Similarities in cognitive abilities in older couples: a study of mutual influences.

Objective: Similarities between spouses in cognitive functions have been mainly explained by the assortative mating phenomenon and the convergence for age and education. The mutual influence between spouses is another explanation particularly relevant in the elderly population. Today, it remains difficult to determine whether cognitive similarities exclusively result from the convergence effect or from the mutual influence. Using a novel methodology, the present study aimed to assess the impact of the marital relationship on cognitive similarities among elderly couples.Methods: 1723 couples from the Three-City Cohort Study were classified in two groups of couples with homogeneous and heterogeneous age and education. We also constituted two groups of pseudo-couples by a random association of individuals, with homogeneous and heterogeneous age and education. Dyadic analyses were conducted in the four groups, regarding the similarities in lexicosemantic abilities, executive functions, memory and global cognitive functioning.Results: Similarities were found on lexicosemantic abilities both in mate-assorted couples and in couples heterogeneous in age and education but no similarity was found in pseudo-couples.Discussion: Beyond the convergence effect, the fact that the spouses co-construct their lifestyles may contribute to cognitive similarities in the lexicosemantic domain.

Study of mutual influence between trait anxiety and risk of depression among older couples facing cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The present study aims to examine the process of mutual influence in older couples with cancer diagnosis by studying their risk of depression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 282 couples with one spouse diagnosed with cancer were selected from the Three-City cohort study. Dyadic analyses were used to determine whether trait anxiety affects the risk of depression and whether a mutual influence process occurs prior and post cancer diagnosis. Cross-sectional analyses were performed at two time-points: before and after receiving the diagnosis. RESULTS: A higher level of anxiety among cancer patients resulted in a decreased risk of depression among spousal caregivers. Moreover, a higher anxiety among spousal caregivers increased their own risk of depression, but it didn't influence depression risk among cancer patients. While there is an intra-individual relationship between a higher level of trait anxiety and a greater risk of depression prior to cancer diagnosis, there is no cross-influence between spouses. DISCUSSION: The study findings indicate that a dyadic psychological adjustment process might help older adults to cope with cancer by limiting the risk of depression among spousal caregivers.