Clinical progression is associated with poor prognosis whatever the treatment line in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer: The CATS international database.

AIM OF THE STUDY: Our goal was to evaluate the impact of progression type (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] only, radiological or clinical) at initiation of first-, second- and third life-extending therapy (LET) on treatment outcomes in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients, by performing a post-hoc analysis using data from the CATS international registry. METHODS: The 669 consecutive mCRPC patients of the CATS registry were classified according to their type of progression at initiation of each LET: PSA only (PSA-p), radiological (±PSA) (Radio-p); or clinical (±PSA, ±radiological) progression (Clin-p). Overall survival (OS), the primary endpoint, was calculated from initiation of the first-, second- and third-LET to death for each sequence. RESULTS: Median OS was shorter in the Clin-p group compared with the PSA-p group (14-month difference in first line; around 7-month difference in second- and third line). Shorter progression-free survival (PFS) was also observed in Clin-p patients, whatever the treatment is. Clinical progression seemed to be associated with a shorter duration of therapy with androgen receptor-targeted therapy (ART) compared with taxanes. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical progression at initiation of a LET is associated with poor outcomes including shorter PFS and OS as well as clinical and biological features of aggressive disease. Stratifying patients in clinical trials according to disease progression type may prevent selection bias and data heterogeneity. In daily practice, first signs of clinical progression may prompt physicians to consider starting a new LET, independently of PSA levels.

Sequencing of Taxanes and New Androgen-targeted Therapies in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Results of the International Multicentre Retrospective CATS Database.

BACKGROUND: The optimal sequence of life-extending therapies in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate outcomes among mCRPC patients treated with docetaxel (DOC), cabazitaxel (CABA), and a novel androgen receptor-targeted agent (ART; abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide) according to three different sequences. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Data from 669 consecutive mCRPC patients were retrospectively collected between November 2012 and October 2016. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary endpoint was the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (decrease ≥50% from baseline) to each therapy. Secondary endpoints included best clinical benefit, time to PSA progression, radiological progression-free survival (rPFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 158 patients received DOC→CABA→ART (group 1), 456 received DOC→ART→CABA (group 2), and 55 received ART→DOC→CABA (group 3). At baseline, PSA progression only and Gleason <8 were more common in group 3. PSA response on DOC was lower in group 3 than in other groups (p=0.02) and PSA response on CABA was higher in the second than in the third line (p=0.001). In Group 3, rPFS on ART (6.6 mo) and DOC (9.2 mo) was also shorter than in the other groups. OS calculated from the first life-extending therapy reached 34.8, 35.8, and 28.9 mo in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively (p=0.007). Toxicity was comparable between the arms. The main limitations of the trial are its retrospective design and the low number of patients in group 3. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective trial, sequencing of DOC, CABA, and one ART, was associated with median OS of up to 35.8 mo. CABA seemed to retain its activity regardless of treatment sequence. DOC activity after ART appeared to be reduced, but the data are insufficient to conclude that cross-resistance occurs. PATIENT SUMMARY: The order of drugs administered to patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer could impact their efficacy, with cabazitaxel appearing to retain its activity whatever the therapeutic sequence.

The predictive value of IL28B rs12979860, rs11881222 and rs8099917 polymorphisms and IP-10 in the therapeutic response of Egyptian genotype 4 patients.

UNLABELLED: Interleukin-28B (IL28B) polymorphisms have previously been reported to be strongly associated with spontaneous and treatment-induced HCV viral clearance. AIM: To assess the impact of four different IL28B polymorphisms and their haplotype combination and interferon-c inducible protein 10 (IP-10) in response to treatment in Egyptian genotype 4 patients. METHOD: 159 HCV-genotype 4 patients were included. All patients were treated with Peginterferon alph2a/Ribavirin for 48 wk. The following polymorphisms rs12979860, rs11881222, rs8103142 and rs8099917 and rs80803142 of Il-28 were known to be associated with the sustained virological response. They were genotyped using the TaqMan assay. IP-10 was assessed by Eliza. RESULTS: The data indicated that all SNPs are within the Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) except for rs8103142 (p=6.255(-9)), therefore it was excluded from the study since it deviates from HWE-P. The CC, AA and TT genotypes of rs12979860, rs11881222 and rs8099917 were the more frequent genotypes among the responders at RVR, EVR, ETR and SVR, respectively. The frequency of CC, CT, and TT genotype was 46.4%, 38.1% and 15.5% among responders of RVR, and was 46.9%, 45.9% and 7.2 among responders of SVR for rs12979860, respectively. The relapse rate was 18.0% and 16.0 % during EVR and ETR, while the response rate was 52.8%, 58.5%, 59.7% and 61.6% after 4, 12, 48 and 72 weeks of treatment. The transient virological response (TVR) was 6.9% among HCV patients. The results showed that the odds ratio and 95% CI of HCV genotype 4 patients to have a better sustained response to treatment (SVR) was 2.92, (1.83-4.68, p=2.01(-5)), 2.89 (1.79-4.70, p=2.53(-5)), and 2.73 (0.21-0.65, p=0.0007) for those with the major allele "C" of rs12979860, the "A" allele of rs11881222, and the "T" allele of rs8099917, respectively. Furthermore, the positive predictive value (PPV) of the major homozygous alleles for SVR with better response to therapy was in the following order: 78.69%, 68.42%, and 32.14% with a positive likelihood ratio of 1.95, 1.25, and 0.86 for rs12979860, rs11881222 and rs8099917, respectively. The haplotype formed between the 3 studied SNPs (rs12979860, rs11881222 and rs8099917) showed that two haplotypes (TGG and TGT) increased the probability of a poor response to therapy, but the CAT haplotype had the opposite effect. Multinomial logistic regression analysis revealed that the viral load and rs12979860 are the only significant actors involved in the efficacy of the treatment response among the cohort study. In addition, patients with SVR had significantly lower values of IP-10 than non-responder patients (NR), with a P-value<=0.001. CONCLUSIONS: In genotype 4 cases, the IL28B SNPs rs12979860 rs8099917, and rs11881222 are the strongest predictors of a response, while IP-10 is a strong negative biomarker of a response. Accounting for this factor is important in the individualization of treatment and enhances the degree of predictiveness of the IL28 polymorphism in the final treatment outcome. The frequent distribution of C, A and T alleles of IL28 polymorphism are higher among TVR, which may reflect sensitivity to prolonged course.