Pharmacists' perceptions of their emerging general practice roles in UK primary care: a qualitative interview study.

BACKGROUND: UK general practice is experiencing a workload crisis. Pharmacists are the third largest healthcare profession in the UK; however, their skills are a currently underutilised and potentially highly valuable resource for primary health care. This study forms part of the evaluation of an innovative training programme for pharmacists who are interested in extended roles in primary care, advocated by a UK collaborative '10-point GP workforce action plan'. AIM: To explore pharmacists' perceptions of primary care roles including the potential for greater integration of their profession into general practice. DESIGN AND SETTING: A qualitative interview study in UK primary care carried out between October 2015 and July 2016. METHOD: Pharmacists were purposively sampled by level of experience, geographical location, and type of workplace. Two confidential semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted - one before and one after the training programme. A constant comparative, inductive approach to thematic analysis was used. RESULTS: Sixteen participants were interviewed. The themes related to: initial expectations of the general practice role, varying by participants' experience of primary care; the influence of the training course with respect to managing uncertainty, critical appraisal skills, and confidence for the role; and predictions for the future of this role. CONCLUSION: There is enthusiasm and willingness among pharmacists for new, extended roles in primary care, which could effectively relieve GP workload pressures. A definition of the role, with examples of the knowledge, skills, and attributes required, should be made available to pharmacists, primary care teams, and the public. Training should include clinical skills teaching, set in context through exposure to general practice, and delivered motivationally by primary care practitioners.

Assessing adrenal status in patients before and immediately after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with cortisol deficiency poorly tolerate any systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), and may die if not treated with sufficient exogenous glucocorticoids. Controversy surrounds what constitutes a 'normal' adrenal response in critical illness. This study uses conventional tests for adrenal insufficiency to investigate cortisol status in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass surgery, a condition frequently associated with SIRS. DESIGN: A prospective, observational study. METHODS: Thirty patients with impaired left ventricular function (ejection fraction >23% <50%) underwent basal ACTH measurement, and a short cosyntropin test (250 µg, i.v.) 1 week preoperatively, and at +4 h following induction of general anaesthesia. Preoperatively, a 30 min cortisol level post cosyntropin >550 nmol/l was taken as a normal response. RESULTS: Prior to surgery, all patients had a normal response to cosyntropin. Postoperatively, eight patients (26.7%) did not achieve stimulated cortisol levels >550 nmol/l and the mean peak cortisol postoperatively was lower (1048 vs 730 nmol/l; P<0.001). There was a significant rise in ACTH after surgery (21 vs 184 ng/l; P=0.007) and reduction in Δ-cortisol post cosyntropin (579 vs 229 nmol/l; P<0.001). There was no change in basal cortisol pre- and post-operatively (447 vs 501; P=0.4). All patients underwent routine, uneventful postoperative recovery. CONCLUSION: Up to one quarter of patients with a normal cortisol status preoperatively demonstrated a raised ACTH and deficient cortisol response postoperatively. Despite these responses, all patients had uneventful outcomes. These data reinforce the need for caution when interpreting results of endocrine testing following major surgery or in the intensive care environment, and that prognostic value of these results may be of limited use.