A phase 3 double-blind study of the addition of tocilizumab vs placebo to cyclosporin/methotrexate GVHD prophylaxis.

We determined the efficacy of tocilizumab (TCZ) in preventing grade 2-4 acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) in patients with acute leukemia or myelodysplasia undergoing matched sibling donor (MSD) or volunteer unrelated donor (VUD) allogeneic stem cell transplantation after myeloablative or reduced-intensity conditioning across 5 Australian centers. A total of 145 patients (50 MSD, 95 VUD) were randomly assigned to placebo or TCZ on day -1. All patients received T-cell-replete peripheral blood stem cell grafts and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with cyclosporin/methotrexate. A planned substudy analyzed the VUD cohort. With a median follow-up of 746 days, the incidence of grade 2-4 aGVHD at day 100 for the entire cohort was 36% for placebo vs 27% for TCZ (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-1.26; P = .23) and 45% vs 32% (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.31-1.22; P = .16) for the VUD subgroup. The incidence of grade 2-4 aGVHD at day 180 for the entire cohort was 40% for placebo vs 29% for TCZ (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.38-1.22; P = .19) and 48% vs 32% (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.30-1.16; P = .13) for the VUD subgroup. Reductions in aGVHD were predominantly in grade 2 disease. For the entire cohort, transplant-related mortality occurred in 8% vs 11% of placebo-treated vs TCZ-treated patients, respectively (P = .56), and overall survival was 79% vs 71% (P = .27). Median day to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was delayed by 2 to 3 days in TCZ-treated patients, whereas liver toxicity and infectious complications were similar between groups. In this phase 3 randomized double-blind trial, TCZ showed nonsignificant trends toward reduced incidence of grade 2-4 aGVHD in recipients from HLA-matched VUDs but no improvements in long term-survival.

A randomized trial of olanzapine versus palonosetron versus infused ondansetron for the treatment of breakthrough chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

PURPOSE: The primary aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of olanzapine, palonosetron and ondansetron infusion (standard of care) for the treatment of breakthrough chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). METHOD: It was a randomized open-label prospective study. Sixty-two patients were randomized to receive either ondansetron 32-mg infusion over 24 h, or olanzapine wafer 10 mg once daily in addition to ondansetron 8 mg IV three times a day or a single dose of palonosetron 0.25 mg IV instead of ondansetron. All groups were allowed rescue antiemetics. The primary endpoint was a composite outcome of no emesis, no use of rescue medication, and nausea score reduction of ≥50 %. The secondary endpoint was nausea score reduction of ≥50 %. Both endpoints were measured at 24 and 48 h after initiation of the study treatment. Statistical analysis was conducted using a double-sided Fisher's exact test. RESULT: The primary endpoint was achieved in 6, 45, and 18 %, and 6, 64, and 18 % of ondansetron versus olanzapine versus palonosetron patient groups at 24 and 48 h, respectively. The secondary outcome was observed in 17, 60, and 62 %, and 35, 71, and 43 % of ondansetron versus olanzapine versus palonosetron patient groups at 24 and 48 h, respectively. Serious adverse drug reactions were not reported in any arms. Time to engraftment was not significantly different between the arms. CONCLUSIONS: Olanzapine was an effective treatment of breakthrough CINV. A single dose of palonosetron significantly reduced nausea up to 24 h.

Addition of interleukin-6 inhibition with tocilizumab to standard graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation: a phase 1/2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Interleukin 6 mediates graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in experimental allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (allogeneic SCT) and represents an attractive therapeutic target. We aimed to assess whether the humanised anti-interleukin-6 receptor monoclonal antibody, tocilizumab, could attenuate the incidence of acute GVHD. METHODS: We undertook a single-group, single-institution phase 1/2 study at the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Bone Marrow Transplantation unit, QLD, Australia. Eligible patients were 18-65 years old and underwent T-replete HLA-matched allogeneic SCT with either total body irradiation-based myeloablative or reduced-intensity conditioning from unrelated or sibling donors. One intravenous dose of tocilizumab (8 mg/kg, capped at 800 mg, over 60 mins' infusion) was given the day before allogeneic SCT along with standard GVHD prophylaxis (cyclosporin [5 mg/kg per day on days -1 to +1, then 3 mg/kg per day to maintain therapeutic levels (trough levels of 140-300 ng/mL) for 100 days plus methotrexate [15 mg/m(2) on day 1, then 10 mg/m(2) on days 3, 6, and 11]). The primary endpoint was incidence of grade 2-4 acute GVHD at day 100, assessed and graded as per the Seattle criteria. Immunological profiles were compared with a non-randomised group of patients receiving allogeneic SCT, but not treated with tocilizumab. This trial is registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, number ACTRN12612000726853. FINDINGS: Between Jan 19, 2012, and Aug 27, 2013, 48 eligible patients receiving cyclosporin and methotrexate as GVHD prophylaxis were enrolled into the study. The incidence of grade 2-4 acute GVHD in patients treated with tocilizumab at day 100 was 12% (95% CI 5-24), and the incidence of grade 3-4 acute GVHD was 4% (1-13). Grade 2-4 acute GVHD involving the skin developed in five (10%) patients of 48 treated with tocilizumab, involving the gastrointestinal tract in four (8%) patients; there were no reported cases involving the liver. Low incidences of grade 2-4 acute GVHD were noted in patients receiving both myeloablative total body irradiation-based conditioning (12% [95% CI 2-34) and fludarabine and melphalan reduced-intensity conditioning (12% [4-27]). Immune reconstitution was preserved in recipients of interleukin-6 receptor inhibition, but qualitatively modified with suppression of known pathogenic STAT3-dependent pathways. INTERPRETATION: Interleukin 6 is the main detectable and dysregulated cytokine secreted after allogeneic SCT and its inhibition is a potential new and simple strategy to protect from acute GVHD despite robust immune reconstitution; a randomised, controlled trial assessing tocilizumab in addition to standard GVHD prophylaxis in these patients is warranted. FUNDING: National Health and Medical Research Council and Queensland Health.

Clinical assessment of anti-viral CD8+ T cell immune monitoring using QuantiFERON-CMV® assay to identify high risk allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients with CMV infection complications.

The reconstitution of anti-viral cellular immunity following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is crucial in preventing cytomegalovirus (CMV)-associated complications. Thus immunological monitoring has emerged as an important tool to better target pre-emptive anti-viral therapies. However, traditional laboratory-based assays are too cumbersome and complicated to implement in a clinical setting. Here we conducted a prospective study of a new whole blood assay (referred to as QuantiFERON-CMV®) to determine the clinical utility of measuring CMV-specific CD8+ T-cell responses as a prognostic tool. Forty-one evaluable allogeneic HSCT recipients underwent weekly immunological monitoring from day 21 post-transplant and of these 21 (51.2%) showed CMV reactivation and 29 (70.7%) developed acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). Patients with acute GvHD (grade ≥ 2) within 6 weeks of transplant showed delayed reconstitution of CMV-specific T-cell immunity (p = 0.013) and a higher risk of CMV viremia (p = 0.026). The median time to stable CMV-specific immune reconstitution was 59 days and the incidence of CMV reactivation was lower in patients who developed this than those who did not (27% versus 65%; p = 0.031). Furthermore, a failure to reconstitute CMV-specific immunity soon after the onset of CMV viraemia was associated with higher peak viral loads (5685 copies/ml versus 875 copies/ml; p = 0.002). Hence, QuantiFERON-CMV® testing in the week following CMV viremia can be useful in identifying HSCT recipients at risk of complicated reactivation.