Do different types of liver lesions differ in their uptake of the microbubble contrast agent SH U 508A in the late liver phase? Early experience.

PURPOSE: To compare the uptake of SH U 508A in different types of liver lesions by using stimulated acoustic emission. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with characterized lesions (metastasis, n = 17; hepatocellular carcinoma, n = 4; hemangioma, n = 9; focal nodular hyperplasia, n = 7) received 2.5 g SH U 508A. After 5 minutes, stimulated acoustic emission was elicited by using a previously described method. Liver and/or lesional differences were assessed with videodensitometry (objective conspicuity score), and two observers assessed each lesion by using a six-point scale (subjective conspicuity score). RESULTS: Metastases and hepatocellular carcinoma had low stimulated acoustic emission; median objective conspicuity scores were 70% and 68% (all scores were > or =43%), respectively, and subjective conspicuity scores were 2 or higher for both observers. Hemangiomas had reduced stimulated acoustic emission, with more variability; the median objective conspicuity score was 41% (range, 9%-72%), and the median subjective conspicuity scores were 2 (range, 1-4) and 3.5 (range, 1-5) for observers 1 and 2, respectively. Focal nodular hyperplasia had stimulated acoustic emission comparable to that of the liver in all cases; the median objective conspicuity score was -4.7% (all scores were <6%), and the subjective conspicuity score was 1 or lower for both observers. This finding completely separated focal nodular hyperplasia and malignancies. Significant differences were seen between focal nodular hyperplasia and all other lesion types (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Strong late-phase lesional uptake of SH U 508A is characteristic of focal nodular hyperplasia, is seen in some hemangiomas, and was not observed in malignancies.

[Comparison of bolus and infusion of the ultrasound contrast media levovist for color doppler ultrasound of renal arteries]. / Vergleich von Bolusgabe und Infusion des Ultraschallkontrastmittels Levovist in der farbkodierten Duplexsonographie von Nierenarterien.

PURPOSE: To investigate if the duration of Doppler enhancement of the ultrasound contrast agent Levovist can be prolonged by continuous infusion compared to bolus injections in patients. METHODS: 12 patients with suspected renal artery stenosis were included. Each patient received 1 or 2 bolus injections of 4 g each and a "fast" infusion of 3 ml/min (average dose: 7 g) of Levovist. In 8 patients an additional "slow" infusion of 1 ml/min (average dose 4.2 g) was given. The duration of "strong" Doppler signal enhancement and the visualization of vessels were compared. RESULTS: The duration of strong enhancement was substantially prolonged by the slow infusion (bolus 6:21 min, fast infusion: 8:57 min, slow infusion: 15:12 min, p < 0.001). The dose effectiveness (duration of strong enhancement per 1 g Levovist) was markedly improved from 0:57 min (bolus) to 3:36 min (slow infusion). Visualisation of the renal arteries was more complete with the slow infusion. CONCLUSION: Levovist infusions at 1 ml/min are superior to bolus injections in the assessment of renal arteries. They prolong the enhancement, make more efficient use of a given dose of contrast material and thus allow additional clinically relevant information to be obtained at reduced cost.

Hepatic malignancies: improved detection with pulse-inversion US in late phase of enhancement with SH U 508A-early experience.

Twenty consecutive patients with known liver malignancies underwent ultrasonography (US) in conventional B mode and in pulse-inversion mode in the late hepatic-specific parenchymal phase after intravenous administration of SH U 508A, a microbubble US contrast agent. Two experienced readers assessed subjective and objective conspicuity, number of lesions, and smallest lesion diameter in each mode. Subjective and objective conspicuity were improved with pulse-inversion mode, and smaller lesions were depicted with pulse-inversion mode than with conventional B mode, improving the detection of metastases less than 1 cm in size.

Pulse-inversion mode imaging of liver specific microbubbles: improved detection of subcentimetre metastases.

Pulse-inversion mode (a new ultrasound mode) can be used to image the late liver-specific parenchymal phase of the microbubble contrast-agent Levovist. Scanning in pulse-inversion mode after Levovist improves the detection of liver metastases and reveals more lesions of smaller size than conventional ultrasonography and computed tomography.

[Stimulated acoustic emissions with the ultrasound contrast medium levovist: a clinically useful contrast effect with liver-specific properties]. / Stimulierte akustische Emission mit dem Ultraschall-Kontrastmittel Levovist: Ein klinisch nutzbarer Kontrasteffekt mit leberspezifischen Eigenschaften.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was systematically to investigate stimulated acoustic emission (SAE) with the microbubble contrast agent Levovist (Schering AG, Berlin) in vivo with regards to reproducibility, distribution in various organs over time, dependence on technical factors, and influence on the delineation of focal liver lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 2 intravenous injections of 1 g of Levovist were given to 2 dogs and 1-6 injections of 2.5 g Levovist to 5 healthy volunteers and 37 patients. The liver, spleen, large abdominal vessels, and kidney were intermittently scanned for up to 30 min. Studies were evaluated for the presence of SAE signals by 2 observers. In 20 patients with focal liver lesions (15 with metastases, 4 haemangiomata, 1 hepatocellular carcinoma, and 1 cyst) the influence on lesion visualization was also assessed. RESULTS: SAE effects, lasting up to 30 minutes, were seen in all subjects in the liver and spleen. Vascular and renal SAE signals were noted shortly after injection, lasting up to 6 minutes. SAE was absent or markedly reduced in focal liver lesions, which were seen as colour voids. This increased the conspicuity of focal lesions, and in 5 patients additional metastases were detected that could not be delineated on B-mode alone. CONCLUSION: A liver- and spleen-specific late phase of Levovist can be consistently demonstrated using SAE and the effect increases the conspicuity of focal liver lesions.

Non-invasive diagnosis of hepatic cirrhosis by transit-time analysis of an ultrasound contrast agent.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic cirrhosis is accompanied by several haemodynamic changes including arterialisation of the liver, intrahepatic shunts, pulmonary arteriovenous shunts, and a hyperdynamic circulatory state. We postulated that the hepatic first pass of a bolus of an ultrasound contrast agent injected into a peripheral vein is accelerated in patients with cirrhosis. We investigated this first pass in patients with diffuse liver disease and in normal controls to assess whether it provides useful differential diagnostic information. METHODS: We enrolled 15 patients with biopsy-proven cirrhosis, 12 patients with biopsy-proven non-cirrhotic diffuse liver disease, and 11 normal controls. We carried out continuous spectral doppler ultrasonography of a hepatic vein from 20 s before to 3 min after a peripheral intravenous bolus injection of 2.5 g Levovist. The intensity of the doppler signal was measured and used to plot time-intensity curves. FINDINGS: Patients with cirrhosis showed a much earlier onset of enhancement (arrival time; mean 18.3 s) and peak enhancement (mean 55.5 s) than controls (49.8 s and 97.5 s) or patients with non-cirrhotic diffuse liver disease (35.8 s and 79.7 s). All patients with cirrhosis had an arrival time of the bolus of less than 24 s, whereas the arrival time was 24 s or more in 22 of the 23 other participants. Peak enhancement was higher in patients with cirrhosis (mean 48.7 units) than in the other two groups (12.5 and 12.3 units, respectively). We found highly significant differences between the patients with cirrhosis and each of the other two groups for all variables (p<0.005), whereas we found no significant differences between non-cirrhotic patients and controls. INTERPRETATION: Our preliminary study suggests that analysis of liver transit time of a bolus of ultrasound contrast agent provides useful information about haemodynamic changes in patients with cirrhosis. Measurement of the arrival time of the bolus allows discrimination of patients with cirrhosis from controls and from patients with non-cirrhotic diffuse liver disease, and has potential as a non-invasive test for cirrhosis.

Improved imaging of liver metastases with stimulated acoustic emission in the late phase of enhancement with the US contrast agent SH U 508A: early experience.

PURPOSE: To see whether stimulated acoustic emission (SAE) in the liver parenchyma in the late phase of enhancement with SH U 508A increases the conspicuity of occult metastases at ultrasonography (US). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with known hypo- or hypervascular hepatic metastases underwent US after SH U 508A administration, after a delay of at least 5 minutes, to ensure decay of blood pool enhancement. In 16 patients with visible metastases, conspicuity was compared on registered SAE and gray-scale scans by two blinded readers and by using computerized analysis of relative gray-scale and color Doppler conspicuity scores inside and outside the lesion. In nine patients, areas suspected of being involved but without definite gray-scale masses were imaged in the same way. Paired sections were analyzed by two blinded readers looking for parenchymal color defects without corresponding gray-scale masses; nine control images from three healthy volunteers were also included. RESULTS: Intense, transient parenchymal SAE was seen in all subjects. All metastases appeared as areas of reduced or absent signal. The conspicuity score was 80% for SAE versus 9% for gray-scale US (P < .001, Wilcoxon signed rank test). SAE-specific defects were seen in all patients but in none of the volunteers. Metastases seen on SAE but undetectable on gray-scale images were proved in three patients. CONCLUSION: SAE with SH U 508A improves the conspicuity of metastases. SAE-specific defects may reveal isoechoic or subtle metastases.

Stimulated acoustic emission to image a late liver and spleen-specific phase of Levovist in normal volunteers and patients with and without liver disease.

Quantitative studies were performed to investigate liver- specific uptake of the microbubble Levovist, using stimulated acoustic emission (SAE), which can detect microbubbles even when stationary or slow-moving. These comprised studies of biodistribution comparing the liver and kidney in five normal volunteers, reproducibility in 34 patients, comparison between cirrhotics and controls (n = 9 each) and maximal depth of effect at different frequencies (180 measurements in 31 patients). Stimulated acoustic emission lasted beyond 30 min, with strongly liver-specific properties in each volunteer and was highly reproducible. No difference in the amount of SAE in the superficial liver was seen between cirrhotic and normal livers, but attenuation was higher in cirrhotics. This demonstrates a frequency-dependent effect on liver SAE penetration. We conclude that the liver uptake of Levovist lasts over 30 min, is reproducible, occurs even where diffuse liver disease is present and can be used to assess tissue attenuation in a novel fashion.