Country Case Studies in Economic Fitness: Mexico and Brazil.

We leverage a new complexity framework called Economic Fitness, which characterizes an economy's level of diversification and its capabilities to produce more complex products. It can be used to predict economic growth and competitiveness. This paper describes an application of Economic Fitness called the Country Opportunity Spotlight (COS) that assesses a country's current level of capabilities and demonstrates which industries have upgrade and diversification potential given those capabilities. It helps unlock the explanatory and predictive power of Economic Fitness for policymakers. COS results serve as a starting point for policymakers to shape and validate priorities, compare countries, asses the capabilities needed in specific industries and begin identifying constraints to growth. We showcase the use of this framework for Mexico and Brazil. These countries provide an interesting case study, as they have similar growth outlooks yet demonstrate different productive capabilities. Examining Mexico and Brazil side by side illustrates the value this analysis can have on deciphering structural change and decision making and at the same time reinforces the need for a nuanced consideration of each country's unique context.

The Virtuous Interplay of Infrastructure Development and the Complexity of Nations.

Does the infrastructure stock catalyze the development of new capabilities and ultimately of new products or vice-versa? Here we want to quantify the interplay between these two dimensions from a temporal dynamics perspective and, namely, to address whether the interaction occurs predominantly in a specific direction. We therefore need to measure the complexity of an economy (i.e., its capability stock) and the infrastructure stock of a country. For the former, we leverage a previously proposed metrics, the Economic Fitness (Tacchella, A.; et al. Sci. Rep. 2012, 2, 723). For the latter, we propose a new purely statistical indicator which is the principal component performed on the 47 infrastructure indicators published by the World Bank. The proposed indicator still belongs to the class of linear combination of relevant indicators but, differently from standard economic indicators of the same type as the Connectivity Index, the HDI, etc, the weights of the linear combination are not subjectively chosen or re-calibrated on a regular basis but they are those which capture the highest fraction of the information encoded in the initial dataset. The two metrics allow the study of the dynamics in the Economic Fitness-Infrastructure plane and reveal the existence of two regimes: one for low Fitness where the infrastructure and the complexity of an economy are unrelated and a second regime where the two dimensions are tightly related. To quantify the interplay of the two dimensions in this latter regime, we assume a parsimonious linear dynamic model and the emerging picture is that: (i) the feedback occurs in both directions; (ii) on the short-term (<3 years) the predominant direction of interaction is from infrastructure to capability stock; (iii) while for longer time scale (>3 years) the interaction is reversed, new capabilities lead to increasing infrastructure stock.