Association between dental visits during pregnancy and setting for prenatal care.

OBJECTIVES: Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) may be well positioned to facilitate dental visits during pregnancy for low-income women. We sought to compare receipt of dental visits during pregnancy for women who received prenatal care at an FQHC versus a non-FQHC setting. METHODS: We analyzed Michigan Medicaid administrative data for all live birth deliveries between April 2018 and December 2020. We used billing data to categorize the predominant setting for prenatal care as occurring at a FQHC or a non-FQHC and claims data to identify dental visits during pregnancy (in the 9 months prior to delivery). We employed bivariate and multivariate analyses to explore the relationship between setting for prenatal care and dental visits during pregnancy. RESULTS: Women who received prenatal care at an FQHC versus non-FQHC had a higher proportion of dental visits during pregnancy (31.85% vs. 19.37%, p < 0.0001). In multivariate analyses, the strongest predictors of having a dental visit during pregnancy were FQHC prenatal care setting, having a dental emergency visit, having ≥3 prenatal visits, and having Medicaid coverage throughout pregnancy. Hispanic or Black race/ethnicity and 2020 delivery year were predictors of a lower likelihood of a dental visit. These predictors were consistent for the overall population and for the subset who had no dental visits pre-pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Medicaid-enrolled women who receive prenatal care at an FQHC are more likely to have a dental visit during pregnancy than their counterparts who receive prenatal care in a non-FQHC setting.

Microbiology-Based Instruction during Prenatal Dental Visits Improves Perinatal Oral Health Literacy.

To improve oral hygiene education, we evaluated the perception and potential impact of microbiology-focused oral hygiene instructions (OHI) given to pregnant patients. Dental hygienists provided this supplemental education and administered Saliva-Check Mutans (SCM) tests to pregnant patients (n = 188) in Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB/GYN) settings. Patients reported their self-perceived understanding of the relationship between oral bacteria and dental disease and returned postdelivery to receive a second SCM test and follow-up questionnaire (n = 47). Prior to the hygienist instruction, 84% of participants understood that bacteria caused tooth decay, while only 36% understood they could transfer these bacteria to their children. After instruction, patient understanding increased to 97% and 95%, respectively. Participants attributed these increases to the hygienist's explanation and SCM test. In postdelivery participants, >80% reported adherence to routine oral hygiene practices, and a significant decrease in patients with high-risk levels of salivary Streptococcus mutans was determined by SCM test (p = 0.0253). Participants agreed that the SCM test (89%) and microbiology explanation (95%) should be provided to every pregnant patient. Evaluation of patient perception of this intervention highlights how focused instruction on the infectious nature of dental disease can increase perinatal oral health literacy. Microbiology-focused education should be given to pregnant patients to reduce oral health disparities.

Oral health care for patients with developmental disabilities: A survey of Michigan general dentists.

AIMS: The aim of this study to examine the level of access to dental care in Michigan for individuals with DD and explore the dentists' practices, attitudes, and perceived barriers to providing care to this vulnerable population. METHODS AND RESULTS: A survey was mailed to a random sample of 1250 general dental practitioners with an active license in the State of Michigan. The survey included questions related to dentists' demographic information, opinion about willingness, barriers, and training needs associated with delivering care to children and adults with developmental disabilities. Descriptive statistics were computed and chi-squared tests and logistic regression models analyzed the association between predictor and key outcome variables. Results show that most dentists treated individuals with developmental disabilities (80.3%). Respondents who indicated that they currently do not treat these patients identified behavior management of patient (67.9%), inadequate training and experiences (52.4%) and severity of patient's condition (41.7%) as the most common reasons for not providing care to individuals with developmental disabilities. CONCLUSION: A majority of Michigan general dentists treat patients with developmental disabilities. Addressing barriers like training and improved reimbursements might help in increasing the number of dentists willing to treat patients with developmental disabilities.

Association of caries and tobacco risk with Dental Fitness Classification.

OBJECTIVE: Dental emergencies negatively affect the Army during combat. Dental readiness continues to be a primary mission of the Army Dental Care System and is an important part of mobilization. Dental Fitness Classification (DFC) is used to evaluate the oral health status and current treatment needs of soldiers. Caries and tobacco risk assessments were recently added to the annual examination of Army soldiers. The aim of this project was to determine whether any association existed between the DFC and caries and tobacco risk assessments of Army soldiers. METHODS: The study population consisted of 66,484 U.S. Army active duty soldiers. The data were obtained from an Army electronic database that maintains all patient visits. The following information was obtained for each soldier; rank, DFC, caries risk, and tobacco risk assessment. Summary statistics were computed and DFC was compared with caries risk, tobacco risk, and rank using the chi2 analysis and logistic regression model. RESULTS: High-caries risk soldiers were 15.6 times more likely to be a DFC 3 or 4 as compared to DFC 1 and 2 soldiers. DFC 3 or 4 soldiers were 1.43 times more likely to be tobacco users than DFC 1 or 2 soldiers. Logistic regression models showed that high-caries risk soldiers were at 13 times the odds of being a DFC 3 or DFC 4 as compared to DFC 1 or DFC 2. Soldiers who used tobacco products were also more likely to be in higher DFC classification compared to those that did not use any tobacco products. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown clear associations between DFC categories and caries and tobacco risk wherein DFC 3 and 4 soldiers are at higher risk for future caries and of being tobacco users. This relationship warrants the inclusion of caries and tobacco risk in the overall dental assessment of soldiers.