RESUMO
Background: Individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) can develop metabolic acidosis which, in turn, is associated with faster progression of CKD and an increased need for dialysis. Oral sodium bicarbonate (the current standard of care therapy for metabolic acidosis) is poorly tolerated leading to low adherence. Base-producing or alkalizing Fruit and vegetables have potential as an alternative treatment for metabolic acidosis as they have been shown to reduce acid load arising from the diet. Objective: This trial will evaluate the feasibility of providing base-producing fruit and vegetables as a dietary treatment for metabolic acidosis, compared with oral sodium bicarbonate. Design: A 2-arm, open-label, dual-center, randomized controlled feasibility trial. Setting: Two Canadian sites: a nephrology clinic in Winnipeg, Manitoba, and a nephrology clinic in Halifax, Nova Scotia. Participants: Adult participants with G3-G5 CKD and metabolic acidosis. Measurements: Participants will undergo baseline measurements and attend 5 study visits over 12 months at which they will have a measurement of feasibility criteria as well as blood pressure, blood and urine biochemistry, 5-repetition chair stand test (STS5), and questionnaires to assess quality of life and symptoms. Furthermore, participants fill out Automated Self-Administered 24-hour recalls (ASA-24) in the beginning, middle, and end of trial. Methods: A total of 40 eligible participants will be randomized 1:1 to either base-producing fruit and vegetables (experimental) group or sodium bicarbonate (control) group, beginning from a daily dose of 1500 mg. Limitations: Using self-administered dietary assessments, lack of supervision over the consumption of study treatments and the possible disappointment of the control group for not receiving fruit and vegetables would be considered as limitations for this study. However, we are planning to undertake proper practices to overcome the possible limitations. These practices are discussed throughout the article in detail. Conclusions: This study will generate data on base-producing fruit and vegetables consumption as a dietary treatment for metabolic acidosis in CKD. The data will be used to design a future multi-center trial looking at slowing CKD progression in people with metabolic acidosis. Trial Registration: This study is registered on clinicaltrials.gov with the identifier NCT05113641.
Contexte: Les personnes atteintes d'insuffisance rénale chronique (IRC) courent le risque de développer une acidose métabolique, laquelle est associée à une progression plus rapide de l'IRC et à un besoin accru de dialyse. La prise de bicarbonate de sodium par voie orale (la norme actuelle de traitement de l'acidose métabolique) est mal tolérée, ce qui se traduit par une faible adhérence. Les fruit et légumes basiques ou alcalifiants ont un potentiel de traitement alternatif pour l'acidose métabolique, car il a été démontré qu'ils peuvent réduire la charge acide provenant de l'alimentation. Objectif: cet essai permettra d'évaluer la faisabilité d'un traitement alimentaire de l'acidose métabolique, en misant sur la consommation de fruit et légumes basiques ou alcalifiants, par rapport à la prise de bicarbonate de sodium par voie orale. Type d'étude: essai de faisabilité contrôlé, randomisé, ouvert, à deux bras, mené dans deux centres. Cadre: deux sites canadiens, soit une clinique de néphrologie à Winnipeg (Manitoba) et une autre à Halifax (Nouvelle-Écosse). Sujets: des patients adultes atteints d'IRC de stade G3-G5 et d'acidose métabolique. Mesures: les participants seront soumis à des mesures initiales et devront se présenter à cinq visites d'étude réparties sur 12 mois. Au cours de chacune, les patients subiront une mesure des critères de faisabilité, une mesure de la pression artérielle, un bilan sanguin et urinaire, un test de lever de chaise à cinq répétitions (STS5 Five Times Sit to Stand Test) et devront répondre à des questionnaires évaluant la qualité de vie et les symptômes. Les participants devront également utiliser un outil en ligne de rappels alimentaires de 24 heures autoadministrés et automatisés (ASA24 Automated Self-Administered 24-hours) au début, à mi-parcours et à la fin de l'essai. Méthodologie: 40 patients admissibles seront randomisés (1:1) dans le groupe expérimental (fruit et légumes basiques ou alcalifiants) ou dans le groupe témoin (bicarbonate de sodium) avec une dose quotidienne initiale de 1 500 mg. Limites: l'utilisation d'outils d'évaluation alimentaire autoadministrés, le manque de supervision de la consommation des traitements à l'étude et la possible déception du groupe témoin de ne pas recevoir de fruit et légumes constituent des limites pour cette étude. Nous prévoyons cependant adopter des pratiques appropriées pour surmonter ces possibles limites. Ces pratiques sont discutées plus en détail dans le manuscrit. Conclusion: cette étude produira des données sur la consommation de fruit et légumes basiques ou alcalifiants comme traitement alimentaire pour l'acidose métabolique en contexte d'IRC. Ces données seront utilisées pour concevoir un futur essai multicentrique visant à ralentir la progression de l'IRC chez les personnes atteintes d'acidose métabolique. Enregistrement de l'essai: Cette étude a reçu l'approbation du Conseil d'éthique de la recherche en santé de l'Université du Manitoba (HS24768 [B2021:025]) et est enregistrée sur ClinicalTrials.gov avec l'identifiant NCT05113641.
RESUMO
Introduction: With the prevalence of obesity increasing, many weight-loss programs were created to aid in combating the trend. The Weight Loss Clinic (WLC) was created to provide personalized support for lifestyle changes using a multidisciplinary team with medical oversight. This study evaluated the clinically-managed weight loss program at the Wellness Institute. Methods: This was a prospective evaluation of a newly established program between January 2019-August 2020. Participants who entered the weight loss program were approached to learn about the evaluation. A total of 41 participants were included. The primary outcomes included changes in body weight and achievement of more than 5% initial body weight loss. Outcome measures were collected pre-and post-program and the data was analyzed through paired t-tests on R studio. Results: Greater body weight-loss was seen in completers pre-COVID-19 compared to those who completed during the pandemic (Mean, ±SD; 7.51 ± 6.24 kg n = 13 p < 0.001 vs. 1.75 ± 4.43 kg n = 9, p = 0.02). Completers pre-COVID-19 demonstrated improvements in waist circumference, Framingham risk score, blood pressure, hemoglobin A1C, and body fat percentage. Conclusions and implications: Though the sample size was small to show definitve evidence, the results may suggest the program worked well prior to the pandemic but the pandemic created barriers to weight-loss for participants.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Obesity has become a major driver in the burden of chronic diseases. The Canadian Clinical Practice Guidelines recommend a lifestyle intervention for the management and prevention of obesity. This includes behavior modification, dietary counseling, and physical activity. With the market overwhelmed with weight loss programs, the majority are focused on low-calorie diets and general recommendations for exercise. Most are not personalized and are not administered by healthcare professionals. An interdisciplinary team of highly trained healthcare professionals has the ability to provide medically sound and safe advice in all aspects of an individuals' life, such as lifestyle, sleep, mental health, and behaviors. A clinically managed weight loss program is defined as a team including a dietitian, exercise professional, psychologist, and/or physician or nurse practitioner oversight. With limiting results in the literature regarding clinically managed weight loss programs, it is difficult to conclude whether it may be effective. Therefore, the objective of this systematic review is to assess clinically managed weight loss programs, with a physician or nurse practitioner oversight in comparison with non-clinically managed weight loss programs with no physician oversight or nurse practitioner oversight in adults who are living with overweight or obesity. METHODS: A literature search will be executed by a knowledge synthesis librarian on MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL. The data collected will be extracted, stored, and managed in MS Excel 2016. The extraction of the data will include study details, study population details, health team details, intervention details, and outcome details. DISCUSSION: The prevalence of obesity has been increasing throughout the decades. The results from this systematic review may aid in recommending a more clinically safe weight loss program for those who struggle with overweight or obesity. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020170014.
