Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Thromb Res ; 234: 75-85, 2024 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38183815

RESUMO

Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT), a thrombosis which involves the portal, mesenteric, and splenic veins, and the Budd-Chiari syndrome, represents an uncommon type of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Like with deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremities and pulmonary embolism, ample evidence suggests a significant association between SVT and cancer, particularly intra-abdominal solid malignancies (e.g. hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancers) and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). Clinical symptoms of SVT in cancer patients can be ambiguous, and frequently attributed to the primary cancer itself. Alternatively, SVT may be asymptomatic and detected incidentally during cancer staging or follow-up evaluations. SVT can also precede the diagnosis of cancer and has been associated with poorer outcomes in patients with liver or pancreatic cancers. Therefore, an unprovoked SVT warrants a thorough evaluation for an underlying malignancy or MPN. Cancer-associated SVT carries a high risk of VTE extension, recurrence and bleeding. Extended anticoagulant treatment is often required in the absence of a high bleeding risk. Guidelines suggest treatment with either low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), although available data on the safety and effectiveness of DOACs in these patients is limited. This comprehensive review outlines the epidemiology, pathogenesis, risk factors, and diagnosis of cancer-associated SVT and underscores the importance of comprehensive patient evaluation and evidence-based management.


Assuntos
Transtornos Mieloproliferativos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Tromboembolia Venosa , Trombose Venosa , Humanos , Heparina de Baixo Peso Molecular/uso terapêutico , Tromboembolia Venosa/complicações , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado do Tratamento , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/induzido quimicamente , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/complicações , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Trombose Venosa/complicações , Trombose Venosa/tratamento farmacológico , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Transtornos Mieloproliferativos/complicações , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/complicações , Circulação Esplâncnica
2.
J Thromb Haemost ; 21(4): 944-952, 2023 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36696186

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) is the most frequent long-term complication of deep vein thrombosis. Apart from anticoagulation, there are no medications, procedures, devices, or lifestyle changes that effectively prevent PTS. There is a growing interest in the potential protective effects of statins for the prevention of PTS. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the role of statins to prevent PTS after a DVT event. METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE(R) ALL, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus from inception to April 5, 2022. The main concepts searched were "statins" and "post thrombotic syndrome." There was no language restriction. The main outcome measure was the incidence rate ratio (IRR) for PTS associated with exposure to statins. RESULTS: Of 1971 screened records, 5 studies were included in the meta-analysis (2 retrospective cohorts and 3 randomized controlled trials [RCTs]). The pooled incidence of PTS was 34.8% per patient-year (95% CI, 9.5-127.4) in patients receiving a statin and 41.6% per patient-year (95% CI, 13.2-132) in controls. Exposure to statins was associated with a significantly decreased risk of PTS (IRR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.63-0.96, I2 = 0%). Meta-analysis of the 2 retrospective cohorts found a significant reduction in the risk of developing PTS (IRR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.51-0.91), whereas meta-analysis of RCTs showed no reduction in PTS occurrence (IRR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.68-1.25). CONCLUSIONS: Although this systematic review suggests that statins may reduce PTS incidence by 22% after deep vein thrombosis, meta-analysis of RCTs showed no risk reduction. Confirmation of the efficacy of statins on the prevention of PTS should be assessed in larger RCTs.


Assuntos
Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases , Síndrome Pós-Trombótica , Trombose Venosa , Humanos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Trombose Venosa/diagnóstico , Trombose Venosa/epidemiologia , Trombose Venosa/prevenção & controle , Síndrome Pós-Trombótica/diagnóstico , Síndrome Pós-Trombótica/epidemiologia , Síndrome Pós-Trombótica/etiologia , Meias de Compressão/efeitos adversos , Incidência
3.
Semin Thromb Hemost ; 47(8): 931-941, 2021 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34116580

RESUMO

Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT), which includes portal, mesenteric, and splenic vein thrombosis and the Budd-Chiari syndrome, is an infrequent manifestation of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Like typical site VTE, SVT is also frequently associated with cancer, particularly intra-abdominal solid malignancies and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). The clinical presentation of SVT is nonspecific. Symptoms may be related to the underlying malignancy, and thrombosis is incidentally diagnosed by imaging studies for cancer staging or follow-up in a substantial proportion of cases. The occurrence of SVT predicts worse prognosis in patients with liver or pancreatic cancer and, not uncommonly, SVT may precede the diagnosis of cancer. Therefore, the occurrence of an apparently unprovoked SVT should prompt careful patient evaluation for the presence of an underlying malignancy or MPN. Cancer patients carry a high risk of VTE extension and recurrence and long-term anticoagulant treatment is suggested in the absence of high risk of bleeding. Either LMWH or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are suggested for the treatment of patients with cancer-related SVT, although limited experience is available on the use of DOACs in these settings. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) are suggested for the short and long-term treatment of SVT associated with MPN. This review outlines the epidemiological aspects, pathogenesis, risk factors, and diagnosis of cancer-associated SVT, and addresses questions regarding the management of this challenging condition.


Assuntos
Neoplasias , Tromboembolia Venosa , Trombose Venosa , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Heparina de Baixo Peso Molecular , Humanos , Neoplasias/complicações , Trombose Venosa/tratamento farmacológico , Trombose Venosa/epidemiologia , Trombose Venosa/etiologia
4.
J Thromb Haemost ; 19(4): 983-991, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33306241

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cancer represents a risk factor for splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) and usual site venous thromboembolism (VTE). OBJECTIVES: To compare characteristics and outcomes of patients with cancer-associated SVT and usual site VTE. PATIENTS/METHODS: Patients with solid cancer and SVT were enrolled in an international, prospective registry between May 2008 and January 2012. The comparison cohort included (1:1 ratio) patients with solid cancer and usual site VTE treated at two thrombosis centers who had a minimum of 12 months follow-up at December 2019 or experienced one of the outcomes within 12 months follow-up. Recurrent VTE, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality were evaluated at 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 264 patients (132 in each cohort) were enrolled. Patients with SVT were less likely to have metastatic disease (36.1% vs 72.5%) or receive cancer therapy at thrombosis diagnosis (29.6% vs 64.9%). The most frequent cancer types were hepatobiliary and pancreatic in the SVT cohort and gastrointestinal in the usual site VTE cohort. Fewer patients with SVT received anticoagulation (68.9% vs 99.2%), and treatment duration was shorter (6.0 vs 11.0 months). The cumulative incidence of major bleeding (2.3% vs 4.7%) was nonsignificantly lower in the SVT cohort, whereas recurrent thrombosis (4.7% vs 5.5%) and all-cause mortality (41.7% vs 39.4%) were comparable between the two cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of recurrent thrombosis and bleeding appears to be similar in cancer patients with SVT and cancer patients with usual site VTE, despite some differences in baseline characteristics and anticoagulant treatment. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.


Assuntos
Neoplasias , Tromboembolia Venosa , Trombose Venosa , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Tromboembolia Venosa/diagnóstico , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamento farmacológico , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiologia , Trombose Venosa/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...