Comparing fine needle biopsy techniques in solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective randomized study.

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsies (EUS-FNB) are the best technique for sampling solid pancreatic lesions. However, the most appropriate biopsy technique has not been standardized using Fine Needle Biopsy (FNB) needles. The aim of this work was to identify the best biopsy technique to achieve the best tissue integrity and cause the least blood contamination. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients ≥18 years of age with solid pancreatic lesions who underwent EUS-FNB at our institution from January 2020 to May 2021 were consecutively selected. Three passes were performed with each of the threee techniques to obtain tissue: suction with 10 ml of vacuum, capillary, and wet. An independent pathologist evaluated the received tissue integrity and the degree of blood contamination of each sample according to scales. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients were recruited for our study. A superior tissue integrity was observed using the wet-suction technique in lesions located in the body and/or tail of the pancreas, and an average score of 4.40 (p = 0.027) was assigned for this technique. Regarding the contamination of the sample in the whole cohort, the simple-suction technique shown a higher contamination, 1.55 (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference among the techniques when evaluating tissue integrity or contamination in lesions larger or smaller than 3 cm. CONCLUSION: When performing EUS-FNB for solid pancreatic lesions located in the head/uncinated process, the three methods provided similar diagnostic yields. The wet-suction technique had a higher score in tissue integrity when lesions were located in the body and/or tail of the pancreas.

Netherton Syndrome: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Netherton syndrome (NS) is a rare genodermatosis with an autosomal recessive pattern of inheritance caused by pathogenic variants in the SPINK5 gene. It is characterized by a triad consisting of atopic diathesis, ichthyosis linearis circumflexa, and hair shaft abnormalities. Ichthyosis linearis circumflexa can be confused with atopic dermatitis leading to a delayed diagnosis. Furthermore, difficulty in making the differential diagnosis with other atopiform, erythrodermic, and ichthyosiform entities that exhibit hair shaft abnormalities represent a challenge. Trichoscopy is an accessible and noninvasive auxiliary diagnostic tool in these cases; the hair shaft abnormalities found in NS are bamboo, golf tee, and matchstick hairs. Identification of a pathogenic variant in the SPINK5 gene through genetic testing is necessary to confirm the diagnosis. Multiple treatment options are available including topical therapy with emollients, corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, antiseptics, and narrowband UVB phototherapy. Systemic treatments comprehend intravenous immunoglobulins, and advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology of NS have led to more directed therapies with biologics such as infliximab, ixekizumab, secukinumab, ustekinumab, and dupilumab. Treatments currently under investigation include inhibitors of kallikrein 5, cathelicidins, drugs activating the transcription factor nuclear factor erythroid-derived 2-like 2, and gene therapy using autologous keratinocytes induced with a lentiviral vector encoding SPINK5.