Global 30-Day Morbidity and Mortality of Primary Bariatric Surgery Combined with Another Procedure: The BLEND Study.

BACKGROUND: No robust data are available on the safety of primary bariatric and metabolic surgery (BMS) alone compared to primary BMS combined with other procedures. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to collect a 30-day mortality and morbidity of primary BMS combined with cholecystectomy, ventral hernia repair, or hiatal hernia repair. SETTING: This is as an international, multicenter, prospective, and observational audit of patients undergoing primary BMS combined with one or more additional procedures. METHODS: The audit took place from January 1 to June 30, 2022. A descriptive analysis was conducted. A propensity score matching analysis compared the BLEND study patients with those from the GENEVA cohort to obtain objective evaluation between combined procedures and primary BMS alone. RESULTS: A total of 75 centers submitted data on 1036 patients. Sleeve gastrectomy was the most commonly primary BMS (N = 653, 63%), and hiatal hernia repair was the most commonly concomitant procedure (N = 447, 43.1%). RYGB accounted for the highest percentage (20.6%) of a 30-day morbidity, followed by SG (10.5%). More than one combined procedures had the highest morbidities among all combinations (17.1%). Out of overall 134 complications, 129 (96.2%) were Clavien-Dindo I-III, and 4 were CD V. Patients who underwent a primary bariatric surgery combined with another procedure had a pronounced increase in a 30-day complication rate compared with patients who underwent only BMS (12.7% vs. 7.1%). CONCLUSION: Combining BMS with another procedure increases the risk of complications, but most are minor and require no further treatment. Combined procedures with primary BMS is a viable option to consider in selected patients following multi-disciplinary discussion.

Comparison of clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted and video-assisted esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) is a recently developed technique for the treatment of resectable esophageal cancer. The present study compares the outcomes of RAMIE and video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy (VATE). METHOD: Patients undergoing minimally invasive esophageal surgery between December 2020 and September 2022 were included in the study, while those undergoing conventional surgery were excluded. The patients were divided into two groups, as those undergoing RAMIE (Group 1) and those undergoing VATE (Group 2). The demographic and clinical characteristics, intraoperative parameters, pathological data, and postoperative parameters of the groups were compared. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients were included in the study, with 13 patients in Group 1 and 15 patients in Group 2. The gender distribution was similar (P = 0.488), and the mean age was 64.7 and 59.0 years in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = 0.068). The majority of the sample was in the ASA2 category (46.2% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.341); Ca19.9 levels were higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (25.7 vs. 13.7, P = 0.027); preoperative Hb was lower in Group 1 than in Group 2 (10.9 g/dL vs. 12.2 g/dL, P = 0.043); the most commonly performed surgery was the McKeown procedure (69.2% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.492); an intraoperative feeding jejunostomy was placed only in Group 2; the operation time was similar between the groups (338.5 min vs. 340 min, P = 0.916); and the distribution of tumor localizations was similar between the groups (P = 0.407). In terms of tumor histology, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) was the most common tumor type in the two groups (84.6% vs. 80%, P = 0.636); the tumor diameter was similar between the groups (14.9 vs. 18.1, P = 0.652); the number of removed lymph nodes was similar between the groups (24.9 vs. 22.5, P = 0.419); and the number of metastatic lymph nodes was higher in Group 2 (0.08 vs. 1.07, P = 0.27). One patient in Group 2 underwent repeat surgery due to suspected ischemic anastomosis; the distribution of postoperative complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system was similar in the two groups (P = 0.650); there was no early mortality within the first 30 days in either group; one patient in Group 2 was re-admitted within 90 days of discharge with decreased oral intake; the length of hospital stay was shorter in Group 1 (9 days vs. 16.5 days, P = 0.006); and the patients in Group 2 more often received neoadjuvant therapy in proportion to the disease stage (15.4% vs. 60%, P = 0.016). CONCLUSION: Robotic procedures can be safely performed in esophageal cancers with complication rates and oncological radicality similar to those of other minimally invasive techniques.

Short-term surgical outcomes of robotic gastrectomy. A single center/single surgeon experience.

AIM: Surgical resection is considered the optimum approach to the treatment of gastric cancer. The present study evaluates the efficacy of robotic surgery for the treatment of gastric cancer. METHOD: Included in the study were 30 patients who underwent robotic surgery for gastric cancer at the General Surgery Clinic between July 2021 and 2022. The demographic and clinical properties of the patients,intraoperative and postoperative results, tumor Characteristics, and early morbidity and mortality values were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean age of the 30 (F/M:8/22) patients was 63.9 (42-83) years, among which 20 (66.7%) had undergone neoadjuvant treatment. The mean surgery duration was 252.82 (110-380) minutes. A subtotal gastrectomy was performed in 10 patients (33%), while the remaining 20 patients (67%) underwent a total gastrectomy. The operation was converted to open surgery in four patients (13.2%). No intraoperative complications were seen, although one patient (3%) underwent re-anastomosis on postoperative day 3 due to an obstruction in the gastroenterostomy anastomosis. The mean largest diameter of the tumor was 4.6 (0-9) cm; the mean number of resected lymph nodes was 30.8 (11-58); and the mean duration of hospital stay was 5.9 (3-12) days. Early mortality within the first 30 days was seen in one patient with a cardiac cause. The rate of re-admission to hospital within the first 90 days was 11% (3 patients). CONCLUSION: Robotic surgery in patients with gastric cancer can be applied efficiently considering the successful clinicopathological results, short hospital stay, and low morbidity and mortality rates. KEY WORDS: Cancer, Morbidity, Mortality, Robotic Surgery, Stomach.

Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on platelet count and mean platelet volume.

Objective: Several studies have reported an increase in platelet (PLT) count with chronic inflammation in the presence of obesity. Mean platelet volume (MPV) is an important marker for PLT activity. Our study aims to demonstrate if laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has any effect on PLT, MPV and white blood cells (WBCs). Methods: A total of 202 patients undergoing LSG for morbid obesity between January 2019 and March 2020 who completed at least 1 year of follow-up were included in the study. Patients' characteristics and laboratory parameters were recorded preoperatively and were compared in the 6th and 12th months. Results: Two hundred and two patients (50% - female) with a mean age of 37.5 ± 12.2 years and mean pre-operative body mass index (BMI) of 43 (34.1-62.5) kg/m2 underwent LSG. BMI regressed to 28.2 ± 4.5 kg/m2 at 1 year after LSG (P < 0.001). The mean PLT count, MPV and WBC during the pre-operative period were 293.2 ± 70.3 103 cells/µL, 10.22 ± 0.9 fL and 7.8 ± 1.9 103 cells/µL, respectively. A significant decrease was seen in mean PLT count, with 257.3 ± 54.2 103cell/µL (P < 0.001) at 1 year post-LSG. The mean MPV was increased at 6 months 10.5 ± 1.2 fL (P < 0.001) and remained unchanged at 1 year 10.3 ± 1.3 fL (P = 0.9). The mean WBC levels were significantly decreased with 6.5 ± 1.7 103 cells/µL (P < 0.001) at 1 year. At the end of the follow-up, weight loss showed no correlation with PLT and MPV (P = 0.42, P = 0.32). Conclusion: Our study has shown a significant decrease in circulating PLT and WBC levels while MPV remained unchanged after LSG.

An early experience with the Da Vinci Xi surgical system in colorectal surgery. A single-center study.

AIM: Surgery is the optimum treatment approach in cases of colorectal cancer, with open or minimally invasive surgery options applied to patients in general surgery clinics. We present here an assessment of our use of robotic colorectal surgery for the treatment of colorectal cancer. METHOD: The outcomes of robotic colorectal surgeries performed in the General Surgery Clinic of Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital were evaluated. The demographic data, indications, type of surgery, complications, duration of postoperative stay and pathology results of the patients were recorded, and the surgical results were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: Of the 50 patients who underwent robotic colorectal surgery selected for the study, 19 were female and 31 were male, with a mean age of 60.9 years. Among the patients, 48% received neoadjuvant treatment and the most common tumor localization was the rectosigmoid region (40%), the most frequently performed operation was low anterior resection (44%). An ostomy was created in 50% of the patients, and two patients were converted. The mean duration of surgery was 191 minutes, the mean tumor diameter was 36 mm, the mean total number of lymph nodes dissected was 22.2 and the rate of complications of Clavien Dindo grade 3 or higher was 10%, namely anastomotic leak, anastomotic bleeding and chylous fistula. The mean length of hospital stay was 5 days, and one patient was reoperated due to the development of stomal necrosis. The rate of 90-day unplanned readmission was 10% and the most frequent cause was sub-ileus. One patient died in the postoperative period. CONCLUSION: Robotic surgery is a minimally invasive surgical approach that can be successfully applied in centers where perioperative and postoperative complications can be managed. KEY WORDS: Colorectal Cancer, Minimally Invasive Surgery, Robotic Surgery.

Menetrier's disease in a morbid obese patient undergoing bariatric surgery: A case report.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Menetrier's disease is a rare type of hypertrophic gastropathy characterized by the atrophy of the gastric parietal cells and dilatation of mucus releasing glands. Hereby, we present a morbid obese patient who has undergone laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and he has also diagnosed with Menetrier's disease. CASE PRESENTATION: A 67-year-old male patient whose body mass index (BMI) was 39 kg/m2. Preoperative endoscopy was done. There were no pathologies except increased gastric mucosal folds. LSG was done. During the surgery it was noticed that gastric tissue was abnormally thick. After LSG completed, it was observed that there was an abnormal bleeding from the staple line. The staple line was oversewed with 3.0 V-Loc™ and bleeding was stopped. Pathology report was compatible with menetrier's disease. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Hypoalbuminemia and H. pylori take an important place in diagnosis of Menetrier's disease, but H. pylori was not detected and albumin level was normal in our patient. For certain diagnosis full-thickness gastric biopsy is needed. The routine use of preoperative endoscopy in patients scheduled for bariatric surgery was still controversial until recently. CONCLUSION: This is the first case with menetrier's disease that has undergone LSG. Preoperative endoscopic evaluation before bariatric surgery is crucial. As in this case, it will be effective in terms performing additional intraoperative precautions when necessary and preventing possible complications.

Staple-line reinforcement using barbed sutures in 1008 sleeve gastrectomies.

PURPOSE: Among various staple-line reinforcement methods applied during sleeve gastrectomy (SG), although data on full-thickness-continuous-suturing (FTCS) is nearly nil, it has been considered as potentially harmful. The safety/efficacy profile of FTCS is assessed. METHODS: All consecutive SGs completing 3-month follow-up were studied. Data on peri-operative parameters, complications, and follow-up were prospectively recorded. All reinforcements were completed by FTCS utilizing barbed suture. Super-super obese, secondary SGs, SGs performed in patients with prior anti-reflux surgery, and SGs performed with additional concomitant procedures were evaluated as "technically demanding" SGs. Student's t/chi-square tests were used as appropriate. RESULTS: Between January 2012 and July 2020, 1008 SGs (941 "primary-standard," 67 "technically demanding") were performed without mortality/venous event. Single leak occurred in a patient with sleeve obstruction (0.1%). Thirteen bleedings, 4 requiring re-surgery (0.4%), and 17 stenoses (1.7%) were encountered. Four stenoses were treated with gastric bypass (1 emergency), 6 by dilatation(s), and one required parenteral nutrition. Six patients with stenosis chose not to have any treatment. No statistically significant difference was observed in postoperative complications between "primary-standard" and "technically demanding" SGs (p > 0.05). The median follow-up was 44 months. The excess weight loss % at 5th year was 80.1%. Suturing added 28.4 ± 6 minutes to the SG, 3 or fewer sutures were used to complete the reinforcement in > 95%. No mishap/complication occurred related to suturing. CONCLUSION: FTCS produced excellent result in terms of leakage/hemorrhage with an acceptable stenosis rate at a low cost with half-an-hour increase in the operating time. In contrast to previous allegations, no harm attributable to stitching itself occurred.

Inadvertent stapling of the orogastric tube during bariatric surgery: Report of 3 cases and a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Entrapment of an orally introduced tube by stapling/stitching is an intra-operative complication of bariatric surgery with grave consequences. Incidence is unknown. No prevention/management strategy is available. A systematic review was performed to assess the absolute reported observed risk and incidence. Additionally, data on 3 cases during our entire sleeve gastrectomy (SG) experience is evaluated. METHODS: Literature is reviewed using PubMed/Web of science data-bases. Data was recorded prospectively. Videos of orally introduced tube staplings were re-watched, presentation/recognition/management were re-evaluated. A protocol ensuring the removal of the small caliber orogastric tube (OGT) by the surgeons direct inspection was introduced after the 3rd entrapment. RESULTS: Review revealed OGT as the most commonly entrapped tube following temperature probe and bougie. SG/stapling were the most common causative operation/reason, respectively. Leak rates over 20%, conversion, early-late re-operations and mortality were reported. During our 948 consecutive SGs, 3 OGT entrapments (0.32%), third one with double stapling, occurred. All were recognized/managed intraoperatively by freeing the entrapped-end of the OGT from the sleeve part of the staple-line. In doubly stapled case, second transected end could only be recognized when routine reinforcement suturing come in proximity. Defects were continuously stitched with barbed suture. No morbidity occurred. One-year excess-weight-loss was 82%. A pre-protocol incidence of 0.56% (n: 3/534) dropped to nil in the remaining 414. CONCLUSION: Iatrogenic stapling of the OGT during SG is rare, but morbid. It must be avoided by a strict protocol. Upon occurrence/recognition, stapling must immediately stop until the "entirety" of the tube, including the "specimen-part", is retrieved, to avoid double entrapment.

Sleeve gastrectomy in class 1 obesity: Assessment of operative outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The risk/benefit ratio of sleeve gastrectomy (SG), especially in patients without type 2 diabetes (T2D), is unknown for patients with class 1 obesity. OBJECTIVES: Assessment of operative outcomes of SG in class 1 obesity. SETTING: Private practice. METHODS: Candidates for a primary SG with body mass index 30-35 kg/m2 after 5 years of unsuccessful dieting were included after informed consent was obtained. Participants who did not complete 3-month follow-up and those who underwent modified SGs were excluded. Data and complications were recorded prospectively. Patients were followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months and yearly thereafter. Definition of presence and remission of T2D and insulin resistance were set according to guidelines. Effects on weight loss parameters were evaluated with Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: Between 2012 and 2020, 143 consecutive SGs were performed in patients with class 1 obesity without conversion, leak, mortality, or a venous event. Two were lost to follow-up. In 141 participants, 2 bleedings and 1 colon perforation occurred (2.1% rate for acute life-threatening events). During a mean follow-up of 25.9 months; 1 case of functional stenosis and 4 cases of de novo symptomatic cholelithiasis clinically became evident in different patients, all requiring reoperation. Therefore a 5.6% rate of major complications were identified at 2 years. The benefit on weight loss was immediate and permanent (P < .001). T2D and insulin resistance were in remission in 100% and 98.1% of participants at 1 year, respectively. CONCLUSION: The 5.6% major complication rate reflects a minimum because more de novo symptomatic gallstones and stenosis are yet to occur or overlooked. Additionally, this excludes patients with de novo reflux and malnutrition, dissatisfaction issues, or recidivism. Caution is required to freely operate on patients with class 1 obesity with no co-morbidity. Evidence-based outcome data are lacking to balance the reported risks.

Mesh Repair of a Giant Para-Esophageal Hernia + Sleeve Gastrectomy. Combined Treatment of Intra-Thoracic Stomach and Morbid Obesity: a Video Case Presentation.

Concurrent surgical treatment of an intra-gastric stomach + morbid obesity is demonstrated. Video footage on diagnosis (gastroscopy and upper GI series) and surgical steps, as well as 2-year outcome (upper GI series), is presented. Although controversy exists regarding the best bariatric option when concomitantly repairing a giant para-esophageal hernia, in the light of recent reports and our own experience, sleeve gastrectomy may be the procedure of choice if reflux is no issue.

Sleeve gastrectomy in patients with previous antireflux surgery. Preliminary results of the "no-touch to posterior wrap" technique.

BACKGROUND: Reported morbidity of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in patients with previous antireflux surgery warrants caution, and data on sleeve gastrectomy (SG) are unexpectedly scarce. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and efficiency of SG in patients who previously underwent an antireflux procedure. A new technique to preserve intact fundoplication is described. SETTING: Private practice, bariatric center of excellence, Turkey. METHODS: The following data were retrieved from our prospective data base: (1) details of previous repair; (2) clinical/endoscopic reflux status, body mass index (kg/m2), and presence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) before SG; (3) duration of SG, length of stay, complications; and (4) percent excess weight loss, MetS/T2D resolution, and reflux status at follow-up. RESULTS: Fifteen consecutive SGs were performed without conversion or major complications. The first case is excluded from the analysis because complete wrap unfolding was abandoned in favor of the described technique. Among 14, 10 had MetS, 4 had T2D, and 1 had a proven reflux recurrence before SG. Mean operating time was 118.5 minutes. All were discharged on the third postoperative day. Apart from 1 functional stenosis, no complications occurred. At 12 months, percent excess weight loss rate was 82.2, MetS resolved in 9 of 10, and T2D was in complete (n = 2) or partial remission (n = 1). No de novo reflux became evident, and absence of reflux was proved by pHmeter in 3. CONCLUSIONS: SG is feasible in patients who previously had antireflux repair with negligible morbidity and percent excess weight loss rates similar to that with regular sleeves. Results in reflux control needs further confirmation.

Iatrogenic cardiac tamponade as a mortal complication of peri-hiatal surgery. Analysis of 30 published cases.

Iatrogenic cardiac tamponade (ICT) is a dreadful complication of peri-hiatal surgery and vast majority occur during a hernia repair. Strikingly, against all warnings, the incidents and related deaths seem to be increasing. The aim of this review is to provide insight on how to prevent and challenge ICT. PubMed search identified 30 distinct ICTs with 10 deaths (33.3%) due to peri-hiatal procedures. Twenty-nine operations were mechanical repairs and laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery was the primary cause (n:18). Graft fixation (n:23) and helical tacks (n:13) were the main offenders. Initial symptom was hypotension affecting 92%. Seven ICTs were only identified at autopsy. All treated patients except one underwent a drainage. Almost all ICTs were caused by injury to the diaphragmatic dome, anterior to hiatus. In conclusion, peri-hiatal surgery-related ICT is extremely fatal. ICT mainly occurs during the repair of a hernia, a benign condition and therefore must be prevented. Graft fixation, around the ante-hiatal diaphragmatic dome must be abandoned. If mesh-augmentation is absolutely necessary, meticulous stitching must be preferred instead of fixators. Persistent hypotension during or following a peri-hiatal operation is an alarming sign of ICT. Increased awareness is mandatory for prevention and survival.

A Comparative Study Evaluating the Incidence of Colorectal Neoplasia(s) in Candidates for Bariatric Surgery by Screening Colonoscopy, 40-49 Versus 50-65 Years Old: a Preliminary Study.

INTRODUCTION: Obesity and metabolic syndrome (MetS) are associated with colorectal neoplasia (CRN) and carcinoma (CRC). Whether such subjects must undergo screening colonoscopy (SC) earlier, is unknown. Incidences of CRNs in 40-49- versus 50-65-year-old bariatric patients were compared by SC. No prospective data on SC is available in morbidly obese/MetS. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Surgical weight loss candidates over 39 years of age, asymptomatic, and average-risk for CRC offered SC. Those giving written informed consent were enrolled. Colonoscopies were done by the same surgeon. Smoking/drinking history, fasting blood glucose (FBG), insulin, C-peptide, triglyceride, high density lipoprotein, vitamin D, HbA1c, and insulin resistance parameters were recorded. CRN rate and the distribution of variables in patients 40-49 years of age were compared with 50-65. Student's t and Chi-square tests were used as appropriate. P < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. RESULTS: Among 168 SCs, 47 had CRNs (27.9%). Including carcinoma, 15 had an advanced CRN (aCRN) (8.9% aCRN and 0.6% CRC). CRN rate was 35.6% in ≥ 50 years old whereas 22.1% in 40-49 (p = 0.053). aCRN rates (8.4% in 40-49 versus 9.6% in 50-65) were similar (p = 0.792). Metabolic parameters and smoking-drinking history were equally distributed between the groups except FBG and HbA1c as their mean levels were slightly higher in the 50-65 age group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Presented results warrant routine SC in the 40-49-year-old morbidly obese and/or MetS patient population with average risk, and in aged > 50, it certainly must be enforced and included in the preoperative check-list if not done before.

Phenol Injection Versus Excision With Open Healing in Pilonidal Disease: A Prospective Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive procedures may be an alternative to surgical excisions for pilonidal disease. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare phenol injection versus excision with open healing technique. DESIGN: This is a prospective randomized study (ACTRN12612000868886). SETTINGS: This study was conducted at the Ankara University and Ufuk University Departments of Surgery. PATIENTS: One hundred forty patients were randomly assigned to phenol injection (n = 70) or excision with open healing (n = 70). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point of the study was the time to complete wound healing. Secondary end points were visual analog scale pain score, painkiller intake, time to resume daily activities, recurrence rate, Short Form 36 Health Survey, and Nottingham Health Profile at 3 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: Time to complete wound healing (16.2 ± 8.7 versus 40.1 ± 9.7 days) was significantly in favor of the phenol injection group (p < 0.001). The median operation time was 14.0 ± 3.8 minutes in the phenol group versus 49.0 ± 24.2 minutes in the excision with open healing group (p < 0.001). The time to resume daily activities (pain-free mobilization and defecation) was 0.8 ± 2.8 and 16.2 ± 12.6 hours after phenol injection and 9.3 ± 10.0 and 22.5 ± 15.1 hours after the excision with open healing treatment (p < 0.001, p = 0.008). Visual analog pain score at 48 hours and painkiller intake within 48 hours were significantly in favor of the phenol injection group. At the mean follow-up of 39.2 ± 9.0 months after surgery, no differences were seen in the recurrence rate between the treatment arms (13 recurrences in phenol vs 9 in excision with open healing; p = not significant). Short Form 36 and Nottingham Health Profile scores at 3 weeks after surgery were also in favor of phenol injection. LIMITATIONS: The present study was not double blinded, and a history of abscess drainage was significantly higher in the surgery group. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results, we conclude that phenol injection is as effective as the excision with open healing technique.