC95%: 0.16-0.92]. Conclusion: the abbreviated preoperative fasting favors the metabolic-nutritional recovery, reducing the time for complete oral intake. The implementation of the abbreviation protocol reduces hospital admission costs.