Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Br J Radiol ; 94(1122): 20201368, 2021 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33882250

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Obtaining informed consent is a mandatory part of modern clinical practice. The aim of this study was to identify how often complications relating to Interventional Radiology (IR) procedures were discussed with the patient prior to the procedure. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 100 patients who experienced a complication related to an IR procedure was performed. The patient's procedure consent form was examined to identify whether the complication they experienced had been discussed as a possible risk. Other parts of the consent form relating to need for blood transfusion and the need for further procedures were also examined. RESULTS: 39% of patients who experienced a complication did not have the complication documented as a potential risk on the consent form. 14% of patients required a blood transfusion but were not consented for this. 42% of patients required a further procedure or operation but were not warned of this. CONCLUSION: The model of gaining informed consent on the day of procedure is no longer valid. Better education and the use of clinics, patient information sheets and other resources is essential. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The paper highlights the inadequacies of the current model in gaining consent for IR procedures. A more comprehensive consent process making use of all available resources is essential.


Assuntos
Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido , Radiografia Intervencionista/efeitos adversos , Transfusão de Componentes Sanguíneos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Reino Unido
3.
Diagn Interv Radiol ; 26(2): 140-142, 2020 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32071021

RESUMO

A number of embolic agents are currently available each with their own properties. Precipitating hydrophobic injectable liquid (PHIL) is a new dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) compatible embolic agent with a number of specific properties which make it of interest to interventional radiologists. We review the use of PHIL in a non-neurointerventional setting, describing its use in a range of procedures such as trauma embolization, pseudoaneurysm embolization, and tumor embolization. PHIL's properties include a lack of skin discoloration, the possibility of rapid injection and a lack of glare artifact on follow-up computed tomography imaging. These properties make it an important new tool in the armamentarium of the body interventional radiologist.


Assuntos
Dimetil Sulfóxido/uso terapêutico , Embolização Terapêutica/métodos , Sequestradores de Radicais Livres/uso terapêutico , Radiologia Intervencionista/métodos , Dimetil Sulfóxido/administração & dosagem , Sequestradores de Radicais Livres/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Interações Hidrofóbicas e Hidrofílicas , Injeções
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...