Intensive glucose control and macrovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Improved glucose control in type 2 diabetes is known to reduce the risk of microvascular events. There is, however, continuing uncertainty about its impact on macrovascular disease. The aim of these analyses was to generate more precise estimates of the effects of more-intensive, compared with less-intensive, glucose control on the risk of major cardiovascular events amongst patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: A prospectively planned group-level meta-analysis in which characteristics of trials to be included, outcomes of interest, analyses and subgroup definitions were all pre-specified. RESULTS: A total of 27,049 participants and 2,370 major vascular events contributed to the meta-analyses. Allocation to more-intensive, compared with less-intensive, glucose control reduced the risk of major cardiovascular events by 9% (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.84-0.99), primarily because of a 15% reduced risk of myocardial infarction (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.76-0.94). Mortality was not decreased, with non-significant HRs of 1.04 for all-cause mortality (95% CI 0.90-1.20) and 1.10 for cardiovascular death (95% CI 0.84-1.42). Intensively treated participants had significantly more major hypoglycaemic events (HR 2.48, 95% CI 1.91-3.21). Exploratory subgroup analyses suggested the possibility of a differential effect for major cardiovascular events in participants with and without macrovascular disease (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.89-1.13, vs HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74-0.94, respectively; interaction p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Targeting more-intensive glucose lowering modestly reduced major macrovascular events and increased major hypoglycaemia over 4.4 years in persons with type 2 diabetes. The analyses suggest that glucose-lowering regimens should be tailored to the individual.

Reduction of stroke events with pravastatin: the Prospective Pravastatin Pooling (PPP) Project.

BACKGROUND: Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability. Although clinical trials of the early lipid-lowering therapies did not demonstrate a reduction in the rates of stroke, data from recently completed statin trials strongly suggest benefit. METHODS AND RESULTS: The effect of pravastatin 40 mg/d on stroke events was investigated in a prospectively defined pooled analysis of 3 large, placebo-controlled, randomized trials that included 19 768 patients with 102 559 person-years of follow-up. In all, 598 participants had a stroke during approximately 5 years of follow-up. The 2 secondary prevention trials (CARE [Cholesterol And Recurrent Events] and LIPID [Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease]) individually demonstrated reductions in nonfatal and total stroke rates. When the 13 173 patients from CARE and LIPID were combined, there was a 22% reduction in total strokes (95% CI 7% to 35%, P:=0.01) and a 25% reduction in nonfatal stroke (95% CI 10% to 38%). The beneficial effect of pravastatin on total stroke was observed across a wide range of patient characteristics. WOSCOPS (West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study, a primary prevention trial in hypercholesterolemic men) exhibited a similar, although smaller, trend for a reduction in total stroke. Among the CARE/LIPID participants, pravastatin was associated with a 23% reduction in nonhemorrhagic strokes (95% CI 6% to 37%), but there was no statistical treatment group difference in hemorrhagic or unknown type. CONCLUSIONS: Pravastatin reduced the risk of stroke over a wide range of lipid values among patients with documented coronary disease. This effect was due to a reduction in nonfatal nonhemorrhagic strokes.

Effect of amlodipine on the progression of atherosclerosis and the occurrence of clinical events. PREVENT Investigators.

BACKGROUND: The results of angiographic studies have suggested that calcium channel-blocking agents may prevent new coronary lesion formation, the progression of minimal lesions, or both. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Prospective Randomized Evaluation of the Vascular Effects of Norvasc Trial (PREVENT) was a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked clinical trial designed to test whether amlodipine would slow the progression of early coronary atherosclerosis in 825 patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease. The primary outcome was the average 36-month angiographic change in mean minimal diameters of segments with a baseline diameter stenosis of 30%. A secondary hypothesis was whether amlodipine would reduce the rate of atherosclerosis in the carotid arteries as assessed with B-mode ultrasonography, which measured intimal-medial thicknesses (IMT). The rates of clinical events were also monitored. The placebo and amlodipine groups had nearly identical average 36-month reductions in the minimal diameter: 0.084 versus 0.095 mm, respectively (P:=0.38). In contrast, amlodipine had a significant effect in slowing the 36-month progression of carotid artery atherosclerosis: the placebo group experienced a 0.033-mm increase in IMT, whereas there was a 0. 0126-mm decrease in the amlodipine group (P:=0.007). There was no treatment difference in the rates of all-cause mortality or major cardiovascular events, although amlodipine use was associated with fewer cases of unstable angina and coronary revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: Amlodipine has no demonstrable effect on angiographic progression of coronary atherosclerosis or the risk of major cardiovascular events but is associated with fewer hospitalizations for unstable angina and revascularization.

Effects of lovastatin and warfarin on early carotid atherosclerosis: sex-specific analyses. Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Progression Study (ACAPS) Research Group.

BACKGROUND: Few clinical trials have documented the efficacy of preventive treatment in asymptomatic women. METHODS AND RESULTS: Lovastatin and minidose warfarin were evaluated in a factorially designed, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. The primary outcome was 3-year change in the mean maximum intimal-medial thickness of the carotid arteries as measured by B-mode ultrasonography. Participants (n=919) were randomized to 1 of 4 treatment groups: lovastatin alone, warfarin alone, lovastatin+warfarin combination, or a double-placebo group. Eligible participants were asymptomatic for cardiovascular disease, with evidence of early carotid atherosclerosis and moderately elevated LDL cholesterol level. Almost half (n=445) of the participants were women. To avoid confounding, 117 women taking estrogen were excluded from analysis. Both sexes experienced reductions in disease progression with lovastatin; there was no evidence of an overall sex x treatment interaction (P=0.72). When estimates of the sex-specific results were examined post hoc, women experienced disease regression to the greatest extent with the lovastatin + warfarin combination (P=0.02), although the women on lovastatin alone also had a reduction in progression (P=0.09). Men experienced the greatest reduction with lovastatin alone (P=0.02), although there is a suggestion that warfarin may also reduce progression to some extent. CONCLUSIONS: Lovastatin is beneficial in reducing disease progression in women and men. Warfarin has no effect in women, although it may reduce progression in men. In men, warfarin does not add to the benefit of lovastatin and has no advantage over lovastatin alone.

Isradipine in prediabetic hypertensive subjects.

OBJECTIVE: Investigators from the Multicenter Isradipine Diuretic Atherosclerosis Study (MIDAS) previously reported that the isradipine group had a higher incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events than the diuretic group. The ultimate objective of the analyses presented here was to assess how indices of glycemia (specifically, serum glucose, serum insulin, and HbA1c) might have influenced the effects of the two agents on blood pressure control and CVD events. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Inclusion criteria included men and women > or = 40 years of age with ultrasonographically confirmed carotid atherosclerosis and a diastolic blood pressure of > 90 mmHg. Although insulin-dependent diabetic patients were excluded, the three glycemia indices had wide enough ranges to include patients who may be classified as prediabetic. A total of 883 patients were randomized either to the dihydropyridine calcium antagonist (CA) isradipine (2.5-5 mg twice a day) or to the diuretic hydrochlorothiazide (12.5-25 mg twice a day) and followed in double-blind fashion for 3 years. RESULTS: Both treatment groups had achieved comparable control of diastolic blood pressure, and there were no statistically significant differences in any of the glycemia indices, either at baseline or during follow-up. However, the excess isradipine events were noted to be clustered among those patients with elevated baseline levels of HbA1c who also experienced greater blood pressure reductions during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The increased cardiovascular risk associated with dihydropyridine CAs in prediabetic patients may be an explanation for the overall CA debate.

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor therapy and stroke risk reduction: an analysis of clinical trials data.

Although associations of cholesterol and coronary heart disease (CHD) are well accepted, the association between cholesterol and stroke has been a subject of some confusion. Epidemiologic evidence suggests no association between plasma concentrations of cholesterol and stroke, and earlier clinical trials were also negative. Two early meta-analyses of clinical trials designed to evaluate the effects of cholesterol lowering on CHD concluded that cholesterol lowering had no effect. More recently newer, more potent and better tolerated agents (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, reductase inhibitors) have become available and have been tested for their efficacy in reducing cholesterol and CHD in both primary prevention and secondary prevention trials. Meta-analyses of these trials, in contrast to the earlier trials, reveal a powerful statistically significant effect to reduce stroke as well as CHD in secondary prevention (30%); the direction of the effect is the same in trials of primary prevention or trials that randomized patients with and without CHD (mixed primary and secondary prevention trials) where the risk reductions for stroke, although not reaching statistical significance are 11 and 30%, respectively. An important difference in the newer analysis is the availability of several trials of secondary prevention in which low density lipoprotein cholesterol was lowered 25-30% and in which CHD event reduction was similarly reduced by 30%. Mechanisms for stroke reduction likely involve retardation of plaque progression in the intracranial and extracranial carotid arteries, plaque stabilization, and, in addition, stroke may be reduced partly as a consequence of CHD reduction.

Outcome results of the Fosinopril Versus Amlodipine Cardiovascular Events Randomized Trial (FACET) in patients with hypertension and NIDDM.

OBJECTIVE: ACE inhibitors and calcium antagonists may favorably affect serum lipids and glucose metabolism. The primary aim of the Fosinopril Versus Amlodipine Cardiovascular Events Randomized Trial (FACET) was to compare the effects of fosinopril and amlodipine on serum lipids and diabetes control in NIDDM patients with hypertension. Prospectively defined cardiovascular events were assessed as secondary outcomes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Inclusion criteria included a diagnosis of NIDDM and hypertension (systolic blood pressure of > 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure of > 90 mmHg). Exclusion criteria included a history of coronary heart disease or stroke, serum creatinine > 1.5 mg/dl, albuminuria > 40 micrograms/min, and use of lipid-lowering drugs, aspirin, or antihypertensive agents other than beta-blockers or diuretics. A total of 380 hypertensive diabetics were randomly assigned to open-label fosinopril (20 mg/day) or amlodipine (10 mg/day) and followed for up to 3.5 years. If blood pressure was not controlled, the other study drug was added. RESULTS: Both treatments were effective in lowering blood pressure. At the end of follow-up, between the two groups there was no significant difference in total serum cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, HbA1c, fasting serum glucose, or plasma insulin. The patients receiving fosinopril had a significantly lower risk of the combined outcome of acute myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospitalized angina than those receiving amlodipine (14/189 vs. 27/191; hazards ratio = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.26-0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Fosinopril and amlodipine had similar effects on biochemical measures, but the patients randomized to fosinopril had a significantly lower risk of major vascular events, compared with the patients randomized to amlodipine.

Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of the Prospective Randomized Evaluation of the Vascular Effects of Norvasc Trial (PREVENT).

The Prospective Randomized Evaluation of the Vascular Effects of Norvasc Trial is the first angiographic clinical trial to be designed to test whether an agent can slow or even reverse the progression of early coronary atherosclerosis in patients with documented disease. In addition, a subset of patients are undergoing carotid ultrasound examinations, providing a unique opportunity to assess and correlate disease progression in 2 arterial beds.

Reductase inhibitor monotherapy and stroke prevention.

BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic evidence and meta-analyses of data from early clinical trials suggest that lowering the levels of cholesterol does not reduce the events of stroke. These analyses have not included more recent clinical trials using reductase inhibitors. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a meta-analysis of the effect of reducing cholesterol levels on stroke in all reported clinical trials of primary (n = 4) and secondary (n = 8) prevention of coronary heart disease that used reductase inhibitor monotherapy and provided information on incident stroke. RESULTS: Analysis of combined data from primary and secondary prevention trials showed a highly statistically significant reduction of stroke associated with the use of reductase inhibitor monotherapy (27% reduction in stroke; P = .001). Analysis of secondary prevention trials alone disclosed a similar statistically significant effect (32% reduction in stroke; P = .001). A smaller nonsignificant reduction in stroke was noted in the primary prevention trials (15% reduction in stroke; P = .48). CONCLUSIONS: Reductase inhibitors now in use for lowering cholesterol levels are more potent and have fewer side effects than the cholesterol-lowering agents previously available. They appear to reduce stroke, most notably in patients with prevalent coronary artery disease, which may be partly due to the effects of lowering the levels of cholesterol on the progression and plaque stability of extracranial carotid atherosclerosis or the marked reduction of incident coronary heart disease associated with treatment.

[Reduction of cardiovascular events with pravastatin. A pooled analysis of clinical events within the scope of the Pravastatin Atherosclerosis Intervention Program]. / Reduktion kardiovaskulärer Ereignisse unter Pravastatin. Eine gepoolte Analyse klinischer Ereignisse im Rahmen des Pravastatin-Atherosklerose-Interventions-Programms.

BACKGROUND: It has been documented that the HMG coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, or statins, can decrease cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with clinical coronary disease and moderately to severely elevated lipid levels. Additional data are required to demonstrate a reduction of vascular events in coronary patients with less than severely elevated lipid levels and in subgroups of this population. METHODS AND RESULTS: Clinical data from four atherosclerosis regression trials that evaluated pravastatin were pooled for a predetermined analysis of the effect of that agent on the risk of coronary events. All trials were double-masked, placebo-controlled designs that used pravastatin as monotherapy for 2 to 3 years. The 1891 participants in the trials had evidence of atherosclerosis and mildly to moderately elevated lipid levels. For fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction, there was a 62% reduction in events attributable to pravastatin (p = .001). This effect was evident in younger and older patients, men and women, and patients with and without histories of hypertension and prior infarction. There was a 46% reduction in all-cause mortality (p = 17), which, although not statistically significant, is consistent with the results of other statin trials. There also was a 62% reduction in the risk of fatal or nonfatal stroke (p = .054). CONCLUSIONS: These pooled results provide strong evidence that pravastatin reduces the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with atherosclerotic disease and mildly to moderately elevated lipid levels. The benefit for reducing myocardial infarction is evident in older and younger patients, men and women, and patients with and without histories of hypertension and prior infarction.

Maximizing recruitment efforts in a drug lipid-lowering trial with dietary intervention to lower LDL cholesterol.

A select group of screened applicants initially disqualified from a four-center, primary prevention drug lipid-lowering trial because of borderline elevated serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, as defined in National Cholesterol Education Program-Adult Treatment Panel I (NCEP-ATP I) guidelines, participated in a dietary intervention protocol that was incorporated into the screening phase of the trial. Seventy-seven screened applicants for the Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Progression Study entered the dietary program, which was overseen by an experienced registered dietitian at the central operations sites who collaborated with local staff at clinical sites during program implementation. NCEP-ATP I fat-modified step I diet specifications served as the basis for the intervention. The program, consisting of five sessions conducted over an 8-week period, primarily used written and audiovisual educational materials in combination with behavioral approaches. Of the original 77 participants, 36 responded to the intervention by achieving their LDL-C goal. Twenty-nine were nonresponders and 12 were dropouts. Responders achieved an average 11.7% drop in total cholesterol at the end of the 8-week program. Mean LDL-C decline paralleled total cholesterol change. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol also decreased significantly. These results were sustained for 24 of the responders attending the final screening visit approximately a month later, when another fasting blood lipid measurement was made. Participants who dropped out were more likely to be smokers. Pre- and postintervention nutrition data assessed by semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire for 20 screenees randomized into the study indicated significant reductions in total fat, saturated fat, polyunsaturated fat, and dietary cholesterol, all known to influence blood lipid levels. Similar programs may prove useful to other drug lipid-lowering trials to maximize recruitment efforts.

Reduction in cardiovascular events during pravastatin therapy. Pooled analysis of clinical events of the Pravastatin Atherosclerosis Intervention Program.

BACKGROUND: It has been documented that the HMG coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, or statins, can decrease cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with clinical coronary disease and moderately to severely elevated lipid levels. Additional data are required to demonstrate a reduction of vascular events in coronary patients with less than severely elevated lipid levels and in subgroups of this population. METHODS AND RESULTS: Clinical data from four atherosclerosis regression trials that evaluated pravastatin were pooled for a predetermined analysis of the effect of that agent on the risk of coronary events. All trials were double-masked, placebo-controlled designs that used pravastatin as monotherapy for 2 to 3 years. The 1981 participants in the trials had evidence of atherosclerosis and mildly to moderately elevated lipid levels. For fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction, there was a 62% reduction in events attributable to pravastatin (P = .001). This effect was evident in younger and older patients, men and women, and patients with and without histories of hypertension and prior infarction. There was a 46% reduction in all-cause mortality (P = .17), which, although not statistically significant, is consistent with the results of other statin trials. There also was a 62% reduction in the risk of fatal or nonfatal stroke (P = .054). CONCLUSIONS: These pooled results provide strong evidence that pravastatin reduces the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with atherosclerotic disease and mildly to moderately elevated lipid levels. The benefit for reducing myocardial infarction is evident in older and younger patients, men and women, and patients with and without histories of hypertension and prior infarction.

Results of the primary outcome measure and clinical events from the Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Progression Study.

The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors have proven to be more effective in reducing levels of low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and to be better tolerated than other lipid-lowering compounds. Most of the trials evaluating the effects of these new agents on progression of atherosclerosis have not included individuals asymptomatic for cardiovascular disease and who have LDL cholesterol levels at or below the limits established by the National Cholesterol Education Program for initiating treatment. The Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Progression Study (ACAPS) tested the effect of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, lovastatin, on early-stage carotid atherosclerosis (as detected by B-mode ultrasonography) in 919 asymptomatic men and women, 40-79 years of age, who had LDL cholesterol levels between the 60th and 90th percentiles. Participants randomized into this double-blind, placebo-controlled, factorially designed study received lovastatin (20-40 mg/day) or lovastatin-placebo and warfarin (1 mg/day), or warfarin-placebo over a 3-year period. The progression of the mean maximum intimal-medial thickness (IMT) over 12 walls of both carotid arteries represented the primary outcome. Lovastatin treatment was associated with a reduction in progression of mean maximum IMT (p < 0.001). Levels of LDL cholesterol were reduced by 28% (43.5 mg/dl [11.25 mmol/liter]) in the lovastatin group within 6 months (p < 0.0001) and remained stable throughout the follow-up period, whereas these levels remained essentially unchanged in the lovastatin-placebo group. The difference in incidence of major cardiovascular events for patients in the lovastatin-placebo group was significant: 5 versus 14, respectively (p < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Pravastatin, Lipids, and Atherosclerosis in the Carotid Arteries (PLAC-II).

The Pravastatin, Lipids, and Atherosclerosis in the Carotid Arteries trial (PLAC-II) was initiated in 1987 and was the first double-blind, randomized clinical trial with progression of early extracranial carotid atherosclerosis as an outcome variable. We randomized 151 coronary patients to placebo or pravastatin and treated them for 3 years. B-mode ultrasound quantification of carotid artery intimal-medial thickness (IMT) was obtained at baseline and sequentially during this period. The primary outcome was the change in the mean of the maximum IMT measurements over time. Effects on individual carotid artery segments (common, bifurcation, internal carotid artery) and on clinical events were also investigated. During follow-up, plasma concentrations of total cholesterol were lower in pravastatin-treated patients compared with those of placebo-treated patients (4.81 vs 6.08 mmol/liter [186 vs 235 mg/dl]) as were concentrations of low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (3.10 vs 4.29 mmol/liter [120 vs 167 mg/dl]). Plasma concentrations of high density lipoprotein2 (HDL2) cholesterol were higher in pravastatin-treated patients than in placebo-treated patients (0.16 vs 0.14 mmol/liter [6.1 vs 5.5 mg/dl]). Active treatment resulted in a nonsignificant 12% reduction in progression of the mean-maximum IMT (from 0.068 mm/yr placebo to 0.059 mm/yr pravastatin) and a statistically significant 35% reduction in IMT progression in the common carotid (p = 0.03). Active treatment was also associated with a 60% reduction of nonfatal myocardial infarction plus death caused by coronary artery disease (p = 0.09), a 61% reduction of any fatal event plus any nonfatal myocardial infarction (p = 0.04), and an 80% reduction of fatal plus any nonfatal myocardial infarction (p = 0.03).

Reduction in coronary events during treatment with pravastatin. PLAC I and PLAC II Investigators. Pravastatin Limitation of Atherosclerosis in the Coronary Arteries.

The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors, or statins, are more efficacious than older lipid-lowering agents and therefore may be more effective in reducing the incidence of coronary events. The objective of this prespecified analysis was to examine in coronary patients the effect of the lipid-lowering agent pravastatin on 3-year rates of coronary event incidence, all-cause mortality, and nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), and to determine whether any observed benefit was also evident in patients > or = 65 years of age. The design of this analysis was to pool the data from 2 concurrent 3-year placebo-controlled clinical trials of pravastatin monotherapy in coronary patients (Pravastatin Limitation of Atherosclerosis in the Coronary Arteries [PLAC I] and the Pravastatin, Lipids, and Atherosclerosis in the Carotid Arteries [PLAC II]). This pooled database included 559 coronary patients with moderately elevated levels of low density lipoprotein cholesterol (between the 60th and 90th percentiles for age and gender in the United States). Over the 3 years of follow-up, use of pravastatin was associated with a 55% reduction in coronary incidence (p = 0.014). Pravastatin was also associated with a 67% reduction in nonfatal MI (p = 0.006). Eleven placebo patients died over the 3 years of follow-up compared with 7 in the pravastatin groups (a 40% reduction). Among older patients (age > or = 65 years), pravastatin therapy was associated with a 79% reduction in coronary event incidence (95% confidence interval [CI] 33-100%) and with a 86% reduction in nonfatal myocardial infarction (CI, 35-100%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Pravastatin, Lipids, and Atherosclerosis in the Carotid Arteries (PLAC-II)

We randomized 151 coronary patients to placebo or pravastatin and treated them for 3 years. B-mode ultrasound quantification of carotid artery intimal-medial thickness (IMT) was obtained at baseline and sequentially during this period. The primary outcome was the change in the mean of the maximal IMT measurements across time. Effects on individual carotid artery segments (common, bifurcation, and internal carotid) and on clinical events were also investigated. Plasma concentrations of total cholesterol were lower with active treatment than with placebo (4.80 vs 6.07 mmol/L [186 vs 235 mg/dl], respectively) as were concentrations of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (3.11 vs 4.30 mmol/L [120 vs 167 mg/dl], respectively). Plasma concentrations of high-density lipoprotein2 cholesterol were higher with active treatment (0.16 vs 0.14 mmol/L [6.1 vs 5.5 mg/dl], respectively). Active treatment resulted in a nonsignificant 12% reduction in progression of the mean-maximum IMT (from 0.068 to 0.059 mm/year) and a statistically significant 35% reduction in IMT progression in the common carotid. Active treatment was also associated with a reduction in fatal and nonfatal coronary events [corrected] (p = 0.09) and of any fatal event plus nonfatal myocardial infarction (p = 0.04).