Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rev. colomb. gastroenterol ; 36(4): 446-454, oct.-dic. 2021. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | LILACS | ID: biblio-1360968

RESUMO

Resumen Introducción: la anemia es la complicación más frecuente en enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (EII). El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar la prevalencia, asociaciones y tratamiento de la anemia en EII en nuestro medio. Materiales y métodos: se analizaron de forma retrospectiva datos de pacientes adultos con EII del Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe en Medellín, Colombia, que consultaron desde 2001 hasta febrero de 2019. Se emplearon frecuencias absolutas y relativas. Para comparar dos proporciones se utilizó la prueba de chi cuadrado de independencia y se estimó el Odds ratio (OR). Resultados: se documentaron 759 pacientes con EII, de los cuales 544 (71,6 %) presentaron colitis ulcerativa (CU); 200 (26,3 %), enfermedad de Crohn (EC), y 15, EII no clasificable (1,9 %). En total, 185 (24,4 %) pacientes con EII presentaron anemia, que es menos frecuente en CU que en EC (22,2 % frente a 32,5 %, respectivamente; OR: 0,684; IC: 0,456-0,96; p = 0,03). Los pacientes con CU extensa (54,1 %) tenían más anemia que aquellos con CU no extensa (46,3 %) (OR: 4,4; IC: 2,6-7,4; p = 0,001); lo mismo se observó al comparar la CU grave (66,1 %) con la no grave (32,3 %) (OR: 4,95; IC: 2,87-8,51; p = 0,000). En la EC, los pacientes con comportamiento no inflamatorio (B2, B3: 73,9 %) presentaron más anemia en comparación con aquellos con comportamiento inflamatorio (B1: 26,2 %) (OR: 0,35; IC: 0,18-0,67; p = 0,000). 44,3 % de los pacientes no recibió tratamiento, 19,5 % recibió hierro oral, 20,0 % recibió hierro intravenoso y 16,2 % fue transfundido. Conclusiones: la anemia es una complicación frecuente de la EII en nuestro medio (24,4 %). A pesar de las guías internacionales, el tratamiento es subóptimo en nuestro medio.


Abstract Introduction: Anemia is the most frequent complication of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This study aims to determine the prevalence, connection, and treatment of anemia in IBD in a local context. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at The Pablo Tobon Uribe Hospital, in Medellín (Colombia) with adult patients who (were admitted) came for consultation from 2001, until February 2019. Absolut and relative frequencies were calculated. The Chi square test of independence was applied for comparing two proportions and the odds ratio (OR) was estimated. Results: A total of 759 IBD patients were enrolled, 544 (71.6%) with ulcerative colitis (UC); 200 (26.3%) Crohn's disease (CD), and 15 (1.9%) with non-classifiable IBD. In total, 185 (24,4 %) IBD patients had a diagnosis of anemia, that is less frequent in UC patients that in CD patients (22,2 % versus 32,5 %, respectively; OR: 0,684; CI: 0,456-0,96; p = 0,03). Extensive UC patients (54,1 %) had a more recurrent level of anemia than non-extensive UC (46,3 %) (OR: 4,4; CI: 2,6-7,4; p = 0,001); the same result was observed when severe UC (66,1 %) was compared with UC non-severe (32,3 %) (OR: 4,95; CI: 2,87-8,51; p = 0,000). In the analysis of CD, patients with a non-inflammatory response (B2, B3: 73,9 %) had a more recurrent level of anemia than patients with an inflammatory response (B1: 26,2 %) (OR: 0,35; CI: 0,18-0,67; p = 0,000). 44,3 % of the total number of patients received treatment, 19,5 % received oral iron, 20,0 % received intravenous iron, and 16,2 % received a blood transfusion. Conclusions: In our context, Anemia is a common complication in IBD cases (24,4 %). Despite the existence of international guidelines, the treatment in our context is not optimal.


Assuntos
Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Prevalência , Anemia , Ferro , Pacientes , Terapêutica , Transfusão de Sangue , Doença de Crohn , Hospitais
2.
Rev. colomb. cancerol ; 25(3): 172-177, jul.-set. 2021. tab, graf
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: biblio-1376844

RESUMO

Resumen Los bisfosfonatos constituyen uno de los pilares fundamentales en el manejo de la morbilidad ósea de los pacientes con varios tipos de tumores sólidos (1, 3). Sin embargo, a pesar de la experiencia que tenemos por su uso desde hace décadas, existen eventos adversos como las fracturas atípicas (FA) que por su baja frecuencia pueden pasar desapercibidas y no recibir un manejo adecuado. Existen pocos reportes en la literatura de FA en el manejo de pacientes con cáncer. Se presenta un caso en el cual una paciente con un tumor metacrónico de mama con metástasis ósea al debut, actualmente en remisión, presenta una FA de fémur tras recibir bisfosfonatos durante 8 años.


Abstract Bisphosphonates are one of the fundamental pillars in the treatment of bone morbidities in patients with different types of solid tumors.1-3 However, despite the experience that we have accumulated during decades, there are adverse events such as atypical fractures (AF) that due to their low frequency can go unnoticed and might not receive adequate management. There are few reports in the literature about AF in cancer treatments. We present a case of a patient with metachronous breast cancer and bone metastases at initial diagnosis, currently in remission, who presents AF of the femur after receiving bisphosphonates for 8 years.


Assuntos
Humanos , Difosfonatos , Fraturas Ósseas , Fêmur , Terapêutica , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Neoplasias
3.
Gastroenterol. hepatol. (Ed. impr.) ; 44(6): 398-404, Jun-Jul. 2021. graf, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-221672

RESUMO

Introducción: Las manifestaciones extraintestinales (MEI) son frecuentes en pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (EII). Nuestro objetivo es caracterizar y determinar la prevalencia de MEI en nuestra cohorte de pacientes con EII. Pacientes y métodos: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo en pacientes adultos con EII del Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe en Medellín (Colombia). Se consideraron MEI articulares, colangitis esclerosante primaria (CEP), oftalmológicas y dermatológicas. Se emplearon frecuencias absolutas y relativas. Para comparar 2proporciones se utilizó la prueba χ2 de independencia y se estimó el odds ratio (OR). Resultados: Nuestro registro cuenta con 759 pacientes con EII, 544 presentaban CU (71,6%), 200 EC (26,3%) y 15 EII no clasificable (1,9%). Del total, 177 pacientes con EII (23,3%) presentaron MEI, 123 de 544 (22,6%) con CU y 53 de 200 (26,5%) con EC (OR: 0,81; IC 95%: 0,55-1,17; p=0,31). En cuanto al tipo de MEI, las articulares fueron las más frecuentes (13,5%), más en EC que en CU (20,0 vs. 11,3%; OR 1,94; IC 95%: 1,25-3,00; p=0,0037). Los pacientes con EII y MEI utilizaron más anticuerpos contra el factor de necrosis tumoral (anti-TNF) que aquellos sin MEI (43,5 vs. 18,5%; OR 3,38; IC 95%: 2,31-4,90; p=0,0001). Conclusiones: La prevalencia de MEI en nuestra cohorte es alta (23,3%) y el tipo más frecuente es la articular. Los anti-TNF son más utilizados cuando coexisten EII y MEI. Nuestro estudio aporta información valiosa sobre la asociación de MEI y EII en Latinoamérica.(AU)


Introduction: Extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs) are frequent in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Our objective is to characterize and determine the prevalence of MEIs in our cohort of patients with IBD. Patients and methods: A retrospective study was carried out in adult patients with IBD at the Pablo Tobón Uribe Hospital in Medellín. Colombia. Articular MEIs, primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), both ophthalmological and dermatological, were considered. Absolute and relative frequencies were used. The Chi square test of independence was used to compare 2proportions and the odds ratio (OR) was estimated. Results: Our registry has 759 patients with IBD, 544 present UC (71.6%), 200 CD (26.3%) and 15 unclassifiable IBD (1.9%); 177 patients with IBD (23.3%) presented EIMs, 123 of 544 (22.6%) with UC and 53 of 200 (26.5%) with CD (OR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.55-1.17, P=0.31). Regarding the type of EIMs, the articular ones were the most frequent (13.5%), more in CD than in UC (20.0 vs. 11.3%, OR 1.94, 95% CI: 1.25-3.00, P=0.0037). Patients with IBD and EIMs used more antibodies against tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNFs), compared to those without EIMs (43.5 vs. 18.5%, OR 3.38, 95% CI: 2.31-4.90, P=0.0001). Conclusions: The prevalence of EIMs in our cohort is high (23.3%) and the most frequent type is joint. Anti-TNFs are most used when IBD and EIMs coexist. Our study provides valuable information on the association of EIMs and IBD in Latin America.(AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/complicações , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/diagnóstico , Doença de Crohn , Colite Ulcerativa , Colômbia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Gastroenterologia , Gastroenteropatias , Estudos de Coortes , Prevalência
4.
Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 44(6): 398-404, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33172691

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs) are frequent in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Our objective is to characterize and determine the prevalence of MEIs in our cohort of patients with IBD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out in adult patients with IBD at the Pablo Tobón Uribe Hospital in Medellín. Colombia. Articular MEIs, primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), both ophthalmological and dermatological, were considered. Absolute and relative frequencies were used. The Chi square test of independence was used to compare 2proportions and the odds ratio (OR) was estimated. RESULTS: Our registry has 759 patients with IBD, 544 present UC (71.6%), 200 CD (26.3%) and 15 unclassifiable IBD (1.9%); 177 patients with IBD (23.3%) presented EIMs, 123 of 544 (22.6%) with UC and 53 of 200 (26.5%) with CD (OR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.55-1.17, P=0.31). Regarding the type of EIMs, the articular ones were the most frequent (13.5%), more in CD than in UC (20.0 vs. 11.3%, OR 1.94, 95% CI: 1.25-3.00, P=0.0037). Patients with IBD and EIMs used more antibodies against tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNFs), compared to those without EIMs (43.5 vs. 18.5%, OR 3.38, 95% CI: 2.31-4.90, P=0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of EIMs in our cohort is high (23.3%) and the most frequent type is joint. Anti-TNFs are most used when IBD and EIMs coexist. Our study provides valuable information on the association of EIMs and IBD in Latin America.


Assuntos
Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/complicações , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Estudos de Coortes , Colite Ulcerativa/complicações , Colite Ulcerativa/epidemiologia , Colômbia/epidemiologia , Doença de Crohn/complicações , Doença de Crohn/epidemiologia , Eritema Nodoso/epidemiologia , Eritema Nodoso/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/epidemiologia , Artropatias/epidemiologia , Artropatias/etiologia , Masculino , Razão de Chances , Úlceras Orais/epidemiologia , Úlceras Orais/etiologia , Prevalência , Psoríase/epidemiologia , Psoríase/etiologia , Pioderma Gangrenoso/epidemiologia , Pioderma Gangrenoso/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Esclerite/epidemiologia , Uveíte/epidemiologia , Uveíte/etiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...