Prevalencia de la miocardiopatía hipertrófica en una amplia muestra de la población laboral española / Prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in a large sample of the Spanish working population

Antecedentes y objetivo En España no existen estudios que hayan evaluado la prevalencia de la miocardiopatía hipertrófica en la población general. El objetivo de este trabajo fue evaluar la prevalencia de la miocardiopatía hipertrófica en una muestra amplia de la población laboral española. Materiales y métodos Se incluyó a 13.179 trabajadores (73% varones, con una edad media de 40 años) de 5 regiones españolas a los que, entre mayo de 2008 y noviembre de 2010, se les realizó un reconocimiento médico con un electrocardiograma. Se derivó a los trabajadores con alteraciones sugestivas en el electrocardiograma o con antecedentes médicos predisponentes (síncope de esfuerzo o muerte súbita en familiar menor de 50 años) para una evaluación ecocardiográfica. Se definió miocardiopatía hipertrófica a la presencia de un grosor parietal igual o mayor a 13mm en cualquier segmento del ventrículo izquierdo. Se estimó la prevalencia de la miocardiopatía hipertrófica en toda la muestra y en los trabajadores no hipertensos. Resultados Se seleccionó a 1.008 trabajadores para el ecocardiograma, aunque solo 496 (49,2% de los seleccionados) acudieron a la prueba. Tras el ecocardiograma se detectaron 16 casos de miocardiopatía hipertrófica y se estimó una prevalencia del 0,24% en el total de la muestra. En el subgrupo de trabajadores no hipertensos se objetivaron 10 casos de miocardiopatía hipertrófica, que se corresponden con una prevalencia estimada del 0,19%. Conclusiones En nuestra muestra de la población laboral española la prevalencia estimada de miocardiopatía hipertrófica fue del 0,24%. En el subgrupo de pacientes no hipertensos la prevalencia estimada fue del 0,19% (AU)

Background and objectives To date, in Spain, there are no studies that have evaluated the prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in the general population. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in a large sample of the working population of Spain. Materials and methods The study included 13,179 workers (73% men; mean age, 40 years) from 5 regions of Spain who, between May 2008 and November 2010, had a medical examination with an electrocardiogram. The workers with suggestive abnormalities in the electrocardiogram or a predisposing medical history (exertional syncope or sudden death of a family member younger than 50 years) were referred for an echocardiographic evaluation. We defined hypertrophic cardiomyopathy as a parietal thickness ≥13mm in any segment of the left ventricle. We estimated the prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in the entire sample and in the workers without hypertension. Results A total of 1008 workers were selected for the echocardiogram, although only 496 (49.2% of those selected) of these attended the appointment. After the echocardiogram, we detected 16 cases of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, estimating a prevalence of 0.24% for the entire sample. In the subgroup of workers with no hypertension, we observed 10 cases of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, which corresponds to an estimated prevalence of 0.19%. Conclusions In our sample of the working population in Spain, the estimated prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy was 0.24%. In the subgroup of patients with no hypertension, the estimated prevalence was 0.19% (AU)

Prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in a large sample of the Spanish working population.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To date, in Spain, there are no studies that have evaluated the prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in the general population. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in a large sample of the working population of Spain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 13,179 workers (73% men; mean age: 40 years) from 5 regions of Spain who, between May 2008 and November 2010, had a medical examination with an electrocardiogram. The workers with suggestive abnormalities in the electrocardiogram or a predisposing medical history (exertional syncope or sudden death of a family member younger than 50 years) were referred for an echocardiographic evaluation. We defined hypertrophic cardiomyopathy as a parietal thickness ≥13mm in any segment of the left ventricle. We estimated the prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in the entire sample and in the workers without hypertension. RESULTS: A total of 1008 workers were selected for the echocardiogram, although only 496 (49.2% of those selected) of these attended the appointment. After the echocardiogram, we detected 16 cases of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, estimating a prevalence of 0.24% for the entire sample. In the subgroup of workers with no hypertension, we observed 10 cases of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, which corresponds to an estimated prevalence of 0.19%. CONCLUSIONS: In our sample of the working population in Spain, the estimated prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy was 0.24%. In the subgroup of patients with no hypertension, the estimated prevalence was 0.19%.

Prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in a large sample of the Spanish working population. / Prevalencia de la miocardiopatía hipertrófica en una amplia muestra de la población laboral española.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To date, in Spain, there are no studies that have evaluated the prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in the general population. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in a large sample of the working population of Spain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 13,179 workers (73% men; mean age, 40 years) from 5 regions of Spain who, between May 2008 and November 2010, had a medical examination with an electrocardiogram. The workers with suggestive abnormalities in the electrocardiogram or a predisposing medical history (exertional syncope or sudden death of a family member younger than 50 years) were referred for an echocardiographic evaluation. We defined hypertrophic cardiomyopathy as a parietal thickness ≥13mm in any segment of the left ventricle. We estimated the prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in the entire sample and in the workers without hypertension. RESULTS: A total of 1008 workers were selected for the echocardiogram, although only 496 (49.2% of those selected) of these attended the appointment. After the echocardiogram, we detected 16 cases of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, estimating a prevalence of 0.24% for the entire sample. In the subgroup of workers with no hypertension, we observed 10 cases of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, which corresponds to an estimated prevalence of 0.19%. CONCLUSIONS: In our sample of the working population in Spain, the estimated prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy was 0.24%. In the subgroup of patients with no hypertension, the estimated prevalence was 0.19%.

[Heart failure as the initial cardiac manifestation of Steinert's myotonic dystrophy]. / Insuficiencia cardíaca como manifestación cardiológica inicial de la distrofia miotónica de Steinert.

The relationship between neuromuscular diseases and the heart has been well known for many years. Cardiac lesions tend to involve the specialized conducting system. We report the case of a 36-year-old male diagnosed with Steinert's myotonic dystrophy whose initial cardiovascular symptom was heart failure and not symptoms related to alterations of the specialized conducting system.

[Quality control and improvement of the care provided to the patient with acute myocardial infarction. Implementation of a quality assurance program]. / Garantía y mejora de calidad de la atención al paciente con infarto agudo de miocardio. Implantación de un programa de calidad.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Hospital care of patients with acute myocardial infarction involves a series of therapeutic measures and risk stratification which are a must since their efficacy has been clearly demonstrated. The aim of this study was to develop an internal program to guarantee and improve the quality of hospital care to acute myocardial infarction patients. METHODS: A medical audit was carried out for evaluation. Seven evaluation criteria considered as class I by the guidelines on the management of acute myocardial infarction patients were analyzed in the discharge report of 163 consecutive patients. Following analysis of the results corrective measures were implemented. In the second phase reevaluation of 40 patients was performed to determine the efficacy of the adopted measures. RESULTS: Following the first evaluation the use of AAS, IECAS and the beta-blockers was found to be correctly indicated in 95, 80 and 72% of the patients, respectively. A strategy of the adequate stratification of risk was carried out and ventricular function was evaluated in 93 and 96% of the cases. Correct hypolipemia treatment was indicated in 54% of the cases with an adequate diet being prescribed in 100%. Three months after the intervention, 40 new patients were evaluated with all the criteria analyzed being fulfilled in 100% of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: The use of evaluation techniques and improvement in the quality of health care provided to cases of acute myocardial infarction allows the determination of the care undertaken and its correction if necessary in order to follow the guidelines recommended for the care of these patients.