Management of the Potential Organ Donor in the ICU: Society of Critical Care Medicine/American College of Chest Physicians/Association of Organ Procurement Organizations Consensus Statement.

This document was developed through the collaborative efforts of the Society of Critical Care Medicine, the American College of Chest Physicians, and the Association of Organ Procurement Organizations. Under the auspices of these societies, a multidisciplinary, multi-institutional task force was convened, incorporating expertise in critical care medicine, organ donor management, and transplantation. Members of the task force were divided into 13 subcommittees, each focused on one of the following general or organ-specific areas: death determination using neurologic criteria, donation after circulatory death determination, authorization process, general contraindications to donation, hemodynamic management, endocrine dysfunction and hormone replacement therapy, pediatric donor management, cardiac donation, lung donation, liver donation, kidney donation, small bowel donation, and pancreas donation. Subcommittees were charged with generating a series of management-related questions related to their topic. For each question, subcommittees provided a summary of relevant literature and specific recommendations. The specific recommendations were approved by all members of the task force and then assembled into a complete document. Because the available literature was overwhelmingly comprised of observational studies and case series, representing low-quality evidence, a decision was made that the document would assume the form of a consensus statement rather than a formally graded guideline. The goal of this document is to provide critical care practitioners with essential information and practical recommendations related to management of the potential organ donor, based on the available literature and expert consensus.

Computed tomography scans with intravenous contrast: low incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy in blunt trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) with intravenous (IV) contrast is an important step in the evaluation of the blunt trauma patient; however, the risk for contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in these patients still remains unclear. The goal of this study was to describe the rate of CIN in blunt trauma patients at a Level 1 trauma center and identify the risk factors of developing CIN. METHODS: After internal review board approval, we reviewed our Level 1 trauma registry to identify blunt trauma patients admitted during a 1-year period. Chart review was used to identify patient demographics, creatinine levels, and vital signs. CIN was defined as an increase in creatinine by 0.5 mg/dL from admission after undergoing CT with IV contrast. RESULTS: Four percent of patients developed CIN during their admission following receipt of IV contrast for CT; 1% had continued renal impairment on discharge. No patients required dialysis during their admission. Diabetic patients had an increased rate of CIN, with 10% rate of CIN during admission and 4% at discharge. In multivariate analysis, only preexisting diabetes and Injury Severity Score (ISS) of greater than 25 were independently associated with risk for CIN. CONCLUSION: The rate of CIN in trauma patients following CT scan with IV contrast is low. Diabetes and ISS were independent risk factors of development of CIN in trauma patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiologic/prognostic study, level III.

Providing care for critically ill surgical patients: challenges and recommendations.

Providing optimal care for critically ill and injured surgical patients will become more challenging with staff shortages for surgeons and intensivists. This white paper addresses the historical issues behind the present situation, the need for all intensivists to engage in dedicated critical care per the intensivist model, and the recognition that intensivists from all specialties can provide optimal care for the critically ill surgical patient, particularly with continuing involvement by the surgeon of record. The new acute care surgery training paradigm (including trauma, surgical critical care, and emergency general surgery) has been developed to increase interest in trauma and surgical critical care, but the number of interested trainees remains too few. Recommendations are made for broadening the multidisciplinary training and practice opportunities in surgical critical care for intensivists from all base specialties and for maintaining the intensivist model within acute care surgery practice. Support from academic and administrative leadership, as well as national organizations, will be needed.

Prospective, protocolized study evaluating effects of antibiotics on sputum culture results in injured patients.

BACKGROUND: Appropriate utilization of antibiotics for critically ill patients involves tailoring the drug to culture results; however, the culture results must be reliable. We hypothesized that antimicrobial agents reduce significantly the reliability of cultures obtained between 1 and 24 h after antibiotic administration. METHODS: Patients were eligible for the study if they were ventilated mechanically and were suspected to have pneumonia. After enrollment, sputum cultures were obtained, and broad-spectrum antibiotics were started. Sputum cultures were repeated at 1, 6, 12, and 24 h after delivery of the first dose of antibiotic. Twenty-one patients whose initial culture was positive were included in the analysis. Their average age was 49.4 years, and the average Injury Severity Score was 27.7 points. RESULTS: The average intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay were 20.2 days and 24.7 days, respectively. All of the organisms grown from the pre-antibiotic cultures also grew in the cultures obtained 1 h after antibiotics were given. However, a significant number of these organisms were unable to be grown in subsequent cultures. The rate of negative cultures increased to 21%, 32%, and 42% in the 6-, 12-, and 24-h groups (p<0.01), respectively. Gram-positive organisms accounted for 42.9% of infections, with Staphylococcus aureus being the most common. All patients positive for S. aureus prior to antibiotic administration remained positive at each subsequent time. By 6 h, 21.5% of the gram-negative organisms could no longer be cultured. At 12 h, among the gram-positive organisms, 11 of 12 cultures were still positive, whereas only 50% of gram-negative organisms were still recoverable. CONCLUSION: Antibiotics have a substantial effect on culture results that is most pronounced in gram-negative organisms and is observed in cultures obtained beginning 1 h after antibiotics are given. As a result, cultures obtained more than 1 h after antibiotics are started cannot be used to tailor antibiotic choice in injured patients with suspected infections.

Therapeutic anticoagulation can be safely accomplished in selected patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage.

INTRODUCTION: Therapeutic anticoagulation is an important treatment of thromboembolic complications, such as DVT, PE, and blunt cerebrovascular injury. Traumatic intracranial hemorrhage has traditionally been considered to be a contraindication to anticoagulation. HYPOTHESIS: Therapeutic anticoagulation can be safely accomplished in select patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage. METHODS: Patients who developed thromboembolic complications of DVT, PE, or blunt cerebrovascular injury were stratified according to mode of treatment. Patients who underwent therapeutic anticoagulation with a heparin infusion or enoxaparin (1 mg/kg BID) were evaluated for neurologic deterioration or hemorrhage extension by CT scan. RESULTS: There were 42 patients with a traumatic intracranial hemorrhage that subsequently developed a thrombotic complication. Thirty-five patients developed a DVT or PE. Blunt cerebrovascular injury was diagnosed in four patients. 26 patients received therapeutic anticoagulation, which was initiated an average of 13 days after injury. 96% of patients had no extension of the hemorrhage after anticoagulation was started. The degree of hemorrhagic extension in the remaining patient was minimal and was not felt to affect the clinical course. CONCLUSION: Therapeutic anticoagulation can be accomplished in select patients with intracranial hemorrhage, although close monitoring with serial CT scans is necessary to demonstrate stability of the hemorrhagic focus.

Repair of high-risk incisional hernias and traumatic abdominal wall defects with porcine mesh.

Complex ventral hernias represent a significant challenge to surgeons. We hypothesized that a wide underlay technique in combination with a novel biologic mesh would result in repair with a low recurrence rate. Medical records of patients undergoing ventral herniorrhaphy with XenMatrix biologic mesh were evaluated. All patients were evaluated for hernia recurrence both immediately and after 2 to 3 years. There were 57 patients included in the study. The overall recurrence rate was 7.2 per cent; however, all recurrences were early and were likely technical failures. The average duration of follow-up was 30.6 months with no further recurrences after the early technical failures. The average number of previous recurrences was 1.5. Fascial closure was obtained over the mesh in 84 per cent of patients, with component separation being necessary in 36 per cent of patients. Lack of fascial reapproximation over the mesh was associated with early recurrence (0 vs 55%, P < 0.0001). Complex ventral hernias can be repaired with a low recurrence rate. Our technique in combination with the XenMatrix biologic mesh provides for durable repair. Whenever possible, the fascia should be closed above the underlay mesh, because this technique provides a more durable repair than using the mesh as a "fascial bridge".

Refeeding in the ICU: an adult and pediatric problem.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To describe the etiology and complications of the refeeding syndrome. RECENT FINDINGS: Complications of the refeeding syndrome can include electrolyte abnormalities, heart failure, respiratory failure, and death. This syndrome is of particular importance to critically ill patients, who can be moved from the starved state to the fed state rapidly via enteral or parenteral nutrition. There are a variety of risk factors for the development of the refeeding syndrome. All of these risk factors are tied together by starvation physiology. Case reports and case series continue to be reported, suggesting that this entity continues to exist in critically ill patients. Initiation of enteral nutrition to patients with starvation physiology should be gradual and careful monitoring of electrolytes and organ function is critical during the early stages of refeeding. SUMMARY: The refeeding syndrome remains a significant issue in critically ill patients. Knowledge of the risk factors and the clinical signs of the refeeding syndrome is important to optimize outcomes.

Reducing complications in trauma patients: use of a standardized quality improvement approach.

Injured patients are especially prone to developing complications. Using a multidisciplinary standardized approach to complication review is an effective method of evaluating quality improvement in patients on the trauma service. Collaboration between trauma surgeons and nurse clinicians is instrumental in improving the care of patients in each of the areas we identified. Using this consistently, quality improvement strategies can be put in place and tracked for outcomes. This has allowed for better quantification of the problem as well as any change that may result from applying this formal review process and subsequent intervention.

Nasal swabs collected routinely to screen for colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in intensive care units are a sensitive screening test for the organism in clinical cultures.

BACKGROUND: Many hospitals screen patients for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) on admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). We hypothesized that this screening information could be used to assist with empiric antibiotic decisions. METHODS: The medical records of patients admitted to a university-affiliated community hospital as well as a tertiary-care university hospital were reviewed. Patients admitted to the ICU were screened for MRSA colonization with a nasal swab that was analyzed with either chromogenic medium (hospital 1) or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (hospital 2). The results of the nasal swab were compared with clinical culture results. RESULTS: There were 141 patients, and 167 cultures were obtained. The majority of the cultures (70%) were performed on sputum specimens in an effort to diagnose pneumonia. The remaining cultures were performed on blood (10.1%), incisions (21.5%), and urine (3.4%). The overall sensitivity of nasal swab results was 69.5%. However, the sensitivity was significantly higher for nasal swab screening performed within six days of clinical cultures compared with screening performed seven days or more before cultures were obtained. (79% vs. 46%; p < 0.0001). Sensitivity also differed significantly depending on the surveillance method, being significantly higher among patients screened with PCR within six days of developing an infection than in patients screened with chromogenic medium (88% vs. 65.5%; p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Screening with PCR analysis of nasal swab specimens is a highly sensitive test for MRSA in clinical cultures. Clinicians may be able to use the swab results to tailor more appropriate empiric antimicrobial regimens. The results with chromogenic medium screening are markedly poorer, which suggests that clinicians should view them with caution.

A novel technique to skin graft abdominal wall wounds surrounding enterocutaneous fistulas.

BACKGROUND: Enterocutaneous fistulas often are associated with large abdominal wall wounds. Successful skin grafting of these sites is difficult, as the bed is constantly bathed by enteric contents. A method to graft these sites successfully would provide an important advance in their treatment. METHODS: The medical records of patients undergoing skin grafting of a site around an enterocutaneous fistula were reviewed. The amount of fistula output at the time of grafting was recorded. The method of grafting, as well as the means of protecting the graft from enteric exposure, were noted. Skin grafts were evaluated for the extent of "take." RESULTS: Seven patients met the inclusion criteria. After 1-2 weeks, the graft take was 90% in three patients, 80% in two patients, and 50% in two patients. After 1 month, there was complete epithelialization in 85% of patients, and the remaining patient had most of the site epithelialized. This healing allowed placement of an ostomy appliance in all patients. The fistula output was >400 mL per day in 70% of the patients. Multiple techniques were used to divert enteric flow away from the graft, but the most common was placement of a negative pressure dressing that concomitantly secured the graft and allowed enteric diversion. CONCLUSION: The presence of a high-output enterocutaneous fistula does not preclude successful skin grafting. Such grafting can accelerate wound healing as well as improve skin and site hygiene by allowing the placement of an ostomy device.

A trauma outreach program provided by a level I trauma center is an effective way to initiate peer review at referring hospitals and foster process improvements.

BACKGROUND: The initial care of critically injured patients has profound effects on ultimate outcomes. The "golden hour" of trauma care is often provided by rural hospitals before definitive transfer. There are, however, no standardized methods for providing educational feedback to these hospitals for the purposes of performance improvement. We hypothesized that an outreach program would stimulate peer review and identify systematic deficiencies in the care of patients with injuries. METHODS: We developed a quality improvement program aimed at providing educational feedback to hospitals that referred patients to our American College of Surgeons-verified level I trauma center. We traveled to each referral center to provide feedback on the initial treatment and ultimate outcome of patients that were transferred to us. These feedback sessions were presented in the format of case presentations and case discussions. RESULTS: The outreach program was presented at each hospital every 3 months to 6 months. Nine hospitals were included in our program. We received 334 patients in transfer from these hospitals during the study period. Formal peer review that focused on trauma patients increased from 14% of hospitals to 100% of hospitals after institution of the program. Eighty-five percent of hospitals thought that the care of patients with injuries was improved as a result of the program. Eighty-five percent of hospitals developed process improvement initiatives as a result of the program. CONCLUSIONS: A formal outreach program can stimulate peer review at rural hospitals, provide continuing education in the care of patients with injuries, and foster process improvements at referring hospitals.

Early enteral nutrition can be successfully implemented in trauma patients with an "open abdomen".

BACKGROUND: The presence of an "open abdomen" after a trauma laparotomy can complicate the nutritional management of injured patients. METHODS: The medical records of patients admitted to an American College of Surgeons-verified level 1 trauma center were evaluated. The timing of nutritional support was noted. The method to obtain abdominal closure was also noted. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were included in the study. Enteral nutrition was successfully initiated in 52% of patients before fascial closure. Enteral nutrition was initiated 3.8 days after the initial laparotomy in these patients. All patients successfully achieved fascial and skin closure, obviating the need for delayed hernia repair or skin grafting. CONCLUSIONS: Enteral nutrition can be successfully initiated in patients with "open abdomens." In our series, early enteral nutrition did not alter our ability to ultimately obtain fascial and skin closure.

Implementation of a mandatory checklist of protocols and objectives improves compliance with a wide range of evidence-based intensive care unit practices.

OBJECTIVE: To determine a) if a checklist covering a diverse group of intensive care unit protocols and objectives would improve clinician consideration of these domains and b) if improved consideration would change practice patterns. DESIGN: Pre- and post observational study. SETTING: A 24-bed surgical/burn/trauma intensive care unit in a teaching hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 1399 patients admitted between June 2006 and May 2007. INTERVENTIONS: The first component of the study evaluated whether mandating verbal review of a checklist covering 14 intensive care unit best practices altered verbal consideration of these domains. Evaluation was performed using real-time bedside audits on morning rounds. The second component evaluated whether the checklist altered implementation of these domains by changing practice patterns. Evaluation was performed by analyzing data from the Project IMPACT database after patients left the intensive care unit. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Verbal consideration of evaluable domains improved from 90.9% (530/583) to 99.7% (669/671, p < .0001) after verbal review of the checklist was mandated. Bedside consideration improved on the use of deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis (p < .05), stress ulcer prophylaxis (p < .01), oral care for ventilated patients (p < 0.01), electrolyte repletion (p < .01), initiation of physical therapy (p < .05), and documentation of restraint orders (p < .0001). Mandatory verbal review of the checklist resulted in a greater than two-fold increase in transferring patients out of the intensive care unit on telemetry (16% vs. 35%, p < .0001) and initiation of physical therapy (28% vs. 42%, p < .0001) compared with baseline practice. CONCLUSIONS: A mandatory verbal review of a checklist covering a wide range of objectives and goals at each patient's bedside is an effective method to improve both consideration and implementation of intensive care unit best practices. A bedside checklist is a simple, cost-effective method to prevent errors of omission in basic domains of intensive care unit management that might otherwise be forgotten in the setting of more urgent care requirements.

Adjunctive measures for treating surgical infections and sepsis.

The history of adjunctive treatments for severe sepsis has been fraught with more failures than successes. To date, there have been few interventions that have been demonstrated to be efficacious by multiple large, well-designed, multicenter randomized clinical trials. However, recent research into treatment strategies using drotrecogin alfa (activated), effective blood glucose management, early goal-directed therapy, protocolization of care, and intensivist management has demonstrated positive results. Further research is being conducted to verify the success of these initial trials. This article summarizes some of the available adjunctive treatments for severe sepsis.

Antimicrobial therapy for acute colonic diverticulitis.

BACKGROUND: Although guidelines and reviews have systematically evaluated diagnosis and surgical management of acute diverticulitis, they have focused only minimally on antibiotic selection for the treatment of this disease. We undertook a review of the literature to assess more clearly the use of specific antimicrobial agents in the treatment of patients with acute diverticulitis of the colon. METHODS: A MEDLINE search was conducted to identify original research, review papers, and guidelines on the use of antimicrobial agents for the treatment of acute diverticulitis. RESULTS: The general recommendation to use antibiotics with activity against common gram-negative and anaerobic pathogens has remained consistent. A number of single agents and combination regimens provide such activity. However, there is little evidence on which to base selection of specific antimicrobial regimens, and no regimen has demonstrated superiority. In general, episodes of diverticulitis severe enough to warrant hospitalization should be managed initially with intravenous antibiotics. Oral therapy can be used for outpatient treatment or when the patient's condition improves. There is a paucity of data regarding the optimal duration of antimicrobial therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Careful clinical studies are needed to evaluate better the antibiotic regimens for the treatment of acute diverticulitis. Until such studies are conducted, we are forced to rely on tradition, in vitro analyses, pharmacokinetic profiling, and indirect evidence from studies of complicated intra-abdominal infections to determine appropriate therapy for this disease.

Prevention of catheter-related blood stream infection.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Catheter-related blood stream infections are a morbid complication of central venous catheters. This review will highlight a comprehensive approach demonstrated to prevent catheter-related blood stream infections. RECENT FINDINGS: Elements of prevention important to inserting a central venous catheter include proper hand hygiene, use of full barrier precautions, appropriate skin preparation with 2% chlorhexidine, and using the subclavian vein as the preferred anatomic site. Rigorous attention needs to be given to dressing care, and there should be daily assessment of the need for central venous catheters, with prompt removal as soon as is practicable. Healthcare workers should be educated routinely on methods to prevent catheter-related blood stream infections. If rates remain higher than benchmark levels despite proper bedside practice, antiseptic or antibiotic-impregnated catheters can also prevent infections effectively. A recent program utilizing these practices in 103 ICUs in Michigan resulted in a 66% decrease in infection rates. SUMMARY: There is increasing recognition that a comprehensive strategy to prevent catheter-related blood stream infections can prevent most infections, if not all. This suggests that thousands of infections can potentially be averted if the simple practices outlined herein are followed.

Impact of resident work-hour restrictions on trauma care.

BACKGROUND: In July 2003, the American Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) required residency programs to significantly restrict resident work hours. The effect of these regulations on trauma services has not yet been investigated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of the ACGME regulations on the care of injured patients and resident education. METHODS: A 24-question instrument was mailed to a sample of senior trauma surgeons. RESULTS: Shift work has become significantly more common among trauma residents since July 2003 (14% vs. 53.4%, (P < .001)). Fifty-four percent of respondents believed that trauma education has worsened and 45% believed that patient care has worsened as a result of the work-hour restrictions. CONCLUSIONS: The ACGME-mandated work-hour restrictions have had a dramatic effect on resident and staff surgeons involved in the care of injured patients. Appropriate methods of responding to these challenges must be developed to improve trauma care and enhance resident education.

A comparison of corrected serum calcium levels to ionized calcium levels among critically ill surgical patients.

BACKGROUND: Aberrations in calcium homeostasis are common in critically ill patients. The proper method to evaluate this issue in surgical patients has not been completely defined. METHODS: Medical records of patients admitted to a university-affiliated, tertiary-care surgical intensive care unit were retrospectively reviewed. Calcium status was evaluated by ionized levels and as a function of serum calcium levels corrected for albumin aberrations. RESULTS: Corrected serum calcium values failed to accurately classify calcium status in 38% of cases. The sensitivity and specificity of the corrected serum calcium formula to evaluate hypocalcemia were 53% and 85%, respectively. Corrected serum values underestimated the prevalence of hypocalcemia and overestimated the prevalence of normocalcemia. No factors were able to discern which patients could be evaluated by corrected serum calcium levels. CONCLUSIONS: Calcium homeostasis should be evaluated by ionized calcium levels rather than as a function of serum calcium and albumin levels.

The effect of obesity on outcomes among injured patients.

INTRODUCTION: The potential consequences of obesity in trauma patients are significant, yet incompletely defined by previous studies. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of obesity on morbidity and mortality among injured patients. METHODS: Medical records of all trauma patients evaluated at an American College of Surgeons verified Level I trauma center over a 1-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Morbidity and mortality were assessed after patients were stratified according to body mass index (BMI=kilograms/meters) and injury severity score. RESULTS: The mortality of patients with a BMI > or =35 (obese patients) was 10.7% versus 4.1% for patients with a BMI<35 (lean patients, p = 0.003). Nearly 27% of obese patients versus 17.6% of lean patients experienced one or more complications while in the hospital (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Obese patients are significantly more likely than lean patients to experience complications and death after a traumatic event. This effect is enhanced with higher levels of injury.

A survey of residents and faculty regarding work hour limitations in surgical training programs.

HYPOTHESIS: Surgical faculty and residents have significantly different attitudes regarding work hour restrictions. SETTING: All general surgery residencies approved by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). PARTICIPANTS: All voluntarily participating surgical faculty and residents. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Current hours worked, days off per month, and attitudes and opinions regarding the current surgical-training environment. METHODS: A 17-question survey instrument was mailed to the program directors of all ACGME-approved surgical-training programs in the United States. They were requested to distribute the survey to all faculty and residents for completion and to return the forms for analysis. RESULTS: Responses (N = 1653) were received from 46% of surgical-training programs. A significant difference was noted between faculty and resident responses in most categories. Most residents (87%) reported more than 80 duty hours per week, whereas 45% reported working more than 100 hours per week. Only 30% of residents reported an average of 1 day per week free of clinical activities. Although a minority of residents (43%) felt that their workload was excessive, 57% felt that their cognitive abilities had been impaired by fatigue. A significant number of residents (64%) and faculty (39%) believe that duty hour restrictions should be adopted. A minority of residents (20%) and faculty (47%) believe that the duration of residency training should be increased to compensate for duty hour restrictions. One quarter of residents regret choosing a career in surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Current duty hours for most surgical residents exceed the proposed ACGME limits. Although most residents support duty hour limits; surgical faculty are less supportive. Significant alterations in the current design and structure of surgical-training programs will be required to meet the ACGME guidelines.