High N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide: a biomarker of lung cancer?

BACKGROUND: The level of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is affected by many known factors. Our study aimed to evaluate whether other factors, in particular lung cancer, could be responsible for an increase in NT-proBNP levels in a population with no known risk factors for elevated NT-proBNP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was based on the RIABO (Recueil de l'Ischémie au Bloc Opératoire) database, a single-center registry that prospectively records in elective noncardiac surgery. Patients aged > 75 years and those presenting with 1 or more known risk factors for high NT-proBNP were excluded. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to preoperative NT-proBNP levels: (≥ 125 pg/mL or < 125 pg/mL). RESULTS: Between October 2005 and February 2007, 439 patients were eligible for inclusion. Among 35 patients with lung cancer, 26 (74%) had elevated NT-proBNP (≥ 125 pg/mL), versus 9 (26%) with NT-proBNP < 125 pg/mL (P < .0001). By multivariate analysis, the presence of lung cancer was an independent risk factor for a level of NT-proBNP ≥ 125 pg/mL (odds ratio, 7; 95% CI, 2.9-17; P < .0001). We also observed an independent relationship between NT-proBNP ≥ 125 pg/mL and age, female sex, smoking status, and C-reactive protein levels. CONCLUSION: In our study, patients with lung cancer were 7 times more likely to have elevated NT-proBNP (≥ 125 pg/mL). The presence of lung cancer should therefore be taken into account when interpreting NT-proBNP levels. Further studies are warranted to explore the diagnostic value of this marker in lung cancer and to identify the cause of the elevation.

Bedside adherence to clinical practice guidelines for enteral nutrition in critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation: a prospective, multi-centre, observational study.

INTRODUCTION: The primary aim was to measure the amount of nutrients required, prescribed and actually administered in critically ill patients. Secondary aims were to assess adherence to clinical practice guidelines, and investigate factors leading to non-adherence. METHODS: Observational, multicenter, prospective study, including 203 patients in a total of 19 intensive care units in France. The prescribed calorie supply was compared with the theoretical minimal required calorie intake (25 Kcal/Kg/day) and with the supply actually delivered to the patient to calculate the ratio of calories prescribed/required and the ratio of calories delivered/prescribed. Clinical factors suspected to influence enteral nutrition were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The median ratio of prescribed/required calories per day was 43 [37-54] at day 1 and increased until day 7. From day 4 until the end of the study, the median ratio was > 80%. The median ratio of delivered/prescribed per day was > 80% for all 7 days from the start of enteral nutrition. Among the variables tested (hospital type, use of a local nutrition protocol, sedation, vasoactive drugs, number of interruptions of enteral nutrition and measurement of gastric residual volume), only measurement of residual volume was significant by univariate analysis. This was confirmed by multivariate analysis, where gastric residual volume measurement was the only variable independently associated with the ratio of delivered/prescribed calories (OR = 1.38; 95%CI, 1.12-2.10, p = .024). CONCLUSIONS: The translation of clinical research and recommendations for enteral nutrition into routine bedside practice in critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation was satisfactory, but could probably be improved with a multidisciplinary approach.

Effect of a nurse-implemented sedation protocol on the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the use of a nurse-implemented sedation protocol could reduce the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill patients. DESIGN: Two-phase (before-after), prospective, controlled study. SETTING: University-affiliated, 11-bed medical intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Patients requiring mechanical ventilation for >or=48 hrs and sedative infusion with midazolam or propofol alone. INTERVENTIONS: During the control phase, sedatives were adjusted according to the physician's decision. During the protocol phase, sedatives were adjusted according to a protocol developed by a multidisciplinary team including nurses and physicians. The protocol was based on the Cambridge scale, and sedation level was adjusted every 3 hrs by the nurses. Standard practices, including weaning from the ventilator and diagnosis of VAP, were the same during both study phases. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 423 patients were enrolled (control group, n = 226; protocol group, n = 197). The incidence of VAP was significantly lower in the protocol group compared with the control group (6% and 15%, respectively, p = .005). By univariate analysis (log-rank test), only use of a nurse-implemented protocol was significantly associated with a decrease of incidence of VAP (p < .01). A nurse-implemented protocol was found to be independently associated with a lower incidence of VAP after adjustment on Simplified Acute Physiology Score II in the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model (hazard rate, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.95; p = .03). The median duration of mechanical ventilation was significantly shorter in the protocol group (4.2 days; interquartile range, 2.1-9.5) compared with the control group (8 days; interquartile range, 2.2-22.0; p = .001), representing a 52% relative reduction. Extubation failure was more frequently observed in the control group compared with the protocol group (13% and 6%, respectively, p = .01). There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality (38% vs. 45% in the protocol vs. control group, respectively, p = .22). CONCLUSIONS: In patients receiving mechanical ventilation and requiring sedative infusions with midazolam or propofol, the use of a nurse-implemented sedation protocol decreases the rate of VAP and the duration of mechanical ventilation.