Effects of calcium ammonium nitrate fed to dairy cows on nutrient intake and digestibility, milk quality, microbial protein synthesis, and ruminal fermentation parameters.

We evaluated the effects of supplemental calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) fed to dairy cows on dry matter (DM) intake, nutrient digestibility, milk quality, microbial protein synthesis, and ruminal fermentation. Six multiparous Holstein cows at 106 ± 14.8 d in milk, with 551 ± 21.8 kg of body weight were used in a replicated 3 × 3 Latin square design. Experimental period lasted 21 d, with 14 d for an adaptation phase and 7 d for sampling and data collection. Cows were randomly assigned to receive the following treatments: URE, 12 g of urea/kg of DM as a control group; CAN15, 15 g of CAN/kg of DM; and CAN30, 30 g of CAN/kg of DM. Supplemental CAN reduced DM intake (URE 19.0 vs. CAN15 18.9 vs. CAN30 16.5 kg/d). No treatment effects were observed for apparent digestibility of DM, organic matter, crude protein, ether extract, and neutral detergent fiber; however, CAN supplementation linearly increased nonfiber carbohydrate digestibility. Milk yield was not affected by treatments (average = 23.1 kg/d), whereas energy-corrected milk (ECM) and 3.5% fat-corrected milk (FCM) decreased as the levels of CAN increased. Nitrate residue in milk increased linearly (URE 0.30 vs. CAN15 0.33 vs. CAN30 0.38 mg/L); however, treatments did not affect nitrite concentration (average: 0.042 mg/L). Milk fat concentration was decreased (URE 3.39 vs. CAN15 3.35 vs. CAN30 2.94%), and the proportion of saturated fatty acids was suppressed by CAN supplementation. No treatment effects were observed on the reducing power and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances of milk, whereas conjugated dienes increased linearly (URE 47.6 vs. CAN15 52.7 vs. CAN30 63.4 mmol/g of fat) with CAN supplementation. Treatments had no effect on microbial protein synthesis; however, molar proportion of ruminal acetate and acetate-to-propionate ratio increased with CAN supplementation. Based on the results observed, supplementing CAN at 30 g/kg of DM should not be recommended as an optimal dose because it lowered DM intake along with ECM and 3.5% FCM, although no major changes were observed on milk quality and ruminal fermentation.

Which One Is the Best for Living Donation: A Multiple-Artery Left Kidney Nephrectomy or a Right Kidney Nephrectomy?

INTRODUCTION: The current approach in living-donor kidney transplant is to preserve the best kidney for the donor and harvest the contralateral one. Due to a shorter renal vein and a greater incidence of venous thrombosis, left kidneys are more frequently elected. Notwithstanding, arterial anatomy may be complex and thus render the transplantation procedure more difficult and prone to complications. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the outcomes after multiple-artery left kidney nephrectomy (MALKN) and right kidney nephrectomy (RKN). RESULTS: Seventy-three cases were performed from 1999 to 2017 in our institution: 34 MALKN and 39 RKN. The mean operative time was significantly longer in MALKN. Warm ischemia time, donor and receptor hospital stay, and postoperative complications did not differ between groups. There was a positive correlation between renal arteries' ostia distance in MALKN and the duration of warm ischemia period. There was no significant difference in the incidence of acute tubular necrosis, first-year variations in serum creatinine, and glomerular filtration rate between groups. Long-term graft survival did not significantly differ between groups. Three cases of vein thrombosis after RKN were reported with graft loss. CONCLUSION: The safety and efficacy of MALKN does not differ from RKN, although there appears to be a higher incidence of vein thrombosis after right kidney transplantation. Despite being technically more demanding, particularly in cases with distant artery ostia, MALKN could be a better option than RKN for living donation, expanding the available donor pool, although more studies are needed to affirm this conclusion.

From Open to Laparoscopic Living-donor Nephrectomy: Changing the Paradigm in a High-volume Transplant Center.

In 1995, Ratner et al reported the first laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy, and since then this approach is gradually replacing traditional open surgery. The learning curve of the procedure is still unclear and lessons taken from initial experience series are of utmost importance. We retrospectively analyzed our initial 50 living-donor laparoscopic nephrectomies, of which 90% were performed on the left side. Renal vascular variation occurred in 28% of donors. The median age and body mass index of the donors were 50 years (IQR 39-55) and 24.65 kg/m(2) (IQR 22.5-27.3), respectively. The median operative time and warm ischemia time were 160 minutes (IQR 141-178) and 240 seconds (IQR 210-280), respectively. Estimated blood loss was 60 mL (IQR 60-127.5). The serum creatinine of the receptors was 97.6 µmol/L (IQR 87.5-139.6) 1 month after transplant. Overall, there were 5 complications, including 2 (4%) open conversions, 1 (2%) incisional hernia, 1 (2%) graft loss, and 1 (2%) reintervention. The body mass index and the multiple arteries did not influence the operative time and warm ischemia time or the recipient's serum creatinine level. Along the series, there was a significant reduction in the operative time (Spearman ρ = -5.2; P < .001), but no significant differences were found for warm ischemia time, blood loss, or serum creatinine of the recipients (P > .05). Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is a safe procedure in centers experienced in laparoscopic surgery; however, the learning curve plateau was not reached after the initial 50 cases.

Female sexual function and depression after kidney transplantation: comparison between deceased- and living-donor recipients.

Disturbances in sexual function and depression are a common feature in women with chronic renal failure. Living-donor kidney transplantation seems to warrant better results than its cadaveric counterpart in many aspects but its impact on post-transplantation sexual function remains unknown. This study aimed to compare post-transplantation sexual function and depression in women receiving kidney grafts from living and deceased donors. From a single-center prospective database of 2016 renal transplantations between June 2011 and June 2013, we enrolled 50 sexually active women after kidney transplantation. Female sexual function was evaluated with the Female Sexual Function Index Questionnaire (FSFI) and depression was assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) scale. Thirty-four patients referred the questionnaires. The sexual domains of satisfaction and desire were significantly better in living-donor receptors; in all other domains evaluated by FSFI no statistically significant difference was encountered between groups, although living-donor receptors tended to report better function. Total BDI-II was well correlated with total FSFI score in our study cohort (Spearman's rho = -0.80, P < .001). Only 34.6% of women referred to have discussed sexual issues with their physicians before transplantation, whereas 73.1% stated it would have been important. In conclusion, living-donor transplantation exerted a positive effect on women's sexual function.